820430_Inspection_20200629

Nivvl S 3 D Mu N 2e i
CD�ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number . °' Z. - sd O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: �m 'ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: '2,q j-it4. Arrival Time: /14 zo At Departure Time:(/1;3041 County: 54-n .2 e l� Region:F4
,
Farm Name: Pt., 5-z i ( Feet 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: 0-nr et lit L )2L b Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: &^e_(( rtt c-Lel vt,--t)Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t( Integrator: pA-e,f crr,c_e_.--
Certified Operator: Certification Number: ��- 1 7
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
,
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish i 2 LI 0 (0,7 1 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D ' Poult Ca 1 aci Po.'.'` Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I La ers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts El Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
Other •Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes g1-N5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No IA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 1;1-NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [1NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes -'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ?2 - Etyu Date of Inspection:q_Z 20
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): a z
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [.-Ni5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes IEK ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [l�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes lal\lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [—"go ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C C '"� (O
13. Soil Type(s): 7 y bC' 19 .f(
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ I�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Q1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yesa ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yesc ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes IZCNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 3G Date of Inspection: 432
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ( ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ©iio ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 9-N ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Q-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ji 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ©'go ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes I -1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
141 e)"l. bC- /1 '18
6, 6 - rz),
s (
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �J [ l 0 (9 Phonevo U 3
t ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (J ( Q c.t 4 -f Date: ZR"( �� 7 l(a °
Page 3 of 3 � 2/4/2015