20201546 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20201218

i0- WithersRavenel
.. our People. Your Success.
December 18, 2020
US Army Corps of Engineers NC -Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Mr. Chris Hopper Mr. Paul Wojoski
3331 Heritage Trade Drive 1617 Mail Service Center
Suite 105 Raleigh, NC 27699
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Hatcher Creek Subdivision - NWP 29 PCN Submittal
Oxford, Granville County
WR Project #03200058.03
Dear Mr. Hopper and Mr. Wojoski,
On behalf of Hatcher Creek, LLC., we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use NWP
29 for 0.313 acres of permanent wetland impacts for construction of the proposed Hatcher Creek
Subdivision project. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NCDWR for these impacts. Please
note that there are no proposed impacts to the onsite Tar -Pam Riparian Buffers, and therefore a
Riparian Buffer Authorization is not required.
The project is ±51.5 acres in size and is located at on the west side of Lewis Street (US 15 Hwy),
approximately 0.5 miles north of the intersection of Lewis Street and Forest Service Road in
Oxford, Granville County (Latitude: 36.284112°N; Longitude:-78.609576°W). The project is
located on the following two parcels:
• PIN: 191204524624 - ±15.1 acres
• PIN: 191204524936 - ±41.15 acres
Access to the project will be located within a platted 50ft Cross Access Easement within PIN:
191204620985.
The project is located in the Tar -Pamlico River basin (HUC: 03020101) and onsite waters drain to
Fishing Creek (Stream Index: 28-11a; Classification: C;NSW).
Proposed Proiect
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision to meet the existing
and growing demand for residential housing in Granville County. The project consists of
construction of a mixed density residential development, containing multi -family apartments,
attached townhomes and single-family homes, as well internal roads, stormwater management,
utilities (water/sewer) and a community pool amenity center. The project consists of construction
of the following:
219 Station Road, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 910.256.9277 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Hatcher Creek Subdivision - Oxford, Granville Co. �: withers Rave n e l
Our People. Your Success.
• 12 Apartment Buildings with a total of 288 Units (576 Bedrooms)
• 110 Townhomes (Attached)
• 38 Single Family Homes
• Construction of infrastructure, including internal access roads, sidewalks, parking for
apartment site, utilities, and stormwater management
• A community pool/amenity site within the single-family residential phase
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and
techniques.
Proiect History
WithersRavenel completed a formal delineation for the project area in March & May 2020. The
attached Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit depicts the results of the delineation. We have
attached a Preliminary JD Request to this application in support of the delineation. Please note
that we are not requesting issuance of a PJD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29.
The only depicted stream within the project area on the USGS Quad or Granville County Soil
Survey is Fishing Creek, which is subject to Tar -Pam Riparian Buffers. Since buffer subjectivity for
Fishing Creek is conceded, a formal buffer determination from NCDWR was not requested.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.313 acres of permanent wetland impacts. Construction of the
internal roads will result in a total of 0.17 acres of permanent wetland impacts. The remaining
0.143 acres of permanent wetland impacts will result from site fill for construction of the
apartment complex, single family lots and community pool/amenity center. There are no proposed
impacts to Tar -Pam Riparian Buffers associated with Fishing Creek.
The onsite wetlands consist of linear wetlands within natural crenulations very high up the slope
which do not contain streams. The primary source of hydrology for the onsite wetlands is surface
runoff from adjacent uplands. The terrain of the project site consists of a ridge running east to
west through the center of the site which slopes to the north and south. The topography is steep,
with the site dropping from elevation 460' in the center of the site to elevation 428' to the south
and elevation 426' to the north along Fishing Creek, resulting in a general 4% slope.
The construction of Main Blvd for access from Lewis Street will result in the 0.053 acres of
permanent impacts (Impact 3) to Wetland D.
Construction of Apartment Building 1 will result in 0.027 acres of permanent wetland impacts
(Impact 4) to Wetland D. The construction of Main Blvd would impact most of the onsite portion
of Wetland D, leaving only the 0.027-acre remnant area of Wetland D.
The construction of apartment site will result in Building 8 will result in 0.071 acres of permanent
wetland impacts. Construction of building containing Townhome Units 45-50 will result in 0.044
acres of permanent wetland impacts (Impact 1) to Wetland A. As previously mentioned, the
topography of the site is steep, and a 15-ft tall retaining wall is necessary to stabilize site fill for
the apartment site to bring it to elevation 450'. While a small area of Wetland A will remain south
of the retaining wall, this area has been included as a permanent impact due to indirect secondary
impacts resulting from fragmentation of Wetland A, as well as the stormwater management system
elimination of the source of hydrology due to runoff being directed away from Wetland A.
Page 2 of 5

