NC0082716_Wasteload Allocation_19921123

NF3DE!i DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0082716
English Wolf WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Correspondence
Instream Assessment (67b)
I
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
November 23, 1992
This document is printed on reuae paper - igraore aay
content on the resreriae side

NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NCO082716
PERMITTEE NAME: English Wolf Lodge
FACILITY NAME: English Wolf Lodge
Facility Status: Proposed 0 ;
Permit Status:---- New -- - --
Major
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity:
Minor `I
0.007 MGD
Domestic (% of Flow):
Industrial (% of Flow):
Comments:
"Suite -type" motel
100 %
STREAM INDEX: 6-112-5-2
RECEIVING STREAM:Wolf Laurel Branch
Class: C-Trout
Sub -Basin: 04-03-04
Reference USGS Quad: D8NE, Sams Gap (please attach)
Cnnnty- Madison
Regional Office: Asheville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 00/00/00 Treatment Plant Class: Prob II
Classification changes within three miles:
Ca. 25 mi. to WS-III on French Broad
Requested
Prepared b
Reviewed
C
Modeler
Date Rec.
#
J`M1J
1-45
2
Drainage Area (mi ) o.-I. Avg. Streamflow (cfs): I. tq
7Q10 (cfs) o• t63 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) O.-L6 30Q2 (cfs) . g )
Toxicity-Limits:-1WCu % Acute/Chronic
histream Monitoring:'
Parameters
Upstream
Location
Downstream Location
Effluent
Characteristics
Summer
Winter
BOD5 (mg/1)
3 0
3 c
NH3-N (mg/1)
1z
zs
D.O. (mg/1)
TSS (mg/1)
30
30
F. Col. (/100ml)
zoa
zoo
PH (SU)
6 q
6 9
Refer : Basinwide / Streamline WLA File
Completed By Permits & Engineering
At Front Of Subbasin �6N E�AL
L*�Srri,tG

FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION '
Request # 7043
Facility N":
English Wolf Lodge
NPDES No.:
NCO082716
Type of Waste:
100% Domestic
Facility Status:
New Proposed
Permit Status:
Proposed
Receiving Stream:
Wolf Laurel Branch
Stream Classification:
C-Trout
Subbasin:
04-03-04
County:
Madison
Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office:
Asheville
USGS #
Requestor:
Jule Shanklin
Date:
Date of Request:
7/29/92
Drainage Area (mi2):
0.7
Topo Quad:
D8NE
Summer 7Q10 (cfs):
0.163
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
0.265
Average Flow (cfs):
1.19
30Q2 (cfs):
.31
IWC (%):
40
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken, correspondence with region, EPA, etc.)
Model accompanying should be refered to ... NH3-N limits are not in effect at surrounding facilities
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewerl7/cs:
mf�
Recommended by:
Farrell Keough
Reviewed by
Instream
Regional
Permits
Assessment: ��( io 0) Date: to a g r1
Supe r: Date:�t9
r
& Engtneering: Date: 11b 2
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: NOV 2 7 1992
RECEIVED
Water Quality Section
NOV 2 - 1992
Seville Regional 0fft
,`@heville, North Cara tF

i
1 �
Recommended Lain
Wasteflow (MGD):
BODS (mg/1):
NH3N (mg/1):
DO (mg/1):
TSS (mg/1):
Fecal Col. (/100 ml):
PH (SU):
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil & Cmase (mg/1):
TP (mg/1):
TN (mg/1):
2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Monthly Average
Summer
Winter
WQ or EL
0.007
0.007
30
30
WQ
1'2..
zs •
' WQ (g-r�
30
30
WQ
200
200
WQ
6-9
6-9
WQ
28
28
WQ
monitor
monitor
EL
x Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the imm to receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent ' 'tations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
•0
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Spcdal In tructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, their attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old
assumptio s that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Addition Information attached? (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments.

