20171112 Ver 2_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2020 (Draft)_20201221

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20170112 Version*2
..........................................
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 12/22/2020
Mitigation Project Submittal - 12/21/2020
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes fJ No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands 17 Buffer IZ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Raymond Holz [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20170112 Version:*2
Existing ID1 Existing Version
Project Type: C DMS 0' Mitigation Bank
Project Name: GUC
County: Pitt
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload: 2017-0112v2_GUC_Draft_2020MY1_.pdf 49.82MB
Rease upload only one R7F of the conplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*

Annual Monitoring Report MY1 (2020)
GUC NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
DWR Project#: 2017-0112v2
Tar-Pamlico River Basin
In Agreement with:
The GUC Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits Pursuant to the
Tar-Pamlico Nutrient Management Strategy
.,., i ••.-1, r „, , _• t„- • r.,•ly., m"...,,,. ,r.., ' .--:,--4-,, ,, •::—, , -'14.:.
` t!f z -, 4acc4y { r� 1 ,, '
,�.� snn z�. .�, ,r 1._ •,'� • y F'' Tea ^, r-
Itilkst
t*i
NiNtu
i':"4t1i/ 'riT.,,' ,1 ' lti J.,,•1 '74,-—,.. .,.i.cri, -. -;:i.',' ',..;\,-.*,r,:,,,&'`..k,:z.,:t.;A... ,,,,,,, kt.
,,,;,,4r # , ... , ilk" 4,„,....,, ,:. ,,.,,,,„1,, - ,\\:\t. , ..y17;,-v,',.s.'0.t.i. t k. •''' 1.4‘....tiqr
• •. ' L' .'" i • r '
December 2020
Prepared By:
[ID Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
RESTORATION Phone: [phone]
SYSTEMS I il.0 Fax: [phone]

GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project#: 2017-0112v2
Annual Monitoring Report MY1 (2020)
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 2
2.0 Parcel Location 2
2.1 Parcel Background 3
2.2 Parcel Objectives 3
3.0 Restoration Activities 4
3.1 Construction Activities 5
3.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities 5
4.0 Mitigation Potential 7
5.0 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria 8
5.1 Monitoring Protocol 8
5.2 Parcel Maintenance 8
5.3 Long Term Management Plan 8
6.0 Adaptive Management 8
7.0 References 10
Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 - Parcel Location/Service Area
Figures 2, 2A-B—Current Conditions Plan View
Figures 3, 3A-B—Credit Determination
Table 1 - Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4- Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix B: Vegetation Data, CVS Output Tables
Table 5—Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Vegetation Plot Photos
CVS Data Collection Sheets (Digital Copy Only)
Appendix C: NC DWR Stream Determination & DWR Piedmont Natural Gas Correspondence
Appendix D: 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule—Effective Date October 24,
2014)
Appendix E: 2021 Adaptive Management Figure
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel pg.i
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

1.0 Introduction
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC
DWR)this As-Built&Baseline Monitoring Report for the GUC Bank Parcel(Parcel).As agreed upon in the
GUC Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) and GUC Bank Parcel
Development Packaged(BPDP), made and entered into on February 17, 2020, by Restoration Systems, LLC
(RS), acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). This document details the riparian area restoration
activities, monitoring efforts, and the Parcel's mitigation potential.
Measuring 97.14 acres, the Parcel is designed to provide mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due
to development within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. Tar-Pamlico River Riparian Buffer mitigation credits
provided by this Parcel are available in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin, according to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule — CMB rule) (effective date— October 24, 2014) (Appendix F).
Mitigation credits for Nutrient Offset are made available within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin USGS 8-digit
HUC 03020103. Supporting figures, tables, and photos are located in Appendix A.
NCDWR representatives Katie Merritt and Chris Pullinger conducted an onsite determination for parcel
applicability and suitability on November 11, 2017. Follow-up information was provided to Katie Merritt
on January 22, 2019, and a Site Viability for Buffer & Nutrient Offset was provided by the Division on
March 25, 2019, and revised on May 29, 2019 (Appendix C).
The Parcel was permitted in two phases (Phase 1 68.02 acres, Phase 2 29.07 acres). A phased approach
was taken to allow for the completion of the Piedmont Natural Gas pipeline 24 "Line 24" — DWR 2018-
1640. Completion of the pipeline within the City of Greenville's property, including 401 permit release,
occurred in March of 2020, allowing RS to perform restoration activities on both phases simultaneously.
Both phases will be reported on and monitored congruently and as one, with one monitoring report
submitted at the end of each year and one financial assurance policy.
Restoration construction activities involved removing existing farm infrastructure, including piped
crossings, dirt roads, a utility line, and a small agricultural building. RS began preparation for the
restoration of the riparian buffer and planted the Parcel in March of 2020. Riparian buffer restoration
activities included ripping/bedding the Parcel with a narrow set plow, bare-root planting, and broadcast
application of a permanent seed mix. During March 18th—26, 2020,Axiom Environmental installed eighty-
seven (87) Carolina Vegetation Survey(CVS) monitoring plots and collected as-built data. Katie Merritt of
DWR performed a restoration verification site visit on June 17, 2020.
2.0 Parcel Location
The Parcel is located approximately 4.5 miles east of Greenville in Pitt County, NC, and within Greenville's
municipal boundaries (Figure 1, Appendix A). The Parcel is within the Tar-Pamlico River Basin 14-digit
USGS Cataloging Unit 03020103070030 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of
Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub-basin Number 03-03-05) (Figure 1, Appendix A).
Parcel Location: (35.603194, -77.294509)
Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
- Take 1-440 East from Capital Boulevard,
- Follow US-264 East to US-264 West (Greenville),
- Take Old Pactolus Rd for 3.2 miles,
- The Parcel is located on the right.
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 2
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

2.1 Parcel Background
The Parcel encompasses 97.14 acres of historical agricultural fields. Before Parcel development,
agricultural fields were used as biosolids irrigation fields for the City of Greenville Waster Water Facility,
and row crop production of hay or sorghum. The Parcel includes three unnamed tributaries and two
surface water conveyances/ditches with direct hydrologic connection to the Tar River, in addition to a
third unnamed tributary that connects to an onsite tributary before discharging into the Tar River(Figures
3A-B,Appendix A). Before construction, Parcel surface water conveyances and unnamed tributaries were
cleared of vegetation by historical agricultural practices and maintained as cleared ditches. Small pockets
of disturbed forests were located on the Parcel at the top of Feature 2, along the margins of Feature 5,
and in the southeast corner of Feature 8 (Figures 3A-B, Appendix A). Dirt roads, a powerline, and a small
dilapidated agricultural building located on the property before construction were entirely removed from
the Parcel's footprint.
The Parcel is comprised of three separate tracts situated just north of the Tar River.Currently, Parcel tracts
are subject to two existing 50-foot Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. (PNG) Easements. PNG Line 42,
DWR Permit No. 2012-1024 v7, runs roughly east to west across the GUC owned tracts,and PNG easement
and gas line(Line 24—DWR 2018-1640-401 approval on 04-26-2019 with DWR approval and 401 release
on March 11, 2020) connects to Line 42 and runs south under the Tar River. Both PNG easements are
outside of the Parcel's footprint.
2.2 Parcel Obiectives
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel focused on
improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat.The Project goals for
each Phase are identical,while the Restoration Plan for each differed only with regards to the removal of
existing infrastructure. These goals were achieved by creating a forested riparian buffer adjacent to
stream channels and a forested riparian area along agricultural ditches and were accomplished by the
following.
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including a)
ceasing the broadcast application of class B biosolids, fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural
materials into and adjacent to Parcel surface water conveyances (ditches) and streams b)
providing a restored buffer to filter runoff from adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank
erosion, vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing
Parcel floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for agricultural
production.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel's riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity.
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 3
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

3.0 Restoration Activities
A restoration plan, including the following components, was completed in March of 2020.
Primary components of the Restoration Plan included the following.
1. Removal of an existing, abandoned farm building adjacent to feature 6B& removal of a powerline
adjacent to features 6A and 6B
2. Removal of existing compacted earth roads adjacent to features 6A, 6B, and
3. Removal of four culverts
4. Parcel-wide soil preparation & herbaceous vegetation treatment
5. Riparian area restoration (replanting) extending from the top of bank (TOB) out 200' where
applicable and
6. Parcel protection in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
Tables A & B detail the restoration and protection activities. An outline of restoration activities and
their completion dates is provided in Table 2 (Appendix A).
Table A—Summary Restoration Activities
Restoration Phase 1 Phase 2
Plan Activity (Figure 3A-C,Appendix A) (Figure 4A-B,Appendix A)
1.) Removal of existing dirt roads adjacent to
Parcel Features 6A,6B
Removal of 1.) Removal of existing dirt roads adjacent to 2.) Removal of two existing culverts at the
Parcel Features 2&8 confluence of Features 5 and 6A
Existing 2.) Removal of two existing culverts at the 3.) Removal of an existing,abandoned farm
Infrastructure confluence of Features 7B and 8 building adjacent to feature 6B
4.) Removal of a powerline adjacent to
features 6A and 6B
1.) Parcel-wide soil preparation herbaceous 1.) Parcel-wide soil preparation herbaceous
vegetation treatment ahead of planting vegetation treatment ahead of planting
2.) Establishment of a native herbaceous 2.) Establishment of a native herbaceous
Riparian community via site-specific seed mix* community via site-specific seed mix*
Restoration 3.) Establishment of a native hardwood 3.) Establishment of a native hardwood forest
forest via the planting of bare-root via the planting of bare-root saplings from
saplings from the top of bank out a the top of bank out a maximum of 200'
maximum of 200'along Parcel Features along Parcel Features
* Permanent Seed Mix:Table D
Table B—Summary Protection Activities
1.) RS was granted a Conservation Easement by the City of Greenville, North Carolina,
on March 19, 2020.The conservation easement was recorded at the Pitt County
Parcel Register of Deeds; Book No. 3912, Page 577-600.
protection
(97.14 acres) 2.) RS marked the easement at every corner with an iron, CE cap, and corner t-post.
Additionally, easement posts were placed every 200-feet along the Parcel
boundaries
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 4
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

3.1 Construction Activities
Three primary construction activities occurred onsite, including 1) removal of an abandoned farm building
adjacent to feature 6B & removal of a powerline adjacent to features 6A and 6B; 2) removal of existing
compacted earth roads adjacent to features 6A, 6B, and 8; and 3) removal of four culverts.
Upon the removal of the powerline, abandoned agricultural building, and compacted earth roads.
Treatment of coastal Bermuda grass was completed in 2019. RS did not feel it was necessary to apply an
additional treatment nor a pre-emergent treatment for other herbaceous species. The Parcel was
prepared for bare-root planting by ripping parallel planting beds off each of the Parcel's features. The
ripping and bedding provided additional water storage for bare-root plantings and introduced
microtopography promoting diffuse flow and surface water storage throughout the floodplain. Soil
amendments were made by the prior farmer before the planting of 2019 row crops. RS did not apply
additional soil amendments.
Four culverts were removed, two between features 5 and 6A, and two between features 7B and 8. After
the culverts were removed, the side slopes were graded to match existing slopes at approximately a five
to one (5:1) slope. Matting, native seed mix, and live stakes were used to stabilize the stream banks and
to avoid erosion, providing long-term stability. Where necessary, black willow live stakes were used to
stabilize the banks throughout the Parcel for the long-term.
3.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
Restoration of the riparian area allows for recolonization and expansion of characteristic species across
the landscape. The riparian areas were restored in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0295. The planting
plan for the entire riparian restoration area (Phase 1 and 2), included planting native bare root hardwood
and shrub saplings across 86.36 acres at a Parcel density of 740 stems per acre and live stakes for stream
bank stabilization where necessary and the broadcast application of 195 LB of permeant seed mix (-2 LB
per acre). Community associations utilized include 1) Brownwater Bottomland Hardwoods(High Subtype)
and 2) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Coastal Plain Subtype) (Schafale 2012). The planted species
composition is intentionally diverse and, while based on these communities, also accounted for local
observations and nursery availability.
All species were selected based on their ability for sediment stabilization, rapid growth rate,the ability to
withstand hydraulic forces associated with flood events, suitability to specific soil types, and Parcel
conditions. Trees were mixed thoroughly before planting to provide diverse and random planting across
the Parcel. Planting occurred at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the
Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 of 260 trees per acre at the end of five years. No one tree species accounted
for greater than 50%of the established stems.
The bare root planting list is provided in Table C followed by the permanent seed mix in Table D. As-built
baseline vegetation data is provided in Appendix B. Vegetation data for MY1 was collected in November
2020 by Axiom Environmental and derived an average planted stem density of 327 stems per acre. In
addition to native hardwood trees, the Sponsor planted several different species of native shrubs, aiding
in developing a robust, ecologically sound riparian buffer. Shrub species are counted towards success
criteria per the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (November 1, 2015).
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 5
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

Table C—Planting List
%of Total
Common Name Scientific Name Tree/ Total Planted
Shrub*
Trees
River birch Betula nigra Tree 5200 8.14%
Hickory(mockernut) Carya tomentosa Tree 1000 1.56%
Chinkapin Castanea pumila Shrub Tree 200 0.31%
Sugarberry Celtis laevigata Tree 1900 2.97%
Hackberry Celtis occidentalis Tree 1400 2.19%
Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis Shrub 800 1.25%
Redbud Cercis canadensis Tree 1100 1.72%
Silky dogwood Corn us amomum Shrub 700 1.10%
Hawthorn Crataegus marshallii Shrub Tree 900 1.41%
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana Tree 1200 1.88%
Yellow poplar Liriodendron tulipifera Tree 5200 8.14%
Crabapple Malus angustifolia Tree 600 0.94%
Mulberry Morus rubra Tree 1600 2.50%
Carolina buckthorn Frangula caroliniana Shrub Tree 2000 3.13%
Black gum Nyssa sylvatica Tree 5100 7.98%
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Tree 5200 8.14%
Chickasaw plum Prunus angustifolia Tree 500 0.78%
Wild Cherry Prunusserotina Tree 1100 1.72%
Oak(White) Quercus alba Tree 2200 3.44%
Oak(Swamp White) Quercus bicolor Tree 2100 3.29%
Oak(Laurel) Quercus laurifolia Tree 1200 1.88%
Oak(Overcup) Quercus lyrata Tree 3000 4.69%
Oak(Swamp Chestnut) Quercus michauxii Tree 3300 5.16%
Oak(Water) Quercus nigra Tree 3,000 4.69%
Oak(Cherrybark) Quercus pagoda Tree 3000 4.69%
Oak(Willow) Quercus phellos Tree 2300 3.60%
Oak(Northern Red) Quercus rubra Tree 3000 4.69%
Oak(Shumard) Quercusshumardii Tree 2100 3.29%
American Elm U/mus americana Tree 3000 4.69%
Arrowwood Vibrunum dentatum Shrub 1000 1.56%
Total 63,900 100%
*CVS species type designation
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 6
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

Table D-Permanent Seed
Amount
Common Name Amount
'n Common Name
pounds) pounds)(in
Common Yarrow 1.95 Showy Ticktrefoil 1.95
Redtop 29.25 Purple Coneflower 11.70
Winter Bentgrass, 9.75 Virginia Wildrye,'Madison' 9.75
Creeping Bentgrass 9.75 Perennial Gaillardia(Blanketflower) 3.90
Clusterspike False Indigo 1.95 Narrowleaf Sunflower 2.93
Showy Aster 1.95 Oxeye Sunflower 1.95
Blue False Indigo 3.90 Wild Bergamot 0.98
Oxeye Daisy 9.75 Deertongue,Tioga 9.75
Shasta Daisy 5.85 Tall White Beardtongue 1.95
Lanceleaf Coreopsis 9.75 Clasping Coneflower 1.95
Plains Coreopsis 9.75 Blackeyed Susan 5.85
Cosmos 3.90 Purpletop 39.00
Rocket Larkspur 3.90 Blue Vervain 1.95
Total(pounds) 195.00
4.0 Mitigation Potential
DWR has determined the nitrogen and phosphorous abatement of restored riparian areas to be 2273.02
lbs per acre for nitrogen and 146.4 lbs per acre for phosphorous as agreed to in the GUC MBI. Riparian
buffer credits were measured by the hundredth of an acre and converted into square feet. Mitigation
potential for each Project Phase is detailed below.
The Parcel generated 86.20 acres of restored riparian area within a 97.14-acre Parcel. The Parcel will
preserve 10.94 acres of riparian areas, streams, and ditches.
Table 1 (Appendix A) outlines the components and mitigation credits to be generated within the Parcel.
Tar-Pamlico riparian buffer mitigation credit generated along Features 2, 6B, 7A, 7B, & 8 (all unnamed
tributaries) can be used for either riparian buffer credits or nutrient offset credits, but not both. For
purposes of this document, RS has chosen to designate the riparian areas from top-of-bank to 100 feet as
Riparian Buffer Credit and areas from 101-200 feet as Nutrient Offset Credit. Riparian Buffer Credits can
be converted and transferred to Nutrient Offset Credits; however, Nutrient Offset Credits conversions
from areas 101-200 feet to Riparian Buffer Credits will not occur.
Nutrient offset credits (nitrogen and phosphorous) generated along the two surface water conveyances
(ditches), Features 5 and 6A, cannot be converted into riparian buffer mitigation credits. RS must request
and receive approval to transfer any mitigation credits from DWR before adding or removing credits from
the ledgers.The Sponsor will maintain three credit ledgers per Phase. One ledger will account for riparian
buffer credits, one will account for nitrogen nutrient offset credits, and one will account for phosphorous
nutrient offset credits.All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on the credit ledgers (Table 1, Appendix
A).
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 7
MY1 Monitoring Report-December 2020

5.0 Monitoring Protocol &Success Criteria
5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation at each Phase will monitor plant survival and species
diversity. Quantitative sampling will include eighty-seven (87 [Phase 1 = 61 Plots & Phase 2 = 26)
permanent 10 x 10-meter vegetation plots as outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and will occur no earlier than Fall of each year (Figures 2A-B,
Appendix A). A reference photo will be taken from the origin point of each plot. All planted stems in the
plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded. Data collected will include species, height, and
planting type(planted stem and/or volunteer). Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for
five years or until success criteria are fulfilled. RS shall submit to NCDWR annual monitoring reports for
both Project Phases (1 and 2) no later than December 31 of each year. Each report will document the
success of the vegetation and any maintenance, supplemental planting, or encroachment within the
easement areas. Success criteria within the buffer and nutrient offset restoration areas will be based on
the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of monitoring.
Year 1(2020) Monitoring occurred between November 2 and November 10, 2020, resulting in an average
of 328 stems/acres across the Site. Additionally, 46 out of the 87 individual plots met success criteria
(Appendix B).
5.2 Parcel Maintenance
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of NCDWR in the event the
Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve success criteria as outlined above. Other
vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. If exotic
invasive plant species require treatment, such species will be controlled by mechanical (physical removal
with the use of a chainsaw) and/or chemical methods (aquatic approved herbicide) following North
Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval by the DWR prior to any mowing activities within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the Neuse buffers along
UT2 to ensure that no buffer violations have been performed. Failure to receive approval to mow within
the Tar-Pamlico buffer as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0258 by the DWR could result in Tar-Pamlico buffer
violations and violations of the conservation easement. If necessary, the Sponsor will develop a species-
specific control plan.
5.3 Long Term Management Plan
The conservation easement preserves all areas and prohibits all uses of the property inconsistent with its
use as mitigation property, including any activity that would materially alter the Parcel's biological
integrity. RS will transfer or assign the conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified
holder under NC General Statute ("GS") 121-34 et seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code before
the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring Report. The holder shall be a land trust or stewardship program
accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission and/or has been approved by DWR. A land trust
must be certified under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
6.0 Adaptive Management
During the June 2020 as-built walkthrough, DWR and RS determined a small area adjacent to vegetation
plot 9 was not planted during the initial site planting effort in March of 2020. During the as-built
walkthrough and subsequent field visits, RS took GPS points where planting did not occur.The area totaled
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 8
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

0.54 acres. RS has ordered bare-roots trees to be planted in this area in January of 2021. RS will photo
document the effort and provide DWR with a memo detailing the completion of the work.
Yr. 1 (2020) monitoring efforts determined the Parcel is meeting success sitewide. However, RS observed
extensive dieback of planted hardwood species across the entire Parcel during the Yr. 1, 2020 Monitoring
Season. The Yr. 1 Monitoring survey shows an average of three hundred and twenty-seven (327) stems
per acre, which exceeds requirements by less than ten percent (10%). However, roughly half of the
vegetation monitoring plots failed to meet success requirements. The low efficacy is widespread across
and not contained to just one area of the project. RS believes poor tree stock, moderate planting
conditions, and drought are the lead cause for the low efficacy with planted stems.
To ensure a successful riparian forest establishes, RS is proposing to replant twenty-four thousand six
hundred and fifty (24,650) hardwood bare roots across the entire ninety-seven (97) acre easement.
Spacing and densities of the planted stems will be based on zones depending on survivability within
specific areas. A map identifying each zone is provided in Appendix E.
To offset drought, RS will be to add Terra-Sorb to the root balls of each sapling planted. Terra-Sorb is a
non-toxic super-absorbent hydrogel material that absorbs up to 150 times its weight in water and releases
it into the roots when the soils are dry.The species below were picked from the original planting list with
minor modifications based on species success during Yr. 1. Table E outlines the species and number of
stems RS plans to plant in January 2021.
Table E:Yr. 2 (2020)Adaptive Management Species and Number of Stems
Species Number of Stems
Betula nigra 2,800
Celtis occidentalis 1,500
Cercis canadensis 900
Diospyros virginiana 900
Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1,400
Liriodendron tulipifera 1,300
Morus rubra 700
Nyssa sylvatica 1,500
Platanus Occidentalis 2,800
Quercus alba 1,400
Quercus lyrate 350
Quercus nigra 3,350
Quercus phellos 3,250
Quercus rubra 1,000
Quercus shumardii 1,000
Ulmus americana 500
Total 24,650
Densities were determined by Yr. 1 monitoring data and infield observations. The adaptive management
planting goal is to make certain surviving planted vegetation (bare root and supplemental)will exceed Yr.
2 vegetation success standards and ensure the planted riparian corridor will track properly toward
becoming a diverse hardwood forest. RS will photo document the effort and provide DWR with a memo
detailing the completion of the work.
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 9
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

7.0 References
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule- 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Published November 17, 2014)
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, SD. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation.
Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy 15A NCAC 2B .0233,
15A NCAC 02B .0240, and 15A NCAC 02B .0295
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina:Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NC
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
USDA, Soil Conservation Service, 1974. Soil Survey of Pitt County, NC.
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 10
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 - Parcel Location/Service Area
Figures 2, 2A-B -Current Conditions Plan View
Figures 3, 3A-B -Credit Determination
Table 1 - Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4- Project Baseline Information and Attributes
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix A:General Figures and Tables
As-Built&Baseline Monitoring Report—March 2020

ilt/' 1Is141)
„Ire° 6°,0 \
GATES N
PERSON hi WARREN NORTHAMPTON
VANCE iioHERTFORD 1, CURRITUCK
CAMDEN
GRANVILLE PASQUOTANK
/ I•• : I,
HAL I FAX -
I 1 I 0 PERQUIMANS
I CHOWAN
L•--vrshurg
ORANGE FRANKLIN
DURHAM .,1 BERTIE
x tort qr. ,�
fi ,Y. _n7'��•W.. . r,n.,-r•�.k .. Clxekj -
ffff ;tM IVAS�HIk. 4 'p • %y��/r 1V• kllrvolat‘,,,
r` ED`GECOMBE��' r. \ .. aff/ T - -.'�_ ;, .•r PyTYRRELL: A gamrRn�r
•Urn�ead ` WII}I a� •- i♦ - '
.F�.1. ,tale Par r i.+ d:, .\�' --- WASHINGTON �. .• _ ",... i
ill
Bn,Eyhtdale = A�43 •'� ;,. MARTI1:3N ^t�-;
.��rrie•. .WAKE �� - ' .. � - �'•-,� `• -0 ;'_�...�� i_.a: .0
i,Po[osnt La kesi• ,c7.44, y r.
CHATHAM- Cary „�r1411100.- , Tar-Pamlico River Basin ph , • ;, ,! National,- 5 � +
Cary USGS HUC 03020103 'r JJrr `° _ I ,'''S1drr� er,.< '� , DARE��
i. i f°...,� (E.)rlr ..I,; .-* ad a`NV,
.... .-?�rinrr
4r.,Lk:
�- ..'WILSON wr+nty .. l� i, _ -
icii;16,44.
•
I Yur rr. illi reek 71,..rr_t/L-i ~ _ryrr e f, - Stunt , rN ��"`` -
��- wll.°n': { wall burg tu' PITT H r&a S,. r
1(
•
el air.,
sh,nplr,n ��
LEE JOHNSTON
[-uuntr k 6rrkr `
Le ty i Matramu keel AWtr°muskrrt i
• 11'
in: y „„ Pb... 1 National�'' GREENE BE__AUFORT�, �.' „Itil,p= •,.,,>_ ,
+ , Inhnstnr+ .:an`v e, �'' Ilydv
t Stare Pa ranu5ly _ _ \� lflor.°ee HrIlk �'A�jx•• '� I�aronll 1. `"'r"'v
• �'°" HYDE
HARNETTAh. dl,} Rettig,
sri+:•y
1 Bank Parcel LocationIrk r,,;=. "`''°' °r F°;
, Count, Fnr + %y
Ulrhvr Lrttlr +,•es ,� Pitt County, NC ^^ -. ,y1 +,�'ye ri -
- nld>:hnt'rWAYNE\r ° ,+ 1`� iM1 aril• yrdp;r,;+
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, Latitude: 35.603194 f °M - ---t..?_:%
DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap, � ,� Longitude: -77.294509° -
increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, lilt
NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, ' \ "' js; LENOIR �' _� . r`
Park . +.n miry• • +110
Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri Mk rer re �ffsr� - - k,r
China Hon Kong), d <� r "r�"'n°r(Hong g), swisstopo, and the GIS '"'
User Community '�,. m "" PAMLICO
P r CRAVEN s�
Legend1111fr•-% Or
riu°ar
il. lir
e
Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
Tar-Pam River Basin USGS HUC 6-Digit: 030201 JONES �1�1rfrf - 'ra hoe Get on 1-440 E from Capital Blvd
g 6. �1� F nil Will.' M'pv 0 trp
- Follow US-264 E to US-264 W(Greenville)
NC County Boundaries • - Take Old Pactolus Rd 3.2 miles— Parcel is located on your right
f • . - Ha�lrrc[._-•T._
O NC River Subbasins: USGS 8-Digit HUCs � CARTERET /
Ri.hh,nrl•. RESTORATION SYSTEMS,LLC SCALE 1 in=12 miles
Bank Parcel Service Area: Tar Pam River Basin USGS HUC 8-Digit: 03020103 1101 IGH,HAYNESNC ST,SUITE211 DATE: 06-2019 Figure 1:
7 RALEIGH,NC 27694
PHONE: [phone] SITE: GUC-00 Parcel Location & Service Area
r / L l , _ ONSLOW FAX: [phone]
�� - ms Rap era eu aem eo�mmea wmm are s�ppuea es s wpm�o weRe�ry.Resmaeo�syneRa,LLc ev,re�sy
60 a�sae�ms Rspo�smo�rym•aemepes o•oeamry ram aw de�Ramer may ease oar orrne'se o•m�ase orm�s mep.¢�s Aerial Imagery.(c) ESRI
0 15 30 ; •,,nsr• 1 I'.STORAT ION mesolere�po�sm�ory or me�se•m aereRRme�rme aerao�m�s map�s eompeme wpm meusers�eeas.m�s map
SYSTEMS 1 T.0 erea e���rvev ae�,�o•�nowa r ae��ea e���en.it�me��er�Rspo�saory m oar p•ope•��rvev Coordinate System:
RO Miles 'J'{: C.n°n• acre�rreparea aye nee�sea s.,Neyo•where repmrea ay law NAD_1983_SP_NC_FIPS_3200_Ft.
rt
PENDER �. `-� �r ealrt ' rn.' 51/larksa e 4 B.;,