Hatcher Creek Subdivision - Oxford, Granville Co. �: Withers Rave ne l
Our People. Your Success.
The construction of the internal roads within the single-family residential portion of the project
will result in 0.097 acres of permanent impacts (Impact 6) to Wetland C. Additionally, the
construction of the cul-de-sac for access to Lots 21-24 will result in 0.020 acres of permanent
wetland impacts (Impact 10) to Wetland C. The proposed road and cul-de-sacs are necessary to
provide access to developable uplands west of Wetland C for construction of the single-family
lots. The design of the road has incorporated traffic calming features, including curves that
promote slower speed for increased pedestrian safety.
The remaining portions of Wetland C not impacted by the road will be impacted for construction
of lots 12, 17, 18, 19, 20 & 21.
The proposed community pool/amenity center within the single-family residential portion of the
project will result in 0.019 acres of permanent wetland impacts (Impact 2) to Wetland B. The
impacts are necessary for the backslopes necessary to tie fill for the pool amenity to natural grade.
The topography in this area is very steep, dropping from 445' to 440' with a slope of 6%. The
backslopes have been designed at a 3:1 slope to minimize impacts.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized. Due to the locations of the wetlands
within the project site, wetland impacts could not be avoided. The site plan has been designed to
avoid impacts to Fishing Creek and its associated 50' riparian buffer.
Permanent wetland impacts for construction of the pool/amenity center (Impact 2) within the
single family residential was minimized by designing 3:1 backslopes to transition site fill to natural
grade.
The Main Blvd road wetland crossing (Impact 3) has been designed to minimize impacts to Wetland
D by using 3:1 backslopes to transition road fill to natural grade.
The construction of Apartment Building 1 will result in permanent impact to the remaining 0.027
acres of Wetland D (Impact 4). The hydrology of Wetland D is provided entirely from upland
runoff, with little to no influence from groundwater fluctuations. If direct impacts were avoided,
the surrounding development would direct all runoff from the built upon area away from the
remnants of Wetland D and into the stormwater management system, thereby eliminating the
primary source of hydrology. Without sufficient upland runoff to maintain the existing wetland
hydrology conditions, the remnants of Wetland D would be secondarily impacted and eventually
convert to uplands. The integrity and long-term viability of the remnants of Wetland D could not
be maintained in the post -development condition. It was determined that the functional value of
the remnants of Wetland D would be better served through provision of mitigation in a regional
mitigation bank, and therefore the applicant is proposing to impact this wetland area for
construction of Apartment Building 1.
The proposed internal road within the single-family residential will impact the majority of Wetland
C, with the remaining portions of Wetland C upstream of the cul-de-sac at Lot 23 being proposed
to be impacted for construction of lots. Due to the location of Wetland C within the project, there
are developable uplands west of Wetland C that require access. The connection of the proposed
road within the single family was dictated by the need to align the road with Road A in the
townhome portion of the project. In the early phases of site design, the potential to minimize
impacts to Wetland C were explored. However, the proposed road could not be aligned to avoid
Page 3 of 5

Hatcher Creek Subdivision - Oxford, Granville Co. %0 Withers Rave net
00 Our People. Your Success.
Wetland C entirely, as the first 150 If of road would cross Wetland C, as would the two cul-de-
sacs needed to access lots 13-17 & 21-23. Even if the proposed road were aligned to avoid most
of Wetland C, four culverted driveway crossings over Wetland C would be needed to access the
lots to the west. This design would have resulted in remnants of Wetland C consisting of short,
fragmented sections of linear wetlands, effectively eliminating any functional value. Additionally,
the stormwater management design would direct runoff into the stormwater management system
and away from Wetland C, thereby eliminating the source of hydrology int the post -development
condition. Without sufficient upland runoff to maintain the existing hydrologic conditions, the
remnants of Wetland C would be secondarily impacted and eventually convert to uplands. The
integrity and long-term viability of the remnants of Wetland C could not be maintained in the post -
development condition. It was determined that the functional value of the remnants of Wetland
D would be better served through provision of mitigation in a regional mitigation bank, and
therefore the applicant is proposing to impact the upper reach of Wetland C.
Access during construction will occur from uplands. Silt fencing will be installed around all
disturbed areas to prevent loss of sediment into adjacent waters.
Mitigation
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the proposed 0.313 acres of permanent wetland impacts at
a 2:1 ratio, resulting in the provision of 0.626 acres of riparian wetland mitigation. WithersRavenel
checked with private mitigation banks within the 03020101 basin, and there was no riparian
wetland mitigation available. Therefore, the applicant proposes to purchase the 0.626 acres or
riparian wetland mitigation through the NCDCM ILF program. A copy of the NCDMS Letter of
Acceptance has attached to this application.
The current request is for 0.313 acres of permanent wetland impacts (see the attached maps and
PCN for details).
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Page 4 of 5

Hatcher Creek Subdivision - Oxford, Granville Co. �: withers Rave n e l
Our People. Your Success.
Attachments:
• Agent Authorization
• Parcel/Owner Information
• Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit
• USGS Quad Exhibits
• Granville County Soil Survey
• Preliminary JD Request
• NCDMS Letter of Acceptance
• NCNHP Project Review Letter
• USFWS T&E List for Granville County
• Impact Exhibits
Page 5 of 5