SUMMER
`
OPEN
REPORT FLOWS
•
TWO
TRIBUTARIES
MODEL RESULTS
Discharger
:
ENGLISH WOLF LODGE
Receiving Stream : WOLF LAUREL BRANCH
------------------------------------------------------------------
The End
D.O.
is*3i6
mg/l.
The End
CBOD
is !3.35
mg/l.
The End
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NBOD
is 4.05
mg/1.
DO,Min
WLA
CBOD
WLA
NBOD
WLA
DO
Waste Flow
(m4/1)
Milepoint Reach #
(mg/1)
(mg/1)
----
(mg/1)
--
(mgd)
----------
Segment
1
------
7.00-
----------------
0.00 1
----
Reach
1
45.00
90.00
5.00
0.03000
Reach
2
45.00
'�55.35-12.3
0.00
0`.0000
Reach
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
4
'45.00
90.00
0.00
0.0.3000
Reach
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000

WINTER
OPEN REPORT FLOWS
TWO TRIBUTARIES
MODEL RESULTS
•.Discharger : ENGLISH WOLF LODGE
Receiving Stream : WOLF LAUREL BRANCH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I
The End D.O. is 10.59 mg/l.
The End CBOD is i3.29 mg/l.
The End NBOD is A .30 mg/l.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WLA WLA WLA
DO,Min CBOD
NBOD
DO
Waste Flow
(mg/ 1) Milepoint Reach # (mg/ 1)
(mg/ 1)
(mg/ 1)
(mgd)
Segment
1
---------------------- ----
881 0.00 1
----
--
----------
Reach
1
45.00
90.00
5.00
0.03000
Reach
2
45.00
127.80
0.00
0.00700
Reach
3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
4
45.00
90.00
0.00
0.03000
Reach
5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000
Reach
6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00000

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : ENGLISH WOLF LODGE Subbasin 040304
','Receiving Stream : WOLF LAUREL BRANCH Stream Class: C-TROUT
-Summer 7Q10 : 0.163 Winter 7Q10 : 0.265
Design Temperature: 23.
i
ILENGTHI SLOPEI VELOCITY I DEPTHI Kd I Kd I Ka I Ka I KN I
I mile I ft/mil fps I ft Idesignl @20;1 Idesignl @20;1 Idesignl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 1 O�.501240.001 0.182 1 0.27 1 0.70 1 0.61 153.37 1 50.00I 0.63 1
Reach 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 1 01.151266.671 0.200 10.28 1 0.73 1 0.64 153.37 1 50.001 0.63 1
Reach 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 I 0.101400.001 0.262 1 0.31 1 0.82 1 0.71 153.37 1 50.00I 0.63 I
Reach 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 I C.751213.331 0.254 1 0.37 1 0.71 1 0.61 153.37 1 50.001 0.63 I
Reach 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------T
I I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 1 .101400.001 0.315 1 0.35 10.85 1 0.74 153.37 1 50.00I 0.63 1
Reach 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I I I I I I I I I
Segment 1 1 .001 50.001 0.248 1 0.65 10.49 10.43 123.86 122.361 0.63 1
Reach 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I Flow I CBOD ( NBOD I D.O. I
I cfs I mg/1 I mg/l I mg/l I
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste I 0.046 1 45.000 1 90.000 1 5.000
Headwatersl 0.130 I 2.000 I '1.000 I 7.720
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.066 1 2.000 I 1.000 I 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 2
Waste I 0.011 145.000 155.350 1 0.000
Tributary 1 0.000 1 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
* R noff 1 0.090 I 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720
Segment 1 Reach 3
Waste 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 I 0.000
Tributary 1 0.093 1 2.000 1 1.000 I 7.720
* Runoff 1 0.930 1 2.000 1 1.000 1 7.720

