The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820469_Inspection_20200812 11( I 0 6 `z_a W ._.:A.gL t§r�. 'ts'l Mr r i^ ;4:V59 3� fri '+it e.Vt , f cry 4ksd>V . . z�*,s� , 41,,r'AT 1� . 4� 4 l 1 f , , vim,-' r 4 `i',. ,, .aFcry �- ia- 3.,. x :_ n_u .. si 5. ." a ,, pe of Visit: Geeompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance ason for Visit: Cfrx``outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access VDeparture County: S(�MPS011 Region: �- to of Visit:��12(?K'� � Arrival Time:l g,0 � Time:amen I rm Name: rail'yak ZO Z-6 Owner Email: vner Name: Wt i t yA '3 r h 1 LLG Phone: ailing Address: I i ysical Address: rr (�r cility Contact: I i i(,'\&'e.t I�Cb rr i 5 Title: Phone:, �L i 'site Representative: Integrator: wi j .. S K.l`c'l , 1 ;rtified Operator: A q,j. .,Z.Ct.i" P 4 rn•e t v Certification Number: !D zb Si ick-up Operator: Certification Number: A I I cation of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: I i I a.kz " r^ .4e. t '. '''ri '' ,. 'sue-' 1 r - L' .k' .o''t4 4 t ': nA: e, a i ., . 4� . ,t#` '� a 5: 3-4-o ,_? 3 � . ti t r4i, l t 0 � ` -.''' i •4 fts _ t s , 'z� t� r-i* III Wean to Finish La er ■Dal Cow e '+•Wean to Feeder ill Non La er _Ill Dai Calf El Feeder to Finish '4 Dai Heifer11 , Farrow to Wean 4 � .. ' ' e. e� D Cow , s -, „` Non-Dai J .FarrowtoFeeder +'t -> ' --x � rY Farrow to Finish .La ers <�Beef Stocker L. •Non-La ers , _I.Beef Feeder �Gllts ■ U Pullets ...I.Beef Brood Cow Boars - ' r✓ a -NNW u- a N ea. ��4 kif: Turke s _ e 4, Turkey Poults � ■Other ,Other ,,, i- . ". IS )ischarges and Stream Impacts .I$any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [(,NZ ❑ NA ❑ NE r Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field El Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No , IR@A ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [ I NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NorNA ❑ NE 2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑-Go ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Q'i‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued _ - Facility Number: Fj 2 - I. Date of Inspection: g,'—(Z. Zo tO Waste Collection&Treatment 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ f]%PdA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): el 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [1'51-o ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE ' waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 11.-No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [4o ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑'Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes arr\lo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): C g HeJ'P s6.0 c4)6 13.Soil Type(s): fb 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA n NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [}< 0 NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes It< ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes EiJ (o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ !o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections z❑Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? - ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Eo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: $ 2,-e/``L Date of Inspection: 0— f 2. '21)24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 4To ❑ NA ❑'NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 12ro ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes El'No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [26To ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [a-No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes t- o . ❑ NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes . L 7< 0 NA ❑ NE Com nenls(refer to_questtom(#) Explarn any YES answers aud(o.r any adclta ill reconmiendations or any ether comments. Use drawings of facility to_;better egpIarn�srtuahons,(use;addittonal a e5,as necessary}. n_;�_t ,. „� ,. _..__ ._ _:: ..._-:�_ �._.. .. - , C&(t - ' Cl - "26) ( t ."R• e4 °t 30% --(0c85 (Reviewer/Inspector Name: e t `` '`'''A 4 ap Phone:G 10' L l3 3°33 ( Reviewer/Inspector Signature: LJ 2 1-") Date: (a,.( / 0 2v Pare 3 of 3 2/4015