820444_Inspection_20200707

vi ion ofWater Resources i',;-;:'-,-',',,,-:.-,2—.:, `>
Facility Number ( `L 7 gi Y 0 Division of Soil and"Water Conservation "3
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Gttompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
4-0
Date of Visit: ��� Arrival Time:I R j l�� Departure Time: �� tiff) County:64rs�l� � Region: FlT
Farm Name: i3 oy i('0,1Lac- t'etP4'i. Owner Email:
Owner Name:` toC�5'i`CQX- (.40r5► ti�� Y11i C-tAk Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: pp
Facility Contact: /—_S L. fi Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: to Integrator: 01 `'
Certified Operator: M\ L AI)/
Certification Number: l� © 2
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current f " , > Design ,Current 'ff . Design Current,' ,
Swine Capacity 'op, Wet Poultry . Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop,
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder . p(7 °f Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Hipp qzi i : � Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Sb ill Design Cur ent Dry Cow
'I '-':',
Farrow to Feeder 1) ;Poult „ Ca 1 ac Po Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish °° E . �� ,`;`_ _Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-La ers ��, Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
other •Turke Poults
Other •Other ��
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ I`iA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) El Yes El No Q'A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes El No []NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes W'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes " No ❑ NA El NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e)Z L{4_t Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA 0 NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0-N' ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z,c 2-5
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ -N 5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) •
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Lf 1V0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ©- ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Qlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ralCrO ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. E Yes "'v E NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C £Gr I -
13. Soil Type(s): I:l ("" `l 0;'l1'_ __ Gt�otiC , 7�� i G �i-key
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAMP? ❑ Yes 111-'1Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes - No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA n NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes U4.0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes I 0 I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes In' o E NA ❑ NE
E Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking E Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z. - 411f Date of Inspection: 7 J wC ZO�c
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ,, Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 111,1<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [✓ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 4lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 0] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ca ti6s/c 'i nV 6— - Stiat( goVel GG r 7, l y - 52-
55 lc.
(a ve
.� � ��f�,� �, SS Lc
C.e,11 31A 6 s
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 0 �l. hJ °A Phone:cp-g3 3-3 3 3 y
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: S (� n Date: 7..Tolif
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015