Segment 1 Reach 4
Waste
I 0.046
1 45.000
1 90.000 1
0.000
Tributary
I 0.000
( 2.000
I 1.000 I
7.720
* Runoff
I 0.130
I 2.000
I 1.000 I
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 5
Waste
1 0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000 1
0.000
Tributary
I 0.000
1 2.000
I 1.000 1
7.720
* Runoff
I 0.130
I 2.000
I 1.000 I
7.720
Segment 1
Reach 6
Wast
1 0.000
I 0.000
I 0.000 (
0.000
Tributary
1 0.630
I 2.000
I 1.000 I
7.720
* Runoff
1 0.740
1 2.000
1 1.000 1
7.720
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

SUMMER
OPEN REPORT FLOWS
TWO TRIBUTARIES
I Seg #
Reach #
1 Seg Mi I
D.O. I
CBOD
I NBOD I
Flow I
1
1
0.00
7.00
13.33
24.45
0.18
1
1
0.05
7.68
12.97
23.76
0.18
1
1
0.10
7.95
12.62
23.11
0.18
1
1
0.15
8.07
12.29
22.48
0.19
1
1
0.20
8.12
11.97
21.87
0.19
1
1
0.25
8.15
11.66
21.29
0.19
1
1
0.30
8.17
11.36
20.72
0.20
1
1
0.35
8.18
11.08
20.18
0.20
1
1
0.40
8.19
10.80
19.66
0.20
1
1
0.45
8.20
10.53
19.16
0.21
1
1
0.50
8.21
10.28
�_ f8.67
0.21
1
2
0.50
7.81
11.99
2 .
0.22
1
2
0.55
8.02
11.66
19.90
0.22
1
2
0.60
8.11
11.34
19.34
0.23
1
2
0.65
8.16
11.04
18.80
0.23
1
3
0.65
8.04
8.47
13.74
0.33
1
3
0.70
8.15
7.59
12.06
0.37
1
3
0.75
8.21
6.90
10.76
0.42
1
4 1
0.75
7.39
10.70
18.66
0.47
1
4
0.80
7.79
10.49
18.28
0.47
1
4
0.85
8.00
10.29
17.91
0.48
1
4
0.90
8.11
10.09
17.55
0.49
1
4
0.95
8.17
9.90
17.20
0.49
1
4
1.00
8.21
9.72
16.86
0.50
1
4
1.05
8.23
9.54
16.53
0.51
1
4
1.10
8.24
9.36
16.21
0.51
1
4
1.15
8.25
9.19
15.90
0.52
1
4
1.20
8.26
9.02
15.59
0.52
1
4
1.25
8.27
8.86
15.30
0.53
1
4
1.30
8.27
8.71
15.01
0.54
1
4
1.35
8.28
8.55
14.73
0.54
1
4
1.40
8.28
8.40
14.46
0.55
1
4
1.45
8.29
8.26
14.20
0.56
1
4
1.50
8.29
8.12
13.94
0.56
1
5
1.50
8.29
8.12
13.94
0.56
1
5
1.55
8.29
7.98
13.71
0.57
1
5
1.60
8.29
7.85
13.48
0.58
1
6
1.60
7.99
4.80
6.97
1.21
1
6
1.65
8.06
4.68
6.74
1.24
1
6
1.70
8.12
4.58
6.52
1.28
1
6
1.75
8.16
4.48
6.31
1.32
1
6
1.80
8.20
4.38
6.12
1.35
1
6
1.85
8.22
4.29
5.94
1.39
1
6
1.90
8.24
4.21
5.77
1.43
1
6
1.95
8.26
4.13
5.60
1.47
1
6
2.00
8.27
4.05
5.45
1.50
1
6
2.05
8.28
3.98
5.30
1.54
1
6
2.10
8.29
3.91
5.16
1.58
1
6
2.15
8.30
3.84
5.02
1.61
1
6
2.20
8.31
3.78
4.90
1.65
1
6
2.25
8.32
3.72
4.77
1.69
1
6
2.30
8.32
3.66
4.66
1.72
1
6
2.35
8.33
3.60
4.54
1.76
1
6
2.40
8.34
3.55
4.44
1.80
1
6
2.45
8.34
3.49
4.33
1.84
1
6
2.50
8.35
3.44
4.23
1.87

