Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout820471_Inspection_20200812 Pa 1* ( L Nt.-VU (; 7z—u 2-Z IS U br, 1 � 4 .'� `" .011:iNfe. f�Wa eerRet$ii `es Y r v, ' s be` Z rr �€w Q ivisioq�of o an g Wate Conserve l pn h, fi '" %a 0114 ,, r 3 Qthe Ag,ettey =, —-, ,y- , ;.k Saea z t7d , ype of Visit: cy Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance eason for Visit: iig Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other, 0 Denied Access Al ate of Visit:VC7�i'oa� Arrival Time:I r 17 r - Departure Time:rSfely. I County: Pi Region:R-r arm Name: C '""' IA" 2-1":"-%° Owner Email: Iwner Name: Vi,e, t-t •lJ r4641 v\- (-1--(.. Phone: ' ' lading Address: • - . hysical Address: (, - �g 'acility Contact: , ,fC J I �N� 1 s Title: Phone: )nsite Representative: l - • Integrator: 441 tJ ` 5r" v`e ;ertified Operator: Cr/Ai-4 La. ,,6 Certification Number: Z6 e c tack-up Operator: ' Certification Number: vocation of Farm: Latitude: • Longitude: h .,, _ = ' - _'i ia'` ;_, z..,: �<,r met,. ,: .s= s'i aT':`, .e,,!; - .s-4,;; r•::..��, �� 4 �� ��� � Current �, ` � ,� Des a Cur-re�ttf* -� -.;�.���,�,-�- _r,,e � �� �e� . .. ! �. ."bs- ..�, .r sy'A r,�,;. .F r'..3{t.,2,. �^' `ur `— 5-°l. elgi ' ': i,,.�' , .• . nr =4,,, ,� D C : llt' gn �, ` � �����,i„fi3jro ..,�e�;"' N,a. i. :�.r,��`''^::: s}.� a Say.:;,,F,`a .t`-* �-'` .`*�'_x. � .,"ry�. .ids .,F, 4 .., e4i '.'`=C•a :ci ' Pop.; h ;% etPbuitiy,�. :Capei ,,Po �Z _ •Catttle r� .itt� o, ;r`<��`t 1ks�,S.YYll1.. rz,F 3;�.,; �� ,.�4' C z � §�.'L4�� 4"€,-� n`;'�'J;� 5.#" �� �5 '�p a�s.;� a �-�• s' w� sa -S, '' .�li+.�C$.pa.0 y ¢p" ,� . .2.14- 0r`kh.".J � 'a ,s,' .i, <iz n,ua• '� ."x--•,:d o,f4, sv.;.,,, �I,,,• o„,,, ?v>.•.„ .f.. s=&0vt-.5 =4� F �e ..�,... ems._ s-a. .. .t+ �' `�s i '.s�+..�� .. !'"" wfi*' - ., �,� , ? a•r r �,.��°-'xxA.'�.'.�:.t`..,n ,:z *�«.� r«,..3s.. _t sv ar�'i ' r •Wean to Finish jigrn Layer Dairy Cow Non-Layer DairyCalf x Wean to Feeder -- -slti •Feeder to% Finish ,, ` �.4:$ 4 ft A# 4. x .. Dairy Heifer '4 ' } - , Design Current Dry Cow - ,- ;�Farrow toWean 0�, *. -. {Y4 E Farrow to Feeder 43. %D ;Pon _ *,vCa•act :�;Po'..,y-; ,1 Non-Dairy :. -' Farrow to Finish —t • =:x Beef Stocker -,•Gilts —,;� •Non-La ers _ -'A Beef Feeder " NI Boars y •Pullets --g Beef Brood Cow *�f "C 6,u * - giNfi ens r, f ,�F!.` �2 f•■=IEEE-- �'#, " '.F - '- } ;',° ,.t t - �; ,, r .5, �,,; , €t .vi Turke Poults , = x p 1. IF "" 1 ' ` t e� e- � 7 �v'ba„. L Nx.�.� ..sia't ■ k l 0 tc' l,'4 x-A5�. y� �' e-fk-a Other � I ��,� Other � .�,.�v,°� }��^}' �p�� �'3>,��.. �� � �rye Discharges and Stream Impacts - 1.Is any discharge observed from any part Of the operation? ❑ Yes 2-No ❑NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes El No IRNA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No L NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? • ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No' El NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? • . Page 1 of 3 V 2/4/2015 Continued 'Facility Number: el, 47 r Date of Inspection: i 2)Zc2 Waste Collection&Treatment • 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ®-❑ NAB El NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? El Yes El No ❑_ 2 ,❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: 2_O7G 3 2,SZ) ' Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): 1 J / 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Rio ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [J-KO ❑ NA n NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE '(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than'the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑,Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): C R S U IAy 13. Soil Type(s): iS.I (di) 14.Do the receiving crops differ'from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [(�te ❑ NA ❑ NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yese ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes El-l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑-NI-6s ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 10 0 NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ( o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA_ ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: 1-) - of 7 ( Date of Inspection: / / 2�4 24.Did the facility-fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes D-Ntr ❑ NA ❑ NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [allo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels D Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: — 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE- 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes a'ICir ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1=1,1Co ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. . ❑ Yes ❑.Nt❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA El NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑- ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments(refer to_question#):Explain any YES,answers and/or any additional`recommendations_:or any other.colninents: ,.- Use`drawings=of facility'to better,explain situations(use additional pages as necessary): ' , _ ' ' = mac- 1i— ( g 55 O� g-R_ • 3 e At c,,\_ (.9L( C-4( q(& .-3 O ----� el,5( Reviewer/Inspector Name: O fi'1,L ) p Phonel©- 3`UcJ3r „„ Reviewer/Inspector Signature: utti afidy Date: 6 (J-u 6 `v20 Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015