820423_Inspection_20200722

E� t ivsion of Water Resources Q� 3' jZ s
Facility Number a �j,4 L 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation ,� 1 >
°O'Other Agency "
Type of Visit: Getom ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
li
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
•Date of Visit: j Arrival Time: /0,30 1.— Departure Time:) /I,30 �) County: S4 Ps6 to Region: =f—
Farm Name:
} CCk.0 seek g 4-to Owner Email:
Owner Name: -u`U,y 1 e, {'16-6 e-yl Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: G,� /
Facility Contact: Z.kCft tot t%tl4 1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ( Integrator: 1"✓ Gym
Certified Operator: l 1� Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: I Cl bt(t7
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Crrent
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity ., Pop :=a Cattle`` �= 1:Capacity ,Pop
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 1,14® 14 1 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design 'Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder r D Poult Ca'aci • Po k - Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-Layers _ Beef Feeder
Boars y_ Pullets - Beef= Beef Brood Cow
Other. , •Turke Poults -- -
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes latcrii ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑.Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ©NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q'NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ El NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes -No Cl NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e� -9 Z3 Date of Inspection: 7 J7-d7 ar)k
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ad'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2 L /J
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ®,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®moo NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes aIlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [E]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C g(S'o G Ira
13. Soil Type(s): ge-t U
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes lEl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents 19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes L�-, < ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes a�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q.o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: z - Date of Inspection: 02,2,Ytfy P 2
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 11 I o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 0'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 4To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Ly'1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 12'lTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
6.17
t) r&e-C-6 145 COtt I 61r\c&-.1.('I'l I'5'r gi/L-(e76 S-c-i-vV`-ei Ccf (9 — ID—Sic
a10--306 --C4 �f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Q t U vdap Phone: 10— 1(3J 333y
c
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � e� ' ' I/ 1 Date: 7
Page 3 of 3 / 2/4/201