1 6
1 6
.I Seg # I Reach
2.55 8.35 3.39 4.14
2.60 8.36 3.35 4.05
I Seg Mi ( D.O. I CBOD J NBOD I
1.91
1.95
Flow I

Wn�NUf Pun ENc,uSH WXF Tm%vTAv- kc�f- U oRt L
n
ec-ut i-I
�tC-w�H
`"'t-�I
-•�
Reach#
i s
t w
2 s
2 w
Ms
3 w
Ms
4 w
(5),
S w
6 s
6 w
7 s
7 w
(8)s
(6) w
(9)s
(9) w
Length
,5
—
.t5
—I
MMKOM
—
•�
—
.�
—
�-0
--
.03
—
.00
Deslgn Flow
45
—
—
45
_
CBOD
A
55.35
K
17-4 7
..,
90
—
NBOD
5
—
DO
.',3
I-`IG
.i3;
.zt
.f3,
Z1
.}4
i.11
7Q10
_i3
p0�;
.�,_•,
QA
-
--
. 6
G
.82
—
.9 Z
—
4,5-7
--
.093
�5Z
63
9
7Q70
.6
—
9•D
—
QA
Slo fm)
zya.o
--
z[k.67
—
400.0
—
-Q-33
—
400.0
—
60.0
_
ENc,L5H Loa.F LoOGE
NCM S?-4 % 6
" A&0 wr mberts dez1v(d 'fwo , lAR'e"alon) FoE►.t1rya — Whit's
to .ro "A/lewAbI& Write CoNa--,n ent�oN7" wip�g
bnlnNc� e�uatpn�

El,GtAOH Woof. LoMe
'uLODSZ916
WOLF (pLAI?S-- SeAMCH
NO O\sC}{wQGE7
-slum w5 e1&rfaaY
Q*C,6 03•Y °t.i-1z8
fJw=2.6'i \2 Oq= 2.6�M'2
Qq; 4•S S 2wy y,p c.F3
53a1o= acts 53a10=•63-N5
+Jaciq .}cFs waQto-.95cF3
,30
— OPDO RPr.
I
,4
1 ,"0
\
�Inq 03 YS3
1-
Ddc
.
Oq- 1� M?
qp=z.q
Qw= 2-s3 cf,
S 4Gi0= cis
3aQ lv=.y cis
OP�P�oi
W �Q �-.y5c�5
w�6it0=.6y cis
3 =.}SeFs
3odz=.88eCs
�1 \
aA=ILt2cf3 1
39a10= t_7}is
wgato= z'4Ic
30a"t° 3.83cC, OP¢ro RPT,
USGS Ob•`a53 96w
Do= },41
Qac P6-Y s 3430,
59Cy\0= •58 c4s
wa4\ - 1.9Ycf5
mwv = CmwR,) ♦ COw�
\91
SaQ1d = 0.135 MAFI 95
µpQIO= 0. 261 MAO
3j&2= 0M4(PWf�1m0
3380
-�waw0c MMT. VEWU?_e
D
Q,z i.i9
51Qpa.\�}
C1A. i•�4 �{3 3a'6`
bi 10-t�CSJ //•�
w�o =.vsb=cS S pO�y
3ogt:59°te�
3i
a
WOLF I.ADQEI. SK\ 0.COV0,T
pn= 1.23 rv\ i
Gtw-
Qq= 1.85 cis
.6R cS, ZR�BVrpu-Y
Dot Atq\i
57a\o=•093o 5 Q.gmoe�
W}Q1V - .t52a,
3oQi<,io66i
,p q,ll OPw war
yp•SMRP)
"`YYY WiC3�O� .LO Gia
5oaz= •zB oFs
Eu4J,OH Wa.P i cE
0.w=•o0}^'Kw0 590.10=•163
ow= .}M.'' W9Q\o= �265 occ-�u RPr
Qw- 1.05 c;s 30Qi' -31 C\5 mAE�
C39*-