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
October 26, 2020 Ver 3.3
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
C Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20201546
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Central Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Hatcher Creek Subdivision
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Troy Beasley
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
12/18/2020
Nearest Body of Water
Fishing Creek (Stream Index 28-11a)
Basin
Tar -Pamlico
Water Classification
C;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
36.284112
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
ID#
20201546
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date*
10/21/2020
Longitude:
178.609576
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Rick Trone:eads\rvtrone
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Version
1
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:*
EMAIL —Pre -Filing Meeting is not needed for Hatcher Creek Subdivision - 20201546 Ver 1_2020-11-21.pdf 581.5KB
A. Processing Information C^U
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Granville

Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
* Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
F 401 Water Quality Certification - E)press
F Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Hatcher Creek Subdivision Acceptance Letter_2020-12-04.pdf
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
V Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Hatcher Creek, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book: 01762; Page: 0763
2c. Responsible party:
William Wynn - Manager
2d.Address
295.83KB
*
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

Street Address
2550 Capitol Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 105
City
Creedmoor
Fbstal / Zip Code
27522
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Addyson Qualified Opportunity Fund, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
Book: 01762; Page: 0331
2c. Responsible party:
William Wynn - Manager
2d.Address
Street Address
2550 Capitol Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 105
City
Creedmoor
Postal / Zip Code
27522
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
William Wynn
3b. Business Name:
Hatcher Creek, LLC
3c.Address
Street Address
2550 Capitol Drive
Address Line 2
Suite 105
City
Creedmoor
Fbstal / Zip Code
27522
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Troy Beasley
4b. Business Name:
WithersRavenel
4c.Address
Slate / Rovince / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:

Street Address
219 Station Road
Address Line 2
Suite 101
City
Slate / Fnwince / Pagion
Wilmington
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28405
USA
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
Signed Agent Authorization_Hatcher Creek-Addyson.pdf 1.39MB
SIGNED_Agent Authorization —Hatcher Creek LLC.pdf 358.51 KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Oxford
Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
191204524624 & 191204524936
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Located west of Lewis Street (US 15 Hwy), south of Fishing Creek
Address Line 2
City
Oxford
Postal / Zip Code
27565
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Fishing Creek (Stream Index: 28-11a)
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
QNSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar -Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030201010201
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
±51.5 acres
Slate / Rmince / Pagion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project currently consists of undeveloped woodlands, and is bordered to the north by Fishing Creek. The general land use in the vicinity consists of a mbdure of undeveloped land,
commercial and residential land use.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes IT No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
USGS Quads-2019.pdf 528.19KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Granville Co Soil Survey.pdf 1.59MB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.34 acres

4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
1080 If
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision to meet the existing and growing demand for residential housing in Oxford and Granville County.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision to meet the existing and growing demand for residential housing in Granville County. The project consists
of construction of a mixed density residential development, containing multi -family apartments, attached townhomes and single-family homes, as well internal roads, stormwater
management, utilities (water/sewer) and a community pool amenity center. The project consists of construction of the following:
• 12 Apartment Buildings with a total of 288 Units (576 Bedrooms)
• 110 Townhomes (Attached)
38 Single Family Homes
Construction of infrastructure, including internal access roads, sidewalks, parking for apartment site, utilities, and
stormwater management
• A community pool/amenity site within the single-family residential phase
The project will be constructed using traditional commercial construction equipment and techniques.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Wetland Impact Maps.pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
WithersRavenel completed a formal delineation for the project area in March & May 2020. The
attached Wetland/Buffer Delineation Exhibit depicts the results of the delineation. We have attached
a Preliminary JD Request to this application in support of the delineation. Please note that we are
not requesting issuance of a PJD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary f Approved r Not Verified r" Unknown r WA
Corps AID Number
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Alyssa Ricci & Troy Beasley
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Other:
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload
Hatcher Creek PJD Request 08.17.2020.pdf
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes O No
3.23MB
9.05MB
r Unknown
7b. If yes, explain.
The multi -family apartment complex and townhomes will be constructed in the first phase, with the single family residential being constructed as the second phase. However, all impacts
necessary to construct the entire proposed project are included in this application.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory l^V
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
IW Wetlands r Streams -tributaries r Buffers
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type M 2c. Type of W. 2d. W. name" 2e. Forested 2f. Type of 2g. Impact
Jurisdicition*(?) area*
Im act 1 Site Fill P Headwater Forest Wetland A Yes Both 0.044
P
(acres)

