820398_Inspection_20200805

'Division of Water Resources e,sot5 (
Facility Number J Z - 33,
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: erCom ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
lokki
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Z.f 5 f) Departure Time:I' r County: S )'11 P O IVRegion:
f .
Farm Name: C- / • :toy Fei,141. Owner Email:
Owner Name: .�A A/g Gcy- , y Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: (i&ni'�fc 6,..t tlJta- Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ( Integrator: Pr STD-7 ce'
Certified Operator: Certification Number: J
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 13s'S Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current ,Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers •Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets _ _ _ Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure El Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 'A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No/ [ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [.�'N ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: E3 Z- 2 7 (6 Date of Inspection:,C, L o Zca
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Q-do❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 0).: ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes '" ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ` v ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers, setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C 3 cS 6- C2 P
13. Soil Type(s): '�j Lwn;(-e C/i
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes L j-NiE ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes m'lGo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes gv ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes DI--IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes al‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lad ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑--K ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes aNc 0 NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 O ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 8,2 - <35,8 Date of Inspection: S 4(66 2049
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q N'oo NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 121-1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes QK o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes vI le- ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes To ❑ NA El NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes p N9- ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
�v
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑) ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
cdz .ro —)\_3- sip ©- 2,or =((,3
2-1°1U
fb r—cjits '7 g-
r1/4, k 0,4 6 4-cto_
cot c- f v -3 0 16e
Reviewer/Inspector Name: L I. (toG.v. Phone: -I ! ,"tf3 :3 v3 3 31
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l� U14afY Date:Page 3 of 3 2/4/2al?„,0
5