}o15-
,. 03- oLI
DBNE
ENGLISH WOLF I00GE
uccv az� tb
Wolf LAUIZL:t_ 8¢ANGfI
14MMONIA INTc feAcxtoN5
(-o6 W- mod -e .03 m8d� #• 1.549 _ .1 6-5 (-Tom' RUnI�
\ b Qc7UNdG—�Q10@ RFfI 4(,ma SY 4Rp4x,XATTRTIyE�
�(xt .�1.(.-LI f[ { .3}c
.tx /Lt
.7-t3x t
K = I mdf---l�3m�/•z13
.-}z 1h:5(cla� cLI �c.H 3flE
r� "—
(mx�cl ,Np�t:s;mmca) •�z _-34 _ -oo�
pp•fix t-1111c, �
1,8rns�K- .55
. 3 °t l �`c9Ik- - . t v.
/cl erg c'�-
(mocw't Imwrvm )t.6(, �'/�Ac _ g.3�-t - •W-- - zs-�' wi5o f- 9.5 1.= IVY'S roC300 moc4el

Worksheet2
Dist
Cum. Dist.
Elevation
Slope
0.00
0.00
3880
0.50
1 0.50
3760
240.00
0.15
0.65
3720
266.67
0.10
0.75
3680
400.00
0.75
1.50
3520
213.33
0.1
1.60
3480
400.00
1
2.60
3430
50.00
v
C
cc
d
w
4185
i
3685
3185
4
2685
�
2185
1685
1185
685
185
0.00 1.00
Distance
17
2.00 3.00
{miles
Page 1

English Wolf Lodge - Allowable Waste Concentrations
Residual Chlorine
7010 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (UG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (UG/L)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (ug/1)
SUMMER
Ammonia as NH3
0.163
7010 (CFS)
0.007
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
0.01085
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
17.0
STREAM STD (MG/L)
0
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
6.24
IWC (%)
272.39
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
WINTER
Ammonia as NH3
7010 (CFS)
DESIGN FLOW (MGD)
DESIGN FLOW (CFS)
STREAM STD (MG/L)
UPS BACKGROUND LEVEL (MG/L)
IWC (%)
Allowable Concentration (mg/1)
0.163
0.007
0.01085
1.0
0.22
6.24
12.72
0.265
0.007
0.01085
1.8
0.22
3.93
40.39
NC0082716 FK 10/21 /92

ENG US }i (Ootf Lol7GF—
W-M $Z--+1.6
SrAT-f- Woltv
M OACc-Eq
. I oa 5 39 9 (11 o : 'luki
.Z}I5

'ED STATES
VALLEY AUTHORITY
SERVICES BRANCH
A 56 1' S£ ERIVIN 16 MI
46 POND 196SE) V= 1113 POND I V
SAMS GAP QUADRANGLE ,4995a
NORTH CAROLINA-TENNESSEE b55�oP
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) 191-NE l?
82*301 _ �_�� �i.:.i�i„ 4Ak J1.iNA 960,OG FEEL
\4oLv LA
i
WAWU:';IMo.Su,
67,
vP .�uSro Fq�'1.
I r ..