Im act 2
P
Site Fill
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland B
Yes
Both
0.019
(acres)
Im act 3
P
Road Crossing
9
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland D
Yes
Both
0.053
(acres)
Im act 4
P
Site Fill
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland D
Yes
Both
0.026
(acres)
Impact 5
Site Fill
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.005
(acres)
Impact 6
Road Crossing
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.097
(acres)
Impact 7
Site Fill
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
Impact 8
Site Fill
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.003
(acres)
Impact 9
Site Fill
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.045
(acres)
Impact 10
Site Fill
P
Headwater Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.020
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.000 0.313
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.313
2h. Comments:
See Cover Letter for additional information on proposed impacts.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be
minimized. Due to the locations of the wetlands within the project site, wetland impacts could not be avoided. The site plan has been designed to avoid
impacts to Fishing Creek and its associated 50' riparian buffer.
Permanent wetland impacts for construction of the pool/amenity center (Impact 2) within the single family residential was minimized by designing 3:1
backslopes to transition site fill to natural grade.
The Main Blvd road wetland crossing (Impact 3) has been designed to minimize impacts to Wetland D by using 3:1 backslopes to transition road fill to
natural grade.
The construction of Apartment Building 1 Will result in permanent impact to the remaining 0.027 acres of Wetland D (Impact 4). The hydrology of
Wetland D is provided entirely from upland runoff, with little to no influence from groundwater fluctuations. If direct impacts were avoided, the
surrounding development would direct all runoff from the built upon area away from the remnants of Wetland D and into the stormwater management
system, thereby eliminating the primary source of hydrology. Without sufficient upland runoff to maintain the epsting wetland hydrology conditions, the
remnants of Wetland D would be secondarily impacted and eventually convert to uplands. The integrity and long-term viability of the remnants of
Wetland D could not be maintained in the post -development condition. It was determined that the functional value of the remnants of Wetland D would
be better served through provision of mitigation in a regional mitigation bank, and therefore the applicant is proposing to impact this wetland area for
construction of Apartment Building 1.
The proposed internal road within the single-family residential will impact the majority of Wetland C, with the remaining portions of Wetland C upstream
of the cul-de-sac at Lot 23 being proposed to be impacted for construction of lots. Due to the location of Wetland C within the project, there are
developable uplands west of Wetland C that require access. The connection of the proposed road within the single family was dictated by the need to
align the road with Road A in the townhome portion of the project. In the early phases of site design, the potential to minimize impacts to Wetland C
were a)plored. However, the proposed road could not be aligned to avoid Wetland C entirely, as the first 150 If of road would cross Wetland C, as
would the two cul-de-sacs needed to access lots 13-17 & 21-23. Even if the proposed road were aligned to avoid most of Wetland C, four culverted
driveway crossings over Wetland C would be needed to access the lots to the west. This design would have resulted in remnants of Wetland C
consisting of short, fragmented sections of linear wetlands, effectively eliminating any functional value. Additionally, the stormwater management
design would direct runoff into the stormwater management system and away from Wetland C, thereby eliminating the source of hydrology int the post -
development condition. Without sufficient upland runoff to maintain the epsting hydrologic conditions, the remnants of Wetland C would be secondarily
impacted and eventually convert to uplands. The integrity and long-term viability of the remnants of Wetland C could not be maintained in the post -
development condition. It was determined that the functional value of the remnants of Wetland D would be better served through provision of
mitigation in a regional mitigation bank, and therefore the applicant is proposing to impact the upper reach of Wetland C.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Access during construction will occur from uplands. Silt fencing will be installed around all disturbed areas to prevent loss of sediment into adjacent
ureters.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
r DWR W Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?

r Mitigation bank W Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
r Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.628 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
WithersRavenel contacted mitigation banks listed for the 03020101 basin, and there was no wetland mitigation available. Therefore, the applicant
proposed to provide the required mitigation through the purchase of 0.628 acres of riparian wetland mitigation through the NCDMS ILF program. A
copy of the NCDMS Letter of Acceptance has been attached to this application.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?
r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
9 Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen
r Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
r N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
W Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
17 Phase II r NSW r USMP F Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
City of O)dord
Comments:
The Stormwater management plan consists of two wet detention SCMs which will provide 30% nitrogen removal and therefore diffuse flow is not required. The stormwater management
plan will be reviewed and approved by the City of O)dord as the certified municipality.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes f• No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
There are no future phases of the proposed project and is not anticipated to result in additional development. Anyadditional development in the
vicinity of the proposed project will be required to meet federal, state and local regulations in order to prevent impact to nearby downstream water
quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Onsite sewer will connect to the City of Oxford's sanitary sewer system for collection and treatment in their WWTP.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Just a heads up on this. We've had a working relationship with Talbert & Bright since 2010 and they are one of the Enviro Department's biggest
clients. While not formally exclusive, we do run all potential opportunities by them to see if they are chasing it before going out an partnering with other
firms.
Talbert & Bright is currently the on -call engineer for Lumberton Airport. Bob Snuck, the airport director had a bit of a strained relationship with Talbert
& Bright over the design of the new airport terminal building (which the architect designed, not T&B). But the board of the airport was always happy
with Talbert & Bright's work. Mr. Snuck put this RFQ out very early, as the on -call engineering contract wouldn't come into effect until 2022. However,
Mr. Snuck has resigned from his position since issuing the RFQ due to medical issues. Based on the relationship that Talbert & Bright has with the
airport board, I would say there's a 95 % chance that Talbert & Bright will be awarded the on -call contract for the additional 5-years. I don't think it's
worth the effort of trying to pull a newteam together to chase this.
Talbert & Bright always includes WR for all of their environmental work, and survey work where they can in all of their RFQ submittals. They've started
using our utilities dept as well. I think it would be worth setting up a videoconference with some of the T&B PMs to introduce them to our Pavement
Conditions capabilities, as well as any other services we'd like to integrate with them.
Consultation Documentation Upload
NCNHP Project Review Review Letter_2020-12-16.pdf 197.52KB
USFWS T&E List for Granville Co_2020-07-17.pdf 138.78KB
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
WR reviewed the NOAA Essential Fish Habitat online mapper, located at: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/indexhtmi and
determined that there are no waters classified as EFH in Granville County.

