820363_Inspection_20200731

(gebivision of Water Resources '6 mks 3 AA)G to 2 .
Facility Number j .2__ - ,3( 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservationt \ �
0 Other Agency t��
Type of Visit: mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ['S 3 1,-7o * Arrival Time: 7,'30" A--- Departure Time: 7f 4) ' County: cf M(I 1 I& Region: Fay
Farm Name: L eA /c,�u f -SG. ' 1 i Owner Email: (((
Owner Name: Co hL t -Pc f-Air►k Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Ct,c.d._-`f`S -gginWtittr Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Q. Integrator: Ct'tiSl .r
ppn �`
Certified Operator: •-V G Pot, c 7 �f,5� Certification Number: /Ob C 9 7v
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish - Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean (g7 2, Z 0_5 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
-
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q'lCo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [' CIA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes E'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6 Z- Date of Inspection:a( 7 Wk22
Waste Collection &Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No j1A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 30
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 1321-6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Eg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El 1V U ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C LJ s& 0
13. Soil Type(s): 1. cL
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA 0 NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes D--/cic> ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable n Yes lj,Pd'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes FqTlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0} ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design n Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 11,1NIG ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers 0 Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: 3(7:—.) -Zrge
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes n-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [L] ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes n I�Te- ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? �/�
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 0a2Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 02'6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings offacility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
e i 71,3 .01018 6L&f,e5 5c or-u,e7 I._8--)ct D;Lf, C( 3 2 z
go titiiLL., Ktz. d--e- 02-0 pocr t G, c,U1,
p �
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ,,tvLI ap Phone: Mb 113 3`
333(/'
,a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: iA f�J‘c,J,T Date: 73(.174 (. 20
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015