820403-Inspection_20200828

Division of Water Resources
n,-
Facility Number ,., - L{U3 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: P`? Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up� " 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: --h'6o Arrival Time: gip I- Departure Time: , `� County:o'lipsor0 Region:
Farm Name: r K r c,- v14 Owner Email:
Owner Name: . ot,o,4 l3 ' {eIC ra,,f L LC- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: r.
Facility Contact: ej-v''1`5 { 4i/4t t r Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t t Integrator: M
Certified Operator: Dct,1 L 1 N'O1,�4;,4 Certification Number: a ` ID
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer _Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish � � �S J Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current _Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish _ Layers _ _Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers _ _ _ _Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults •
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes m ►; ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure n Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No 1A ri NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No TA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No TA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes la< ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2 - 'f t2-? Date of Inspection: e Ly
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes IR< ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No DICTA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): _
Observed Freeboard(in): L
5.Are there any immediate threats-to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes LJ 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 17'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes la co ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ONO ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ect- , lJ
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes El<1:o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 13<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
r- ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 121. .o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6')
2. 1103 Date of Inspection:',944)(;-2v7 ,
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ©-IQco ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues �,
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes L J4I ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 0, ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
c
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ®moo NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes D4.10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑- (oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawing O�IL -s_of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ct�t'"1 �VEl _I Z�ZV1 6 9e--6.1"k417 ( ( -aje) F p s 6 - r 0 6,.�`J
Com tt p s r
,f )44 (tk
r c
,<< '� (Oil` in 511) \ r
Reviewer/Inspector Name: IA T V vaa p Phone:'1)0 ' �2 3 l
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (J1,1 Date: , U) ` 07-0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015