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? *
WR reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoveb/, to determine if there were any
known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The database review did not identify any known resources within or
immediately adjacent to the proposed project.
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
www.ncfloodmaps.com
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
Parcel -Owner Info.pdf 365.75KB
Cover Letter.pdf 122.51 KB
Signature
*
17 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Troy Beasley
Signature
01 4*
Date
12/18/2020
u

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Bill Wynn
Hatcher Creek LLC
2550 Capitol Drive, Suite 105
Creedmoor, NC 27522
"N QUAM`1111�/
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 4, 2020
Expiration of Acceptance: 6/4/2021
Project: Hatcher Creek Subdivision County: Granville
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Tar -Pamlico
03020101
Riparian Wetland
0.313
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and
15A NCAC 02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact [e-mail].
cc: Troy Beasley, agent
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
NORTH CARo ND_EQ��
oeparlment of Environmental Duali
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

40 WithersRavenel
NoOur People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner Add son Qualified Opportunity Fund LLC (Client) does hereby
appoint WithersRavenel Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the
appropriate local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of
Engineers, NC Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local
municipalities, etc.) for: a) review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite
jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation
and submittal of appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for Lot 4 (±36A
acres) located west of Lewis Road in Oxford, NC.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, INC 27511
Date: (�/!� OZ 6
Signature of Client:
�} [�.& ,.. 14 rJVtv) Ma-nanyer
&ALg4,,(Name - Print) (Title)
I�
(Signature)
Tel. [phone] �C ss� �b �`rd� p r• , 5[a,`e ��S
Mailing Address
Cree jtnoar, N C o2 Sod a -
City State Zip
Phone:
Email: 1 D W nn jk6 Id tin S• C p�
115 MacKenan Drive i Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 ( f: 919.467.60081 www.withersrave nel.corn I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

t WW111 A VIM WIRE' 1W 1w2 RA'
W ORM.I VILILS W AVFII,I'.GI fALV, .W
aLN4 yp,{v w.,a ,IIotA ,.v 41.1PIwmti
MAf � SMtr a 2ro�NarYw lw M[
9tiYEt 6 9tlni wFA[vy neat bE 4RAmAviS
a:nu a parr as n o�xl[a ew+ f:ianm,1°
p !�,
C�-[�
Mt NS RA' Nay PnpyEy M aCr00110A�Y2
2q Iq AVIa@ YO Mal ws uaP
{��N
fY eltt FW eNtl 9R1[111G t[ MYA1 G3:0'MA
(f
'
(11 ACaC Y ISW1 wUxss OIYCMII sa,'u+r.
�;OfAfv, gwiRe alN t3A1
1p_Iut a JIeNiL �M
1 L--� 7
t `
IXIOILip'�6Yi fM0 9RR,Ot P-nwl
U .ulmv rnRn we P. t.n.rvrr error,
nc rvwrsos Q',.- Nexw=v,�
Mn>I�wnw ar ure
vo,2aol waa
AF1/IG„[ Ot 11.,4119f U4i 4@fh,k 1
[rtl Ipmr cqm ,Iur I aY h[ .a[1 UM ,m t w .uu a
� wc�m�ir iiawy�.cm fnw a 68 ii'
Raarno. lPr., w ((ay 11ws raao,l. r3uwo- wF«'�!.-.m
uuaAY eh0..a .Kl AIO omr+A 4l S,oEE„
�� wwt5 NO I1YfN 91LS TO It�t 01
iawnaw Q ne d. a oeao. I:,INIW
3�R/delo >Mrv: iVvw x•�• Ttea.Ge.�Ala^°p'
�FAaeTy NW1N CNi,XN1A
.nxw rrnou
�S GYBE ILL�Nlplr '.�a
Y
f1R(!Ih➢ td RL1519AAp1 e.s nay d u
(�Sl At
R1Qf Yd dlfAlL OWIfY RC N Yv.
Iirsv a oms
ado
SIS
1,588,525 sq.fi � 313,962 eq.R 9
M6- 2,2 A- 7.253 AC. 1
C-33 ,
' � R
833.9T6 U1¢ft
14M4 AC
t w w
MMCd,4va:.w K F1E6N1G PM� A mlAl utSAfD 'AIRYEY.
d OMG []RSPnS, A II[ 96MPM a f1B6M9ola
raa. fwaxady xw� :.
rrGJv"'VIVCAWTHORNE, MOSS lC PANCIERA, P.Q PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, C-1525, 391'5.'1
WZ133 sp.IL
8313 AC
W_
.a r . s ei � m�oai iwaon
O. - LSlYN M wl
•n-wra
Iwr1 NOTES:
- 4A ca.v®n moiq.,.S K 10
IM 1W.rcm
WI.AwY
REC04BMATIM SURVEY rOR
n
SHIELD DEVELOPMENT. LLC
U.S. HIGHWAY t5 I.E"% S:MT
OWNER: SHIELD OEVELOPNENT, UX
I
REF: D.B. 1709, PACE 530
REF: P.B. 42, PAGE 90
N
FISHING CREEK TOYMSHIP
CRANVAU COUNTY, NORIN CAROUNA
2m ,a) P Mo tw
SCALE 1'-200'g
J
!
SEPTENBER IS, 2019 4
20NED R-A, ]g
Ka
PINT 1912-$2-4935
i. BOx 1251 WAKE FOREST N.C.. 275M [phone]

