20201784 Ver 1_Bridge #99 No Survey Architecture_20201221

Project tracking No.(Hnternai Use)
16-12-0011
♦ HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
7 NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
t is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: County: Orange
WBS No.: 17BP.7.R.111 Document
Type:
Fed.Aid No: Funding: X State Federal
Federal X Yes No Permit NWP
Permit(s): Type(s):
Project Description: Replace Bridge No. 99 on SR 1723 (New Hope Church Road) over
New Hope Creek (no off-site detour specified).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIPTION OF REVIEW ACTIVITIES,RESULTS,AND CONCLUSIONS:HPOWeb reviewed on 21 December
2016 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Orange
County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated a mostly wooded APE
with residential resources dating from the 1950s to the 2010s (viewed 21 December 2016). Two mid-
twentieth-century houses, one at either end of the APE, are unexceptional examples of their types.
Bridge No. 99, built in 1951, is not eligible for the National Register according to the NCDOT Historic
Bridge Survey as it is not representative of any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type. Google Maps
"Street View"confirmed the absence of critical architectural and landscape resources in the APE (viewed
21 December 2016). The project is reviewed under both GS 121-12(a)and Section 106.
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDES A RELIABLE BASIS FOR REASONABLY PREDICTING THAT
THERE ARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE RESOURCES IN
THE PROJECT AREA: APE extends 600 feet to either end of the existing bridge(NE-SW) and 100 feet to
either side of the SR 1723 (New Hope Church Road) centerline (SE-NW)to encompass proposed
construction. Comprehensive historic architectural survey of Orange County(1992; 1993-4; 2001-2;
2014-present), and county GIS/tax materials and other visuals illustrate the absence of significant
architectural and landscape resources in the APE. No National Register-listed properties are located
within the APE.
Should the design of the project change, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture
as additional review may be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Historic Architecture and Landscapes --NO SURVEY REQUIRED
• c:2/ ,1a/6
NCDOT Architectural Historian Date
Historic Architecture and Landscapes NO SURVEY REOUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Oncrlified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.

r ',113
SR-
, -b
_
.� z
r� j
(, &
a
n� t
y \'a6\t .
m N
i New Hope Creek
t
tat Sinai 1=2,1
I Ili:;in,i
, ,\ .,
m
Whitfield Rct
'3/4'
G'
J
eon
wy
Weaver Dair•.
ORANGEoso `
Project Area .,,hr t.°°'
r 40. c• iF{'
:=ar.i Idcnap.`
Park r 7-6
Y. f
ua iolina 0 1 =
Horace t't
orace Williams r
North - ;tu.urt N I-s I
tes4
Pores) Pritchard F, ,.\`t
m (I /.1.'" 0s.i;h ill- hk 5t l
y� �fN. 7 Park ! < 1
is
a G4 y O w 3
n4 - y 'f s,,rs (
mom, ,,, - r,1' l'I
NC,'
� . -
I`
6®r
'I ''4.14 SG`f. Chapel Hill m p n ::l a e\
,t (
Carrbcro
m 42 ct 14''I iw,n di, Fi`4.i
Bridge No. 99 Replacement Orange County
WBS No. 17BP.7.R.111 Base map: HPOWeb, nts
NCDOT—Historic Architecture
December 2016
Tracking No. 16-12-0011