.-.r
letl
R M` 4• is r 1;064•aY±sp ?'t. f, .4.ft • .. ,,,-,...,..-.r.,.. "- ,
1 N
til. Ats. 0, ,,,,,, 3 , , PL
A
sii, r.
.� . � hx am Env ronmenias,Inc.
K i;4. ` ° 'I r 401041( . Ir.
.111V,7 . .
,,ri, •.4. •�,�r�, .. ti:y �} Prepared for:
•
y� g"� 'ti.4 - k W.
i72115
,. e .. .1;� - _ ....411W,
4'. - _ ' ; •- _ • _ Figure 2B
rw,. • n t
Figure 2A — a�"s (_.r.=,r. Vic• ,+1 'a^ ,• :, *Ili O O RESTORATION
- SYSTEMS I LLC
O •
O ,5 •• , • . " �•" 0 Project
• . � ''":.;;ti s ea��e• • _... eft
, 1,. _` ,/�F , Ore
0GUC SITE
_ ❑ 0 a
CA
0
Ore, 0 '"y� +�.r O
■ o o � o Pitt County, NC
• ".., ti a - O �4r Title:
0
❑ ° :t.:.
CURRENT
c� i CONDITIONS
• : CO ° ❑ PLAN VIEW
CO
of
, . i;' . . .
■ ■ ■ _ , ; ,y Drawn by
• .44 .:4 l. - • KRJ
..t r„ ' Date
O
► : - NOV 2020
+_41.0r .
_ _" - Scale
` ,v y , L, _ 1:6800
Project No.:
_ r.. 20-008
•ti
'ems ,- y z Qy a : r
,� 4 Legend
=, >+ , . tlIiI
FIGURE
,, • • GUC Easement = 97.14 acres
:,,;.'..i: - . '.y , . ,,• "te ,,,� .: Hydrologic Features
CVS Plots 2
, ,
AWE allIWIIMINIMINIFOINWM.
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet

•
4141
O.
11
` , •:4. -. , • tc. *. 4 ► • .
N . , +' r1 � • tii ^ �t . t •
i
•
y , J 1. [•
• Ai'
T •- r '/✓w {i -�y -- A . , e+i •• . r ,
-iiii-J----.::.• - •' A
• t .' .�: ' , .... • 28 e--- -; .,,. .3 -.. I Aram Env ronmenia� Inc.
' § 'r^'.� :: '`, *1'. :i f vi[•
;_*`'`�I • �;.• t.. .; -' ,, O •• 27' I r i�•!4,�: e-.' •
•
•
... '. - ''. + • -�\ `: -' ' ' Prepared for:
r'j:1'.1 *46:1.' / . ' e • .261-: '''"- - :"" •
Rs
i ..., .: a . ,
•
�71;' ,;I I •` I.r'l RESTORATION
! I I ::1 f 1 J. i ;33• SYSTEMS LL.0
1• I I. I 1 I.• . I 1
,;I
1 1•,. .:, . . 23i 1;� � 1 I Project:
•
__ ,
�ed��,♦ - :. .:1.. . •- , .... - 221:. : I i J _I t•
Ore,♦ • •; :1 5 _ I I:• •S4 ' 1 - :_ '' .si
'.0. - ,. 1 1 GUC SITE
o1
. I 1 1 , .'• x A
a• a) 13� x '• 7�.
Pitt County, NC
20 I s�. - 4' ..s: 'fix f . Title:
-E-
1 - 1• 1,• •.ti6i 1 ,' CURRENT
0 1 191;: .;1 z I' CONDITIONS
c�I - I 1 1:: 11 137 I .' � '�; PLAN VIEW
y 1 11 E... 'C1 1
co 1 I
..1 1 ! 4 f 8 cn •:1 1 1 - ..• I i.-- ...;?•• i
•
o :3 • _ --' ,
•
.:I I I i CO 1' i I — • • .. • ' — • • 43, — •' 44'••-. ,:j15 , Drawn by:
•I 1 .. - _ ;� 17 :I - _ 40 — ' • _ o — ....: - -- --I • Date:
•'4+ :- 'II . „I • i - . - + 1u_ •'139- - .,Feata're-7,A-_Strew-....
_- :- --3; I• f4 NOV 2020
tr Scale:
S", •
'•, 1,1°) . 1 • .:1 I ►I t '' .,•�;" - _-_ • - _72 I ' 1:3 8 5 0
r -F' �;I 1 s�' rt �}' r -- — — • -69 • — — _ 4••• Project No.:
w>,
' r Legend '` 68 _ . - - - • ;� .110• 20-008
; � r' •61,' ` ' O GUC Easement=97.14 acres � .' — — • �., ►"Y
i. ;`• ''.. E; °`'K w� 5. .r • - - Hydrologic Features r,'
e �`� �aifr• �' - CVS Plots MeetingMY1 (2020)Success Criteria ' ° •++ " r.i ,k "" i
`� :� :�_ « , -� •:r. � • f . .�;' • ` - FIGURE
** .� . �. .
CVS Plots Not Meeting MY1 (2020)Success Criteria „ . - y ,. , .• ,;+
in•' TL Top of Bank to 20-Feet �' +�[.Y;�i,. ; ,
--- .- w -- - -` ♦'I: Top of Bank to 30 Feet . .. -,k �` �,
• _ "t•AT
� t = , - — Top of Bank to 50 Feet - 2A
* ; q '.°..1. . - • —Top of Bank to 100-Feet
�: #.''�: � ¢ t A ` , ,' r ' -t- .' - . . 0 250 500 1 000
v' Top of Bank to 200-Feet
- ► Feet

N
•
'ice .' •4i." s i? f,•fr' - •'`•' .1 ,, -....''..f.l...o. .....,s.��r•
■r „`r •' ' ,� •..•: . -.n. : Aram Environmental,Inc-
'4' 1 4.
± •
'�` J ��� - ,, Prepared for:
Rs
. ... .
• ... --28 .•-• - ...1,..•• • ••• ...-
•
•
/5-ce - . .• .
\ • e0 ir• e RESTORATION
I . ,ea'"v::i -.-- �•��-.• °"S�i t�� SYSTEMS I LLC
- ..�-� . • r .: r '- Project:
T \ 1:146GUC SITE
i — 58 x:
_
I A3 :
_• ` . ... - Pitt County, NC
•
- � ice ` . • - V44 ' Title:
.' 50 ' 5 t; , �.- — :• ._ , ; e.)nn. e g' may .04
- ..: e .. , 6 _ :r ..a:..'b; CURRENT
- - `8k:•:•. ::,ah.�-:- • i, _---' ',••. -'• CONDITIONS
i . �.••�. F fit . �
1 • . . ' .� • �82' 86` . ` - t .- -.- :` : a M1 • PLAN VIEW
- -- 47• • --;•10*-,Z.•• ••-• '•. •:'-'.; - ...-it* ,..21.. .,43p . ,, _
' .'C `O -I /p-- - ' irk•'• y Tf..,�'
i.... -i -- v • S -' ,,, 4 `' Drawn by:
i• 45 i.s',/'::� - 77/ • — irk+ . Date:
•
1 •
�.• ��' .;i i NOV 2020
' �.. .,• :-i f6 v • , ...,,C,+ ' • - ": Legend
— _ , • �. ,, �' Scale:
. 44
Q GUC Easement= 97.14 acres 1:3850
_ . / c' - —
_ _ 43— .44-s. .•�•95, • .1. .�R- `' -- ..i. _ Hydrologic Features
— •4-- — — • • • ' e - ., Project No.:
_ 41— _ _Z ...• '� i 4.' �,- ' k" , CVS Plots Meeting MY1 (2020)Success Criteria 20-008
40— • — - -._ •� '' •, 1 -1 ;�r ..1 T. . • - ... ., , - . CVS Plots Not Meeting MY1 (2020)Success Criteria
- �_• .........._ • Top of Bank to 20 Feet
+ _ - - — _ — • -72. r�' ;k u - .Top of Bank to 30-Feet FIGURE
—70- • -71 _ # - — Top of Bank to 50-Feet
— — • �9 _ • _ . - • — Top of Bank to 100-Feet
_ • - • ' 2B
f Top of Bank to 200 Feet
n;' `• }, •: 'F ;:V �, 4;w .. .r..e 0 250 500 1,000
Feet

Legend , Iii, - i f: :, * ;..:.t` it
1� '
..
/ .• .•V• ,J• ,IY.
GUC Easement=97.14 acres ®No Credit: Less Than 20-Feet or Non-Contiguous AreaAlp • -
Top of Bank(TOB)of Bank Parcel Hydrologic Features —Zone A(20-29'), Buffer Restoration i ;' '''! ijt :::,,
*` �► •.1/
r
a ti -z
- • —Top of Bank to 100-Feet Zone B (51'-100'), Buffer Preservation Ill%ek
��� Aram Environmenial,inc.
- • • Top of Bank to 200-Feet Zone C (101'-200'), Buffer Preservation �'IE.p x
Zone A(20-29'), Nutrient Offset Prepared for:
itio Zone A(0-50'), Nutrient Offset F •
Zone B (51'-100'), Nutrient Offset M11 nt:�v' -`.. .
•
i7115Zone C (101'-200'), Nutrient Offset �
`. :, F - .
, RESTORATION
f •
�� ill.P SYSTEMS I LLC
_ Project:
s .
• Figure 2B `r.=-.=s
`0
- - Figure 2A - '.:.__ r-�''/ Figure 2D, - • ,' / '. . .l< ' r• s•. .•'.,''r��e5 ' ;:, A. GUC SITE
• I� I - - C
r -° ri li
si
` % •x , Pitt County, NC
1; co} til ,- . !,:4:. - ' 14"
�.t Title:
_ al e ar 'I I 10 :1 I ' ` ``t1. '-
•
•
�r , • .Xc,.......,....... . . ....,, . . . , s.s� CREDIT
' ,I .. .. 1 - dog , .
', • "a tyre •j DETERMINATION
E i
. ,.
c\i ,
a) rI I�, i I.es.s ',
3 +II 3 ;II • • / /•�' sue •/ /� _ -
r
- Ica 41 — •/ '•-'/ / • Drawn by:
LL: +II 0, I . r// ! '
li, a — r �/ KRJ
. lair
s Ls-
,I I.
) --?._.j:,_r._ _ . . jpollapp :at:
:
rI \ -ter — • • JUL 2020
.. • cae:
.0., Figure 2C 1:7500
Project No.:
20-008
•
- 7-0.,... '''',••:.,-. e '4.: . -.
R
J�C�Y► i t% y� •
"; ...4):. ''. 01-11; *lir".;—4,W:1.''..1: 1:: :111. '*..-‘44.'' : - . .'- . ' :..-1' '
4` n 0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet

-- 'Cater Zy8 .'�.?, .�
r� .
-' i•.
•
i �. 'J AS,
e� ia ,{ s
J
�"�.•.. .' ,� vim. �}. ai
r f
t '�~ . s'
` J ;: Am i:xionvMonmeMal,Inc.
�' T
y�.L:..•y.i'.�r-. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Prepared for:
* ..r e-
n . •_,- - •-- . ;, + } •' . Zone A(20-29'), Buffer Restoration
C . Rs
"_?' , (75% of RBM Credit)
Ilif
•
�. `k ri: ��..�• . �I"' '; �. �, +.a f i RESTORATIONtitib
���. _'t , s ,.t -4 SYSTEMS I LLC
44
TOB -20-Feet= No Credit t - �Y{
r 1 . . ► -A Project:
A
, •,
•
i > / : :. . GUC SITE
'* '; ♦ ♦. r . _ / '. Pitt County, NC
•
t •
V. .• •
' i'�
`�twr ♦ '':..♦ ♦ Title:
• . ... .
,.. •• •
- ..„:.- ..':r' '' ' - '''' • 'N..:• ' :‘..'•........................................
7• CREDIT
• ♦ ♦ ♦ ;: • , . .' 4 ,: -4- ............................................................. - :''` { - .r— ,• DETERMINATION
•
•
Stream r-
` Q� Legend
• • — ram' Q• GUC Easement=97.14 acres Drawn by:
• • • • — ' — ' ' r ' ' — �� • Top of Bank(TOB)of Bank Parcel Hydrologic Features KRJ
•
0rD '
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS: -z �1 No Credit: Less Than 20-Feet or Non-Contiguous Area
Zone A(20-29'), Buffer Restoration - Date:
Riparian Buffer Mitigation(RBM) .- - JUL 2020
' Restoration Areas TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% RBM credit : ,3 Zone A(0-50'), Buffer Restoration C
: ':`��, Zone B (51'-100'), Buffer Restoration ( Scale:
TOB-100 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum ;E Zone A(0-50'), Buffer Preservation 1:2600
of 30 ft.from the TOB and maximum of 100 ft.from the TOB, r -t
and qualifies for 100% RBM credit. Zone B (51'-100'), Buffer Preservation Project No.:
r - - _Zone C (101'-200'), Buffer Preservation 20-008
L -- Riparian Buffer Credit 101-200 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous -Zone A(20-29'), Nutrient Offset
� from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft.from the TOB and a maximum :
' ,: K of 200 ft.from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% RBM credit. Zone A(0-50'), Nutrient Offset
fr' .
' Nutrient Offset Credit(NOC) Zone B (51'-100'), Nutrient Offset FIGURE
- f TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% Nutrient Offset Credit -Zone C (101'-200'), Nutrient Offset •
t- t,� �� - - - Top of Bank to 20-Feet •
w. ..- TOB-200 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum 3A
i ,: Top of Bank to 30-Feet ..), • 24- �. of 30 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft.from the TOB,
°T. - — Topof Bank to 50-Feet
and qualifies for 100% Nutrient Offset Credit. �"�•
200 400 800 - - •• —Top of Bank to 100-Feet
0 l r
Feet - Top of Bank to 200-Feet

is 7 ` ` .- ,�"\ -'•` ♦ ..
- •:..
�.. ♦ \•-:.- ..♦ -♦ Legend
'- , • ♦ \' :. . \ O GUC Easement=97.14 acres •
ir .-, 7'• F f ♦ \ \ '•`'-♦ •\ Top of Bank(TOB)of Bank Parcel Hydrologic Features
�' 4 \ ♦ 4
♦ ..
\ No Credit: Less Than 20-Feet or Non-Contiguous Area
..
f �: ``% tr
\ ♦ N. \ Zone A(20-29'), Buffer Restoration L5
}•?; i " - •\ ♦ \i ZoneA(0-50'), Buffer Restoration
' • ..
rr*'^ , s Zone B (51'-100'), Buffer Restoration
• '.\ \ �\ ♦ :-\ Axiom Envi onmeMal Inc.
Y x NO CREDIT AREA \ -- ZoneA(0-50'), Buffer Preservation
' * -: t -♦ \• \- (Existing Forest Adjacent to a Ditch) �\ ♦ ♦��-
•. '• t• 1 Zone B (51'-100'), Buffer Preservation
:-♦ Both Sides of Ditch `� • -
\ ♦ + 1 • ' 1 Zone C(101'-200'), Buffer Preservation Prepared for:
N. Zone A(20-29'), Restoration for NOC •\ - 1
:-\ (75% of NO Credit) 1 • '-:' 1 ZoneA(20-29'), Nutrient Offset
` \ ,�` 1 1 • Zone (0-50'), Nutrient Offset
....
. zt i \ - - - - 1 1 • Zone B (51'-100'), Nutrient Offset Rs
• TOB 20 Feet= No Credit '
--•\ \ \ t 1 1 .Zone C(101'-200'), Nutrient Offset
t • \ \ \ • - 1;• - - -Top of Bank to 20-Feet
'; _ ♦ '-\ - ■ ' 1 To of Bank to 30-Feet
` - \-; .. \ ♦. 1 1 • - — Top of Bank to 50-Feet RESTaRr1TIDN
:. :.r �.... 1 1 , p SYSTEMS I LLC
++ .` \ TI 1 - • -Top of Bank to 100-Feet
\ • {x +x- v 1 ' - Top of Bank to 200-Feet Project:
s - \ ♦ • • . - . . TOB -20-Feet= No Credit ► ••
\ \ s-% - - Zone A(20-29'), Restoration for NOC N 1 1 •• ; ► 1 '
. \ \ .:.\ \ \ (75°ro of NO Credit) m ► 1:' ; -' GUC SITE
1 4 \:, -
;.'. s r ��.� \-' f :\ ♦ 1 i ► • 1 ► Pitt County, NC
N.
�; .:► . S \''• _ \ \ 1 : 1 1 1 Title:
---' '-' ::* \ - , — ' •• ` .1 •� ;,-- -
:,,c \';s:s •• • CREDIT
.. - \. y'W'' • ' _ •"4' DETERMINATION
i.
NO CREDIT AREAiitl %' . — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - •- - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'- .'.
' (Existing Forest Adjacent to a Ditch) - \ — — — — — — — — — — /
Both Sides of Ditch _ _
=f., �} •// - _ — 'Feature o ' _ . . _ . . _ . ., . ., . . ._ - -is
: _%; •,. , Drawn by:
�� �J/ Feature 6Bs-Stream '`iii- • . •'•7' KRJ
'` e Date:
y • -•
- -- %Zone (20-29'), Restoration for NOC • - Y' #* . - } JUL 2020
-. _ - -\ -- (75 of NO Credit) NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS: _ Scale:
Riparian Buffer Mitigation(RBM) :2800
`"�' TOB -20-Feet= No Credit •- Restoration Areas TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% RBM credit 'Y=` :
} : ;o Project No.:
a _ TOB-100 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum •`' -•..• 20-008
• ., ,_` •=. � ' .. - .t► of 30 ft.from the TOB and maximum of 100 ft.from the TOB, _ t
• and qualifies for 100% RBM credit. lilt• . ' ,
•' w•... ; 1 Riparian Buffer Credit 101-200 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous '
�.► :, '_ FIGURE
•- . ` , from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft.from the TOB and a maximum .�
f -y u�.•+ F of 200 ft.from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% RBM credit.
;, • '�' ►
.. '. N. 4 3 B
x , It - '4 ''i TOB -20-Feet= No Credit •-
•• ,, I • - • . Nutrient Offset Credit(NOC)
s "'�'• ,, •.. ,, ++ TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% Nutrient Offset Credit
pc.' - �., z:'. :_ Zone (20 29'), Restoration for NOC ? '
•
�(, ` (75% of NO Credit) • i TOB-200 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum
=' �.•, - y of 30 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft.from the TOB, 0 150 300 600
•-•- — y/)y and qualifies for 100% Nutrient Offset Credit. Feet
' .�- WC F . ..Ny' •.Arr'�' .I�'• '4.121.: ,b h ,9M...a. -

•
N .- .._ .
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS:
Riparian Buffer Mitigation(RBM) .
Restoration Areas TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% RBM credit .
TOB-100 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum
of 30 ft.from the TOB and maximum of 100 ft.from the TOB,
and qualifies for 100% RBM credit. Axiom ErrofonmenlaI,Inc.
Riparian Buffer Credit 101-200 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous —
from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft.from the TOB and a maximum ` • Prepared for:
of 200 ft.from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% RBM credit. • '
Nutrient Offset Credit(NOC) � _ — — ' "
TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% Nutrient Offset Credit �. x.-�: :`v? ::`,T , r - ' - • , Rs
•••1 ..
-
TOB-200 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum :': - - --....., . :. • ` -• ' ` - -
of 30 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft.from the TOB, ! - �, • ' - ' -
and qualifies for 100% Nutrient Offset Credit. x,` • ' - - - - -
=;a. ,:. : . - - - - - - - RESTORATION
- 3 .,, ' - 4',-..-:•' !---;,,-., .j: s :. - - - ' : -- �� SYSTEMS I LLC
"-.. - .j A �- ;.• -:- 'r•'-• ...*••- .'t�- `_ a -:. :. .r - .-• - ' - - -.••- ' Project:
4' q_ r.•. { _t_ :r. F eat, e•' - - - '* - - -
•
•
- - ' - - ' .-'- ;--,.; --' e - GUC SITE
/. ' - - - - ' - -- �: -- - - . •..
- Pitt County, NC
•
/ / - J -- -•
- - ' %- ' - - ' - - }'"` Title:
:. CREDIT
'�' - DETERMINATION
- • - /, • :- J / 1 1, lt. m ` • ..
— • - - ... A......• �� � �2. ' Legend
— . — • — / f / ,. • '; rvF''.'14? - -i Drawn by:
— , • — — — — '4 ••/ • / w��., a . O GUC Easement=97.14 acres KRJ
— — - - - - - •-/ •/ •!; •;a • ..'.: '.;, � as° Top of Bank(TOB)of Bank Parcel Hydrologic Features
it �.--:
- - - - :-�J d,'• • •',? ''' ,y �.' T,. . .r R No Credit: Less Than 20-Feet or Non-Contiguous Area Date:
— — - -.. J' •
it : ' ; • ), 4-,f ' • Zone A(20-29'), Buffer Restoration JUL2020
- •
- - ------ -- J ♦/•• : }• •''. . h. Zone (0-50'), Buffer Restoration
- .= — — Scale:
---- ..---- — — • — • — •
J' * Zone B (51'-100'), Buffer Restoration
_ 1:2600
— — — — , — •' — - ' 4••ti� �, Zone A(0-50'), Buffer Preservation
— — — • — •- • , ' k )'+ s•. • •, } ' Zone B (51'-100'), Buffer Preservation Project No..
• IV ` 20-008
— • — - �. � � . " � �*,� `�� 5 `i` � =Zone C(101'-200'), Buffer Preservation
- ,.fit • —Zone (20-29'), Nutrient Offset
art:;.' i`' ` • Zone (0-50'), Nutrient Offset
— • ;� ,O 4 r`• '' ilr~14. NM Zone B 51'-100' Nutrient Offset
} F ` ( ), FIGURE
" •: `•-.. - �teie 4, 1'. * .rt. " m Zone C(101'-200'), Nutrient Offset
-', gr., lei r :-1 • - - -Top of Bank to 20-Feet
3C
• Top of Bank to 30-Feet
1,,Y'�.te .�`-,..,. ._ • „.. :a!'iq . ..„.mil- d' _'3'%m , a;: "a 054 . `f o" :� :. ;...... . v srt. .4' r"� ` _ — Top of Bank to 50-Feet
.:., • :fir ''w„ - • -
0 200 400 800 ' .,~ � v `1.. . ' • 4 ..ik. ' ^�' aTop of Bank to too-Feet
Feet '; .- ,;�. .� f .r ,. '�k T. �•; � ik.,. - • • Top of Bank to 200-Feet

Legend
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS: O GUC Easement=97.14 acres k
1
Riparian Buffer Mitigation(RBM) Top of Bank(TOB)of Bank Parcel Hydrologic Features
Restoration Areas TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% RBM credit +, n No Credit: Less Than 20-Feet or Non-Contiguous Area
It
Zone A(20-29'), Buffer Restoration
TOB-100 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum -
•�, of 30 ft.from the TOB and maximum of 100 ft.from the TOB, 'b Zone A(0-50'), Buffer Restoration
Ili
/+ and qualifies for 100% RBM credit. Zone B (51'-100'), Buffer Restoration g Axiom i:nvKonmenlaI,Inc.
Riparian Buffer Credit 101-200 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous Zone A(0-50'), Buffer Preservation
• -...- from TOB, is a minimum of 101 ft.from the TOB and a maximum Zone B (51'-100'), Buffer Preservation Prepared for:
' i. of 200 ft.from the TOB,and qualifies for 33% RBM credit. -Zone C (101'-200'), Buffer Preservation
�. Nutrient Offset Credit(NOC) =Zone A(20-29'), Nutrient Offset
TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% Nutrient Offset Credit Zone A(0-50'), Nutrient Offset RS
+I Zone B (51'-100'), Nutrient Offset
TOB-200 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum
of 30 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft.from the TOB, , _Zone C (101'-200'), Nutrient Offset
and qualifies for 100% Nutrient Offset Credit. - - - Top of Bank to 20-Feet
t "/•' "fir Topof Bank to 30-Feet RESTORATION
LC
�,. . - — SYSTEMS LLC
- • - .:4:L,:. + ; Top of Bank to 50-Feet
:' ' -t
-. —Top of Bank to 100-Feet Project:
rc-• '4 Top of Bank to 200-Feet
'Y: : _:3,- % is ' -`` K• + •z+ 44 / r[* r`
,�'„'♦-0 - Fe cUre0�str�''- ,'1 y 7/ .;o , '' . : '+ ^ ,-.-. r,� r GUC SITE
-=� a I
., - ` — _ e ' ` — ^' . ` '` _ / •
/ / 4. -
- / .' . — / / / :. Pitt County, NC
e
�•- :�•�-- / / • > .. . , _ , . � 'I ! '••. - . , ' Title:
- ' _ ,,a CREDIT
`r ! / DETERMINATION
/ ' / / /
4.7
- Zone A(20-29'), Buffer Restoration / /
(75% of RBM Credit) - /
• - ' / �.'. •�'-00S4 e - . Drawn by:
t Y .• KRJ
- - -
- - TOB -20-Feet= No Credit •/ — — — / ,j�'{ L_
- - - . /' F t Date:
- - - - - - - - . - -...._.... / —• — — — — — — — — - 1'� ", ,..« Nil JUL2020
•
• •+y„r ./ / 0. — — - - - - - -+r •%YI' .z;.- —.-.-.-.--- a,. Scale:
•
.. / _ 0
, :.. _ • r.1
/ / > • ' / / '
•
FIGURE
• • / • .
/ 1.
•.•> `
z. , : :S> , r Feature 7B
. .
• . . R ' ..,
3D
, , . • ... , ,
. .. _ .,..,... ..
0 150 300 600 • / ' / / -/ •�
> , .
Feet , .• / /

Table 1. GUC Mitigation Site, 2017-1122v2, Project Credits
Tar-Pamlico 03020103 Project Area
19.16394 N Credit Conversion Ratio(ft2/pound)
297.54099 P Credit Conversion Ratio(ft2/pound)
Subject?(enter
Total(Creditable) Convertible to Convertible Delivered Delivered
NO if Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian Buffer
Credit Type Location Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(ft2) Area of Buffer %Full Credit Riparian to Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient
ephemeral or Width (ft) 2 Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Credits
ditch 1) Mitigation(ft ) Buffer? Offset? Offset: N(Ibs) Offset: P(Ibs)
Buffer Rural Yes I/ P Restoration 20-29 2,7B 401 1 75% 1.33333 Yes 300.751 No — —
Buffer Rural Yes I/ P Restoration 0-100 2,6B, 7A,7B,8 1,491,585 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 1,491,585.000 Yes 0.000 0.000
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 0-100 5,6A, 420,657 1 100% No — Yes 21,950.434 1,413.778
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 101-200 5,6A 382,282 1 33% No — Yes 19,947.962 1,284.803
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200 2,6B,7A,7B,8 1,460,125 1 33% No — Yes 76,191.257 4,907.306
Totals: 2,263,063 1,491,986
Enter Preservation Credits Below Eligible for Preservation (ft2): 497,329
Total (Creditable)
Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area (sf) Area for Buffer %Full Credit
Width (ft) 2 Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Buffer Credits
Mitigation (ft )
Rural Yes I/ P 0-100 2,8 64,781 64,781 10 100% 10.00000 6,478.100
Rural Yes I/ P 101-200 2 10,492 10,492 10 33% 30.30303 346.242
Buffer Preservation —
Preservation Area Subtotal (ft2): 75,273
Preservation as%Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 3.8% TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
Ephemeral Reaches as%Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: o.o% Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Restoration: 1,491,986 1,491,885.751
Enhancement: o o.000
Preservation: 75,273 6,824.342
Total Riparian Buffer: 1,567,259 1,498,710.093
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Nutrient Nitrogen: 118,089.653
2,263,063
1. The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250(5)(a). Offset: Phosphorus: 7,605.887
last updated 11/22/2019