40- WithersRavenel
YA■ Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner Hatcher Creek, LLC (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel,
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and
federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface
waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for Lot 3 (i14,55 acres) located west of Lewis
Road in Oxford, NC.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511 -
Date: �— a� ` a0a 6
Signature of Client:
R �,Wy p n MP�rn er�lYl@ rLa�
(Name - Print) (Title)
&a"
(Signature)
Tel. [phone] a,55o GpTA 1
Mailing Address
o211 S 0o
City State Zip
Phone: Ct ICI — D30 r �? 6 8
KW
EmaEmail:���1� (1.1hh+►�O1��v5.com
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.33401 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenetcom I License No. C-0832
Asheville I Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

L WDVU A VM WR. TW M RAT
p5 W w' um, Yr 9A� rHO. wv
.LN4 9AS1' M.IC[ WS(P W Pli FH9p..
1W,fr 6 9 MMOL —1 ►C i¢ c.xf5
9cN.T[o NK of RT .IRA l 1:
/r t
P.K.K rLv 9RK+nf Wi9t GROtwA
tr I.d[ x ,euP Y,1� w awW4 so,•wr.
r y�y £
; l �/Ii '-
n.sJlLoara :vao
j
PA:R9AWAL IAIO aRw+ol 4-r..,
14 RmenauA a1eAL1 ra M,
II[ PPV,6+66 p riQ 9A,1Y96-
a Yx Ory a .Y�Yn .OAry cuawa
mlrArr.x o' awowa un omr+„aY
1p ImT CA1Ft TM1, AY (K NIE1 PY �. ..
owa,lsl a x PAn em• 9n�n n,o ocm.aw
au,z, un ,ru+, f.0 weir A0�! P.S PLLM a "
ao,aso, wm w�{w�i,tx wreorT. lsrAe.i, u�i �.�T'1.:u-ia,
UIIB I4 9YJY1lW, 6 �1i 1[.'4ra[
alfglr� _ 'tQ�
fi14M1E [WNTT. HORM GNi�AMA
,mac R _ _ leex olAttA
K 9iA4Y{tl [AM,. LA4r+ All M t
YY A RA1 ,014, 9P5 �A1dt
ItW i[tl0.i! NY ix,]DID.ILL
.A Rr'eP arm,
eT6,ow r -+x m+¢raa.rvv i°c� ar #.
� � -4S E 1]vAY7 Yf
1.I'WS25 .WfL $ 315.m AC'
q.
R :+
3&422 AG .q��
I
O.a •a r ti
833,976 �R
14u.,u.r.��aeeAe� Grlr,
liilHi�iNkli�µkilMM�If u"
%,Mr'nL, y�L✓�W .. H.n WigcOo�a-wla
.—P
a49 -19
� M M
a ns9 (T,
ra��w •065 iA�w t ��aa�rLvoa ,m. T- lYa �a,��
� Y
�R1LEI,M.'i., a FAiThC PwK. e0.WT GgRPm B.Y EY.
a m.aa guano. m n,T ou:aa a aePaw..
LNoD
u ee, uos, wus»axa 1a*+trm xo ._1... ox.
CAWfHORNE. MOSS do PANCERA. P.C. PROFESMIAL LAND SURVEYORS, C-1525, S 1
1/ o
2
WZ133 p.R
fl313 AG-
° a M.
riy as-,�qn
VICINITY MAP
M.1 Noms:
.e. arum n mw•.x rTrca
.ten bs'grv�• r suim'45'.n�a g� rw�'�'. eo.m ter_
IA[ T'.'PE l[RNC
_ 7_RS-,i _ I WA
u --
ITS
RECOWMaAT1CN SURVEY roR
SHIELD DEVELOPMENT. LLC
i j..
U.S. NICNWAY 15 LEWIS STREET
13wm : SHIELD DEVELOPMENT, LLC
+
REF: D.B. 17D9, PAVE 630
2
REF' P,B, 42, PAGE 90
W
41SHAIG CREEK TOYMSW
MANVILLE COUNTY, NORM CAROLINA
2w im 6 2w 1w
SCALE i'-200'
SEPTEMBER IS, ZD19
5
ZONED R-A
1912-52-493S
) BOX 12SI WAKE FOREST N.C.. 2758B,(919) 558-31�8
11— 11 n.. 11 Eaa 1

