The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About820466_Inspection_20200812 L ''k `r. �;ai'' =`_se er `'' '',*c�w ` , 'a 1�. 1 +. mot 1� G °' a a•=: r I Z 3 V. ' i : 1 ''' a ` —1 s , i Z-?� S .", ;i lr t . i, �n� 1 i� ate' °tt. s 4 -- <•s ., v.� t ,t om,-4,4,, � - t z.; g,-+,t r'i"..' .1 4 -4 �:�`4. t! ra r �E '' _.y � y� s`' .0s." i�,,' n ..r s =,P;iv .m':; x ,V,--4,F ` .,. :4-...,••3C _ f l �r47,1 a ,.r- s.. € 'Tc�":.` �4*,411.yy», , '-�.,r o. °"'A pe of Visit: eto pliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance ason for Visit: C>Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access to of Visit: 811.-2W1 Arrival Time: V(2s A. Departure Time: 8:t(A... County: SAP(Pox Region:l___ rm Name: Fet.PAA. 2.p 31 4- 7 o 3 e 60 CiA1 Owner Email: a vner Name: iquArkll1��W Il Li.-' Phone: 1 II__ ailing Address: ysical Address: 1 Phone: 1 dray Contact: � ('(etc. �6r{r1`J Title: ��qq LL Inte rator: v4 L .. � i (Jt, Ze.f.( isite Representative: g ;rtified Operator: V Y�H tz.gyr P. Ar-e c,M Certification Number: j 17E2 (o 3 1 i ick-up Operator: Certification Number: i i )cation of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 1 1 t �� P$. z .. V— •- 5.: ,�.- _ rs .,x -'�' *.*-`'sue, r.4",'",,,.„.t..,t:,; .q, 2".'�",— r}.x:k' ? 1 c , c s - 4„�' i`. - ' ry T f.. fi.. .� 'f.< 3� * ire a�_" c° x 3' j-.g.,. �� '� sz�� y'<-a n r� � � � _ s. � �� ;'> ry --�- x`-�-' k- e �4rA',t,.r-',�' `*.*'',_�3,rc •as*a. r5:; 4,,-.• -s" -r"',? � '*r..�.r:� nt-*—'"�.» - �'-3[Jy n°k•v "�`,L �' oikVg* -`!'" ,7: " ' S1:1, �.w Z-0f Yy .N `z�'s.. m •''': .—::le " o,: „. r `", ;,, :- .: ): ==rig" -Te .,E..>''u j ::;_ , e� , >3 t „ ta-5^ Popl'S' ,, :14 Lt r 1' `d. ' "3 7 o athe+a . , I*'iCa' � � - i ..,c, ? 4.._• *rs 'ar.,.. ...:4... t�i".��R''�c".- lr- ..�.'f.:.- .�,�5, e (�` ' ;�' .' k ..t`n�.',3 ' a II Wean to Finish --- Layer I.Dai Cow -- 1 x•Wean to Feeder Non-Layer , �Dai Calf -- a JdaL , A` { }ei '" - x ,k -�zr Dai Heifer -- • Feeder to Finish x�� —P < Farrow to Wean , � b , . D Cow 4`IZ El Farrow to Feeder I ` 4 ^tt ` -°ac' s R i z ;t_ ,• ' Non-Dai -- • Farrow to Finish I.Beef Stocker -- U Gilts -- '.m Non-La ers --; El Beef Feeder ''Ta EN Boars ;El Pullets I.Beef Brood Cow ——a % �-.� SO ` r s a`��b - � � � *[� C �. �r�� ewq�bAg kCi ri� ti TurkeurkePuults � 4.�. aa C 4T. , t ,}4; c " -ait�J P4c��. 4, "P:ti�:9s�=;lt9�V :� ' a3�-$ C� � O� f--,� " i r4'-g r Other till Other)ischarges and Stream Impacts ❑ ❑ .Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes. No NA NE • Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? n Yes ❑ No [g NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE ?.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes [ rj ❑ NA ❑ NE 3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes u No ❑ NA ❑ NE ry p of the State other than from a discharge? Paffe 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued j Facility Number: 6 Z= If 4 4 I Date of Inspection: e-f L- ,.....1 Waste Collection&Treatment ' 4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q-1Z❑ NA ❑ NE a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [].PEA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure/�2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: ' Zot3 3DZ83 T zd.383 9 Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): Observed Freeboard(in): 2.4 Z.i J i 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 142ro ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR/ Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes [ .No ❑ NA El NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2-11Go ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives`that need ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes OK ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload El Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN El PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus '❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable�l Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): Gt7 1,I+l S t/0 C. CO -a 13.Soil Type(s): NO z c9�vS CO 0L- 14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes gpvto ❑ NA ❑NE 15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [to ❑ NA ❑ NE 18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes LJ \ro ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records &Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes u lvu ❑ NA ❑ NE El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers El Weather Code ❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey 22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? . ❑ Yes No El NA, ❑ NE 23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: - —{((p Date of Inspection: 8 (2 W 24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes l±r< ❑ NA ❑ NE 25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes r o ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [lo•No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ -No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ 1--Ic'o ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the D Yes Erro ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes E1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE 33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes u No 0 NA ❑ NE 34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE w en . Commts(refer to:**4#on ) Egplam any yE-5 ansvrers and/or any 444-tonal reco Brno do iii any other comments Usedraw gs of facility to better explamssxtuat ons(use additional pages as necessary) � �1�� tia" CD -�,�'� wo,.K► aA. e4 Jo 5P o I 00 , b t • °� it,tt(votkus ss OK 3o fit'k f4 9(1C 44k CS-4416 c - 50 B '- (9 ( - Reviewer/Inspector Name: l k 1`Z Uh/� a Phone: U 0` g-8 3 g f Reviewer/Inspector Signature: le) al Date: 1Z406 Z'at Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015