ENGINEERING PROPOSAL - 17 July 1992
WASTEWATER DISPOSAL SYSTEM
ENGLISH WOLF LODGE
Wolf Laurel, Madison County, North Carolina
Orvile English - OWNER
Joe K. Matheson, Jr., PE - CONSULTING ENGINEER - NC 3183
Wolf Laurel, Rt.3 Mars Hill, NC 28754
704-689-5328 FAX [phone]
The System will treat domestic waste from a proposed 40 unit,
suite -type motel for skiers at Wolf Laurel resort. The units
will be one -bedroom with limited cooking facilities.
The avers a daily flow (ADF) is computed as:
4 units at 175 gpd = '7000 GPD - DESIGN FLOW
Sewage stilengtb is assumed to be 300 ppm of 5-day BOD.
The treata.tent and disposal options considered were:
1. pumping sewage to Town of Mars Hill sewers
2. sep'ic tank with subsurface disposal
3. WWT with spray irrigation of effluent
4. WWT with effluent discharged to stream on site.
The pum ing option is not economically feasible. The nearest
sewers ar about 13 miles away.
The subsurface and the spray irrigation options are ruled out
by the laI�k of space for the required buffer zones for
environmental protection of wetlands and streams.
e works will consist of a package steel
The pro coed treatment
extended eration type plant with an aerated surge tank for flow
attenuati n, an aerated sludge holding tank and chlorination
tank, tab et type chlorination and dechlorination; arranged and
equipped as indicated on the attached manufacturer's drawing.
The pro osed system will be designed to produce a degree of
treatment as specified by the Permit. The surge tank will be
sized for one half the ADF and provided with appropriately sized
grinder pumps with flow adjustment by return -flow adjustable
weir.
The effluent will be chlorinated, with contact time of at least
30 minutes and then chemically dechlorinated at the plant outlet.

An electrically driven flow indicator - recorder, for use with
a calibrated weir, is proposed.
Standbypower will not be required since the site adjoins the
primary power line for Madison County that is served from main
substatiolis each way.
The proposed discharge point is on Wolf Laurel Creek in Madison
County near the Wolf Laurel Central Office, just upstream of
where it rosses under the ski slope entrance road; as shown on
the attac ,ed map.
Operation, maintenance, monitoring and waste sludge disposal
will be the responsibility of the Owner and performed by contract
with a se vice company. Waste sludge will be disposed of by the
service company under its septic tank pumping and disposal
permit.
Revenue Ifrom the operation of the Lodge, or from sewer charges
already a tablished at Wolf Laurel if and when the units are sold
to indivi uals, will assure adequate finances for operation of
the facilities.
2 -

1
EXHIBITS
DISCpSSION - EVALUATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL OPTIONS
MADISON MIDDLE SCHOOL
I - Connection to Town of Mars Hill Sewer System
The dis;erbaps
ance to the nearest town manhole is about 13 miles.
Several, as many as ten, high head pump stations would be
required. This is obviously not a viable option.
2 - Subsurface Disposal
Except or the area which is the only suitable site for the
motel units, the property is steep mountainside or
adjacent -to -stream wetlands. This Engineer could not find any
amount of land to even begin to investigate for soil
suitability.
Adjacen lands can not be obtained .... letter attached.
The estimated flow cannot be reduced because of the DEHNR rules
for design flows.
3 - Spray Irrigation
This option is virtually impossible due to the required minimum
separatio from creek and property lines on a long narrow lot
leaving n place for holding pond or disposal field.
4 - WWTP with Discharge To Stream.
This option is technically, economically and environmentally
feasible
There is a large drainage area - large flow stream on the
property about 50 feet from the plant site. The 7Q10/30Q2 is
certainly greater than zero.
The pro}iosed plant will be above the 100 year flood level as
establishgd by engineer's calculations.
3 -

I
CONCLUSION
The pumping to Mars Hill sewers is economically impossible.
1
Subsurface disposal or spray irrigation are not feasible due to
space andienvironmental considerations.
The WWTP; with discharge to the stream is the only feasible
alternative.
16 ORVLSEVR.RPT
4 -

f� R E L 11v1► �lt•I� f�Y
5ENVER PL/%!1
51T� I�LI�N
ENJCIL1514 VOLF LODgE
ATCVO LF 1.,,/�U RE. L
M/�-.D150 N cou w TY N G / '•' / ' o
C� 12 V I U-E 1= I -I C-t L 151-1 _ p W N E'R-
fZT 3 MAQ5 PILL NC 2875� f � -...�• ` i
JOF-,I<, MATIJESON , JR PE
CON
��'�'- _ _ � .. \ - \;�� it • _ � \ � � _ � .. ' . ' r - ", ''"� ' .
7-7
INI
S. 50
1 �• • ~ !
j�� .• �i err .........w.r.
11001,
38