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity/Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA January 23,2020
Parcel Protection Q1 2020 March 19,2020
Easement Transfer to Third Party By Yr.4 Monitoring(2023) On schedule
Soil preparation Q1 2020 March 2020
Removal of Powerline/Pole Q1 2020 May 2019
Planting Q12020 March 12.2020
As-Built Data Collection Q1 2020 March 18th—26,2020
As-Built Report Submittal Q2 2020 July 2020
Year 1 Monitoring December 2020 December 2020
Year 2-5 Monitoring 10/2021-2024 On schedule
Table 3: Project Contact
Firm POC&Address
Full Delivery Provider 1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Restoration Systems,LLC
Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
POC:Raymond Holz
Designer/Permitting
919.755.9490
Planting Contractor Josh Merritt:919.755.9490
Matthew Harrell:919.755.9490
Restoration Systems,LLC 1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Seeding Contractor Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
Nursery Stock Suppliers: ArborGen 1.888.888.7158
Grant Lewis;919.215.1693
Baseline Data Collection Axiom Environmental,Inc. 218 Snow Ave.Raleigh,NC
27603
Grant Lewis;919.215.1693
Vegetation Monitoring: Axiom Environmental,Inc. 218 Snow Ave.Raleigh,NC
27603
Table 4: Project Baseline Information&Attributes
Project Information
Project Name GUC
County Pitt
Project Area (acres) 97.14
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude) 35.603194°N,-77.2945092W(NAD83/WGS84)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
River Basin Tar-Pamlico
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020103 USGS Hydrologic Unit14-digit 03020103070030
DWR Sub-basin 03-03-05
Project Drainage Area,Total Outfall(acres) 975
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious >5%
Area
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix A:General Figures and Tables
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data,CVS Output Tables
Table 5—Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Vegetation Plot Photos
CVS Data Collection Sheets (Digital Copy Only)
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Baseline Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

Table 5. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Project Code 20008. Project Name:GUC
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020)
20008-01-0001 20008-01-0002 20008-01-0003 20008-01-0004 20008-01-0005 20008-01-0006 20008-01-0007 20008-01-0008 20008-01-0009 20008-01-0010
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory
Castanea pumila chinkapin Shrub Tree
Celtis hackberry Tree
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1
Crataegus marshallii parsley hawthorn Shrub Tree 3 3 3
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1
Frangula caroliniana Carolina buckthorn Shrub Tree 2 2 2
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 1 1 1
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 5 5 5 2 2 2
Quercus oak Tree 7 7 7 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 5 5 5 4 4 4
Quercus alba white oak Tree 3 3 3
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3
Ulmus elm Tree
Ulmus americana American elm Tree
Unknown Shrub or Tree
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub
Stem count 10 10 10 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 11 11 11 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 12 12 12 12 12 12
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6
Stems per ACRE 404.7 404.7 404.7 202.3 202.3 202.3 242.8 242.8 242.8 283.3 283.3 283.3 445.2 445.2 445.2 323.7 323.7 323.7 283.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 485.6 485.6 485.6 485.6 485.6 485.6
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 5. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
Project Code 20008. Project Name:GUC
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020)
20008-01-0011 20008-01-0012 20008-01-0013 20008-01-0014 20008-01-0015 20008-01-0016 20008-01-0017 20008-01-0018 20008-01-0019 20008-01-0020
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory
Castanea pumila chinkapin Shrub Tree
Celtis hackberry Tree
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 2 2 2
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1
Crataegus marshallii parsley hawthorn Shrub Tree
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Frangula caroliniana Carolina buckthorn Shrub Tree
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus oak Tree 7 7 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus alba white oak Tree 6 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Ulmus elm Tree
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1
Unknown Shrub or Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 2 2 2
Stem count 20 20 20 15 15 15 16 16 16 13 13 13 7 7 7 3 3 3 0 0 0 7 7 7 0 0 0 2 2 2
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 7 7 7 9 9 9 10 10 10 7 7 7 4 4 4 3 3 3 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 2 2 2
Stems per ACRE 809.4 809.4 809.4 607 607 607 647.5 647.5 647.5 526.1 526.1 526.1 283.3 283.3 283.3 121.4 121.4 121.4 0 0 0 283.3 283.3 283.3 0 0 0 80.94 80.94 80.94
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 5. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
Project Code 20008. Project Name:GUC
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020)
20008-01-0021 20008-01-0022 20008-01-0023 20008-01-0024 20008-01-0025 20008-01-0026 20008-01-0027 20008-01-0028 20008-01-0029 20008-01-0030
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 5 1 1 1
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory
Castanea pumila chinkapin Shrub Tree
Celtis hackberry Tree
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub
Crataegus marshallii parsley hawthorn Shrub Tree
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1
Frangula caroliniana Carolina buckthorn Shrub Tree
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 1 1 1
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 5 5 5
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1
Ulmus elm Tree 1 1 1
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Unknown Shrub or Tree 1 1 1
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub
Stem count 3 3 3 7 7 7 5 5 5 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 4 12 12 12 6 6 6
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 2 2 2 6 6 6 3 3 3 6 6 6 3 3 3 7 7 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5
Stems per ACRE 121.4 121.4 121.4 283.3 283.3 283.3 202.3 202.3 202.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 323.7 323.7 323.7 323.7 323.7 323.7 323.7 323.7 323.7 161.9 161.9 161.9 485.6 485.6 485.6 242.8 242.8 242.8
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 5. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
Project Code 20008. Project Name:GUC
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020)
20008-01-0031 20008-01-0032 20008-01-0033 20008-01-0034 20008-01-0035 20008-01-0036 20008-01-0037 20008-01-0038 20008-01-0039 20008-01-0040
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory
Castanea pumila chinkapin Shrub Tree
Celtis hackberry Tree
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 2 2 2
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub
Crataegus marshallii parsley hawthorn Shrub Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 2 2 2
Frangula caroliniana Carolina buckthorn Shrub Tree
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 3 3 3
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 2 2 2
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2
Quercus oak Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus alba white oak Tree
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 4 4 4
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Ulmus elm Tree
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 5 5 5 4 4 4
Unknown Shrub or Tree
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub
Stem count 8 8 8 9 9 9 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 12 12 12 2 2 2 13 13 13 9 9 9
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 5 5 5 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 2 7 7 7 4 4 4
Stems per ACRE 323.7 323.7 323.7 364.2 364.2 364.2 242.8 242.8 242.8 161.9 161.9 161.9 161.9 161.9 161.9 242.8 242.8 242.8 485.6 485.6 485.6 80.94 80.94 80.94 526.1 526.1 526.1 364.2 364.2 364.2
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 5. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
Project Code 20008. Project Name:GUC
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020)
20008-01-0041 20008-01-0042 20008-01-0043 20008-01-0044 20008-01-0045 20008-01-0046 20008-01-0047 20008-01-0048 20008-01-0049 20008-01-0050
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory
Castanea pumila chinkapin Shrub Tree
Celtis hackberry Tree
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 5 5 5 3 3 3
Crataegus marshallii parsley hawthorn Shrub Tree
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree
Frangula caroliniana Carolina buckthorn Shrub Tree
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 2 2 2 5 5 5
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4
Quercus oak Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 2
Quercus alba white oak Tree
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 5 5 5
Ulmus elm Tree
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 3 3 3
Unknown Shrub or Tree
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub
Stem count 7 7 7 4 4 4 14 14 14 9 9 9 14 14 14 5 5 5 12 12 12 14 14 14 8 8 8 12 12 12
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 5 5 5
Stems per ACRE 283.3 283.3 283.3 161.9 161.9 161.9 566.6 566.6 566.6 364.2 364.2 364.2 566.6 566.6 566.6 202.3 202.3 202.3 485.6 485.6 485.6 566.6 566.6 566.6 323.7 323.7 323.7 485.6 485.6 485.6
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 5. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
Project Code 20008. Project Name:GUC
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020)
20008-01-0051 20008-01-0052 20008-01-0053 20008-01-0054 20008-01-0055 20008-01-0056 20008-01-0057 20008-01-0058 20008-01-0059 20008-01-0060
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory
Castanea pumila chinkapin Shrub Tree
Celtis hackberry Tree
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub
Crataegus marshallii parsley hawthorn Shrub Tree
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree
Frangula caroliniana Carolina buckthorn Shrub Tree
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 3 3 3
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 2 2 2
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 2 2 2 5 5 5
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 2 2 2
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus oak Tree 9 9 9 1 1 1 6 6 6 4 4 4 3 3 3
Quercus alba white oak Tree
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Ulmus elm Tree
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Unknown Shrub or Tree
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub
Stem count 12 12 12 2 2 2 10 10 10 8 8 8 6 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 15 15 15 10 10 10 3 3 3
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 4 4 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 2 2 2
Stems per ACRE 485.6 485.6 485.6 80.94 80.94 80.94 404.7 404.7 404.7 323.7 323.7 323.7 242.8 242.8 242.8 485.6 485.6 485.6 485.6 485.6 485.6 607 607 607 404.7 404.7 404.7 121.4 121.4 121.4
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 5. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
Project Code 20008. Project Name:GUC
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020)
20008-01-0061 20008-01-0062 20008-01-0063 20008-01-0064 20008-01-0065 20008-01-0066 20008-01-0067 20008-01-0068 20008-01-0069 20008-01-0070
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 1 1 1
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory
Castanea pumila chinkapin Shrub Tree
Celtis hackberry Tree
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 2 2 2
Crataegus marshallii parsley hawthorn Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree
Frangula caroliniana Carolina buckthorn Shrub Tree
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree 1
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 80
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 2 2 2
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus oak Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 13 13 13 2 2 2
Quercus alba white oak Tree 2 2 2
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Ulmus elm Tree
Ulmus americana American elm Tree
Unknown Shrub or Tree
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub
Stem count 10 10 10 8 8 8 11 11 11 16 16 16 10 10 10 7 7 7 15 15 97 10 10 10 9 9 9 2 2 2
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 8 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 5 6 6 6 3 3 3 2 2 2
Stems per ACRE 404.7 404.7 404.7 323.7 323.7 323.7 445.2 445.2 445.2 647.5 647.5 647.5 404.7 404.7 404.7 283.3 283.3 283.3 607 607 3925 404.7 404.7 404.7 364.2 364.2 364.2 80.94 80.94 80.94
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 5. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
Project Code 20008. Project Name:GUC
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020)
20008-01-0071 20008-01-0072 20008-01-0073 20008-01-0074 20008-01-0075 20008-01-0076 20008-01-0077 20008-01-0078 20008-01-0079 20008-01-0080
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory
Castanea pumila chinkapin Shrub Tree 1 1 1
Celtis hackberry Tree
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1
Crataegus marshallii parsley hawthorn Shrub Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1
Frangula caroliniana Carolina buckthorn Shrub Tree
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 1 1 1
Quercus oak Tree 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 6 6 6 8 8 8
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 2 2 2
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus nigra water oak Tree
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree
Ulmus elm Tree
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Unknown Shrub or Tree 1 1 1
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 1 1 1
Stem count 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 7 7 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 1 1 2 2 2 11 11 11 14 14 14
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Species count 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 7 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 2 2 2 6 6 6 6 6 6
Stems per ACRE 121.4 121.4 121.4 80.94 80.94 80.94 121.4 121.4 121.4 283.3 283.3 283.3 404.7 404.7 404.7 404.7 404.7 404.7 40.47 40.47 40.47 80.94 80.94 80.94 445.2 445.2 445.2 566.6 566.6 566.6
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

Table 5. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species(continued)
Project Code 20008. Project Name:GUC
Current Plot Data(MY1 2020) Annual Means
20008-01-0081 20008-01-0082 20008-01-0083 20008-01-0084 20008-01-0085 20008-01-0086 20008-01-0087 MY1(2020) MY0(2020)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra river birch Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 71 71 71 128 128 128
Carya tomentosa Mockernut Hickory 7 7 7
Castanea pumila chinkapin Shrub Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2
Celtis hackberry Tree 27 27 27
Celtis occidentalis common hackberry Tree 1 1 1 24 24 24 3 3 3
Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4
Cercis canadensis eastern redbud Tree 10 10 10 13 13 13
Cornus amomum silky dogwood Shrub 1 1 1 15 15 15 24 24 24
Crataegus marshallii parsley hawthorn Shrub Tree 2 2 2 17 17 17 17 17 17
Diospyros virginiana common persimmon Tree 1 1 1 11 11 11 36 36 36
Frangula caroliniana Carolina buckthorn Shrub Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 6 6 6
Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar Tree 1 1
Liquidambar styraciflua sweetgum Tree 80 111
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree 1 1 1 32 32 32 91 91 91
Malus angustifolia southern crabapple Tree 11 11 11 12 12 12
Morus rubra red mulberry Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 23 23 23 36 36 36
Nyssa sylvatica blackgum Tree 2 2 2 35 35 35 74 74 74
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 53 53 53 93 93 93
Prunus serotina black cherry Tree 44 44 45 81 81 82
Quercus oak Tree 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 169 169 169 358 358 358
Quercus alba white oak Tree 1 1 1 16 16 16 29 29 29
Quercus bicolor swamp white oak Tree 9 9 9 21 21 21
Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree 5 5 5 8 8 8
Quercus lyrata overcup oak Tree 1 1 1 13 13 13 17 17 17
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree 20 20 20 19 19 19
Quercus nigra water oak Tree 9 9 9 28 28 28
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree 1 1 1 12 12 12
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 1 1 1 16 16 16 10 10 10
Quercus rubra northern red oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 49 49 49 68 68 68
Ulmus elm Tree 1 1 1
Ulmus americana American elm Tree 34 34 34 53 53 53
Unknown Shrub or Tree 4 4 4 12 12 12
Viburnum dentatum southern arrowwood Shrub 1 1 1 4 4 4 28 28 28
Stem count 9 9 9 9 9 9 5 5 5 3 3 3 5 5 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 704 704 786 1317 1317 1430
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 87 87
size(ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 2.15 2.15
Species count 6 6 6 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 29 29 31 30 30 32
Stems per ACRE 364.2 364.2 364.2 364.2 364.2 364.2 202.3 202.3 202.3 121.4 121.4 121.4 202.3 202.3 202.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 283.3 327.5 327.5 365.6 612.6 612.6 665.2
Color for Density PnoLS=Planted excluding livestakes
Exceeds requirements by 10% P-all=Planting including livestakes
Exceeds requirements,but by less than 10% T=All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
Fails to meet requirements,by less than 10% T includes natural recruits
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 1 ,, , Plot 2
P ?
,‘,1_'' e''''''1.'.! t--.4,i- 17-' _..''"I.' '-'' ' - ,, ...L 1-- ' ';sri'hift'k 'If'4?'..-...3 `',Oklit'''..-,_#.,,`,74"ki-t-, , , 1
a a 1t i si 1
3 -17°'it ,,, 1 `1,-1,4{y 3 ,:0,- 1 1 0- 10- f yi j
R/,, .. f i:d i r ft"+: $?'�r+ ,1j I�11.i, .� .- ' ,, 1 `lo t -St.1V" 4
Plot 3 Plot 4
If 1 �
{��
,� t-
r 3- r s ' f1� r,*"4 , ,,, ,.t 0 , i, � n+w6x a> k
V
3 ..' ' -a �Y'. h AJ2 d 1,t��'q�28� A6 S4. < . ._ 9' "'CgEA1,4121/4
� Syr .' � .a mays 9.2 , " °/'•" cit I,,,Azi4i . .a
Plot 5 Plot 6
al 3�� t� d ' ,� h a
w kFpBf7.0 A f f tJi'-� yia �
' + ivi x6i � *
4
, ti
; ' 'u °< w
< K 11h ' "fi yZ�9 07-11 02 U457,y�,� `0, ,
Y^'i y k.
Plot 7 Plot 8
1fi S
•4 V li f e�ym V y„p -s �; a s,,
9 1 ��r�y
' Y,sfrr.' ,a ' ; sue, a rx , "4`
f ,' a,Yy ' 0."'.. .� 1 'z1O D.�0:1�P ?9 f 4x't 'n ' M f. Mp'�}p,� q ! kt C" '
h ,P'� y > f7 @ < 6 '`�' ys ''_t iry^se�c. aG�sTy
y fi'x c
r N ue�' kv , `'x `. ,0 :.z ' 4 ,
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report-November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 9 Plot 10
tty.
uea.t. �.
� {k
g � • ai ,� e
y ')„i` p�` Oat 0b + �'
S
zt '�. ; .�.�.lvia".' 'At rt � ,a *,,-,.; ;;;;i1 ._...-4,v;...4.,„,,v:tt6w,444qk7z,,L,i � ., ���.z.`+ .. ,,. ,, ,� .w.,,,, - .3j ". .., .. . 7 q-`,\
Plot 11 Plot 12
A.
t�t,',17:4.,,,.2;.:.,,,,,'„'„,;.,.,,A'.1,,...!,.2� � xF�t9� is 1�F 7':*�l � ; ` ! ,, , ls, 1,d? t �- v, .. 01 g�4
r m' X «" ",�" nu ,�' X0z'.16'd') .Y+..d t I 1 4 del' 0
fly r'�� A 1 c " '�F' "' `}s � ' { $ �"' _ '
Plot 13 Plot 14
._.,..
i1
fir `I- 4k
00—
4. ""4�"c 4e f�' 0 " 1. 0='N,� ` 2020,11/02 13:216
ors ,"'* �"', "'a. '„, 4:-iVrV. t ; o -�4', � n. ' `T�
Plot 15Plo
r
zo2oi7�ioz i4:o� � 9 � e � to tip;
0 "J 9 w,,y ��• L ',b 4Y ,ft it
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report—November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 17 Plot 18
,
•
^p
Plot 19 Plot 20
1
Plot 21 Plot 22
IIIII!
—� i
N
7
11
t.
--ter
Plot 23 Plot 24
III!lIlll!llIII__.__ . _ ,.
2020/11{'03 2020/11/03
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report—November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 25 t, Plot
26
m
k2r � �"s ,
.,,if•
Plot 27 Plot 28
by w
-.. 1",..ijitt:,y.41.0,,, ',
v
o�'
r � 4
'2 "�',i- Y $t 'Y: d i:;III e F5 yr j a 4i. '4r r . 'Ts z� ,� ,,�t""a..,: p �,> 3;.
r li fii f v 1 � yglsS i t x p
' ,ty- ,f� r"t�r `r `d "� .; .; 'n .T' tid ' ..ezi .
Plot 29 Plot 30
��3 ��. �. �� ,`° i_o
. '( , , ' , \,_
_ 'Illf ii,,-;'-,,,-`-- "," i ''' .
Plot 31 Plot 32
ill
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report—November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 33 Plot 34
.1
_
'-' 8 1110 j2020 - I ,ry \
.,.�^a1�' ., i<:-1:+ ?A6E:_:f'� ,� .tee-`Y...t: ..
Plot 35 Plot 36
ra ,e *'. —
Plot 37 Plot 38
., _
gr ak .F r a
/ , :#' Hai A �•,
yip *A'T'ryi'tr ...'n i "k $¢,•
" k"ins,T 'r
JI "S a' •u�ask S+ t °"'wt-"n�.,Y= .`F'�.,,,�
5
e...r�i u. szi�l t.
', N"''‘•'4 -V4..,...z -,1 .. ,.&.(,,.— , '1 ,4, _'7
Plot 39 Plot 40
F i-:Y'
i . ,1-
per. S.' r4 4a: ..v. -
�° 44 1 w x 1- , # 1" yfg F -',IPA''
:fig" `n , '
'�,�.'�°�+� �� �t� 1 ' h. �,r s6` ' � W � Yam. k�' �Yk '„� � +r
4C a ' .`,s',1",gdx"n,✓ S t 1 t ', ;',rt'8 a !.' 1 r� fn 3') 'l0. , "' " nr�4..
''Y., {rfs '' , M 3t Z -- ,. ' � is:,.,.,. X c,.' - �,t
�•po
`,1 Ivy e ''n.� i �1 fQ ,f ; s !!ez s .•5? a -,- x_ -y ;+�y .0,-,''
& Tn.:'S".'�','. J� t ...:'.t".Y,'�`I r4 as Zv.... f� * ... /^� 1 rY�`Y�f. ._ k� �;
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report—November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 41 � '; Plot
42
h
r " 1+ �`4� �' a tom'° c ' �,
/ ..,
Plot 43 Plot 44
-44
w t 2 vg.q -**§.
77,
may` , .'I ? #R{ ,t t ^
Plot 45 Plot 46
c
, .. 1411,33 ;ws fig: ._
'•,,-_,-, , .„-4- '•'..,.'"' '''" / ii3-,,,,
Plot 47 Plot 48
Iliciii
'' r
20:
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report-November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 49 Plot 50
as
0020
' `2Q20J 11%05 09 39_ 1l/0�09 52
Plot 51 Plot 52
� . �y
tt')ry 1 f�
tit
•
S
3 V/ I d+ =' sI
;�� k ',
ce
' ;w. -.1 'aaimm '°S4�a , §a`
t � r /
Plot 53 Plot 54
,. svx. .
r ,. 1 r ' ,, 1 �
Wig- �� `v''�, ` :a " UcJ is1 05 "'
Plot 55 Plot 56
�qt Ip �. qr
i i ,ry LL i. 4 f a` k, {p
,.g. '.0*:;,,'74:741"t!,::<4;-'''' jsz-
4.-&,. . . i',1-,,,,,4 k;<,„ :""''''°'''
4 Iq
, „%:,,,„,
{ u g �`fi ,� Ala - i s TA
a � ',,,, -,e 4,,i `i k i
,:„
,1 .,.� "...� � .e�xt �. ,Lib's !t e'1� Qat31,,....
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report—November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 57 aif Plot 58
r f
3,i)
'"¢
• `�- �„ . F �y yr
.. M - I Y V+ B �4 11�1
;� " i rF xe'
a � r - s ���- '�� / ��� I a°emu �dE''F}
a
<tR 9 ,0/11 St Jx c _ r 65
ryr bw p''� r,). �l .D J dt l � yam b +�
r `...
111M11
Plot 59 ;i, Plot 60
:t
}
I_
,
!! `I1 1s
Plot 61 Plot 62
7
i
PlotPlot 64 63
11
ilk i
2020 11,06 09:59
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report—November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 65 Plot 66
c
II
s
•
Plot 67 , -t" 7;4 -4; Plot 68
I i
I
Plot 69 Plot 70
1 ' ,'
� " %070 106 12:06
Plot 71 Plot 72
,
,
-` A
Il!
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report—November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 73 Plot 74
.st
4,4413014
�p .
Plot 75 Plot 76
TTT
1111111101
Plot 77 Plot 78
s
, r
..t: - .. fix=
•
4 •
P 4
Plot 79 Plot 80
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
MY1 Monitoring Report—November 2020

GUC
MY1 (2020)Vegetation Monitoring Photographs(taken November 2020)
Plot 81 Plot 82
gJ`�'.E"" � ' i�c
',� , , . \dd
-1
Plot 83 Plot 84
i;jA' F v -t r l d iV 'hp3�
i4V33,r �:>f', .i ,FP;t' pr,,,
k !;. '' 3�, V,'t r 'T ���,' ' 3 ° • '�� SH i7 IA
coa a, .'t � 'rt+w�m wvx (M h''W"$1�.Y:' . � ,., .J i:�;i2', •r '.� r.'
Plot 85 Plot 86
tif<
•
•
Plot 87
r
p E°
�A
/ ., 6 �' k f y�u 'C
t i'ks
r 1,
MY1 Monitoring Report
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix B:Vegetation Data,CVS Output Table
—November 2020

P i.- t
(r"-Q � c Lt, Li 31 0 005''
Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0001 Parly: Role: _Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / New lanting date m/yy? /
�'�� ' llCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: /P u ��.p}(1,� Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: (J pe .
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.600528 Datum: NAD83/W 1
(dec.deg.or m) - -- c.Q_____
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.302034 UTM Zone: '
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 28
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data -I Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH I Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage*ID Species Name lcm* * g Notes
p char O.lm O.lm 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1317 Quercus sp. O R 1.4 2.1 42.0 0 C O -
1318 Quercus sp. ® R 3.0 4.9 13.0 ❑ I r ❑
1319 Quercus sp. ® R 5.1 3.3 14.0 El /r)
1320 Quercus sp. Vt.(t U vt i(t ® R 6.8 1.7 22.0 ❑ !0 ❑
1321 Prunus serotina O R 9.2 3.6 85.0 0 ❑
Pru
nus Prus serotina Q R 7.2 5.4 94.0 El � i d ,
1323 Quercus sp. () K 9.7 7.3 52.0 El52---0
1324 Quercus sp. ® R 8.2 8.3 60.0
1325 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 6.9 9.4 43.0 El Ill
1326 Quercus sp. ® R 5.5 7.0 61.0 0 i0 1327 Quercus sp. O R 3.6 8.3 65.0 H + ..6 .
1328 Prunus serotina ® R 0.8 8.7 80.0 0 S 0 I=1 3
1329 Quercus sp. Q R 0.6 6.6 12.0 ❑ 1 tD ❑ 7
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.1
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0001 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID S eCiOS map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
P char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /08,subsamnlina**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS—DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub 10 cm-. 50 cm- 100 cm r _
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cit-off>10cm or subsample?100%. ■1 *2 +� le64 .-o, I N10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,_L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap;P=Potted„Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.2
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, ' *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMa1,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

#stems: 13
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0001 x-axis: 28°
0N map size:
- LARGE
•
Y:5n
C -
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu�Tubliqg,R=bare Root M=Mechanicall,U=Unknown
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown 3
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, I ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
I Plot 20008-01-0002 P. : Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / I - 1 / New...planting date m/yy? /
IA/If FA Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: i/✓,(cy rl, .0, , =Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
--1, !0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606502 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) - ''
Longitude or UTM E: -77.30238 UTM Zone: ❑
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): I 52`
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 101 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data 'Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm I * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1330 Frangula caroliniana ® R 2.2 1.4 22.0 lIl ❑ eJ
1331 Frangula caroliniana 0 R 4.5 1.3 45.0 ❑ Y 0 E 7 •
1332 Frangula caroliniana O R 7.1 1.8 27.0 ❑ C k T
1333 Frangula caroliniana O R 9.3 0.3 18.0 ❑ g El 1 "-:')
1334 Ulmus americana O R 8.4 4.0 45.0 ❑ ❑ O
1335 Quercus sp. ® R 6.7 4.6 60.0 0 6 ❑
3.---'
1336 Quercus sp. () R 9.0 71 38.0 ❑ ❑
1337 Quercus sp. O R b 8 7.8 29.0 Ell 1/Li
1338 Quercus sp. R 4.2 7.9 15.0
1339 Quercus sp. ® R 4.0 5.1 48.0 ❑ .`14 n a, 4,,,
1340 Prunus serotina ® R 2.1 8.6 34.0 ❑ ❑ ei
1341 Quercus sp. ® R 1.6 5.0 33.0 ❑ ❑ c)
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.4
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0002 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Explanation
sun amp l°g*:
lei,'ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Re qui red if cutoff>10cm or subsample?100%. fit .2 0/ •04 w v 5 1.6 n7 t 10 Form WS2,ver9.1
•*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p 5
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0002 X-axis: 52 N #stems: 12
map size:
U LARGE
• •
Y:5n
r
• 1
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Trams.lan i L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.6
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too.WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0003 P,i ': Role: _ Date last planted: 03/2020
D Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / _ ? / 17 !� New...planting date m/yy? / I
VIVID LICheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: v-'u(1.91 1 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: att&
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606126 Datum: INAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) d-c
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.302726 UTM Zone: w
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 20
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1343 Carya tomentosa ® R 0.8 2.0 12.0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0
1344 Carya tomentosa O k 3.3 0.9 22.0 ❑ ❑
1345 Prunus serotina () R 4.0 3.1 64.0 ❑ Co-.i I
1346 Prunus serotina ® R 1.9 4.0 76.0 ❑ d
1347 Prunus serotina Q R 6.5 2.2 ❑ 61
1348 Prunus serotina ® R 8.6 1.1 74.0 ❑ 0
r
1349 Prunus serotina © R 7.9 4.0 47.0 ❑ 6
1350 Prunus serotina ® R 5.6 5.6 45.0 ❑ Li 0 1
1351 Prunus serotina O R 8.4 7.2 34.0 ❑ Ip -0 4‘...4
1352 Quercus sp. O R 6.3 8.1 34.0 ❑ El j C?
1353 Quercus sp. ® R 4.4 2.3 55.0 ❑ ❑ dr i
1354 Quercus sp. ® R 2.3 6.9 47.0 ❑ Y
1355 Quercus sp. Q R 0.7 7,5 35.0 S' B Q '
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
(I,I.r6es Sp/' . IL ,4:- i. T3. 3
I 1'
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted;Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown P.7
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. ( Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0003 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
•
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species subsampiing":
E feiyht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm 030cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES ' SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sub =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>10cm or subsample.100 . 1 2 3 •4 15 6 8 '13i0 Foim WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanicall}.U=Unknown p 8
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0003 x-axis: 20° #stems: 13
map size:
0--
LARGE
(91.
Y:5ii
•
(0.0) X:5nA
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tublin• R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ 9
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0004 P. : Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: ' / / I: i t New lanting date m/yy? /
� /t im LJCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 4 (1, Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: VI 11 Latitude or UTM-N: 35.605569 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.302792 1UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 5 -
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH a Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1356 Quercus sp. b t.1 Cr4 Q R 0.1 1.2. 61.0 ❑ 6 D III '
1357 Quercus sp. ® R 2.9 1.5 40.0 0 a,_
1358 Carya tomentosa ® R 0.4 4.3 12.0 0 ❑ "Z
1359 Carya tomentosa Q R 2.9 4.3 10.0 ❑ ❑ ..
1360 Quercus sp. ® I: 5.3 4.2 10.0 0 ❑ .
1361 Carya tomentosa © R 7.8 4.2 7.0 ❑ Li
1362 Quercus sp. 0 R 5.5 1.3 73.0 0 73 ❑ a ?w
1363 Idlmasamawsank quip(t.I 4 0.00 R 8.1 1.4 18.0 ❑ El
1364 Betula nigra O R 7.5 7.3 86.0 ❑ El if,.
1365 Betula nigra ® R 5.3 7.5 80.0 El 0 El 3
1366 Quercus sp. ® R 8.5 8.5 21.0 0 n 5
1367 Betula nigra Q R 2.9 7.4 63.0 ❑ ID A /.9Ki0,
1368 Betula nigra Q R 1.0 7.9 80.0 I=1 6 u 3 •
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake_B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown _ p. 10
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0004 Mar 2020 Data 2 THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &sun moainu***: -
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
•
Species Name a Sub 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>1Ocm or subsample?100%. • 102 0 3• � i N S 5 i' 17 I mi 8 i N10 Fo WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p. 11
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0004 - X-axis: 5° #stems: 13
Cmap size:
N LARGE
it •
I
F
Y:5n{
t
C(s)
• •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap;P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.12
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, 1 *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
I Plot 20008-01-0005 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - .1_ 'Pi t it Net planting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: '' .t C �' Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ''-ley(c Plii 11k
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604667 Datum: NAD83/W .
(dec.deg.or m) `'.p
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.302869 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 10
Plot Dimensions:X:
10 Y: 10 ❑plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1370 Prunus serotina ® R 0.2 1.2 46.0 ❑ _❑ O - y
1371 Prunus serotina R 3.0 1.1 39.0 ,' 3
1372 Prunus serotina ® R 1.9 3.7 45.0 G 0 y
1373 Prunus serotina ® R 5.1 3.9 50.0 ❑ j" u ,
1374 Prunus serotina ® R 5.7 1.1 43.0 ❑ cj- ❑
1375 Prunus serotina Q R 8.5 0.9 43.0 ❑ _ J I___1
1376, Prunus serotina Q R 8.1 3.8 50.0 ❑ Cd n
1377 Diospyros virginiana Q R 9.3 6.8 41.0 El 4
1378 Crataegus marshallii O R `:1)S676 6.6 73.0 0 7 3
1379 Betula nigra ® R 9.2 9.3 88.0 ❑ a 3 n
1380 Crataegus marshallii O R 3.9 6.6 38.0 ❑ Li n - _-1
1381 Crataegus marshallii 0 R 1.4 9.3 46.0 ❑ 4.. _ ❑ J
1382 Celtis occidentalis ® R 1.1 6.4 50.0 ❑ Li f
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(P nted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p 13
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3-good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1
N