■■
NoOur People. Your ,uz c,,.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner Hatcher Creek, LLC (Client) does hereby appoint WithersRavenel,
Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate local, state and
federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of
Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a) review
and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands, surface
waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate
environmental permit applications/requests for the ±51-acre Hatcher Creek Subdivision
Project, located on Lewis Road in Oxford, Granville County, NC. The project consists of the
following two parcels:
• PIN: 191204524624 - ±15.10 acres
• PIN: 191204524936 - ±41.15 acres
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
WithersRavenel, Inc.
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Date: c� - -C - aao cx V
Signature of Client:
(Name - Print) (f itle)
(Signature)
Tel. [phone] �S6 C�a �A4 i �O c -le L 6-57
Mailing Address
Cr-e(fd rny�, N c- 02 25 a
City State Zip
Phone: lr - l 9(5 - q -7 6J
Email: �rl (�I,711(1 1'1I Lc/o 41

h .0
+.w.
HATCHER CREEK 11FRANVILLE CO. SOIL SURVEY (1997)
SHEET 10
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
0
.1w
400 WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

96
5HAG1 GRd� RR Granviite 1
- -- --- �� WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
OXFORD

r
r ,
r 4
L
450
1
1 l
�4 L
PROJECT BOUNDARY
1
�5
15
i
t
� r 'e-
L �
1 �
S
1 +
#041,
r
y
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 250 500
1 inch = 500 ft.
J
1
r
1
' 4j
HATCHER CREEK III USGS QUAD (2019) — OXFORD
400 WithersRavenel
00 Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

VICINITY MAP
%SITE
CERTAINOBON ROAD
DRI
aRIVER OAK N
COURT
Z
W I E
s
1"=4,000' 1MAP B1
10
9
FUTURE SCM 2
7
DEVELOPMENT � � WETPOND _
(CONCEPTUAL)
—
WETLAND IMPACTSUMMARY
MAP
IMPACT #
PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACT
A
1
0.044 AC (1,914 SF)
B1
2
0.019 AC (834 SF)
C
3
0.053 AC (2,297 SF)
4
0.026 AC (1,156 SF)
D
5
0.005 AC (198 SF)
6
0.097 AC (4,212 SF)
7
0.001 AC (39 SF)
8
0.003 AC (134 SF)
9
0.045 AC (1,981 SF)
10
0.020 AC (855 SF)
TOTALS
0.314 AC (13,620 SF)
50' TAR-PAM BUFFER
5
:1 .�■ ..■
WETPOND
L V_ �mar •
i �i �i •
IR
6,6161
---�� •
Co
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 100 200 400
1 inch = 200 Ft.
E
a v
0
Z
Qa
Lu
V
J Q
9a
Lu
0

458
� ASS
♦ _ — —433 — —
♦ \ � 4s3
♦ \ PROPOSED
♦ _ RETAINING
\ WALL
\
♦ o
IMPACT LEGEND
■ PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT - OTHER
W
/ d
/
/
/< a 452
N / /
ID 453
VDS ` G1
�11L
/) \ IMPACT #1-
// PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT-
/ 0.044 AC (1,914 SF)
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 0 10 20 40
1 inch = 20 Ft.
►]

IMPACT LEGEND
■ PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT - OTHER
— 448
__— ---446Z POOL
AMENITY SITE
C oj
442 —
441� /i iii�
1
IMPACT #2
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
0.019 AC (834 SF)
/
WETLANDS
VIIETPOJID \ \ \
\\ 454
i
m
GRAPHIC SCALE
\ 50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 Ft.
z
0
Q
w=
w
=o
z
u
w
Q
0
0
° o 0 0

IMPACT LEGEND
■ PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPACT - OTHER
GRAPHIC SCALE

\ 451_� 45o 449
.W I 448 7
`o �447�
446 \
— \ IMPACT
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
_'C` :._ • \ 0.053 AC (2,297 SF)
IMPACT.�EGEND
PERMANENT WETLAND
IMPAZ`T GOAD
PtRMANENT WETLAND
IMPAJDT�_OTHER
vv W
4�l
51
_ o
so
\ T -450
1 I '449 �44 •/' �/ �
406
5p
IBHOUSE
\ IMPACT #4 ° I \
\ \ PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT 449— ! I I I I
/ 0 0.027 AC (1,156 SF)
4 1` /
—BUILDING 1452-
I � _
1\ �.':..r• WETLANDSCl
\ O '
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
1 inch = 40 Ft.
06
V