- E���J�� 1,�/41..F ,L4DC►E
� y
4�>,Ok Aie& t;;, 8 A c. .
1 r S'7�rw � �o. 2S X&
� y00 AL
a _ v I v , Avao..
d 37j c /57o c,5 Cl q = 2�ss cS
. Ir1
3Ga
TT
•v57 i� 0Yi%
J
J

�2
• t
YN.�f
�� �DY _ O• U. Z
!L
IA
CAeOsS S&CT1 d N
O. i5 (o,o9fs�
!d '� �r��c-r,✓� �1��KJ.dy
2
- r
d 10
;f 12,
/If
(q, eh
3 -30;, 0
3G1

z
p + 10d + /2,
A:A5a,owe
AJ T w
ko c?d e-�
e
and s.
.S'
GtJ Tl- @ 3 8a 5
Pv. 4'f' CvlvPr7� 63 J3elo.rcl3$�
740 �rY1 ��dGl

.41
Local Government Review
Requirements for the Issuance of New
Nonmunicipal Domestic Wastewater Discharge Permits
General Statute Overview
On October 1, 1989, in amendment to North Carolina General Statute 145-215.19 denoted as 145-215.1
(c) (6), became effective. The amendment allows input from local governments in the issuance of NPDES
Permits for nonmuni 1pal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. The new language requires that the
Commission (Enviro mental Management Commission) shall not act on an application for a new
nonmunicipal domes Ic wastewater discharge facility until it has received a written statement from each
city and county gove 7nment having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on which- the proposed facility
and its appurtenance are to be located. The written statement shall state whether the city or county has
in effect a zoning or ubdivision ordinance and, if such an ordinance is in effect, whether the proposed
facility is consistent th the ordinance. The Commision shall not approve a permit application for any
facility which a city or county has determined to be inconsistent With its zoning or subdivision ordinance
unless it determines that the approval of such application has statewide significance and is in the best
interest of the State..
instructions to the AppU!:ant
Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed project, the applicant shall request
that both thenearby i n county government complete this form. The applicant must submit a copy
of the draft permit a plication and shall make a written request for this form to be completed to the clerk
of the city and eoun y by certified mail, return receipt requested. If a (or both) local government(s) fails)
to mail the complet d form, as evidenced by the postmark on the certified mail card(s), within 15 days
after receiving and si ning for the certified mail, the applicant may submit the application for a discharge
permit. As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the
applicant shall sub t a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local
government(s) failed to respond within the 15 day period.
instructions to the Local Government
The nearby city or c ? unty government which may have or has jurisdiction over any part of the lands on
which the proposed cility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local oover�ment M A a k
(City/County)
Does the city/count have jurisdiction over an art of the lands on which the proposed facility and its
appurtenances are to b: located? Yes 0110
� If no, plesse sign this form, have it notarized, and
return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county, have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes I" No ❑
If there is a zoning or au vision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with
the ordinance? Yes 0 No ❑ ) fi
Date "7 - I L4 - 9 2._4.
Signature
(City Manager/CountyManager)
State of N o RLT I C e6 A , County of iA got ; S e A
On this 1 4 1day of ::L►.. tu 19-11, personnally appeared before me,
the said name C-I mq `t' to me known and known to me to be
the person describedin and who executed the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged t,"iat he
(or she) executed the same and being duly sworn by me, made oath that the statements in the fore-101-41
document are true. VJ
My Commision expires 19 (Signature ofNotary Public
Notary Ftblic (official 5ea!)

%A
BLUE MOUNTAIN
KOO
July 20, 1992
To Whom it May Concern:
This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge there is no
more land adjacent to the Orville English track that can be
purchased or used for sub -surface waste deposal.
Thank You,
Taylor Bush
Route 3 Mars Hill, NC 28754 [phone] [phone] FAX [phone]