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0005 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑—6cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>l0cmor subsample?100%. •1 •2 • ••4 t•5 t I 7 8 + �tl0 Form WS2,ver 9.1
I. •• •• •• �• - -
*SOURCE:Tr=Transylant,.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p. 14
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0005 -- x-axis: 10° #stems: 13
map size:
N LARGE LARGE
� Q
•
C �
Y:5n
C� r
(o.o) x:5n1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=MechanicallyyU=Unknown _ p. 15
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, I ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0006 Perry: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - d/, New lanting date m/yy? l /
y� h rr' Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: !'v �(y fi�`� `,/ E,! Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: J..4 7 v rd4
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606242 Datum: iNAD83/W ,
(dec.deg.or m) de'z'
Longitude or UTM-E: v77.30361 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): I 114
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10' ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH v0, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m Icm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1384 Quercus rubra () R 1.7 0.4 32.0 0 34{ LI 7:___
1385 Quercus sp. Q R 4.2 3.9 32.0 0 'lc.
1386 Quercus rubra ® R 0.9 3.6 30.0 Ili 0
r
1387 Quercus sp. ® R 5.1 1.1 45.0 0 3
1388 Quercus rubra O R 7.2 2.0 43.0 0 - ID
1389 Cercis canadensis ® R 9.6 3.8 24.0 0 •: ;: El / ( -i 1390 Quercus rubra Q R 9.2 5.8 21.0 0 ! ❑ d
1391 Quercus rubra O R 6.6 5.1 49.0 ❑
1392 Betula nigra ® R 6.2 7.9 68.0 ❑ 7 0 Ill _2
1393 Nyssa sylvatica © R 9.1 8.4 22.0 ❑ - El (j)
1394 Quercus sp. O R 3.1 9.3 63.0 ❑
1395 Quercus sp. O R 3.5 6.5 44.0 ❑ LJ
1396 Quercus rubra Q R 0.1 6.5 54.0 0 S' 3 t .. ,
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplanj,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanicalh.U=Unknown _ _ p. 16
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnny Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0006 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH , ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
tion of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &suiaampti :
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm 0 137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Lf sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
I ,
•
I — —
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. .1 +2 I:: *4 N5 skit' =7 1=8 In' 10 FoimWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U=Unknown p. 17
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0006 --x-axis: 114° N #stems: 13
\�U size:map
LARGELARGE
s- s
I -
•
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p,18
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0007 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - �) p 1 liCheck box if plot was not
��Taxonomic Standard: (� Ll.e 9 YE _ Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: C.v
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.605734 i Datum: :NAD83/W _
(dec.deg.or m) -77.303686 UTM Zone: _
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): I 104
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 100 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
I I-
Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
-
1397 Quercus sp. O R 0.9 1.4 47.0 0 ` I.
1398 Betula nigra ® It 3.8 2.1 35.0 17 ❑ 01
1399 Betula nigra Q R 3.6 4.6 85.0 ❑ ❑
1400 Betula nigra Q R 0.5 4.1 25.0 ❑ ❑ .''
1401 Quercus rubra 0 R 6.5 3.6 53.0 ❑ (- El
1402 Quercus sp. tl 5/t�, © R 7.1 1.1 29.0 ❑ 3r l 1 3 ry
1403 Quercus sp. tj,,,I i'- ® R 9.9 2.5 32.0 ❑ i
1404 Quercus sp. ® R 9.1 5.2 17.0 0 ay n 3
1405 Quercus sp. O R 6.2 6.6 35.0 - ❑ 3 g - ❑
1406 Quercus sp. ® R 8.6 7.9 24.0 ❑ El
1407 Quercus sp. ® R 5.7 9.8 45.0 ❑ ❑ O
1408 Betula nigra Q R 3.5 7.6 64.0
1409 Betula nigra ® R 0.5 6.8 45.0 0 "3 v ❑ 4,,..
1410 Betula nigra O R 0.4 9.1 32.0 ❑ ❑ [J
#stems: 14 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm- Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown _ _ p. 19
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0007 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
t-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &sub amoiin1!* :
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
•
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name p sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub-
10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red ifca-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. .1 1.2 . 3 I.;4 HS I *6 I=7 =s I0 FoimWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,_R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.20
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0007 x-axis: 104° N #stems: 14
map size:
LARGE
t_
o 7
:5n _s
L
1 •
(0,0) X:5111
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.21
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0008 Pan}: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - )-e / New lanting date m/yy? . /
r� �� Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: l vf,- t',�- _ J - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: dkt'l 'f
i Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604939 Datum: NAD83/W ,
(dec.deg.or m) -77.303479 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 8
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y; 10Li Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data 1 Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm *I lcm* 1 cm sprout
1412 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 2.4 0.8 70.0 III El V
1413 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 4.6 1.4 63.0 ❑ ❑
1414 Quercus lyrata ® R 4.6 4.0 32.0 0 ❑ . '
~1415 Quercus lyrata ® R 2.3 3.7 44.0 D a,V 0 3
1416 Nyssa sylvatica O R 7.1 1.8 57.0
1417 Nyssa sylvatica O R 9.6 1.9 70.0
1418 Quercus sp. © R 4.1 4.8 51.0
1419 Quercus rubra © R 7.0 4.4 70.0 11 3
1420 Nyssa sylvatica O R 6.7 6.4 20.0 ❑ ❑ o W
1421 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 9.3 7.3 41.0 0 ❑
1422 Quercus sp. At c((el ® R 9.6 9.8 38.0 ❑ 3 b 0 f
1423 Quercus sp. O R 7.0 8.9 35.0 ❑ T 9 El 3
1424 Quercus sp. Q R 4.4 8.4 57.0 ❑ O El ' 7i
1425 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 3.8 6.0 47.0 III L)A
1426 Quercus rubra O R 0.6 5.7 63.0 0 7
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) Height cm* 1 Dcm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr'Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tublink4-R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _a.22
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DlSeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

•
Plot(continued): 20008-01-0008 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A&su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
r 1
Species Name Q sub- 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm sub =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Re qui red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. *1 102 •• �04 .5 1r6 I 7 ivtt I 1 �10 FormWS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Pott Tu=Tublin:.R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.23
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0008 X-axis: 8° #stems: 15
map size:
CN LARGE
•
Y:Sm
b
• •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplants L=Live stake,B=Ball and burl P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.24
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0009 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
-VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / `1,c. / New lanting date m/yy?
�y Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: _f�:t' - " ,/�+` ' Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: /Jc tt? fit'
or UTM-N: 35.603702 Datum: •NAD83/W ,
(dec.deg.or m) ,-,,,,0
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.30292 UTM Zone: 1 1
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 1L 279�79
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: I 101 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH g Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1428 Malus angustifolia ® R 1.2 2.0 24.0 El j ❑ 2
1429 Quercus sp. () R 2.4 1.3 38.0 0 C b 1=1 / ...0-f
1430 Quercus rubra ® R 4.9 0.0 44.0 ❑ 1/43.. 1 Ei 3
1431 Quercus sp. O R 4.3 2.1 40.0 0 E O
1432 Quercus rubra O R 4.1 4.1 42.0 ❑ ❑ V
1433 Quercus sp. ® R 2.1 3.5 51.0 ❑ ❑ J
1434 Quercus alba O R 0.7 4.9 32.0 ❑ c‘.-.---- ❑ i qi,,
1435 Quercus sp. O R 5.8 4.2 22.0 0 - ❑ r ) ,
1436 Prunes serotina Q R 6.9 4.1 52.0
1437 Quercus alba ® R 6.1 1.6 43.0 o LI 0 3
1438 Prunus serotina O R 7.3 1.6 34.0 El ')c
1439 Quercus sp. ® R 8.3 2.4 48.0 0 3 t El f
1440 Quercus sp. Q R 7.7 5.0 42.0 ❑ Li / 0
1441 Prunus serotina ® R 6.5 6.6 29.0 0 36
1442 Quercus sp. ® R 5.4 7.0 28.0 ❑ 0 0
1443 Quercus sp. () R 7.6 7.5 "i 47.0 0 5)(�- ❑ ?-3
1444 Prunus serotina () R 6_4 9.2 43.0 0 0 O
1445 Quercus alba Ql R 5.2 8.9 39.0 ❑ 0 0
1446 Quercus alba ® R 3.5 8.4 47.0 ❑ q 8 ID 3
1447 Quercus sp. ® R 3.6 4.4 43.0 ❑ 0 a
1448 Quercus sp. ® R 2 6.2 52.0 El ❑ -
1449 Quercus rubra 0 R 2.1 8.4 30.0 ❑ ❑ i
#stems: 22 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
He
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cmht Dcm Vigor* Damage* Notes
I
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burls P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p_25
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0009 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su beam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name LI Sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01 .2 :3 I..4 0 ,5 6 17 I�r }y�l 10 Font'WS2,ver9.1
•*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Patted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _p.26
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0009 X-axis: 279° #stems: 22
map size:
C\--) LARGE
P. •
f
,7:5„,
i
(0,0, x:51n
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stak,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.27
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. `Printed in the CVS-EEPEntr),Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008.01-0010 P: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - New...planting date m/yy? /
- ICheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: _ li' !,`/ (A [,.(" r - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ""-2.&,0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.60317 Datum: NAD83/W IM
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.303155 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 111
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10. ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X •
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm I * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1451 Quercus rubra 0 R 0.7 0.8 33.0 0 5 El I 3 - -
1452 Quercus sp. ® R 2.3 0.2 48.0 Ill 50
0
CI Quercus alba k 3.9 0.4 39.0 El
1454 Quercus alba © R 3.4 3.1 53.0 0 0 6
1455 Quercus sp. O R 2.1 3.4 47.0 0 ❑ 6'`?
1456 Quercus sp. 0 R 0.7 3.5 55.0 El 94 LI y
1457 Quercus rubra ® R 5.0 3.8 96.0 ❑ 0 C 7
1458 Quercus rubra ® R 5.4 1, . 52.0 ❑ •r`'� ❑ •3
1459 Comus amomum O R 6.2 0.7 42.0 0 Lit ❑ 3
1460 Carya tomentosa O R 6.0 3.9 16.0 ❑ ❑ 40
1461 Nyssa sylvatica © k 7.8 1.9 67.0 0 0 --)
1462 cj7 o/ ® N. 8.5 0.3 35.0 0 ',�•'� s/
1463 Diospyros virginiana -LL• �+® R 5.4 2.6 41.0
1464 Nyssa sylvatica O R 7.3 4.0 74 0 J ❑ 7 S-- 1__I 7 '
1465 Diospyros virginiana ea O( © R 8.1 4.6 41.0 El r r ❑ c'
1466 Diospyros virginiana O R 8. .,_ 6.9 32.0 ❑ ❑ fri
1467 Quercus sp. ® R 8.2 9.1 43.0 ❑ 9 ' Elt
1468 Nyssa sylvatica 0 R 6.9 8.8 54.0 ❑ 0
1469 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 6.9 6.4 68.0 ❑ ❑ 0
1470 Carya tomentosa O R 5.9 5.9 30.0 0 V
1471 Quercus rubra 0 R 5.0 6.2 40.0 ❑ ❑ 0
1472 Quercus cobra Q R 5 8.6 25.0 ❑ 0 El
1473 Diospyros virginiana 0 R 2.2 8.1 55.0 0 CI
1474 Quercus alba CD .R 3.3 5.6 53.0 El ///
1475 Quercus sp. ® R *3
Ti'*--( 1 40.0 111 {,Y 0 1'
1476 Quercus sp. 0 R 2.0 9.8 65.0 0 ❑ 0
1477 Qaescussp.‘„,.t,` ® R 0.5 9.4 63.0 0 ( Y2_. R 3
1478 Quercus sp. 0 R 0.5 6.5 48.0 ❑ 1V El
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.28
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, f*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0010 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
#stems: 28 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y
Species Name Source* (m) (m) ]Icm*t DBH
cmm Vigor* Damage* Notes
,Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling**:
11ei;;ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 CM 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. °i I;2 I. 3 .4 N5 Ir6 1= I:8 l t 10 Form WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Tran plant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Rom M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.29
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 111° N #stems: 28
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0010 \
map size:
CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems LARGE
marked with lowercase letters(i.e. "A"is different from"a").
43,
Y's
Y:5„
(i)
•
(0,0) X:5„,
*SOURCE:Tt=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and bur1 .,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling„R=bare Rood M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.30
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Too!ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0011 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - �^� ; / _ Net planting date m/yy? f /
f Check box if plot was not
,(Taxonomic Standard: ‘ ,-,��, (tW Pl �� Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: F: 6(O - KIr (
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602537 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) `-`,.
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.303105 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 101
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 0 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
' Mar 2020 Data �
Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
o
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1480 Prunus serotina ® R 0.9 0.5 61.0 ❑ ❑ D
1481 Malus angustifolia 0 R 1.9 0.1 48.0 ❑ Li g ❑
1482 Quercus sp. Q R 0.8 2.8 44.0 ❑ 1 S' ❑ 3 .
1483 Malus angu�`stifo7Td% 0 R 1.1 2.2 29.0 ❑ ❑
1484 Diospyros virginiana ® R 3.0 1.9 24.0 ❑ 0. -
1485 Quercus sp. ® R 4.2 1.3 30.0 ❑ ❑ c2
1486 Quercus alba ® R 3.9 3.4 34.0 ❑ ', ❑ j
1487 Quercus rubra ® R 1.8 4.3 61.0 ❑
1488 Quercus sp. 0 R 2.9 4.8 25.0 ❑ ?Q
. A ..,
1489 Quercus alba () R 5.4 3.9 45.0 ❑ 5'I ❑ 3
1490 Quercus sp. 0 R 5.5 1.9 41.0 ❑ 4 3 l 1 3
1491 Betula nigra O R 6.6 1.7 73.0 0 7 : ❑ F 3
1492 I)jpsp�yresPariniaga (.4 W(l © R 6.5 4.2 36.0 ❑ St ❑ 3
1493 Quercus rubra Q R 8.5 2.5 51.0 ❑ ❑
1494 Quercus pagoda Q R 4.8 0.6 67.0 0 ❑
17
1495 Quercus pagoda ® R 9.9 2.9 56.0 ❑ ❑
1496 Quercus sp. ® R 9.8 5.5 41.0 0 ❑ __,0-
. `
1497 Quercus alba ® R 8.2 5.2 44.0 ❑ 4j 3 ❑ ,}
1498 Quercus pagoda () ( R 9.2 7.9 32.0 ❑ ❑ 0
1499 Diospyros virginiana ® R 7 7.9 25.0 ❑ Li O
1500 Ulmus americana Q R 6`3 7.2 31.0 ❑ ❑ 01501 Quercus rubra ® R 5.1 6.5 53.0 ❑ _ -+ ❑ 3
1502 Ulmus americana Q R 5.7 7.9 62.0 0 ❑ 0
•
1504 Diospyros virginiana 0 R 4.8 8.7 32.0 ❑ Li y
1505 Quercus alba O R 3.3 8.2 45.0 ❑ 4 0 [1 3
1506 Quercus alba 0 R 3.5 5.9 51.0 ❑ ❑ 2,
1507 Quercus alba 0 R 2.2 7.7 37.0 0 3 S Q 3 ,
1508 Quercus sp. ® R 1.5 6.9 48.0 ❑ 4 1
1509 Quercus rubra ® R 1.1 9.4 33.0 ❑ 53 ❑ 9
1510 Quercus sp. ® R 0.4 9.4 31.0 ❑ 5 ]'. ❑ 3
1511 •-rteius serdtlnq 0,,,4,(4i ® R 0.6 7.2 54.0 ❑ I SID ❑
'
*SOURCE:Tr=Trangolant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 31
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0011 Mar 2020 Data eZ THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m).„.. (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout a ,
1512 Nyeeas ra ica 0 k. i cI ® R 0.7 5.2 35.0 0 rq-d-
#stems: 32 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) I1 cm*t 1 DBHcmm Vigor* Damage* Notes
— k _
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Explana ion of cut-off&su bsam piing**:
eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name p sub_ 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub_ =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
1
.
**Requi red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. •] 1•2 • z ••4 •-•5 1rb 1=7 I=b I=1 �10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
• •• •• •• •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.32
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, I ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. !Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

stems:
Map-of stems on plot 20008-01-0011 X-axis: 101° N #map size:2
CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems LARGE
marked with lowercase letters(i.e."A"is different from"a"). �J
f i(s
t
4 ,
P
9
At.
ask
________________,- - - I ,,
,:•,... A
t ,i'5
.....,
f O
fr ci f
(ki
•
T •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burls P=Pott Tu=Tubling R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown _ _p.33
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0012 Pariy: Role: Date last planted:
• --��� New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / D`[7 t).4 Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: I,�/e c((k(e(1 - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
f'
Taxonomic Standard DATE: "'),,,)(,V P'" iP
Latitude or UTM-N: 135.601818 Datum: INAD83/W
(dec.deg. Le r.0
Longitude or UTM E or m) -77.303173 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 110
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data 2 THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm I * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1513 Viburnum dentatum ® R 1.5 0.4 20.0 ❑ ❑ "1
1514 Quercus pagoda () R 2.8 1.7 26.0 ❑ Yi
1515 Diespyrea-vitgin ana-014 f 4`) O R 4.6 0.2 52.0 ❑
1516 Diospyros virginiana Q R 4.5 2.5 52.0 ❑ 3
1517 Viburnum dentatum Q R 1.5 2.8 26.0 ❑ ❑ C7
1518 Quercus pagoda ® R 3.0 4.8 25.0 ❑ ❑ d)
1519 Diospyros virginiana (DI R 4.7 4.8 33.0 ❑ 3• ❑ 3
1520 Platanus occidentalis ® R 5.6 3.7 74.0 ❑ .I _. __ 1 III
1521 Quercus alba ® R 6.8 3.1 60.0 ❑ a�
1522 Quercus alba O f: 6.8 1.0 52.0 ❑ C
k 1523 1-IO( ® R 5.5 0.4 34.0 ❑ 70 q F
1524 Ulmus americana () R 7.8 0.1 46.0 ❑ 5-1 ❑
1525 Ulmus americana 0 R 7.7 2.4 38.0 ❑ 7)
1526 Prunus serotina © to 9.6 4.0 28.0 ❑ /11
1527 Liriodendron tulipifera - ® R 9.0 2.4 10.0 ❑ (7)
1528 plans ser ina I () R 7.9 9.7 57.0 ❑ a
1529 cider_..) Q R 9.1 5.2 61.0 ❑ (I 0 I=1 4 -
1530 Q R 6.8 5.6 41.0 ❑ LJ
1531 Platanus occidentalis Q R 5.5 6.3 52.0 Elsd o y
1532 Ulmus americana Q R 6.8 7.7 46.0 ❑ y Li 5-
1533 Betula nigra © R 7.8 7.2 50.0 Ela V
1534 Quercus alba ® R 9.3 8.0 40.0 ❑ Y d� LJ 9
1535 Betula nigra ® R 8.1 9.3 22.0 ❑
1536 Ulmus americana ® R 6.9 9.8 38.0 ❑ fl V
1537 Platanus occidentalis ® R 5.7 8.9 45.0 ❑Prunus5 � `
1538 us serotina Q R 4.5 3.2 60.0 ❑ El 4
1539 Betula nigra ® R 4.6 9.5 45.0 ❑
1540 Quercus rubra ® R 3.9 8.0 45.0 ❑ q
1541 Viburnum dentatum O R 1.8 3.5 15.0 ❑ E /vi
1542 Nyssa sylvatica O R 0.2 8.0 41.0 ❑ 9 "-- - ❑ 3
1543 Viburnum dentatum ® R 1.5 5.6 25.0 ❑ c)
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p,34
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0012 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
,#stems: 31 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
41...,(T , 7 S! 60 _ �-f
[_
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /&subsampiine**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm 0 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
1 — —
i
**Re quiredifci1off>10cmorsubsample?100%. Si I:2 4i ill 04 `"5 I h I:7 1138 I 1 10 FormWS2,ver9.1
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,_P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.35
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0012 - X-axis: 110° N #stems: 31
p size:
LARGE
LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems 0
marked with lowercase letters(i.e."A"is different from"a").
PI f ,..., ) •
f \\._
1‘ 6 4,---
(6,
T
%:,ii,
f 1
k,
14) , r
h
1 1 e(
�®
I
i' t
/ /
(0,0) x:5„i
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burly,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.36
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool vet.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0013 Park: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / -
New planting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 14/c 4 *t, I Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: >/(,/ r
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.60079 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) 77303255 UTM Zone: '
Longitude or UTM-E: i......+
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1r X-Axis bearing(deg): 121
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 1 10' LJ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ca Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1545 Quercus laurifolia 0 R 1.0 2.0 40.0 ❑ - Lj, '
1546 Quercus laurifolia ® R 3.7 1.8 62.0 0 'at L 0 ❑ .
1547 Quercus sp. Q R 2.9 0.5 50.0
Li -f ❑
1548 Diospyros virginiana 0 R 1.9 2.8 16.0 ❑ 3 v ❑ _
1549 Quercus rubra ® R 4.7 4.6 49.0 0 - ❑
1550 Viburnum dentatum ® R 5.3 2.6 18.0 0 � El1551 Prunus serotina ® R 6.1 3.5 67.0 ❑ L ❑ G
1552 Quercus laurifolia 0 R 6.5 0.6 31.0 ❑ ❑ c 2
1553 Quercus pagoda ® R 7.4 0.7 57.0 0 ❑ o
1554 Quercus phellos O R 9.4 0.6 69.0 ❑ G 5-- ❑ 3
1555 "I folLi. ® R 8.7 2.6 53.0 ❑ C ,N+
1556 Quercus sp. O R 8.5 3.3 23.0 ❑ V " ❑
1557 ()CepkelasdxL p 4.t R 8.0 4.9 43.0 4{
1558 Ulmus americana S 0 R 5.6 6.8 70.0 ❑ S _ 3
1559 Quercus alba Q R 8.0 8.2 47.0 ❑
1560 Quercus sp. Q R 8.1 9.3 19.0 0 ❑ [-
1561 Prunus serotina () R 8.9 9.9 85.0 ❑ $0 ❑
1562 Ulmus americana Q R 9.6 9.5 34.0 ❑ yr
1563 CcyamerateeTIUTEK 41 A" ® R 5.8 9.4 80.0 0 10 ❑
1564 Quercus rubra O R 4.2 6.9 70.0 0 1J
1565 Viburnum dentatum ® R 3.3 7.0 20.0 ❑ A �❑
1566 Quercus rubra O R 2.9 8.8 52.0 ❑
1567 Ulmus americana ® R 1.9 8.9 50.0 ❑ d ❑
1568 Quercus sp.-__ ® R 1.1 5.1 rr 23.0 0 ❑ 0
#stems: 24 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (m) Hcmht Dcm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tublinr.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically;U=Unknown p.37
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0013 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(AII stems shorter than thisare ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 1'Ncm
' SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red ifcifoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. .1 I;2 i i3 :4 \i� N w5 r. �!
6 I 1 k` 10 Form WS2,vet.9.1
i •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublint: R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown _ p.38
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, f*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0013 X-axis: 121° N #stems: 24
U
map size:
LARGE
(-I) -----
•
1'
1 (i)
O
I
.,
_ ..._ ___.______
„:5i, ______--,6-, 1 1 ______
i A
k 41
Q
l
I
N1 /
i i
(0,0> x:5m„
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant L=Live stake;B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.39
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSents,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0014 P:Irt\: Role: Date last planted:
,VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / f / r New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: '-,./ ,u(.( ‘P( Notes: sampled,specify reason below
41
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ((� !i -
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.600716 Datum: \AD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) '-77.302774 UTM Zone: -
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 1 115 i
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10I n Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 9, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm , * 1cm* 1 cm sprout
1569 Quercus laurifolia Q R 0.5 0.8 21.0 0 111 ;)
1570 Ulmus americana ® R 1.2 2.2 58.0 0 El D
1571 Ulmus americana ® R 1.6 2.3 30.0 0 . ❑ 0
1572 Quercus laurifolia © R 3.2 1.3 64.0 ❑ 60
1573 Nyssa sylvatica O R 4.3 2.4 62.0 El6 7 ❑ 3
1574 Ulm is a aaer CEtA4 1 ®• R 4.4 2.8 45.0 ❑ . it . ._i fi
1575 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 2.9 4.1 70.0 ❑ 1] •4.7
1576 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 5.7 4.2 53.0 ❑ ❑ L
1577 Quercus laurifolia Q it 5.7 1.7 43.0 ❑ Lj , Y® 3
1578 Prunus serotina ® R 5.2 0.3 67.0 ❑ 6 y El 3
1579 Quercus sp. Q R 3.2 0.7 60.0 0 _E L�1 T
1580 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 3.1 2.3 37.0 0 I'+-J f
1581 Crataegus marshallii Q R 6.9 8.0 45.0 0I 1 :-i
1582 Crataegus marshallii 0 R 9.3 8.4 50.0 El ❑ 47
1583 Quercus sp. 0 R 8.7 6.1 32.0 ❑ 5 D- n 9
1584 Nyssa sylvatica © R 9.7 6.7 55.0 ❑ 5'4 ❑ 3
1585 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 7.2 6.5 60.0 ❑ (, a-- u 3
1586 Quercus sp. O R 6.0 5.8 47.0 ❑ 1--0 ❑ _3
1587 Prunus serotina ® R 5.6 8.1 53.0 0 5.1-/ El 3
1588 Diospyros virginiana () R 8.3 8.2 34.0 ❑ c u de,.
1589 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 3.1 9.8 32.0 ❑ q 1
Et
Li I -1
1590 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 3.1 7.7 43.0 0 (() Li 3
1591 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 2.9 5.6 34.0 ❑ ❑ c)
1592 Nyssa sylvatica • ® R 0.5 7.9 54.0 0 ❑
#stems: 24 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
°,Pk _ it, 't,3 ,� CO
/
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p..40
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0014 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name El Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
A
**Requi red ifcutoff>lOcmorsubsample?100%. 01 i2 •� I:164 •-•5 `1"6 I 7 1 5 10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanicall',U=Unknown p,41
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0014 X-axis: 115° N #stems: 24
map size:
LARGE
0
Y:5n•
1J
(0,0) X:5ni
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stale B=Ball and burls P=PottedTu=TublinM,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.42
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0015 Parr: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): I Date: / / - u fi i9`g Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: L/(cl(A''t - - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: - r=i•:, tf'4 k
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.600489 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) -77.302114 UTM Zone: �
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1'X-Axis bearing(deg): 135
I
Plot Dimensions:X: 101 Y: 101 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH a Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
-
1594 Platanus occidentalis ® R 2.2 0.3 55.0 ❑ f f rug
3 .
1595 Prunus serotina O R 4.4 00 .) 58.0 ❑ 0, ❑ q
1596 Quercus sp. O R 3.1 2.9 30.0 ❑ El 'd
1597 Quercus sp. () R 0.2 2.2 32.0 ❑ 3 Co. u 1
1598 Platanus occidentalis Q R 6.5 3.0 41.0 ❑ 53 ❑ 3
1599 Prunus serotina Q R 6.5 0.8 99.0 ❑ LI d
1600 Platanus occidentalis ® R 8.8 1.1 74.0 ❑ /1•D ❑ 3
1601 Platanus occidentalis Q R 8.9 3.2 47.0 ❑ I c� n
1602 Quercus alba O R 8.5 6.0 52.0 ❑ So ❑ _ 3
1603 Quercus sp. ® R 5.5 5.8 24.0 E 0
1604 Viburnum dentatum ® It 7.4 9.0 20.0 ❑ ❑
1605 Viburnum dentatum ® R 9.5 9.2 41.0 ❑ ❑ C)
1606 Viburnum dentatum ® R 4.9 8.6 20.0 ❑ ❑ D
1607 Viburnum dentatum ® R 2.5 5.4 50.0 ❑ ❑ l
1608 Quercus sp. ® R 2.4 5.6 25.0 ❑ - 0
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown 1' 43
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0015 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of artoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling*•:
Heisht Cut-Off(A11 stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap' 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required ifcit off>10cmor subsample?100%. .1 r2 • Ir*4 0.405
I:1
6 t I $ la :C10 Form WS2,ver
9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burls P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.44
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0015 X-axis: 135° N #stems: 15
map size:
0 LARGE
(4)
Y:5n;
1
(0 0) a:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U=Unknown _ _p.45
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0016 Pai-E`•: Role: Date last planted:
New...planting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / / / 01 i--1 LJCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.600285 Datum: NAD8�3-/+W--�
(dec.deg.or m) 77301713 '1 UTM Zone: 1} 1
'Longitude or UTM-E: 1�
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 152
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y_1 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ri Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm * 1cm* 1 cm sprout
1609 Liriodendron tulipifera 0 R 1.9 2.4 45.0 0 111 0
1610 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 4.6 3.4 30.0 El CI
1611 Platanus occidentalis Q R 5.6 0.7 35.0 ❑ ❑
1612 Quercus rubra ® R 7.0 1.8 40.0 ❑ L! ( ❑ 3
1613 Diospyros virginiana O R 8.0 0.0 91.0 ❑
El
1614 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 7.3 3.4 50.0 ❑ r3
1615 Diospyros virginiana Q1 R 8.8 3.5 17.0 El _ 0 6) F
1616 Prunus serotina 0 R 9.9 2.3 51.0
1617 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 9.3 5.2 33.0 0 . El N 3 .
1618 Ulmus americana 0 R 7.0 7.0 30.0 ❑ ❑ =
1619 Quercus alba 0 R 9.3 8.8 30.0 ❑ El d
1620 Ulmus americana ® R 6.1 9.6 23.0 0 v
1621 Ulmus americana ® R 4.5 6.6 31.0 E LI U
1622 Ulmus americana ® R 1.9 5.9 104.0 DBH?❑ 9 0 El a ( t
1623 Viburnum dentatum 0 R 1.8 8.7 10.0 ❑
#stems: 15 , New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor Damage Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.46
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, ' *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMa1,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0016 I Mar 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
o
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
r Explanation of art-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species loll
jleioht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ lOcm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
_
Species Name p Sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
k . a
**Required ifcrtoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. .1 1*2 ;• :•4 N5 ` 6 I 7 I R 1 :ILO FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p•47
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0016 X-axis: 152° #stems: 15
map size:
N 0
LARGE
(I®
(k)
Y:5m
• •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanicallv,U=Unknown _ p.48
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0017 Pa Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / 91.S4-' - / / ( ( New lanting date m/yy? /
r heck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: �!'C P�1`l ,' =MINIM Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -`s.U. f C
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601515 Datum: NAD83/W(dec.deg.or m) -77.295058 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 195 )19,,,e, lydr' 'r"'".„..'P
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ;IT Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm *1 lcm* 1 cm sprout
1624 Quercus nigra ® R 0.9 3.8 40.0 ❑
1625 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 4.4 2.4 30.0 El ,
1626 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 6.4 3.5 33.0 LI
1627 Quercus nigra () R 6.2 8.0 27.0 ❑ ❑ Ll
1628 Quercus nigra ® R 7.8 0.9 60.00 El H A ^
1629 Quercus sp. ® R 2.6 5.7 41.0 El
1630 Quercus nigra O R 0.0 9.3 62.0 El
El °11#stems: 7 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamoline**:
,f leight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name p Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
e Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. •i 1.2 • 3 •4 �.-.5 6 'n7 It18 `n) 10 FormWS2,ver9.1
•I. •• • •• • I
*SOURCE:T=Transplantn.L=Live stak B=Ball and burla.,P=Po,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown _ p.49
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0017 -X-axis: 195° #stems: 7
map size:
LARGE
NC-
C - — •
Y:5n
• •
(0,0) x:5n,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplan!L=Live stake,BB=Ba11 and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.50
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

•
Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0018 Parry' Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - 1 -4/0 ni} L � New lanting date m/yy? I
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Vt;4 G(G i - , Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: IQ O
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602171 Datum: INAD83/W .
(dec.deg.or m) r'o
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.294898 UTM Zone: -
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): I 195
Plot Dimensions:X: 1- 10 Y: 710
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 2 j Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1632 Quercus lyrata ® R 1.6 0.2 32.0 ❑ y Q D 3
1633 Platanus occidentalis ® R 1.3 4.0 56.0 ❑ 5-O 3 _4.....y.,
1634 Platanus occidentalis ® R 3.2 4.1 51.0 ❑ 0 t�.
1635 Quercus sp. O R 4.1 0.1 38.0 ❑ 0
1636 Quercus nigra ® R 6.5 1.5 68.0 ❑ ❑ 0
1637 Quercus mgra © R 9.3 1.6 40.0 ❑ - o
1638 Platanus occidentalis ® R 5.9 4.4 40.0 ❑ it: ❑ 3
1639 Quercus nigra Q R 8.6 5.1 62.0 ❑ ti 0
1640 Betula nigra O R 4.9 2.6 58.0 ❑ t ❑ 4
1641 Betula nigra ® R 7.8 8.0 54.0 ❑ n
1642 Betula nigra ® R 1.8 7.0 53.0 ❑ 19 i I J 3
#stems: I New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space need ,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Ole V it- 4, /it lon
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burp P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Roos M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.51
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0018 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH t ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
1
A
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Explanation of cutoff
&su bsam ding**:
eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
:Ei: m-
DLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Lf 10 c 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Re qui red if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. r1 1.2 • �`4 �"5 1 6 � 7 K Ir+ 10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stakJ B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p._52
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0018 - X-axis: 195° #stems: 11
p size:
N LARGE
A
LARGEGE
•
Y:5ni
(k)
•
•
(0,0) X:5111
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.53
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0019 P. : Role: Date last planted: I
( ) 1 Date: (� / 'j / 1 p- / / M g 1" J - New...planting date m/yy?L
VMD Year 1-5 : 20 s not
Taxonomic Standard: \J Et k til Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602781 Datum: 'NAD83/W(dec.deg.or m) `'SO
1 Longitude or UTM-E: -77.294933 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 180
Plot Dimensions:X. 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH a Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1644 Quercus pagoda Q R 0.5 0.8 39.0 ❑ _ ❑ ti
1645 Quercus pagoda ® R 3.3 0.5 79.0 ❑ ,t..t
1646 Quercus sp. ® R 4.0 3.4 32.0 ❑ ❑ i"
1647 Quercus sp. Q R 7.8 2.9 50.0 ❑ ❑ O
1648 Quercus pagoda ® R 6.0 0.6 32.0 ❑ ID M
1649 Quercus pagoda Q R 8.5 0.4 40.0 E _ ❑ /_.
1650 Quercus nigra ® R 9.6 6.0 28.0 ❑ 0 "-
1651 Quercus sp. O R 7.1 6.4 70.0 ❑ ❑ M
1652 Quercus sp. Q R 4.6 6.7 51.0 ❑
1653 Quercus sp. () R 1.6 7.5 58.0 ❑ ❑ A"
1654 Quercus nigra ® R 0.9 9.2 57.0 ❑ ❑ M
i
#stems: 11 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor Damage* Notes
()LAC(QA5 5 pp, , V, 0.9 3 9 3 9 -
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p,54
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0019 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH . ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam ding**:
11eit'ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name ,0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap' 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
1 —
1
, `
**Requiredifcitoff>10cmorsuhsample?100%. •1 02 ;+ I .4 "5 r I= 1:8 t�9 In30 FormWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Trantlant,.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U=Unknown _ p.55
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 180° #stems: 11
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0019 map size:
Ne
LARGE
•
Y:5i (110
a
(o,o) X:5ni
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanicalh.U=Unknown _ g 56
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0020 Part; Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / 0 41 ,/� " Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 14/( i f t r` Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ?.)
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603527 Datum: NAD831W
(dec.deg.or in) -77.294944 UTM Zone: .
Longitude or UTM-E: `
1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 20
Coordinate Accuracy(m):
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 1°1ElPlot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm *I lcm* 1 cm sprout
1656 Diospyros virginiana ® R 1.3 0.4 52.0 0 ❑ . '
1657 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 1.2 2.9 53.0 0 ❑ c7
1658 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 3.9 4.0 53.0 ❑ ❑ 0
1659 Liriodendron tulipifera 0 R 14:0- 1.2 54.0 ❑ 0 c., t
1660 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 6.2 1.9 31.0 0 - '-
1661 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 4.4 6.7 51.0 ❑ ❑ .:--,
1662 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 9.6 5.4 58.0 ❑ 11=1 .-
1663 Quercus sp. 0 R 6.3 7.2 22.0
1664 Quercus sp. IL(11r © R 9.8 8.0 21.0 ❑ a`Gt u
1665 Quercus sp. ® R 3.5 6.7 58.0 0 ❑ Ai
1666 Quercus sp. O R 0.6 9.8 38.0 ❑ 3 7
#stems: 11 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap;P=Potted,Tu=Tublinw.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p 57
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MO-Wing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DlSeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0020 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH 6 ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
- i
Exalanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam piing**: -
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES—DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>!0cm or subsample?100%. •1 1.2 • 3 1••S N5 1..t• 1 7 :T 8 10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
• •• •• •• • •
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,_Tu=Tublin$,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.58
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Too!ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0020 X-axis: 20° #stems: 11
G N map size:
LARGE
C
a
•
d (�
\.:5n
f
• •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.59
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0021 Party::: _Role: Date last planted: ,
New...planting date m/yy? / '
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - / / Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: L.t (.1 r 4 _ I ' p - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: G/(0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604196 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) `.Co
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.294866 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 12
Plot Dimensions:X: I 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ca Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm * 1cm* 1 cm sprout
1668 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 0.4 0.6 41.0 0 ❑ 0 r
1669 Quercus sp. Q R 3.8 0.9 41.0 0 El c)
1670 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 3.8 4.6 43.0 0 L
1671 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 1.1 4.6 44.0 ❑ `23
1672 Quercus sp. Q R 1.4 6.8 50.0 ❑ Ili ~
T
1673 Diospyros virginiana © R 9.7 1.2 25.0 ❑ O
1674 Liriodendron tulipifera ® A 6.7 4.8 50.0 0 0 7 O
1675 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 9.5 4.8 53.0 ❑ 0
1676 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 9.1 7.3 38.0 0 3 B D1
1677 Betula nigra ® R 6.4 7.4 83.0 0 9 i ❑ _
1678 Quercus alba ® R 3.2 7.0 59.0
#stems: 11 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 r
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p_6Q
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0021 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species sn n�& uagg *:
eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
I 1____
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. .1 la_ I. 3 ai• d 5 1 6 ' In I i 10 FormWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.61
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0021 - - - X-axis: 12° #stems: 11
map size:
N LARGE
—0
Y:Sn
411
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.62
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DlSeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0022 Parr:: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020 I
New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / 11Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: !pa, 11 ey 'r' P Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: (0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604478 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) - f=C.0
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.294656 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 86 -
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
, Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 2 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1680 Prunus serotina ® R 3.4 1.5 58.0 0 rj
1681 Diospyros virginiana ® R 3.4 3.6 50.0 0 7 t ❑
1682 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 6.5 2.6 50.0 ❑ El 0
1683 Quercus sp. () R 9.5 0.6 22.0 ❑ Til 0
1684 Betula nigra ® R 9.8 3.0 68.0 111 Dd CI I -
1685 Betula nigra ® R 9.2 6.0 52.0 111 0
1686 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 6.1 5.7 53.0 ❑ ❑ O
1687 Betula nigra ® R 8.9 8.4 82.0 0 • .-- El_ 7
1688 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 6.2 9.0 38.0 CI `iQ 0 .,
1689 Pisa 1,,/440(,, Q R 3.4 9.1 49.0 ❑ Ct a__ 0 3 -
1690 Diospyros virginiana 0 R 2.9 6.2 28.0 ❑ Eld7
1691 Castanea pumila Q R 0.2 9.8 15.0 ❑ 0 [�
1692 Nyssa sylvatica a R 0.3 7.4 38.0 ❑ CI
1693 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 0.3 5.0 30.0 El
1694 Cercis canadensis ® R 0.3 3.4 10.002,-"� lilt-1
1695 Cercis canadensis Q 1 0.3 1.3 15.0 ❑ () / /
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS((Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 I -
*SOURCE_Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted_Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U=Unknown _ p.63
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0022 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su Imam oling**:
Hei;;ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): 0 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm sub_ =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01 102 •3 1`4 4145 1 6 I=7 1138 I t xi0 FomnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.64
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0022 - x-axis: 86° N #stems: 16
CD
� map size:
LARGE
•T
(7(
t t
f
\ f
ic: .
y,,ii. 7,
r ic ,
t k
(0 0j x:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplan,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burls ,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling;R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 65
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0023 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year 1 Date: 2/ / - / / 1 P New lanting date m/yy?
(1-5): 1Z Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.605148 Datum: :NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) `�'°
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.294918 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 1 6
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ,, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm 1cm* 1 cm sprout
1697 Emus-ate( 0 c 0 R 0.1 4.8 50.0 El LV 8
1698 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 2.5 3.8 52.0 0 Ti 0
1699 a( (7( ® R 5.5 3.3 60.0 ❑ b \ n 3
1700 r Tlmu atnerirana(e 0 , Q k 7.9 3.3 33.0 0 10 0 -
1701 Betula nigra © R 7.9 6.2 60.0 0 5 9
1702 Betula nigra ® R 5.4 6.3 70.0 ❑
1703 Quercus sp. ® R 6.0 9.2 22.0 0 ❑ e7
w
1704 Quercus sp. ® it 9.3 9.0 20.0 ❑ ❑
1705 04 ® R 2.9 6.4 41.0 0 'r t_ El y^
1706 Quercus sp. Q R 3.1 9.3 10.0 ❑ ❑ 0
1707 Quercus sp. ® R 0.2 9.4 51.0 ❑ Nv ❑ )r
1708 Diospyros virginiana ® R 0.3 6.4 41.0 ❑ ❑ ()
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.66
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, ' *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0023 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH 57, ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of ant-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling**:
iieil;ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if ctYoff>10cm or subsample?100%. •1 I.2 • 3 I.•
•4 �"5 I�'h 7 R Nl0 Form W S2,ver 9.1
I. ••• •■ ••• •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.67
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 6° #stems: 12
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0023 map size:
C— N LARGE
fO
Y:5„
-�1
•
i
(0,0) x:5ni
*SOURCE:Tr=Tranplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.68
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0024 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - f rt"" ,''l New lanting date m/yy?
oo Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: (,,/el.(,(,l 4/ . Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: '0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.605806 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.294668 UTM Zone: -
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): I 262 _
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y; 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH fi, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1709 Quercus sp. Q R 2.5 2.1 40.0 ❑ 3° ❑ 4 i/f`
1710 Quercus sp. Q R 3.1 4.4 52.0 ❑ ❑ D 1
1711 Celtis sp. Q R 5.6 0.0 52.0 o CI G
1712 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 5.6 0.2 50.0 - _)
1713 Ulmus americana Q R 8.6 1.8 28.0 ❑
1714 }Thula amwrirana c o L ® R 9.1 4.2 31.0 0 _ _
1715 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 6.0 3.2 63.0 ❑ I=1 a
1716 Ulmus americana 0 R 8.6 6.6 42.0 ❑ F j
1717 Celtis sp. ® R 9.0 9.3 60.0 ❑ 511 - E -! -
1718 Prunus serotina ® R 5.9 9.8 42.0 0 L.j n , r_,/
Y�
1719 Enimys-seretisk ,,i.(4c !1 Q R 6.2 6.6 60.0 0 8 {ci
1720 Quercus rubra `� Q R 3.4 7.2 58.0 0 S: ._ 0 7
1721 Prunus serotina ® R 0.2 9.4 50.0 ❑ - D
1722 Liriodendron tulipifera Q 1{ 0.3 7.0 40.0 ❑ ❑ 0
#stems: 14 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) Height cm* 1 DBH
cmm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.69
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMa1,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0024 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
P char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species explanation of cut-off10&subsamaline**:
eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 3f 7Cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q sub_ 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. ■1 1•2 • 3 I•.4 `•'- 1fp-•6 =7 \� : !0 FormWS2,ver9.1
• •• •■ •■ • H• ��i
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically=U=Unknown 70
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0024 X-axis: 262° #stems: 14
map size:
LARGE
(1)
fr
f
a
(f,,)
• •
(0,0) X:5 n
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U=Unknown p,71
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
•
I Plot 20008-01-0025 P.., : Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: ,, / 1,- /2 O /1^ t New lanting date m/yy? // / Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: - • Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606139 Datum: VAD83/W _
(dec.deg.or m) o to
Longitude or UTM-E: I-77.294729 _ UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 276
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y; 10 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
ID Species Name Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
P char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1724 Platanus occidentalis O R 0.0 2.2 48.0 ❑ O
1725 Quercus sp. ® R 2.0 2.3 24.0 ❑ 1 E + 7
1726 Betula nigra ( R 4.9 1.9 78.0 ❑ 7 2 L] 3
1727 Betula nigra Q R 4.2 4.6 70.0 ❑ Li a� '3
1728 Betula nigra ® R 7.9 2.6 R ❑J 81.0 ❑ ' 2)
1729 Quercus sp. ® R 8.0 5.5 55.0 Ill ❑ r)
1730 Quercus sp. ® R 8.5 8.0 40.0 ❑ h g ❑ 9
•
1731 Betula nigra ® R 1.6 5.1 30.0 ❑ "i e
1732 Quercus alba () R 1.6 7.7 50.0 0 55 E. -2
J
#stems: 9 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Sri L • '+a `i. 7. 90
I
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /1/1/subsamdina**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 0cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS - DBH TREES -DBH
'
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
\
**Requi red ifciYff>10cmorsubsample?100%. el 1:2 I.: 1::4
-0 N5 I4t I:7 1:
8 1:44 14
10 Form
WS2,vu9.1
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root M=Mechanically_,U=Unknown _ _ p.72
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0025 X-axis: 276° #stems: 9
map size:
CD LARGE
i
C
s i
(0,0) x:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.73
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMaI,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0026 Ps:-: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / / / Newlanting date m/yy? I_ / ICheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: k, 't tq,(y(•N v' Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 'lo\ kvl (`
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606284 Datum: [NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.293745 UTM Zone: a
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 126
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 101 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
ID Species Name Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
P char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1734 Betula nigra 0 R 1.7 1.3 68.0 0 7 c- El 4+
1735 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 8.7 1.7 20.0 ❑ ,0 ❑ '
'a 3
1'436 Crataegus marshallii Q V R�f_fs72- 41:9 SI ‘"f„ 1 27.0 7- ;.-
1737 Crataegus marshallii Q R 5.3 9.2 28.0 +d 1 [ ,'';
1738 Celtis sp. 0 R 9.1 8.8 71.0 ❑ 60 ❑ 2
1739 Unlct px,v 1, ® R 6.5 8.8 60.0 ❑ ) [1
1740 Ulmus americana ® R 3.6 8.8 52.0 0 c ❑ 3
1741 Quercus sp. th.,,,P l4A e/ O R 0.4 8.6 32.0 0 4 6
1742 Quercus lyrata 4 O R 2.7 5.3 58.0 Elef p 3 . , es r
#stems: 9 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
Species Name Source* X Y Height DBH
I� m 11m 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
[
tfplanation of cut
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &snl>samnhina**:off
Ileiht Cut-Off(All sterns shoiterthan thisare ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm 050cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm suer_ =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. III *2 • I•*4 N5 16 in' Ins r 10 Fenn WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanical ,U=Unknown p.74
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlik Iely to survive year,0=dead, I ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. i Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0026 - X-axis: 126° N\ #stems: 9
map size:
LARGE
let
o tr)
�:5 •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown — _ p.75
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, 1 *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0027 Pan:,: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - .."_10 a S Poi, I-( pc. New_planting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 40K 4(e P. �' - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: N9((,
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606748 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) I f 1
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.293131 I UTM Zone:
f'
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 170
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1744 Platanus occidentalis ® R 2.5 0.8 42.0 El 6 r, _
1745 Platanus occidentalis O R 2.5 3.7 68.0 ❑ /oo ElG
1746 Platanus occidentalis ® R 6.0 0.6 61.0 ❑ / 6 (
1747 Platanus occidentalis () k 6.6 4.2 51.0
1748 Quercus sp. iMl 04 it cl y l ® R 8.9 2.4 50.0 ❑ 5- O ❑ i
1749 Platanus occidentalis O R 6.7 7.0 40.0 1-1 5 S
1750 Ulmus americana ® R 8.5 9.4 50.0 0 5`LI ❑ 7
1751 Platanus occidentalis Q R 2.2 6.7 48.0 El '7
#stems: 8 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Pianted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y eig
Species Name Source* (m) (m) I1 cm*t 1 DBH
cmm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1\ v4_
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species subsplanationamdinofa**!-uff:
Height Cut-Off(All sterns shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS - DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
,**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. •E 162
5 3 10 04 4 I 6 � ? 1 8 IT 10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
I - - �
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p,76
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0027 X-axis:
(ir
Y:5n
• v
(0,0, x:5
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.77
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
I Plot 20008-01-0028 Party: Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? / 1
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - '- �/w1 p! P - JCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: (,.� c l ( el • Notes: sampled,specify reason below
ct. el ' / //L
0-11'�/
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606869 Datum: NAD83/W _ -
(dec.deg.or m) e-C-77.292452 UTM Zone:y
Longitude or UTM-E: - - �.--1
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 162
Plot Dimensions:X: I10 Y: ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
<
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X YHeight DBH 9, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1753 Celtis sp. O R 4.0 2.4 52.0 ❑ 5") C 1
1754 Quercus sp. () R 7.7 3.0 50.0 0 l't v 3
1755 Quercus sp. 104(t344
vi , Qf R 8.3 0.0 42.0 ❑ 7 t6
1756 Quercus phellos ® R 7.2 6.3 41.0 ❑
1757 Unknown sp. ® R 2.9 8.7 28.0 ❑ f✓'
1758 Celtis sp. (61 R 3.6 5.6 42.0 n 3 f— El ?
#stems: 6 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
] .
-
Explanation of art-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species I,&subsam piing**:
I leisht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
— F -
f
0— - .
**Requi red ifcrt-0ff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 •2 '• 3 ••4 14P-465 16 n8 rz NI0 Form WS2,ver 9.1
• ••• •• •• ••
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Posed Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p•78
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0028 X-axis: 162° #stems: 6
map size:
N
LARGE
• •
Y:Sn.
•
a
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p 79
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
'Plot 20008-01-0029 Pariy: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / _ - / / !F , n, New lanting date m/yy?
( . LJCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: d Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606989 Datum: NAD83/W ,
(dec.deg.or m) ('C
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.290337 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): -.- 1X-Axis bearing(deg): 174
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Names a { char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm *I lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1759 Ny va v Q R t 6 110 £.8►),I. 60.0 ❑ `I' ® II .
1760 Cercis canadensis ® R 3.7 2.0 49.0 ❑ 3 R
1761 Celtis sp. /� ® R 3.5 1.1 52.0 0 c 0 ❑ 7
1762 �_ 1 A tZ CDR 4.5 3.6 49.0 0 4 -
1763 Unknown sp. �`"� O R 2.5 4.9 50.0 ❑ 1=1 v
1764 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 7.9 0.0 50.0 El '{6 ~ ❑ i
1765 Malus angustifolia t./ Ol R 5.6 0.5 62.0 ❑ (P
1766 Morus rubra O ft 5.0 6.1 60.0 ❑
1767 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 8.3 5.5 52.0 ❑ Zlq ❑ 3
1768 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 7.7 7.1 61.0 ❑_ i
1769 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 6.7 9.5 38.0 ❑ LI 1=1 - 3
1770 Morns rubra O Et 4.1 7.0 61.0 0 El c2
1771 Nyssa sylvatica O R 2.6 9.3 62.0 ❑ c
1772 Morus rubra ® R 0.8 6.1 63.0 rG R ?)
_ _
1773 Nyssa sylvatica O R 0.2 8.9 62.0 ❑ a'0 ❑ j J7
1774 Morus rubra ® R 10.0 1.5 71.0 ❑ 63 f
#sterns: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.80
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0029 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampiing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50em ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Lf Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub_ =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
•
**Requiredif cut-off>lOcmorsubsample?100%. wl 1i2 • 3 1:.4 Ni I 138 I�j
Nit) FormWS2,ver9.1
s •! o N M •■
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown I' 81
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, I ANIMaI,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0029 X-axis: 174° #stems: 16
map size:
N 0 LARGE
k n;
1':J 111
r
(0.0, x:5,,,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.82
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0030 Pjriv: Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / / / 04 iLf Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 1,---Cam,�..1 s / f
�p Notes: sampled,specify reason below
'Taxonomic Standard DATE: fi� _
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606765 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.291383 UTM Zone:' I _ 1
�Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 1 175
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 E Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 2 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1776 14( O R 0.6 1.5 26.0 El3 j
1777 Celtis sp. O Rti G 3-5� Yl
tI G1 57.0 4I
_l I�j Y
` „i3 -
1778 Celtis sp. O R 4.8 5.6 46.0
1779 Morus rubra O R 8.2 0.5 63.0 ❑ 7 "?..... _ 4 4•,1.A
1780 Quercus sp. ® R 7.9 3.3 49.0 ❑ I b ❑
1781 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 7.1 6.4 43.0 E �
1782 Nyssa sylvatica O R 6.3 9.2 42.0 ❑ (,Ij ❑
1783 Celtis sp. 0 R 9.1 4.8 49.0 ❑ ❑
1784 Celtis sp. ® R 5.0 6.8 42.0 111 9 S-
1785 Viburnum dentatum ® I( 1.5 8.6 29.0 ID ❑ ,-i
#stems: 10 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
[ . -- -..
t-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /&subs�aline*:
Heijht Cut-Off(A11 stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name El Sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>10cm or subsample?100%. Ill 02 le• 3• •••4 •5 6 - 1138
` 0 Form WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=U nknown _p_83
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0031 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / New lancing date m/yy? l /
g:s7 1 Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 1,---.." (,.� 2/, ( Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 1.-4( `--
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606419 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) x-
Longitude or UTM-E: `77.291201 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 162
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data I Z ' THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X - Y Height DBH f„D* Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1787 Celtis sp. Q R 0.8 2.9 40.0 ❑ ❑ .`"(
1788 Quercus sp. vi i t�i((1 i.i i ® R 3.1 3.6 62.0 ❑ -7 I
CI
1789 Quercus sp. ® R 0.3 0.9 42.0 ❑ ' 3
1790 Quercus michauxii ® K 0.3 3.7 56.0 ❑ 7 D 4 El -
1791 Diospyros virginiana ® R 2.6 6.0 42.0 ❑ - ❑ w
1792 Prunus serotina ® R 5.3 0.3 42.0 n v►%
1793 Quercus lyrata 0 R 8.1 0.8 35.0 ❑ 3/ V ® ,
1794 Quercus nigra O R 8.8 3.2 38.0 ❑ y,). 1
1795 Quercus nigra Ql R 8.5 5.4 50.0 ❑ El
1796 Quercus sp. ® R 8.4 7.8 45.0 ❑ � d
1797 Quercus sp. Q R 8.3 6.3 48.0 ❑ Li 0
1798 Prunus serotina Q R 6.0 5.6 30.0 ❑ d L I?
1799 Unknown sp. O R 9.1 4.3 22.0 ❑ '
1800 Quercus sp. ® R 0.3 9.0 52.0 ❑ tl 0 I--1 Y
1801 Prunus serotina ® R 9.0 9.2 45.0 ❑
1802 Quercus sp. ® R 0.7 6.7 47.0 ❑ 19 a- 0 ' 1 `
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 p„,i7(c 110115 0'-1.-. w(
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Bail and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin8,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _p.85
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0031 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamrling**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name CZ1sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
** o /o Required ifcltff>10cmor subsample?100 . •i 2 • 3 • •5 6 8 10 FomiWS2,ver9.1
I• •• I •4 ••■ •• S �io �i
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,.P=Potted=Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.86
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0031 X-axis: 162° #stems: 16
map size:
N LARGE
kl)
•
Y:51:
toy
r
(o.o) x:5,11
*SOURCE:Tr=TransplansL=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ _ _ _ _ p.87
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght;STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
r Plot 20008-01-0032 P. : Role: Date last planted:
New lancing date m/yy?
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / T. 1- / /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: _ = Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606016 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) I.77 293137 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E: ME
Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 162
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 2 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1804 Quercus sp. ® R 1.7 0.9 28.0 ❑ .'t)6 n '2)-
1805 Quercus sp. 0 R 1.7 3.9 42.0 ❑ tt t'.i 2
1806 Malus angustifolia 0 R 1.5 4.5 5.0 ❑ ❑ Ai\
1807 Crataegus marshallii Q R 5.0 4.1 46.0 ❑ J ❑ ';
1808 Viburnunrdentatura i.e.! it y 0 R 7.0 1.4 52.0 0 ' , 2 ❑
_
1809 V.I A,, Q R 7.3 3.7 42.0 E 5 0 .3
1810 Quercus pagoda ® R 8.7 0.3 22.0 ❑ ❑ (T W
1811 Yibummui entatum(,`, A.._., ® R 9.3 3.0 32.0 0 6 ❑
1812 Viburnum dentatum O R 7.5 5.4 41.0 0 n
1813 Ulmus americana ® R 6.7 5.6 31.0 0 El /A_ _
1814 Comus amomum O R 9.3 5.6 52.0 ❑ El 0
1815 Viburnum dentatum 0 R 8.0 8.4 32.0 ❑ 0 .1-)
1816 Viburittmrdentatiun(r v.,6. () R 5.8 9.8 30.0 ❑ S� 3
1817 Quercus sp. ® R 6.2 2.0 41.0 0 ❑ v
1818 Quercus sp. O R 2.4 8.8 10.0 El ❑ v
1819 Ulmus americana ® R 9.9 0.4 48.0 o ❑ /l
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m)! 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
tAt1+-,+.5 t...e r:(`.-,,lit 5-‘ 6 g, 2 8 /
(A 1t M • . a vii e': _0.5 .7• 6 0
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown 4_88
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0032 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Ex lunation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &suhsam e**:
IleiAtCut-Of(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100Cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red ifcitoff>10cmor subsample?100%. it 1.2 !.. 1.4 N5 l:b I 7 I 8 I 9 �10 FormWS2,ver9.1
•*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 89
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, 1 *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. �Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0032 x-axis: 162° #stems: 16
map size:
N 1` ) LARGE
Y:5m
(-A
()
1111
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:TT—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.90
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0033 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year 1 Date: / / / / �e..ki^ New lanting date m/yy? /
(1-5): (i �O�a liCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: ,� �t`n`tian
u�e� � Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: Zp to i ) I
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.605384 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.294178 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1I X-Axis bearing(deg): 196
Plot Dimensions:X: 101 Y: I 101 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z, THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Sources X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m� Icm* 1 cm Icm* 1 cm sprout
1822 Ulmus americana O R 2.4 2.8 22.0 ❑ ❑ 0
1823 Quercus A� . I N d ®0, R 5.6 2.5 32.0 ❑ 1} tJ 3 v
1824 Quercus lyrata I R 7.9 2.4 38.0 ❑ 0
1825 Quercus nigra O H kir ,440 5' 42.0 ❑ 51 0 LI -
1826 Nyasa syk,at;dah(„LS .woI 164.,Q R 13iipt19.4 32.0 ❑ L,(r ❑ 3
1827 Malus angustifolia ® A 6.3 9.4 59.0 ❑
(r70 ❑ 3
1828 Quercus michauxii ® R 3.6 5.7 40.0 ❑ GI l ❑ 3
1829 Viburnum dentatum O R 4.0 4.44 to 18.0 ❑ 0 0 ,
1830 Betulanigra ® R 2.1 9.4 76.0 ❑ 71 H
1 Geer
1831 Quercus nigra ® R 0.2 6.9 63.0 ❑ ivl
#stems: 10 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
r-- -
•
41
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsan ru:
�pling *:
height Cut-Off(All stems'shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm -,
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name Q sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Regaired ifcrtoff>l Ocm or subsample?100%. 61 1.2 = 3 1..4 *4 I t-'6 I H I NI0 Fonn W S2,ver 9.1
I. i• ■\ •. i
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p_91
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, 1*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0033 X-axis: 196° #stems: 10
map size:
N 0 LARGE
• i
7
Y:5m
• r
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplan,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling1 R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 92
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
I Plot 20008-01-0034 Party: Role: Date last planted:
New
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: A / 1 / - / / r Pr
lanting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: ' "`z' Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ( 1 ,II
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604601 Datum: 'ADy833//WW _
(dec.deg.or m) 77 294237 UTM Zone. I 1 r (7 y
Longitude or UTM-E: il-J!
Coordinate Accuracy(m): li X-Axis bearing(deg): L 203 y I
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y;1 10 0 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data 'Z I THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vi or Dama e* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1833 Prunus serotina tit R 2.2 0.9 32.0 ❑ ❑
1834 Quercus nigra 65 !t 0.7 3.0 47.0 ❑ `-7 '
1835 Malus angustifolia tit, R 4.0 2.9 52.0 0 R _,
1836 Quercus sp. X R 7.2 0.6 28.0 ❑ -6
1837 Quercus nigra O R 6.7 3.0 49.0 ❑ 4 `Z ❑ if
1838 Quercus sp. O It 9.9 3.2 30.0 ❑ 0 h
1839 Crataegus marshallii ® R 6.7 6.3 38.0 0
1840 Quercus nigra ® R�.16�` 9 g 48.0 0 S H1841 Benda nigra ® R 3.7 6.7 69.0 0 C�
1842 Quercus sp. () R 0.0 7.8 47.0 ..--- n O
#stems: 10 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
-
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species AEx of cut-off
sut ampiing**:
eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name Q sub 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Su
� =10
e Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
1
r
**Requi red ifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01 02 • 3 ••I 6 k I�`t t0 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
• i• ■• •• •• �/ IH
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin .R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.93
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0034 X-axis: 203° #stems: 10
( Rze:
LARGE
LARGGE
N
Y:5n•
41/4
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown i, 94
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Mo titoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0035 Party: Role: Date last planted:
l
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: I / /Zv / / "�"^ New LJanting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: We A(,5 h^ Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 24,4 a ,
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603833 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) ,--ro r
5
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.294147 `UTM Zone: IN
Coordinate Accuracy(m): I 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 194
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y; 1 10
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data, Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1844 Quercus-lyra&r y5, g R 4.4 0.6 62.0 ❑ I ei + Er 3
1845 Betula nigra ® R 2.8 4.0 41.0 ❑
1846 Quercus nigra 0- R 7.1 1.3 52.0 ❑
1847 Quercus nigra W R 9.7 2.0 48.0 ❑ ® n 4
1848 Quercus nigra () R 6.1 4.6 50.0 ❑ -,r ❑ T
1849 Quercus lyrata ® R1,2, /2 c 4 52.0 ❑ L ?�
1850 Quercus/ IBC q„. 0 R 7.6 8.3 48.0 ❑ 53 ❑ 3
1851 Quercus sp. tig, R 5.6 7.3 38.0 ❑ _ -
vr'.r,
1852 Quercus phellos Ick, R 3.0 6.5 60.0 ❑ O ❑ 0
1853 Liriodendron tulipifera t` R 2.0 9.4 48.0 ❑ 2.9, a
1854 Quercus sp. , R 0.6 6.3 29.0 ❑ D
#stems: 11 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L Live stake,B=Ball and burlap;P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.95
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0035 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
P char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Exvlanation of ad-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &suisam:ine**:
7leight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Re qui red ifcdoff>10cmorsubsample?100% .1 I.' • 3 .4 N5 Ir.6 In In' ) x10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burla P=Potted,Tu=Tublinge,R=bare Rook M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p_96
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0035 X-axis: 194° #stems: 11
map size:
N iD LARGE
DT),
•
1:5m
(o9 '\
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=PotteA Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.97_
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0036 P. : Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: E k / % I Z,o - / / v.,1v.,, ,►r
, - New...planting date m/yy?L
s not
Taxonomic Standard: ,1,, ' = Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602922 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) - `C°
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.294252 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 198
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1856 Nyssa sylvatica O R 0.8 0.6 52.0 0 ❑ n
1857 Nyssa sylvatica 0 R 3.5 4er /.0 41.0 ❑ ❑ 0
1858 Betula nigra () R lr, '1,7 81.0 0 El '}
1859 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 8.2 1.5 40.0 El . I__.J t
1860 i erieaaa-6rz„t ems,j4',,,w R 8.8 3.9 21.0 ❑ ?LI LI 3
1861 Crataegus marshallii 0 R 7.8 6.8 42.0 ❑ LI` 3 ,-
1862 Crataegus marshallii 0 R 5.0 6.0 42.0 ❑ 4Z, ❑ 3
1863 Quercus sp. O R 6.7 9.4 43.0 ❑ N Z 0 3
1864 Quercus sp. © R 1,3 s' 9.9 41.0 0CI 1 CI 3 ree,r
1865 Quercus sp. O r 4.1 5.0 32.0 ❑ ❑
1866 Celtis sp. 0 R 1.4 9.0 63.0 ❑ El 0
1867 Crataegus marshallii 0 R 1.9 6.0 31.0 0 Za l 3
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanicallys_U=Unknown _ _ p•98
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0036 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) i (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species A su bsam piing**:
1 lei At Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSFS SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required ifctitoff>1 Ocm or subsample?100%. .1 I s2 •3 I 4 •H5 6 I K I 1 10 Fomi W S2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0036 X-axis: 198° #stems: 12
map size:
N 0 LARGE
f
Alf
Y:5n•
V
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlaps P=Potted,,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Rom M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.100
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CYS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0037 Party: Role: Date last planted:
)erv,igafl New...planting date m/yy? /
VIVID Year(1-5): 1 Date: i / 3 / Zv / / LiCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: l�"�1` Notes: sampled,specify reason below
i- •
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602617 Datum: NAD83/W 1 5
(dec.deg.or m) -77.294102 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E: �--+�
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 193 r
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 0 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEARS DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH N Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1869 Quercus michauxii Q R 0.6 1.2 59.0 0 0 M
1870 Quercus michauxii O R 2.9 1.1 47.0 ❑ 114 I. Z MO
1871 Morns rubra ® R 1.0 4.5 42.0 0 30 _ M 3 W
1872 Morns rubra Q R 3.3 4.5 72.0 10 3Z E 3
,
1873 Quercus sp. ® R 5.0 1.1 40.0 ❑ El 0
1874 Quercus sp. Ol R 7.2 1.0 40.0 ❑ (V 3
1875 Quercus sp. Q R 9.4 1.1 45.0 ❑ 31 3,
1876 Moms rubra () R 9.4 4.6 80.0 0 °A
1877 Morns rubra ® R 6.7 4.3 52.0 0 lD 7 - 3
1878 Quercus michauxii ® R 8.3 7.2 50.0 ❑ 53 ❑ 3
1879 Quercus qr. reit -,xi'. 0 R 5.4 7.1 46.0 ❑ l.(s 0 3 t t S
1880 Diospyros virginiana O R 6.4 10.0 78.0 ❑ 0
1881 Diospyros virginiana () R 9.2 10.0 76.0 , A - b
_.
1882 Diospyros virginiana (FDI R 4.1 10.0 23.0 ❑ 3( 0
1883 Diospyros virginiana () R 1.5 10.0 20.0 11 0 3
1884 Quercus aft.svga...drwlry' ® R 1.9 7.0 33.0 0 ?{j El 3
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor Damage Notes
r
/
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant;L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.101
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1
1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0037 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Exulanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species subsampline**:
1 kit;ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Lf sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>lOcmorsubsample?100%. •1 •2 ■ 3 ••4 111-05 N-ir 1147 38 134 10 FormWS2,ver9.1
• •• •• •• • 411
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.102
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 193° #stems: 16
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0037 map size:
N_J LARGE
a... A...
® /4(
Y:5ni
/5 is 3- i t 5' 1
7. /
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubliag,R=bare Root,M=Mechanical U=Unknown _ _ p.103
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0038 P• : Role: Date last planted:
I - New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: 4A / L / 'Z.p -I / / a-r y 4° A 0,"
•V--th'. � Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: II*1 a !4'.... ,1I Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
'Ml,V Latitude or UTM-N: '35.602040 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg. rra
Longitude or UTM-E:r m) -77.294291 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 188
•
Plot Dimensions:X:
10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Sources X Y Height DBH y I Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1886 Morus rubra 9 R 2.3 1.7 55.0 ❑ , , _ 0 J ,
1887 Quercus lyrata tv11, R 0.6 5.1 33.0 ❑ p
1888 Liriodendron tulipifera t 04 3.3 5.1 72.0 ❑ o 0 0
1889 Cercis canadensis k 5.2 1.3 22.0 ❑ _.
v 1
1890 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 8.4 4.4 30.0 El0 ❑
•
1891 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 6.1 4.2 20.0 ❑ lV\
1892 Cercis canadensis It 7.6 1.8 27.0 ❑ 0 ❑ a
1893 Betula nigra 0 R 9.1 7.8 60.0 ❑ ❑ C3
1894 Quercus sp."',..), eN Ce R 9.2 9.8 40.0 ❑ - El 3
1895 Betula nigra 0 R 7.0 6.9 73.0 ❑ V
1896 Betula nigra ,!* R5,c1Alt 7.5 63.0 ❑ a L a
1897 Betula nigra ® R 1.5 7.3 70.0 ❑ D 6
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tt=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Balland burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubli R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.104
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0038 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
-—
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamaline**:
f iej ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01 10213 I 04 Hti 1' 416 Ir7 Ifh` r ]0 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.105
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0038 x-axis: 188° #Stems' 12
map size:LARGE
N (�� 1 LARGE
•
Y:5ni
• •
(0,0) h:5n,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ba_ll and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling R=bare Root.M=Mechanicaly,U=Unknown p.106
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0039 P rty. Role: Date last planted:
L e;veeN 0� New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: ,\I /3 / 2-0I / / Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: We �.� ' Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 2D 10
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601329 Datum: NAD83/W _
(dec.deg.or m) - r-r. P
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.294197 1 UTM Zone: .
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 171
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 0 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ri, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1899 Nyssa sylvatica ciii. R 1.5 0.0 36.0 0 3 C
1900 Nyssa sylvatica ik R 1.8_ (!i, , ' 62.0 0 0
1901 Nyssa sylvatica R 2.1 4.8 58.0 0 0 111 o
1902 Quercus sp.v_voc al R 0.0 4.9 58.0 0 '- _ El 3
1903 Platanus occidentalis R 4.8 0.8 58.0 0 1 s ❑ :-i -
1904 tnusaae�trma rrvis�5 dc) R5.1k X 5X 3, ` 38.0 0 '2-\ IEt": .
1905 Morus rubra E{ 7.1 2.5 52.0 0 L1 �-=�} . .
..
1906 Betula nigra R 6.9 0.0 71.0 0 4 [1 S _ C: -
1907 Celtis sp. 1{ 9.6 0.5 72.0 0 � ce....:+
1908 Moms rubra U . R 7.7 5.8 60.0 0 i _;- _ El
1909 Celtis sp. ®` R 10.0 5.9 70.0 0 -;u a 'j .
1910 Platanus occidentalis It*, R 5.4 5.8 31.0 0 r•,\ ❑ M
1911 ...edits-sp. `- �y� (i[ R 5.8 8.2 50.0 0 1c�`
1912 Morus rubra `ik- R 7.9 8.9 42.0 0 1 D '2-
1913 Nyssa sylvatica at, R 2.5 9.4 52.0 0 Zq Er 2-1914 Quercus sp. (' R 0.6 9.2 42.0 0 3r)
1915 Quercus sp. R 0.3 7.0 50.0 0 Q 0 0
#stems: 17 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* DBH cm
Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tublinv.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.107
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0039 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): 0 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
1 SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
•
Species Name L1 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. •1 1.2 • 3 I.+4 N5 i:6 1 7 tt 1 10 Foim WS2,ver9.l
a •• •• •• I •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant:L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically=U=Unknown p.108
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0039 X-axis: 171° #stems: 17
map size:
N ) LARGE
• •
Vk
4
c
l':5n•
"OP
ti
CJ \
1
• f
V r
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p 109
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the Ci'S-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0040 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: 1\ / �j /yD - / / - ( 0‘,..., New...planting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: iNNP a1 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 2`O t Q
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601546 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) • rrin 1
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.293616 UTM Zone: 1
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 186 -
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Sources X Y Height DBH I y Height DBH Re- V' or* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sproutg
2162 Quercus rubra Oir R 3.5 1.3 43.0 ❑ 11 H
2163 Quercus rubra a, R 3.1 3.9 22.0 0 O
2164 Prunus serotina iii) R 0.9 0.2 28.0 El ' 0 ❑ a
2165 Prunus serotina et ft 0.4 3.0 35.0 0 I°
2166 Ulmus americana (i R 6.6 1.2 43.0 0 tt` ,?3
2167 Uhnus americana q Rb,168 D 3,2 775.0 ❑ 5 ^ ❑ 7
2168 Quercus sp. (9., R 8.5 1.1 32.0 ❑ 0 - El Q
2169 Liriodendron tulipifera /5" R 8.2 4.0 35.0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0
•
2170 Retala-trigFk u•\Nws 6 R 6.5 5.9 28.0 3
2171 Beptlauigra Law„,.t,L5 . e, R 6.7 8.0 50.0 0 .fib � 3
2172 Quercus sp. t4 R 6.9 9.8 32.0 0 33 J
2173 Platanus occidentalis ip R 9.9 7.6 36.0 ❑ 0
2174 Quercus rubra Irk, R 3.2 6.6 21.0 ❑ 21 ❑ 3
2175 Prunus serotina i R 0.4 7.8 50.0 ❑ 56‘ ❑ 3 V
2176 Prunus serotina ® R 0.5 5.5 36.0 ❑ 0 D
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) I1 cm" 1 DBH
cmm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin&R=bare Rot M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.110
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0040 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
'Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species i&subsampling**:
I!eiht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ l0�cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
S cies Name C?1 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. 0( :2 43 �a4 0.5 I10'i5 1138
I FoimWS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.111
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0040 ' X-axis: 186° #stems: 15
map size:
N C) LARGE
l'
ctlg
•
Y:5n1
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.112
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0041 Pariy: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
1 Date: / /2p - / / New lanting date m/yy?Ls
VMD Year(1-5): '� not
+ �'� sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard: _.1 e,,,�,���� Notes: P , P fY
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 'Z,v l p -
^
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601632 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) `-vu P
I Longitude or UTM-E: 77.292858 UTM Zone:
•
1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 190
Coordinate Accuracy(m): i •
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data 'Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH to., Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char Olin 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2178 Platanus occidentalis () R 2.2 2.6 45.0 0 0 -
2179 Brixtlamigra U(,,,..ia5 p.imerfooick ® R 5.0 1.8 54.0 ❑ 38 R ,
2180 Retiala-nigra 0,,.-,. et",.. Q R 4.7 3.8 50.0 is 3
2181 Platanus occidentalis ® R 7.6 1.0 36.0 0 0
2182 Platanus occidentalis Q R 7.1 3.6 44.0
2183 Quercus phellos ® R 9.5 4.1 60.0 E t g E- 3 ,
2184 Quercus phellos ® R 9.5 6.4 41.0 0 40 I.Y
2185 Quercus phellos 0 R 9.1 9.2 68.0 El (A 0 4
2186 Quercus rubra O k 6.4 9.6 46.0 ❑ El (3
2187 Quercus rubra Q R 6.5 6.3 44.0 ❑ 0 V
2188 Zernareffitenwor V)y,,:,4k^ ,,.,e v,De R 3.8 6.2 54.0 La F 3
2189 Betula nigra ® R 3.7 8.6 82.0 E S 3 -
2190 Platanus occidentalis Q R 0.8 7.8 50.0 ❑ El Q -
2191 Platanus occidentalis ® R 1.5 5.3 84.0 ❑ ❑ rV\
#stems: 14 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor Damage* Notes
• 1 i
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.113
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntryTool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0041 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH p„ ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamalint**:
lieil;ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. r1 lr2 r3 $*4 H; 1r6 s ` 10 Fomi WS2,ver9.1
r rr • r■ •r �i
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=TublinA,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.114
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0041 X-axis: 190° #stems: 14
map size:
N LARGE
•
fi
0
Y':5n
yr
I 7
(0,0) a:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplantt L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin R=bare Roo,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p 115
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0042 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
Date: / / / / l'e r^i 0.ci'i New...planting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 l 5 207.0 -W liCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601620 Datum: 'NAD83/W ,7 I�
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: L77.291971 UTM Zone: -
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 1961
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y:• 'ill' ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH FI, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2194 Platanus occidentalis ( R 1.5 0.7 65.0 ❑ 00 [] 1-i
2195 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.8 2.6 45.0 ❑ El _'
2196 Platanus occidentalis () R 0.1 4.9 60.0 ❑ ❑ Y 0
2197 Quercus rubra © R 5.0 0.2 51.0 ❑ ❑ 0
2198 Quercus rubra ® R 4.2 2.5 48.0 ❑ 3; _ [ ] 3
2199 Quercus rubra Q R 3.4 4.8 45.0 ❑
2200 Betula nigra ® R 7.6 0.6 62.0 ❑ El 0
2201 Betula nigra Q R 6.6 2.8 56.0 ❑ ❑ 0
2202 Betula nigra © R 6.0 5.0 71.0 ❑ - 0 0 -
2203 Quercus sp. ® R 9.6 3.0 37.0 ❑ 39 3 _
2204 Quercus sp. Q R 8.9 5.4 44.0 ❑ 31- 0 3
2205 Quercus sp. Q R 8.2 8.2 38.0 ❑ 0
2206 Betula nigra Q R 5.6 7.4 84.0 ❑ 0
2207 Quercus rubra 0 R 5.0 10.0 30.0 ❑ El ,1
2208 Quercus sp. ® R 2.4 9.6 31.0 ❑ ❑ o
2209 Quercus rubra 0 R 3.1 7.2 7.2 ❑ Ei Q
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor Damage Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanicall\.U=Unknown p.116
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0042 Mar 2020 Data 1 o ' THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH i? ddh Height DBH Re Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
w
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampl➢ne**:
—
eiQht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm 050cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name El Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub_ =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
I —
—
**Requiredifcrtoff>locmorsubsample?100%. ■1 a2 • 3 ••4 ta5 :6 = 138 trY NM Form WS2,ver 9.1
I• •• a■ as •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tublina.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U=Unknown _ i'.117
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0042 X-axis: 196° #stems: 16
map size:
N 0 LARGE
fi
l :5n
t6
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,,R=bare Root,M=Mechanical!1 U=Unknown _ p.118
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

