820426_Inspection_20200722

e Dw 1Q ision'of Water Resources i t> S fD,S 24)
FacilityaNumber LjZ b 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: erCom liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 6Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: a:1—�.�1'.c( p Arrival Time:r'�' Departure Time:V County:s�-i't151.�t Region:`
ll
Farm Name: Pa 1" •ham ., a.J'vLS Owner Email:
Owner Name: 3 n L. (3 &- JiCt 04 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: B evi iDco, i „^1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: e evt. Peu, LviA Integrator: p resive
Certified Operator: q ,Gvt -P ctiv''h(-vii Certification Number: ( 787 9
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
n� 8 Ism... L)eekc tA �1 i\ A QA
1 L0 J f AIt) . (91-- '�?-c�') c-r . f! +,
n ,Design Current Design Current . = Design ,Current
Swine, Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry °: 'Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 4 9,7 S JCJ9 i Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean ; Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult : ' Ca 1 aci Po 1. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •La ers -- Beef Stocker
Gilts El Non-Layers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Other - •Turke Poults
Other •Other ,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes , NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? 0 Yes ❑ No alsIA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No = , ' ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q'g-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [ElNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: p Li 24 Date of Inspection: air ZO 7C'1
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes El--14-6- ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N-A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z p
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ©�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [-1‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ©moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of
Wind Drift E Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CO 13 1-14/
�I
13. Soil Type(s): A/c v, .,11<'
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes a.-Ne ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Arlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [t] b ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 111'1(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 8'Z. - 1 Z,L Date of Inspection: 'Zz 0-* 2,4d
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes El-NO- ❑ NA 0 NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
El Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑- ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? El Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document El Yes 1:1-N5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 0-N-6- ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Q N ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0I° ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? El Yes ©'No El NA El NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Jo El NA El NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary). c,
eji1i ��v`1 0 5-c (-4'9-6)( ,3 6 /D[JLI 01_6(
etl Rio-3 o i? -G S
Reviewer/Inspector Name: E t u CU v►t6 e Phone: 1)- 3 3-33 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: '\ bc( Date: j z, zezo
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015