IMPACT #7
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT IMPACT #8
0.001 AC (39 SF)
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
0.003 AC (134 SF)
l
I M PACT #9 /
/ //� / PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
Zv
C o 0 .3
v �3
v 10
� Y#
0.045 AC (1,981 SF)
IMPACT #6 ,� / � YK — `— AFAF
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT _ IMPACT #10
0.097 AC (4,212 SF) L= J _ � PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
O\ 0.020 AC (855 SF)
06
i
s s \ \ \ \ LIMITS OF
�M / �/ \\ \\ I \ Q �'���\ \�`�o \\ \\ ROAD FILL
510
I ,
LIMITS OF \ \ \ O \ \ \ \ , \
ROAD FILL
449 —� IMPACT #5
0 PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT \ U� \ \ I \ ���� I \ w
450— 0.005 AC 198 SF � \ \ \ \ \ I �s 1 \ I I � � �� U Z
\ ���O I `- 1*1 e I w
O� a / — c9 \ \ I I �I I \l I U
_ —�a M \\ Intl H
1 1 I I I I I I yeI I = o
�0 e I III —I I I X
/ oil
4�/ //� w / // //I / II I I I I I WETLANDS Ye
o
/
I O� I II / / Cp / / l l l f 3T"
I ,lk
�
\ ,A/
0
GRAPHIC SCALE o
�0 0 25 50 100
�J I I 1 inch = 50 Ft. Z

a ■■N Roy Cooper. Governor
00 i NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
notan NATUPAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
E sow Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-13521
December 16. 2020
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE. Hatcher Creek Subdivision, 03200058.30
Dear Troy Beasley.
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence, the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodnev.butlerWncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
1:1 W. JONES STREET, PALE01_ P<_ 27603 - 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEiGH. NC 276"
OFC !J19 707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Hatcher Creek Subdivision
Project No. 03200058.30
December 16, 2020
NCNHDE-13521
Element Occurrences
Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Element Accuracy
Federal State Global
State
Group
Observation Occurrence
Status Status Rank
Rank
Date Rank
i
Dragonfly or
33700 Macromia margarita Mountain River Cruiser 1987-06-06 H 4-Low
--- Significantly G3
S2?
Damselfly
Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner Type
Oxford Tobacco Research Station NC Department of Agriculture, Research State
Stations Division
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httr)s://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/heir). Data query generated on December 16, 2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 October 2020.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-13521: Hatcher Creek Subdivision
W V�n
tic,•
pF
i�
'� r'r.n1n9 Lrvcy PC
Ba111own �yo�
iV
W+E -
S �
December 16, 2020
❑ Project Boundary
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
j Managed Area (MAREA)
1:24,065
0 0.2 0.4 0,8 mi
0 0.325 0.65 13 km
Sources: Esri. HERE, Garmn. Ini—p, inuemenl P Corp., GE6= uSGS,
FAO, F S, NRCAN, GeoS—. IG N. Hadas[er NL, Ordnance Survey. Esri Japan.
MEfE. zu China [Hpng Kong)_ ic] Openar,e M1ap CantrBu[ors, and the C.,IS
user Communiry
Page 3 of 3

Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species,
Granville County, North Carolina
Updated: 07-17-2020
Common Name Scientific name Federal Record Status
Status
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Carolina madtom Range by Basin
Noturus furiosus
ARS
Current
Neuse River waterdog Range by
Necturus lewisi
ARS
Current
basin
Invertebrate:
Atlantic pigtoe Range by Basin
Fusconaia masoni
ARS
Current
Brook floater
Alasmidonta varicosa
ARS
Current
Chowanoke crayfish
Orconectes virginiensis
ARS
Obscure
Dwarf wedgemussel Range by_
Alasmidonta heterodon
E
Current
basin
Green floater
Lasmigona subviridis
ARS
Current
Yellow lance Range by basin
Elliptio lanceolata
T
Current
Vascular Plant:
Harperella
Ptilimnium nodosum
E
Current
Smooth coneflower
Echinacea laevigata
E
Current
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "C1" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
ARS = At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered
Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not required for Candidate or Proposed species;
although a Conference, as described under Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting

species proposed for listing.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA)_
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http://www.fvvs.goy/migratorybirds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(SS/A))_
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be extant in the
county.
Historical - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be historical in the
county, meaning that all recorded occurrences are either extirpated, have not been found in recent surveys, or
have not been surveyed recently enough to be confident they are still present.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 150 300
1 inch = 300 ft.
PIN: 191204524936 - 41.15 ACRES
ADDYSON QUALIFIED OPPORTUNITY FUND, LLC
1696 HAYES ROAD
CREEDMOOR, NC 27522
BOOK: 01768; PAGE: 0331
PIN: 191204524624 - 15.10 ACRES
HATCHER CREEK, LLC
2550 CAPITOL ROAD
CREEDMOOR, NC 27522
BOOK: 01762; PAGE: 0763
50' ACCESS EASEMENT LOCATED ON:
PIN:191204620985
SHIELD DEVELOPMENT, LLC
7320 SIX FORKS ROAD
SUITE 100
RALEIGH, NC 27615
HATCHER CREEK III PARCEL/OWNER EXHIBIT III 40 WgthersRavenel

PIN: 191204524624
"Bac
{
J
F
Tank 3 �yy� �
s � �
�r +
1 �
I �
12/16/2020, 12:30:51 PM
Parcels
Centerlines
Lot Lines
Hydro
Easements
granville_nc_anno
1:4,800
0 0.04 0.09 0.18 mi
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
Granville County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, NGA, EPA, USDA, NPS I Granville County, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS