820491_Inspection_20200602

Cy ivision of Water Resources atrtf ZO Zp
Facility Number Mal - ?1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: aeiimpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 1xoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: MIMEO Arrival Time:iiiM61 Departure Time:mum County:SA-111apil Region:-F-4--
Farm Name: (ix� ) p FC'W"l\ Owner Email:
Owner Name: lz yC( & /eny'Vjyl Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: eto-i4 1`S 1'-' 4Vu i-C`( Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: C( Integrator: 14e47,0
Certified Operator: 2y Cwt. t`1 rt Certification Number: / q 3 ZS
f
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish •Layer _Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer •Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish '7 j 5 715 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current _Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. _Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
1 Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets ,Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No s—NA 0 NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No IENA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:Yv &2 1)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes l'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No E NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 7-,Z1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ©-No ❑ NA E NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 'No n NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Qfilo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes L -1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): S& Gu ,4 S 4-
13. Soil Type(s): 0
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes lEi No E NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes g oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking E Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes IZI<Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e Z - Lfq( Date of Inspection: 303 tl Ze,
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [rN E NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes re No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [g N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? E Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ®'�10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
ew<i° "L-f k9� /0 f � stti_{�, sL 7 .(9,..—ct--) c(
fit��� i,� �cic �'`f f �-f� No l5S r '1y)'e PO �.- � ,,,
e,_u't 9 l o —3 OF . `8 5(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: At I)V 4,Lp Phone: jf t `l 3 3 3
jt9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: \"c lticAkir Date:$c ci `Z-0 2-0Page 3 of 3 2/4/201k