4 Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0043 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: 11 /3 / ` vo I- / / At'rvt«c.�e New...planting date m/yy? ! /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: i}r �V-I P"l L+'• - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
I Taxonomic Standard DATE: 7-4 1 a
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601848 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) o _ C f
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.291388 UTM Zone: t
I Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 11111 _
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z 0 THIS YEAR'S DATA I
Map Source* X Y I Height DBH *+ Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm 1 cm 1cm* 1 cm sprout
2211 Quercus bicolor R 2.4 0.2 17.0 2a 93_
2212 Quercuslifeeler(AI fhk ( a R 2.2 2.3 22.0 3� 3
2213 Quercus Ratiktr Mil Aid A O It 2.3 4.1 16.0 .;
2214 ni • --- ., sS�`4vAici-., R 5.0 2.2 43.0 0
2215 Nyssa sylvatica *1 R 4.8 4.7 48.0 ❑ "to) Z.
2216 Quercus ip.rukir fq 9 R 7.4 2.1 49.0 El t(y, 3
2217 Quercus sp. I K 9.8 0.3 34.0 0 i!O 3
. !2218 Quercus sp. V R 7.3 4.4 58.0 ❑ �� 3
2219 Liriodendron tulipifera �j� P. 10.0 4.7 55.0 0 0
2220 Liriodendron tulipifera DD�ik R 9.9 7.0 38.0
2221 Liriodendron tulipifera q R 10.0 9.7 45.0 0Tz_ 2
" t ,_
2222 Quercus sp. , R 7.4 6.9 30.0
�` El
2223 Quercus r, -a, (mil, R 7.3 9.2 40.0 0 31
2224 Quercus sp.fl <o0 W R 5.1 7.5 37.0 CI - s
2225 Quercus.bieolor ® tt 2.4 6.3 16.0 0 _ CI9)
2226 Quercusbieoitlr 1 i A>r� l t ® R 2.1 8.8 24.0 - >Z-.i.
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) i cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown r
_ 119
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0043 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH a ddh Height DBH Re-
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) * Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Explanation of cut-off
A subsam ante":
eiixht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS --DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name p Sub 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (writeDBII)
**Requiredifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. .1 +2 • 3• Il••4 "5 It4t, = It48 IMt NE FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burla,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ •v.120
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnt,y Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0043 X-axis: 187° #stems: 16
map size:
N` ) LARGE
i
c
t
Y:5„
ohk
Q Gv
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.121
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CAS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0044 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: 1‘ / - / 1Jb - / / V i%Al,. New lancing date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: a -1 ,, ` "'`
_W e Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 65.60 8559�� Datum: INAD83/W �
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.290751 UTM Zone f`
Coordinate Accuracy(m): I 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 168
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 1 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
-Mar 2020 Data Z I THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH f7,
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2228 Liriodendron tulipifera A R 1.4 1.1 43.0 0 1 L 2 0 X
2229 Liriodendron tulipifera . R 3.7 1.6 47.0 ❑ D ❑ D
2230 Liriodendron tulipifera R 3.1 3.8 70.0 0 'L r1=1 - Z
2231 Liriodendron tulipifera l 1; 0.9 3.9 28.0 0 .., D
2232 Prunus serotina 1•: 6.7 1.9 45.0 0 ti ❑ 3
2233 Quercus sp.ILA,I„Atiik R 6.1 4.2 50.0 ❑ ,-7-.0 L [
2234 PC- f$e. r ,, R 8.7 1.0 27.0 0 2-8 0 1
2235 Quercus sp. OK R 8.5 3.6 47.0 0C n V G
2236 Prunus serotina Nir R 8.0 6.6 40.0 ❑ n -
2237 Prunus serotina R 7.6 9.4 60.0 ❑ 7 0 u�
2238 QuercusA.Q.. Y e,x 10 R 5.5 6.7 30.0 ❑ + ❑ 2
2239 Quercus rubra R 4.8 9.2 44.0 0 Lk'' ❑ 3
2240 Liriodendron tulipifera R 2.0 8.5 40.0 0 31 ❑ 2
2241 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 3.1 6.4 38.0 ❑ 17 i 1=1 a
2242 Quercus bicolor ikr R 0.7 6.8 21.0 ❑ fr. .1 ❑ _M ,
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.122
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, ' *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0044 X-axis: 168° #stems: 15
map size:
N LARGE
O V
C)4(
Y:5n
(0,o) x:5„,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p_124
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0045 P.3ri!: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
grh. et planting date m/yy? / I
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: l i / 3 /toll, - / / Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: '35.602437 'Datum: NAD83/W - P S
(dec.deg.or m) -77.290116 UTM Zone: �
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): I X-Axis bearing(deg): 178
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: ' 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2244 Prunus serotina O R 3.1 1.9 42.0 0 p 61 3 r
2245 Prunus serotina ® R 2.0 4.0 35.0 0 ❑ o
2246 Quercus sp. ® R 0.7 0.6 50.0 El Lt0 ❑ 3
2247 Cornus amomum ® R 3.9 4.0 45.0 ❑ 4( - 3
2248 Comus amomum Q R 5.3 1.7 46.0 El iiq ❑ 3
2249 Cornus amomum n R r 0.1 48.0 ❑ So 0 3
2250 Ulmus-amedeena )3kt„II, n t�++rt® R 7.9 3.0 41.0 0 7S i FT 3
2251 Quercus bicolor / ® R 9.3 1.2 21.0 El n ' lk/'
2252 Quercus sp. ® R 6.8 5.4 40.0 0 kA6 ❑
2253 Prunus serotina Q R 8.6 7.8 63.0 ❑ 51.I Ei 3
2254 Prunus serotina ® R 7.1 9.5 50.0 ❑ cS n y
2255 Quercus bicolor Q R 5.2 7.6 25.0 ❑ VS la 3
2256 Prunus serotina ® R 3.9 9.6 60.0 0 Si ❑ 3
2257 Comus amomum ® R 1.2 8.1 48.0 0 7 ID 3
2258 Cornus amomum Q ft 2.5 6.1 43.0 0 (PI
2259 Quercus michauxii 0 R 0.3 5.9 63.0 ❑ G i ❑ 3
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
j - .
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p. 125
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

-
Plot(continued): 20008-01-0045 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH fT, ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Re wired ifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 1.2 IS t.4 "5 1:116
I"7 It
la N10 FomiWS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.126
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntiy Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 178° #stems: 16
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0045 map size:
N 0 LARGE
i
A
YY:5ir
74.
t0
y
• I r
(0 0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin ,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U=Unknown _ p. 127
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0046 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
New lanting date m/yy? L /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: vo / s / va - , / / , Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: - •- 1 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -1-.4 . 0 ,)(ft..-
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602808 Datum: 'NAD83/W (� I /
(dec.deg.or m) - t ' 6,
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.289329 UTM Zone
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 1531
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: I 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data 'Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH F, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m I lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2261 Comus amomum O R 0.2 0.6 45.0 0 E -
2262 Quercus sp. 0 R 2.8 1.4 45.0 ❑ ❑ d
2263 Comus amomum ® R 2.6 3.7 52.0 0 .l ❑ 3
2264 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 5.6 1.3 41.0 0 ❑ M
2265 Quercus sp. 0 R 5.3 3.4 28.0 El El IAA
2266 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 8.1 1.3 23.0 0 El M
2267 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 7.8 3.3 33.0 0 n
2268 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 7.6 5.8 55.0 ❑ S3 ❑ 3
2269 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 7.6 7.9 49.0 El ❑ o
2270 Quercus sp. ® R 5.3 8.5 30.0 0 ❑
2271 Quercus sp. ® R 5.3 5.3 41.0 ❑ d
2272 Cornus amomum ® R 2.6 6.3 63.0 Fil 40 Er 3 car
2273 Comus amomum ® R 2.7 8.4 50.0 0 - 1IS 3
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplanl,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.128
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0046 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH far* ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
,Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &suhsampiing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10Cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS—DBH TREES—DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm- =10
Sub-
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Recuiredif cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. °I 142 •3 I:• 1M5 I:6 I FomiWS2,ver 9.1
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 129
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 153° #stems: 13
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0046 map size:
N �
EI)
LARGE
1111
I
Y:5n
?/'
I
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P.—Potted-Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.130
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0047 Party: Role: Date last planted:n t 03/2020
^�/,.�� ]'-4 t f rt New lanting date m/yy?
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / I. 0 J , - Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: L�,rQ�(7 (r Ir !'` I'` Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: (0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603203 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) -77.288408 UTM Zone:V
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 176
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * _ Icm* 1 cm sprout
Y -
2275 Betula nigra Q R 1.2 2.7 78.0 111
i Lc-
2276 Quercus sp. {t i h�cf Q R 3.8 2.1 50.0 El �-� 3
2277 Quercus sp. !V t;I r ® R 3.8 4.8 35.0 El ❑ 3
2278 Platanus occidentalis Q R 6.4 2.6 51.0 D 1-'0 - 1 1 ❑2279 Quercus sp. (4,1 f{
ro, ® R 9.1 1.0 40.0 ❑ Y
2280 Quercus sp. O R 8.9 3.4 24.0 0 3'. ❑ L
2281 Quercus sp. c.r,/,e`s ® R 8.8 5.9 54.0 ❑ ❑ }
2282 Quercus sp. ® R 8.7 8.2 42.0 ❑ ❑ _J
2283 Platanus occidentalis ® R 5.8 7.9 75.0 ❑ ❑ _
2284 Platanus occidentalis O R 6.0 5.7 56.0 0 r
2285 Quercus sp. ® R 3.6 7.2 60.0 ❑ ❑
2286 Quercus sp. ® R 3.4 9.8 60.0 0 c T 0 )---, 4
2287 Betula nigra ® R 0.9 8.4 73.0 El P5.-- 0 J ,
2288 Betula nigra ® R 1.I 5.3 74.0 -El
#stems: 14 New Stems,not included last year.but are obviously planted. if more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) WO 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 1
5 (Al we. ' `/'c-,
*SOURCE:Tt=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potter Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.131
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1
.

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0047 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (nun) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /&subsamplina**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREFS—DBH
10cm- 50cm 100cm Sub- =10
Species Name B Se d 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
1
— _ p
I
:4) t:
**Required if cut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. •t ■2 II ••4 .05 fi 7 138
10 F o rm W S2,vex 9.1
• •• •• •• •• ,411-1111
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.132
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 176° #stems: 14
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0047 map size:
N LARGE
• ——
K
(('
Y:5n-
(k)
IcS
(0,0) X:5ni
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U�Unknown _ _ p 133
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m.

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
[Plot 20008-01-0048 Parse: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
r� k-I New lanting date m/yy?
VMD Year(1-5): I Date: U V - I I p LiCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: W ee4(,fit.t 6 - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603311 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.287571 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 174
Plot Dimensions:X: i 101 Y: 1 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m I lcm* 1 cm *I lcm* 1 cm sprout
2290 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 2.1 0.5 46.0 ❑ 5- El 3
2291 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 1.9 2.9 42.0 ❑ E _ 4t
2292 Quercus michauxii ® R 4.8 2.2 65.0 ❑ 6/ I ff
2293 Quercus sp. ® R 4.6 5.0 35.0 ❑ S'0 E _
2294 Quercus nigra () R 7.2 1.7 40.0 ❑ 9 0
2295 Quercus sp. 4 tom ® R 7.4 4.5 45.0 ❑ 4 f-
2296 Quercus sp. O.1 r o\ () R 9.7 2.3 47.0 ❑ 5I .;
2297 Quercus sp. �ru ® R 10.0 5.2 57.0 ❑ c �f
2298 Quercus sp. ' 1 ® R 9.9 7.9 37.0 ❑ 3 C
2299 Quercus rubra ❑1 R 7.3 7.2 45.0 ❑ y 7. 3
2300 Quercus sp. () R 7.6 9.8 38.0 ❑ t 0 ❑ 3
2301 Quercus sp. 0 R 4.9 9jI- 10 51.0 ❑ 57 1/
2302 Quercus sp. Q R 4.8 7.3 30.0 ❑ d ❑ ii
2303 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 1.9 5.5 38.0 ❑ 35^ ❑ ` 7
2304 Liriodendron tulipifera 0 R 2.1 2.7 42.0 ❑ 90 [ 4't
2305 Liriodendron tulipifera 0 R 2.3 9.9 30.0 ❑ W 0
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage Notes
e
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p. 134
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnoy Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0048
Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
s — - — — —
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam din a**:
lei,ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm 0 100cm El 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
I
0 Sub- , 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Sr�ecies Name Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sap1 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
1 —
1
**Required if cut-off #I 1.2 •r 1• !�•4 - 5 I�-i6 1= 113s la =10 Form WS2,ver9.1
doff>1 Ocm or subsample.100%. • 1110•
*SOURCE:Tr=Tranpplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p. 135
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.Sm and 50cm if>4m.

X-axis: 174° #stems: 16
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0048 map size:
N ED LARGE
1111
?-) 05
r 4111
(ik
t
1()) ("<-
sji
Y:5m
f
710
'') ,...g---
( ".
1')''
• •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.136
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CYS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0049 Pa n - Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - / / New lanting date m/yy? / 11
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: \A"-. j b f' Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: i
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603676 Datum: `AD83/W I
(dec.deg.or m) `'c°y-�
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.286889 UTM Zone: 1 1 -
1�
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 172
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2307 Nyssa sylvatica 0 R 2.4 1.8 38.0 0 r _.'0
2308 Nyssa sylvatica O R 2.3 3.9 50.0 0 Li$ 1 ❑ 3
2309 Betula nigra Q R 4.9 2.9 51.0 ❑ 9 0 n
2310 Betula nigra Q R 5.0 0.3 49.0 ❑ ❑ of
•
2311 Betula nigra 0 R 7.7 1.2 60.0 ❑ 6 0 El ..
2312 Betula nigra ® R 7.3 3.6 81.0 E E. d
2313 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 9.6 4.5 42.0 0 a
2314 Quercus sp. ® R 9.4 7.0 35.0 0 E1
2315 Quercus sp. O R 9.2 9.3 27.0 0 El 0
2316 Betula nigra () R 6.9 6.4 46.0 ❑ ID Q
2317 Betula nigra ® R 6.7 8.6 70.0 ❑ ;9 t u
2318 Betula nigra O R 3.9 9.3 76.0 ❑ I=1 0 -
2319 Betula nigra ® R 4.3 6.9 62.0 0 ❑ a
2320 Betula nigra ® R 4.5 5.3 80.0 ❑ a
2321 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 2.2 5.8 30.0 0 W
2322 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 2.0 7.3 37.0 ❑ 1 0 El
2323 Nyssa sylvatica O R 1.5 9.4 50.0 0
#stems: 17 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanicall:.U=Unknown _ _p.137
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,L1VESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

a Z THIS YEAR'S DATA Data-Plot(continued): 20008-01-0049 Mar 2020 0
map source X Y 1 ddh Height DBH fl, ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage*Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm E 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
r
El Sub- t 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm- Sub- =10
Species Name c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 , 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. .l 1.2
:: I:*4 �"5 I 6 In7 18 I mo' 10 Fonn WS2,ver9.1
•I
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplaant L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potte&Tu=Tubling..R=bare Root,M=Mechanically U Unknown _ p.138
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1
i
I

X-axis: 172° #stems: 17
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0049 map size:
N LARGE
(I)
(11)
7
Y:Su
s
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublino,,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0050 Parry: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - 1X LJCheck box if plot was not
�,)/ Pi Pi New.slanting date m/yy?
Taxonomic Standard: U- {�(-r(l'J P; - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -W1)C61 I
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604007 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) 1-77 285637 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): I 176, _ ,
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 1 10i Li Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
i
Mar 2020 Data I Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2325 Betula nigra ® R 3.2 1.1 51.0 Elc V 3 ❑ :f
_2326 Betula nigra O R 3.0 3.3 63.0 ❑ -7 C. 0 .
2327 Quercus rubra ® R 5.4 3.2 19.0 ❑ !0 ❑
2328 Quercus nigra () R 5.8 0.7 40.0 ❑ 4/ 0
2329 Quercus rubra O R 8.4 0.5 55.0 ❑
2330 Quercus rubra O R 7.8 3.2 26.0
2331 Quercus bicolor Q R 9.9 4.2 15.0 ❑ LI T
2332 Quercus rubra Q R 7.4 6.2 52.0 ❑ 7 3 `
2333 Quercus sp. ® R 9.5 6.5 30.0 ❑ 0 ❑ 3
2334 Quercus sp. ® R 9.3 8.9 54.0 0 5-, ---- El 3
2335 Quercus rubra () R 7.3 8.8 35.0 ❑ Li 1 -❑
2336 Quercus rubra O R 5.0 6.0 57.0
❑ 95 _ n 3
2337 Quercus rubra ® R 4.8 8.5 47.0 ❑ r' 3 _.__ 3
2338 Betula nigra ® R 2.7 5.8 45.0 ❑ 4 7 A ❑ „dc..
2339 Betula nigra ® R 2.4 7.9 60.0 ❑ ��
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) . 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tublinn.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.140
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. , Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-005Q Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH N ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage*Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
r
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamnling**:
kleight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
Species Name
B sub_ 10
50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
.— I � 4 ,
**Required if cutoff>10cm or subsample?100%. rl 1.2 `. 3 �is �5 I 6 I= 1 g ` 10 Fonn W s2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublini.R=bare Root M.-Mechanically U=Unknown _ Ft..141
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

X-axis: 176° #stems: 15
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0050 — - map size:
N 0 LARGE
•
Y:5n
(0.0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root.M=Mechanicall. U=Unknown _ p.142
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0051 Pam': Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / t / / P� Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: vuc a l% Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: SO\O
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604018 Datum: NAD83/W -
(dec.deg.or m) •
-77.284887 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 181
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH & Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2341 Quercus bicolor ® R 2.1 0.9 20.0 ❑ `,t]
2342 Quercus bicolor O R 1.5 3.2 21.0 ❑ L�
2343 Quercus sp. () R 4.2 1.5 52.0 ❑ 6 1 R • 3
2344 Quercus sp. () R 3.7 3.6 32.0 ❑ C7 c/ E
2345 Quercus sp. 0R 6.8 0.5 32.0 El W U 0 7
2346 Quercus sp. 0 R 6.6 3.3 66.0 ❑ 70
2347 Quercus sp. 0 R 9.2 1.3 24.0 ❑ q 0 3
2348 th1m*s amencaDa Q R 8.7 4.2 49.0 ❑ _ El O
2349 Ulmus americana () R 8.5 7.3 43.0 ❑ ❑
2350 Ulmus americana ® R 8.4 10.0 63.0 ❑ SS El p1.
2351 Quercus sp. O R 6.0 5.9 24.0 ❑ q 0
R
2352 Quercus sp. O R 5.9 8.6 21.0 ❑ 4.0 ® 3
2353 Quercus sp. Q R 3.3 6.0 30.0 ❑ 4 _ t
2354 Quercus sp. Q R 3:� 8.3 24.0 ❑ 15- 3
2355 Quercus michauxii Q R 0.6 7.9 57.0 ❑ a 3
2356 Quercus michauxii ® R 1.0 5.6 57.0 ❑ 0
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
Species Name Source* or
(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm g g
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknwn p.143
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0051 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of art-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling**:
IIeiht Cut-Off(All stems shoiterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm 0 1)0cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- '100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sap1 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requiredifcii-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. ■I I°2 ° 3 I•:3 . S tr,6 8 i IN. Form WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlat P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p,144
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0051 X-axis: 181° #stems: 16
map size:
N 0 LARGE
J/( •
A ,
Y:S,,, .
r
(0,0> x:5,,,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Bal1 and burlap;P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.145
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0052 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: � / 5 //du) - / / New lanting date m/yy? /
P 1 Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: k/1 iC''r/K Y _ Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: / j (0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604347 'Datum: TlAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) ne:
Longitude or UTM-E: {77.284418 UTM Zone: 1 I
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): III 178JJ78 -
•
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10Li Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
ID Species Name Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
p char 0.1m 0.1m lcm 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2358 Betula nigra ® R 2.6 1.3 63.0 El a 1 .
2359 Betula nigra 0 R 2.0 4.1 70.0 El El
2360 Quercus sp. ® R 4.9 3.5 43.0 ❑ ❑ r)
2361 �Q s.*p! I ® R 5.4 1.5 54.0 0 ❑ :./
2362 Quercus bicolor O R 8.0 0.3 20.0 0 El
2363 Quercu bieelor e , ® R 7.3 7.7 ,,, 20.0 0 - El it
2364 Quercus rubra 0 R 9.5 1.6 58.0 00 ,--e,
2365 lAtatrrartiericana O R 9.0 4.2 94.0 Ell 3 , ❑ 3 ,
2366 Quercus bicolor O R 6.8 5.4 27.0 i)
2367 Quercus sp. ® R 8.4 7.3 42.0 a lEf 0
2368 Quescusbicolor t ® R 6.3 2.7 21.0
2369 At eiri us sp. .)f O R 3.8 8.2 57.0 0 y
2370 Quercus sp. Q R 4.2 6.0 34.0 0 El El I
2371 Quereus nigra ® R 1.2 7.0 63.0
2372 Betula nigra 0 R 0.3 9.5 66.0 ❑ ❑ r
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
Species Name X Y Height DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
p Source* (m) (m) 1 cm 1 cm g g
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Roots M=Mechanically,.U=Unknown _ p,146
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, '*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0052 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
P char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsamp Q*R:
Heil:ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 1 cm 050cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
S��ecies Name Lf sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Re qui red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. Si I•2 re 3 I:4 .-.5 6 la la pia i 10 FormWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlapLP=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.147
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0052 X-axis: 178° #stems: 15
map size:
N 0 LARGE
•
tN\
171(131F--
11(\
, (41
Y:5n
Q r
1
•
(0.0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.148
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0053 Parr\ Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - / / P New...planting date m/yy? /
!, Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: l"` Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: •
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604592 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) -77.283273 UTM Zone: -
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1'X-Axis bearing(deg): 1991
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: I 101 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ii> Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m O.lm I lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2374 Comm amomum ® R 1.6 1.8 60.0 0 � { 1 -
2375 C uiSITTOronium f. A Q R 1.3 3.6 37.0 0 ��� . El . -
2376 Betula nigra �1 ® R 3.8 0.7 55.0 0 5-t u -t
2377 Betula nigra O R 3.7 2.9 60.0 0 71- fl `]
2378 Quercus michauxii O R 6.7 0.4 60.0 ❑ I=1 M
2379 Ulmus americana @ R 6.3 2.8 49.0 ❑ 4)
2380 Quercus sp. () R 9.5 0.4 50.0 ❑ Li
2381 Quercus rubra (p) R 9.4 3.0 26.0 0 :_; t: 3
2382 Quercus rubra ® R 9.0 5.8 38.0 ❑ ❑ 0
2383 Quercus rubra () R 9.2 8.5 46.0 ❑ i 5- )
2384 Ulmus americana O R 6.3 5.6 40.0 ❑ I
2385 Ulmus americana ® R 6.5 8.2 40.0 ❑ + -
2386 Betula nigra ® R 3.9 5.5 38.0 ❑ ❑
2387 Betula nigra ® R 3.7 8.2 70.0 0 g o
2388 Corlias dmrn (, ( 41/1‘ ® R 1.0 8.5 57.0 0 CV T
2389 Corpus amomum "� ® R 1.0 6.1 54.0 ❑ A 0 0
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X YSpecies Name Source* (m) (m) Height) 1 * DBH cm
Vigor* Damage* Notes
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplants L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.149
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0053 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems — tallied by species &§ubsamplin:*:
Ileiuht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES—DBH
Species,Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sub- =10
I Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requiredifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. ■I 102 :: 404 if. +. " S I NI Form W S2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted„Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p. 150
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0053 - X-axis: 199° #stems: 16
map size:
N 0 LARGE
• •
K
kl)
1 :Sn
r
(S)
1 \
• - •
(0,0) X:51n
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.151
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, ' *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0054 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: �l / 5 /7 p 241- / / AA lanting date m/yy? /
I liCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: `A/ ek,r t"( _ Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 1-0 t 0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604152 Datum: NAD83/W -,
(dec.deg:or m) '•.v EI
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.282367 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 228
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y; 10LJ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2391 Moms rubra ® R 1.1 1.2 90.0 05 b I 1 1)
2392 Moms rubra ® R 1.2 3.9 58.0 El -it
2393 Quercus sp. ® R 4.0 1.1 55.0 III1 ❑ v
2394 Betula nigra O R 3.9 3.9 60.0 ❑ ()
2395 C = fir{ O R 6.9 2.5 58.0 ❑ ❑ 3
2396 rn...,m ..ezica a ( F C( n R 9.7 1.2 52.0 0 517 El -�
2397 Ulmus americana ® R 9.3 3.7 35.0 ❑ 3 0
El 3 -
2398 Betula nigra O R 6.5 4.9 80.0 ❑ - k ❑ 3
2399 Ulmus americana ® R 9.1 6.8 115.0 DBH?❑ n v
2400 Betula nigra Q R 6.6 7.3 82.0 ❑ 7 ( ❑
2401 Betula nigra Q R 6.1 9.6 80.0 ❑ (-3 0
2402 Betula nigra O R 3.5 8.4 82.0 0 E 0
2403 Betula nigra ® R 3.8 6.4 90.0 111
- 0
2404 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 1.1 6.7 36.0 o ❑ �E)
2405 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 0.7 9.0 21.0 ❑
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root;M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.152
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0054 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
ut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &planation
un a�uo�g *:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm El 50cm ❑ 100cm El 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH _ TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red ifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. .1 1:2 •3 I*:4 !Ni f •5 Ir. In7 138 10 Form WS2,ver 9.1
!• !i i•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown _p,153
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, T*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, I ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEnt,y Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0054 X-axis: 228° #Stems: IS
map size:
%/ LARGE
N
0
0
k
Y:5n•
(0,0) a:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.154
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LNESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0055 Part : Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
/ / / / M IA New...planting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: ‘k 5 °� liCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: kk/CM/-A Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 1 0 LO .
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603764 Datum: 'NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.281869 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 323
Plot Dimensions:X: I 10 y: I- 10'
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2407 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 1.9 0.7 52.0 ❑ 0 1
2408 Quercus bicolor O R 0.4 2.9 23.0 ❑ /ti,
2409 Quercus alba Q R 2.8 3.1 36.0 ❑ El 0
2410 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 4.0 0.8 43.0 ❑ 171 c
2411 Quercus alba ® R 5.3 3.6 19.0 ❑ t.)
2412 Nyssa sylvatica O R 6.6 0.4 47.0 ❑ G}2 2
2413 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 8.7 0.5 37.0 ❑ ` '3
2414 Quercus rubra () R 10.0 3.3 18.0 ❑ 07
2415 Quercus rubra ® R 7.5 3.1 57.0 ❑ O
2416 Platanus occidentalis ® R 9.2 6.0 71.0 ❑ l v'
2417 Platanus occidentalis O R 9.8 8.4 68.0 ❑ �7
2418 Platanus occidentalis O R 7.6 8.3 56.0 . ❑ . Er f 7
2419 Platanus occidentalis () R 5.4 8.4 72.0 ❑
2420 Quercus bicolor ® R 7.1 5.7 15.0 ❑ V 7 ❑ f
2421 Quercus bicolor ® R 4.5 5.5 10.0 ❑ -0
2422 Quercus bicolor Q R 2.3 5.6 14.0 ❑ ❑
2423 Quercus bicolor ® R 0.8 8.3 21.0 ❑ 9.-S- E__I -2,
2424 Platanus occidentalis ® R 3.3 8.4 43.0 ❑ _0
#stems: 18 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* • Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling;R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown r 155
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0055 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /If&su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name p Sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red if cut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. •I 1•2 • 3 1••4 ,NSA I F I J 8 ` 7 �I0 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
■ •• I•• •• • dFi
*SOURCETr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 156
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0055 X-axis: 323° #stems: 18
map size:
N LARGE
- -
Y:5n
VM
� €1
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.157
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0056 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: \\ / 5 / 42U- / / /r'1 t-4 New...planting date m/yy? C /
3 Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: �r I�� ` Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 1,0 UP
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604081 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.281198 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 258E
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10LI Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ca Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2426 Quercus sp. ® R 2.1 1.3 23.0 El .21 i• ❑ 3
2427 Quercus sp. ® R 4.5 1.0 33.0 ❑ 50 ❑
2428 Quercus sp. O R 5.0 4.0 35.0 o ❑ Al
2429 Quercus rubra () R 2.7 3.8 40.0 0 '2) ❑
2430 Quercus rubra () R 0.4 3.9 41.0 0 ❑ el
2431 Quercus sp. Oj R 6.7 0.8 25.0 ❑ 2U L___l
2432 Quercus sp. ® R 7.1 3.8 44.0 0 ❑ /t.
2433 Ulmus americana ® R 9.4 0.9 32.0 0 ❑
^
2434 Quercus sp. ® R 9.2 3.8 40.0 ❑ c2, 1
2435 Platanus occidentalis O R 9.6 6.2 41.0 ❑ ' , Q -j -
2436 Platanus occidentalis () R 7.7 6.2 26.0 ❑ ❑ -
2437 Quercus rubra O R 7.6 8.7 40.0 ❑ ❑ AA
2438 Platanus occidentalis O R 5.6 6.3 32.0 ❑ V '�
2439 Quercus sp. Q R 5.0 8.9 35.0 ❑ 2 ❑ 2
2440 Platanus occidentalis ® R 3.4 6.2 28.0 ❑ -- 0 El
'5
2441 Quercus sp. Q R 2.8 8.3 20.0 ' ❑ ❑ 40 .
2442 Quercus sp. Q R 1.0 6.1 32.0 ❑ Ai
1
2443 Quercus sp. ® R 0.5 8.4 35.0 ❑ ❑ L.f.-
#stems: 18 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (m) Heig1 mh* 1 t DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
I
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically;U=Unknown 158
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0056 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re-
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout Vigor Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &suIsampling**:
Nei.ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES—DBH
Species Name p Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- - =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 12.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>10cm or subsample?100%. s1 1.2 `e 3 Ii S4 l"5 I16 I vg Ind 1410 Fomi WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.159
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0056 X-axis: 258° #stems: 18
map size:
(7) LARGE
• •
YY:5„
•
(0,0) k:5n,
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanicallq.U=Unknown p 160
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0057 Parry: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
thCheckboxifIlotwasnot
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: k\/ 5 /w w Jll- / / ;�' New_planting date m/yy?
Taxonomic Standard: fJ ' Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ,
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.604497 Datum: NAD83/W}/W _ ,
(dec.deg.or m) -77 280523 UTM Zone:u 1 1
Longitude or UTM-E: 11��11
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 132'
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10
1 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
s
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2446 Quercus sp. ® R 1.6 2.0 38.0 ❑ `fi t3 : E
2447 RCULlias.serotina uk,k. U^1 ® R 4.4 0.2 72.0 ❑ 70 • ❑
2448 Quercus sp. 0 K 3.8 2.4 34.0 ❑ rry 8 r ❑ 3
y 2449 Platanus occidentalis ® R 3.3 4.9 38.0 ❑ 8 El 3
2450 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 0.8 4.2 60.0 ❑ PO [ 1 _-)1
2451 Quercus sp. O R 6.0 2.5 25.0 ❑
2452 Quercus sp. © 8.2 2.8 33.0 ❑ ` El 3
2453 Platanus occidentalis Ol R 8.2 5.6 53.0 ❑ O a
2454 Platanus occidentalis ® R 5.8 5.5 58.0 ❑ ?a E 1
2455 Betula nigra O R 6.6 8.4 73.0 ❑ 7 2- n
2456 Betula nigra ® R 9.0 8.7 54.0 ❑ ❑ J (-)
2457 Betula nigra O R 4.2 8.3 38.0 ❑ 36 ❑ 3
2458 Betula nigra ® R 1.9 7.6 64.0 ❑ G 42- III
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.161
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0057 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling**:
11ei. ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
o Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapt 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
•
**Etequiredif cot-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. ■1 1.2 1
3 I•*4 6 I*�7 I $ Pr 10 FormWS2,vn9.1
• 10 ri ►• i H/ I H
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.162
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0057 - X-axis: 132° lv\ #stems: 13
map size:
LARGE
i
Y:5n
C� C�
-0
(o,o) X:5111
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant„L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubli R=bare Root,,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p. 163
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. i Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0058 Party: L Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: \\ / 5 / w- / / , `\ New lanting date m/yy? /
Taxonomic Standard: Q P liCheck sam ledbx if specify
t was not
1NL'h �C �� • Notes: P s P fY reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: k 17
Latitude or UTM-N: '35.604920 Datum: NAD83/W _
(dec.deg.or m) 77 281338 UTM ZoneIr.c:
Longitude or UTM-E: -
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 186
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10 0 Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z 0 THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH i Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
R
2460 Celtis occidentalis ® R 1.1 1.0 53.0 ❑ 4- t ❑
2461 Celtis occidentalis ® R 4.3 0.6 57.0 ❑ i-t,( ❑ - 3
2462 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 4.5 2.8 49.0 ❑ 7y ❑ i, '
2463 Platanus occidentalis ID 2.1 3.3 30.0 ❑ , /
2464 Platanus occidentalis Q R 7.1 2.9 60.0 ❑ f.. :i1
2465 Platanus occidentalis ® R 9.3 2.8 38.0 0 C,(S-- y
2466 Platanus occidentalis ® R 10.0 0.4 36.0 ❑ ti r, El
2467 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 9.1 5.5 36.0 ❑ [)©
2468 Nyssa sylvatica ® \R 7.0 5.8 40.0
R .
2469 Nyssa sylvatica 0 R 8.3 7.7 43.0 0 LI 3 y
2470 Betula nigra ® R 5.6 7.0 83.0 ❑ 7 1 W 2v
2471 Betula nigra ® R 3.3 8.4 80.0 0 g. _
2472 Nyssa sylvatica Q R 4.6 5.7 52.0 ❑ In'r Li 3
2473 Nyssa sylvatica O R 2.2 5.8 40.0 ❑ II ❑ 3 ,
R
2474 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 0.0 6.6 38.0 ❑ 1 C , 1
2475 Betula nigra ® R 0.9 8.9 62.0 ❑ ,.__ ❑
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* DBH cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.164
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0058 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH g ddh Height DBH Re-
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout1-1
Vigor* Damage* Notes
vlanafion of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species snl�sampling**:
eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑Ex 10cm ❑ SOcm D 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
su
S�recies Name Lfb 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (Write DBH)
**Requi red ifcitff>10cmorsubsample?100%. Si 1.2 • 3 5 4 `o "5 Ir6 I=7 }-:8 n] 1 10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
• ■s s ■■ ■ i// }�
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burls P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 165
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0058 x-axis: 186° #stems: 16
map size:
N; I LARGE
•
p
Y:5ni
cif..
• i
(0.0) x:5nn
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p 166
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data("VIVID)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0059 PLI5 L,,: Role: _ Date last planted: 03/2020
New...planting date m/yy? /
VIVID Year(1-5): I Date: / / kti i4 11Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Wen IX•9 P' Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: "-Lab
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.605248 Datum: 'NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) Ire.° i
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.281065 i UTM Zone: M , _
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): I 177 i
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 1 101 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ti, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2477 Prunus serotina ® R 1.8 1.9 48.0 !-} / n Ci
2478 Quercus phellos Q R 4.6 1.5 39.0 ❑ 3`/ ` R
2479 Quercus sp. ® R 4.2 3.9 53.0 ❑ ' ) 0
2480 Quercus sp. Q R 1.6 4.9 55.0 0 5-$ Ili -
2481 Quercus sp. ® R 7.0 4.0 57.0 ❑ S 'a ❑
2482 Quercus laurifolia Q li 7.3 1.2 62.0 n 60 El ^7
2483 Quercus sp. ® - El R 9.8 1.0 79.0 ❑ 7
2484 Quercus sp. O R 9.7 3.6 32.0 ❑ 0 P
2485 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 5.6 6.6 60.0 0 0 n b
2486 Liriodendron tulipifera © ft 8.2 6.4 45.0 0 5'1- n j
2487 Quercus rubra Q R 8.1 9.0 35.0 El 7® n
2488 Liriodendron tulipifera () k 5.4 9.5 32.0 ❑ (/ L 3
2489 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 2.5 7.4 70.0 O 7© ❑ t
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Fonn:
X Y BH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 11 cm*t 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 167
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0059 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH .lY*I ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Explanation of cut-off
/&subsampiing *:
eightCut-Off(Allstems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ID10cm CI50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
I SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name c Sub-
1 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sap1 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
J—
**Re qui red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. .1 ;2 • 3 I.•4• Ns 1r6 In7 ins Ni0 FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ _ p.168
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0059 X-axis: 177° #stems: 13
map size:
N 0 LARGE
k
1:5n,
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.169
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
IPlot 20008-01-0060 Par) Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / _ -ta New wanting date m/yy? /
aCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: l,(/, 1/4
- Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.605211 Datum: NAD83/W , .
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.282237 UTM Zone: .
Coordinate Accuracy(m): l X-Axis bearing(deg): 11 14141 I
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2491 Prunus serotina 0 R 0.8 2.4 34.0 Ill ❑ Q
2492 Quercus nigra ® R 4.5 5.0 47.0 ❑ ID -25
2493 Prunus serotina O R 5.4 1.1 38.0 ❑ El At
2494 Prunus serotina O R 7.8 1.0 30.0 ❑ a 3
2495 Quercus rubra O R 9.4 3.6 35.0 0 yEl 0
2496 Quercus nigra ® R 7.2 4.0 51.0 ❑ ❑ .
2497 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 9.8 6.8 43.0 ❑ ❑
2498 Platanus occidentalis ® R 7.4 7.5 60.0 ❑ ❑ - 1
2499 Prunus serotina O R 8.4 10.0 43.0 ❑ ❑
2500 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.7 8.3 60.0 ❑ / A
2501 Platanus occidentalis ® R 1.7 9.0 66.0 0 6"i 0
2502 Quercus rubra Q R 2.1 5.1 32.0 0 -
#sterns: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) Height cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tt=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burls P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.170
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0-dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0060 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (in) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species l&subsam piing**:
3lei�ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name �Lf sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm- sub =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Re qui red ifcutoff>lOcm or subsample?100%. ■1 1.2 •3 •
�:4 N5 I 6 1 7 I � f 9 1310 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.171
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DlSeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Mapof stemsplot 20008-01-0060 '>X-axis: 141° #stems: 12
on N ^ map size:
LARGE
:5n ®�
,„
r
(0,0) x:5„
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplanter L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.172
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0061 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - � �j New lanting date m/yy?
1' Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: '(tt,st u^ 1 P Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: L e)A
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.605747 Datum: NAD83/W ,
(dec.deg.or m) (-coo
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.282286 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 78
Plot Dimensions:X: I 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2504 Prunus serotina ® R 2.2 1.9 70.0 D Go i
2505 Prunus serotina 0 R 4.9 2.0 45.0 0 47 i
2506 Prunus serotina O R 7.1 1.3 32.0 ❑ - 0 7-1
2507 Prunus serotina O R 9.6 1.1 78.0 ❑ ' -1
2508 Platanus occidentalis O R 1);1,-84) Sr1-1` , 34.0 0 � -. _�( }
2509 Na an,,s nacide tal;s Q, 4..`c4 ® R 5.7 5.3 56.0 u
2510 Quercus sp. 0 R 8.4 8.8 43.0 ❑ r-b `
2511 Quercus michauxii Q R 6 48:8 7 r c 44.0 ❑ 0 0
2512 Quercus michauxii 0 R 12.7 8.5 32.0 0 -1 ❑
~
2513 Quercus bicolor ® R 3.5 7.9 18.0 ❑ c(t,
2514 Platanus occidentalis () R 3.6 5.4 31.0 ❑ n k'
2515 Platanus occidentalis Q R 1.0 5.8 33.0 [l ❑ wl
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically_U=Unknwn _ p.173
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNICNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0061 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsarn piing**:
f!eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
•
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
, r
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm-
Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap' 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01 I. • 3 I••4 0-i5 �•6 I I �` NIO Form WS2,ver 9.1
• •• •• •• •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.174
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
l=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, I ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0061 • X-axis: 78° N #stems: 12
map size:
U LARGE
r •
Y:5n
• •
(0.0) x:5,,,
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanicallv.U=Unknown p_175
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, I ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0062 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
New planting date /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / _ '�,� / _ ifplot
Check box plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: I2r/ PE.,. Cl.( r n� Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 04
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.605934 Datum: 'NAD83/W I ,
(dec.deg.or m)
77.282056 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E: 'El
-
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 137
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: I 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH I* Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2517 Quercus rubra ® R 1.9 2.6 40.0 0 D
2518 Platanus occidentalis Q R 4.9 0.9 39.0 ❑ n 41//
2519 Quercus sp. ® R 4.2 3.4 35.0 ❑ 111 7
3
2520 Prunus serotina () R 1.1 4.9 60.0 ❑ U ' v
2521 Quercus sp. Q R 6.4 4.2 33.0 0 C O
2522 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 7.3 1.8 28.0 ❑ ❑ f
2523 Platanus occidentalis ( R 9.8 2.8 40.0 ❑ 9 El
2524 Mores-z a. i , oQ ® R 8.3 5.3 48.0 0 ,c- C 3 .
2525 Platanus occidentalis () R 7.3 7.1 60.0 0 n �- n
2526 Platanus occidentalis Q R 10.0 8.2 43.0 ❑ ❑ 0
2527 Quercus michauxii ® R 6.9 8.9 42.0 ❑
2528 Quercus sp. Q R 4.8 6.3 31.0 ❑ i - IA % c 4
2529 Quercus sp. Q R 4.6 8.7 35.0 0 D
2530 Prunus serotina Q R 2.4 9.7 36.0 ❑ 35-
2531 Betula nigra Q R 0.0 9.4 51.0 ❑
2532 Cercis canadensis ® R 0.6 7.0 37.0 0 33
2533 Quercus sp. ® R 2.6 7.6 26.0 riP L
#stems: 17 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (in) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.176
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MO-Wing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0062 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH % ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of art-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &suhsamdina**:
1 lei2ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 1-37cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>l0cm or subsample?100%. •1 1•2 ■3 1!•4 !-!5 I# !f-i
-!6 I=7 =8 =10 Form WS2,ver9.1
• •a II•• •• is �i•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted Tu=Tubliw.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p,177
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Mapof stems onplot 20008-01-0062 - X-axis: 137° #stems: 17
N map size:
0 LARGE
O
(1)
Y:Sn
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake-B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p, 178
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
'Plot 20008-01-0063 Part): Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - A' Nt/ lM 0 New...planting date m/yy? /
e Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: L 1,f i i - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
li Taxonomic Standard DATE: d 0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.60657 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) r•cu.
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.28324 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 114
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ., Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2535 Quercus sp. 116k eg,5 O R 0.3 1.3 34.0 a
2536 Quercus sp. 0 R 2.9 1.3 27.0 0 0 0
2537 Morus rubra ® R 4.5 3.8 65.0 ❑ 15- 0 1* �.
2538 Morus rubra ® R 1.8 3.6 52.0 El ❑
2539 Quercus sp. Q R 5.5 1.6 20.0 ❑ ❑ G
2540 Quercus sp. f' IS ® R 7.9 1.1 33.0 0
,, - 3 i v
2541 Morus rubra Q R u 5 3.7 60.0 E i N 3 '
2542 Quercusrubra ® R 7.1 3.6 55.0 ❑ Ic- 3
2543 Betula nigra © R 8.3 6.6 75.0 0 1-i._ ❑ ?
2544 Betula nigra Q R 6.1 6.8 83.0 E AA ) 111 7 ,
2545 Liriodendron tulipifera Ql R 7.7 9.6 34.0 E 0
2546 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 5.2 9.5 25.0 0
2547 Betula nigra O R 3.7 6,6 112.0 DBH?❑ ( 0
2548 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 2.1 8.8 32.0 ❑ 3 _
2549 Betula nigra ® R 1.2 6.0 85.0 ❑ t 0
#stems: 15 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) tml 1 cm" 1 cm Vigor* Damages Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically:U=Unknown p.179
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0063 Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) i (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /Asubsampling•*:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH T TREES — DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm `Sub- 1 1 =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requiredif cut-off>1ocmorsubsample?100%. *1 Ir2 •3 4•4 �N5 rF I=7 I=8 `N9 10 FotmWS2,va9.1
r •• • ,•• • Imo! E I!
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,,U=Unknown p:180
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3--good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0063 — x-8Xis: 114° N #stems: 15
1�U map size:
LARGE
•
Y:5m
f® (t)
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted Tu=Tublinf.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.181
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0064 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - -/0 / Y - /9C New...planting date m/yy? /
cr P ,p Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: a IiSt -
i /
.JL�; Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: i")
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.606729 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) f_77 284106
Longitude or UTM-E: ! UTM Zone: ,
Coordinate Accuracy(m): f 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): I 108 ,
Plot Dimensions:X: 1 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2551 Betula nigra () R 0.2 2.2 76.0 ❑ , (j
2552 Betula nigra 0 R 2.6 1.6 68.0 ❑ 6
2553 Quercus sp. ® R 4.7 4.5 46.0 ❑ G ❑
2554 Quercus sp. O R 2.2 4.4 32.0 ❑ 3 0 ..
2555 Betula nigra O R 5.5 1.7 66.0 ❑ '7/7 7_,
2556 Betula nigra ® R 8.5 3.9 77.0 ❑ 6 y E
2557 Quercus sp. ® R 7.6 5.0 53.0 ❑ A r,.
�
o--
2558 Malus angustifolia © R 5.3 6.7 60.0 ❑ 7 6 0 -:
2559 Platanus occidentalis (a R 7.2 7.8 60.0 ❑ j 33-s
2560 Quercus sp. j/1, , F V(G, ® R 9.2 6.9 40.0 ❑ Li $ ❑ 3
2561 Platanus occidentalis Q R 4.9 8.8 47.0 ❑ ',J
2562 Malus angustifolia ® R 3.0 6.9 73.0 ❑ 7,)-
2563 Quercus sp. ✓tq (cro , it(' Q R 2.3 8.6 29.0 ❑ 0 CI 7,
2564 Quercus sp. l( ® R 0.9 2.6 37.0 ❑ ❑ •r_'
2565 Cephalanthus occidentalis ® R 2.3 6.1 25.0 ❑ it El .
2566 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 7.7 6.2 33.0 ❑ El 0
2567 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 5.0 6.0 24.0 ❑ 3 6 El
7�
2568 Prunus serotina O R 9.6 8.9 32.0 ❑ ® ,
#stems: 18 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown 2,182
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CAS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0064 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Explanation
sulaam ina *:
O-ieight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why totheright.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01 1•2103 t•4 0-65 t, =7 138` ) NJ FonnWS2,ver9.1
• •• • •• • •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling;R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown .N183
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntu Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0064 X-axis: 108° N #stems: 18
map size:
LARGE
f
d
Y:Sm
a
A
• •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.184
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMp1ed,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CAS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
'Plot 20008-01-0065 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: (` 9: - / / NI /-1, New...planting date m/yy? I / I
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: V7 (+[eCPr'47
Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: (--)49CQ
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.607395 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) rrn
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.284645 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 15
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10Li Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
10
Map Source* X Y 1 Height DBH 2 Height DBH Re- Vi or Dama e* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m, lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2570 Quercus laurifolia Q R 0.5 4.0 48.0 ❑ ❑ ;1
2571 Quercus nigra ® R 2.9 4.5 45.0 ❑ L . ❑ a
2572 Quercus sp. ® I{ 2.3 0.7 30.0 0 f 5.- El - 3 1
2573 Betula nigra Q R 5.8 1.4 63.0 ❑ 20 El 3
2574 Betula nigra Q R 8.7 1.2 82.0 0 "�Q ❑
2575 Crataegus marshallii ® R 10.0 4.4 59.0 ❑ 60 J
2576 Quercus nigra Q R 7.7 4.4 47.0 0 r J
2577 Quercus nigra ® R 5.3 4.4 30.0 ❑ 0
2578 Betula nigra ® R 9.9 6.8 71.0 ❑ (3 c,
2579 Betula nigra ® R 7.8 6.7 82.0 0 (J
2580 Betula nigra O R . , 7.0 85.0 � ^5,5_ 7 5- f
2581 Quercus sp. ® R 9.0 9.3 40.0 ❑ c/ b , -
2582 Quercus sp. ® R 6.8 9.7 41.0 0 q ❑ • 7,
2583 Quercus sp. ® R 4.5 10.0 36.0 0 FJ'/
2584 Betula nigra () R 3.2 6.9 65.0 0 a ❑
2585 Betula nigra ® R 0.8 6.4 85.0 ❑ ISO
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.185
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, r*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 2O0O8-01-0065 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re-
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout Vigor Damage Notes
Explanation of art-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su imam dine**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES — DBH
s Name p Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm-
Specie Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. *1 I:2 •3 I+:4 .1
5 Inh In7 Ins I 10 FotmWS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.186
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
l=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0065 X-axis: 15° #stems: 16
map size:
N LARGE
k:
?(6
Y:5n
(i)
OI
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.187
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMa1,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0066 Par;.:: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - � u New lanting date m/yy? /
-"TA',/ 1 vT t i P ' A- ' LJCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: f/p ti.c,;-rt. Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: C 0
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.60736 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) - - '-'.c9
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.285415 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): l 991
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
-
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH , Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2587 Quercus sp. ® R 2.7 1.9 15.0 ❑ r�
2588 Quercus sp. ® R 3.3 4.7 37.0 ❑ D ❑
2589 Quercus rubra ® R 6.1 4.8 41.0 ❑ 1
2590 Quercus nigra 0 R 6.0 2.0 17.0 ❑ A -a ,
2591 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 8.9 1.4 54.0 ❑ ❑ J
2592 Liriodendron tulipifera 0 R 9.5 4.6 42.0 ❑ E
2593 Quercus sp. O R 9.4 8.1 45.0 ❑
2594 Quercus sp. Q R 9.2 8.8 50.0 ❑ n
2595 Quercus rubra ® R 7.1 7.9 28.0 ❑ 3 n
2596 Quercus sp. © R 4.1 7.9 27.0 ❑ to ❑
2597 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 0.1 7.7 56.0 ❑ 6f- CI i.
2598 Morus rubra ® R 0.6 9.8 50.0 ❑ V CI fi
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stakes B=Ball and burls .P=Potted.Tu=Tublin R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p 188
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0066 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH 7 ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
( Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampiing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 110 Sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
* '
**Re wired ifcrtoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. .1 `.2 103 I084 M5 1z-.6 In7 nh la `�10 FormWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.189
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0066 x-axis: 99° N #stems: 12
0 LARGE size:
C - I
4
f
. 1 F
[,' .I
Y:Sm
t (k
Cfk
(0,0) \:Jun
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.190
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0067 P: : Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / C- / Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: ",v,0., Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: a-150(Op r
Latitude or UTM-N:or 35.607684 Datum: NAD83/W
ecLongitude or UTM-E: m)
77.286218 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 110
Plot Dimensions:X: I 10, Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z 0 THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH g Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm * 1cm* 1 cm sprout
2716 Quercus sp. © It 0.7 0.9 39.0 ❑
;5,
2717 Quercus sp. O R 0.1 3.6 63.0y El
40
2718 Quercus sp. O R 2.5 3.6 28.0 ❑
2719 Quercus sp. CO R 3.6 1.2 47.0 ❑ ST- R 3 :
2720 Quercus sp. O R 5.5 3.5 70.0 ❑ I O El5
2721 Quercus sp. Q R 6.2 0.9 33.0 1 0 d R ,_r
2722 Quercus phellos () R 9.0 3.5 58.0 ❑ op '3
2723 Quercus sp. ® R 8.9 0.9 38.0 ❑ T 3'
2724 Quercus sp. 9 R 9.5 6.2 46.0 ❑ L© 3
2725 Quercus sp. 0 R 7.1 6.1 37.0 ❑ 5--cl C.�
2726 Quercus sp. 0 R 9.2 9.0 43.0 Li / 5.- rf
2727 Quercus sp. () R 6.5 9.0 32.0 ❑ 2 ❑ 31
2728 Quercus sp. Q R 3.4 9.1 30.0 ❑ 3c ' 1-
2729 Quercus sp. 0 R 4.1 6.0 53.0 ❑ Q U
2730 Quercus phellos ® R 1.5 5.8 69.0 ❑ 7 Cj 3
2731 Quercus sp. 0 R 0.7 8.9 43.0 D 7,1, _....R
#stems: 16 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(P anted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
. _ '
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.191
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0067 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
N
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * mm ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) ( ) (cm) (cm) sprout
Ex anation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam oline**:
ieight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 10 sub_ 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm sub} =10
I /� o Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps fr4 /0y-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
I .et,P.,41r -, at cZ4 ka
! r:I). r 11 n4�IiiC gr.
• •
nAvIt.s4 Sf(E2-En,
•
**Re quiredifcutoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 1.2 S 3 t•4 •N5 irh f*"�7 I $`a 1410 Form WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown ^p.192
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0067 X-axis: 110° N #stems: 16
U
\.� map size:
LARGE
0
IC)
/6
Y:5n
(")
r
t t
'''k 4
(0.0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.193
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2—fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1 1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0068 Party: Role: Date last planted:
-VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / / / New...planting date m/yy?
x if
was not
Taxonomic Standard: Ili �sam leCheck d specify to reason below
Notes: P
Taxonomic Standard DATE: (?( 0.9
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.60066 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) '
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.294332 UTM Zone:u�
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 181
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH g Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1918 Quercus sp. ,((It t` O R 2.7 2.9 30.0 0 So
1919 Quercus pagoda ® R 6.1 2.2 52.0 0 5'� ❑
1920 Queue sp ��(' AA O R 8.9 2.5 40.0 ❑ W `-
1921 Quercus lyrata ® R 6.0 5.6 20.0 El l 0 ❑ 3
1922 Comus amomum ® R 9.0 5.7 52.0 ❑ 5' c) El
1923 Prunus serotina ® R 8.6 8.8 50.0 ❑ c L 3 V
1924 Prunus serotina 0 R 5.3 9.7 52.0 E i-G
1925 Morus rubra G. R 3.1 6.0 10.0 ❑ I t-- I I ,
1926 Quercus alba ® R 2.7 5.4 39.0 ❑ _'
•
2714 Quercus lyrata © R 2.6 7.3� n 38.0 D ,J],
T
2715 Quercus lyrata ® R 3.0 0.9 22.0 ❑ y d ❑ I
#stems: 11 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublin ,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.194
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0068 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re Vigor* Dama g
Specieschar (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout a
ID Notes
Explanation of nit-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /ftLLsubsamnlina**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap]. 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. •1 1.2
11 + f••4 .-.5 It-•6 I 7 $ L1l0 FomiWS2,ver9.1
I. •• •• •• ■
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.195
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0068 x-axis: 181° #stems: 11
map size:
N 0 LARGE
14.
Y:5n
J
(0,0) X:Sm
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubli R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 196
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Too!ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
'Plot 20008-01-0069 P. : Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
New...planting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - / / Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: IMM = Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: C
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.600785 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) r'c W
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.293497 UTM Zone: -
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1i X-Axis bearing(deg): 193
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1928 Liriodendron tulipifera a R 1.7 2.0 42.0 ❑ (, ?
1929 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 1.2 4.4 33.0 ❑ -3 e 9
CO, )7...,
11930 Quercus sp. R 8.3 1.2 43.0 S
1931 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 8.0 4.4 50.0 ❑ 5- l ❑
1932 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 7.5 7.6 50.0 ❑ ❑
=7
. . 3'
1933 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 1.0 7.1 58.0 El -
1934 Quercus sp. ® R 0.5 9.7 40.0 ❑ a T - 3
, H
2711 Cercis canadensis ® F; 5.5 13i'• e-- 15.0 ❑ :.15.-- 3
2712 Cercis canadensis Q R 5.2 3.3 14.0 ❑ a, 0 R 3
2713 Cercis canadensis ® K 4.8 6.1 12.0 ❑ �` I
#stems: 10 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1
Explanation of cut-of
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &snhsamt>!i ¢**:
Heigh tCut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if ctff>10cmorsubsample?100%. `I ■ 3tNS I� 6 N :3
8 I 10 FotmWS2,ver9.1
I. ■ r •a ■*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p_197
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0069 x-axis: 193° #stems: 10
map size:
N�D LARGE
•
d
Y:5n
• i
(0,0) X:510
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap„P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.198
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0070 Part.: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
144 r<. New...planting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / �� f� 17 e Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: V- (_(Le( . - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -a.'eGi
Latitude or UTM-N: 135.600917 Datum: NAD83/W a
(dec.deg.or m) r'cu
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.292844 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 187
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH ti Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1936 Betula nigra () R 2.0 1.5 83.0 El ❑ LJ
1937 Betula nigra Q R 1.5 4.7 92.0 ❑ 7610
1938 Comus amomum O R 5.3 4.8 48.0 ❑ ❑
1939 Comus amomum ® R 5.8 2.3 59.0 ❑ n
-
1940 Quercus sp. Q R 9.5 2.6 38.0 ❑ ❑
1941 Quercus sp. O R 8.7 5.2 40.0 ❑
1942 Quercus michauxii ® R 8.5 7.9 48.0 ❑ 513 ❑
1943 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 5.0 8.1 28.0 ❑ ❑ a
1944 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 1.5 7.0 42.0 ❑ ❑ v
2710 Comus amomum O R 5.9 0.0 43.0 ❑ 0 d
#stems: 10 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) I1 cm* 1 DBcm Vigor* Damage* Notes
u
,I
11.(slanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species sul�samplin¢5*:
31ei”ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm 050cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
-
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name El Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm sub_ =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapt 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
- -
• 1
**Requi red ifcitoff>10cmor subsample?100%. •1 1.2 •3 1••4 •-•5 ■•6 7 Iis 1a H 10 FonnWS2,ver9.1
• •• •• •• • `�j
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.199
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Too!ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0070 - X-axis: 187° #stems: 10
map size:
N_!— LARGE
•
't3
Y
Y:Sn1
• k, a
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubline.R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.200
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0071 P.m:,:: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
Ne
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / / / w
LJanting date m/yy? /Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: U^ ' ti (4 / N Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: MEMIll ,
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.6009 1 Datum: 1 NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) -
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.292406 UTM Zone:
'
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 190 ,
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data e THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Zr Height DBH tY, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm I * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1946 Quercus sp. ® R 1.9 2.2 62.0 Li ❑ r
1947 Quercus sp. 0 R 7.9 5.1 45.0 ❑ El 1,-.1948 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 5.0 476' I
1,1 26.0 � J -
1949 Quercus michauxii () R 5.2 1.4 60.0 ❑ /P.)
-
1950 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 9.0 0.0 50.0 ❑ ❑
1951 Crataegus marshallii (il R 8.8 2.8 36.0 1 El 3
1952 Crataegus marshallii O R 7.9 9.3 32.0 ❑ El /
/
1953 Diospyros virginiana 0 R 4.8 7.8 51.0 ❑ J
1954 Quercus sp. Q R 0.7 7.5 28.0 ❑ ❑ 0
2709 Crataegus marshallii ® R 7.8 6.3 28.0 ❑ -3 4 ❑ _ 7)
#stems: 10 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
i -
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species i&subsampline :
I(eight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
i
,
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. •l 1.2 1.r *4 "5 ir6 I= [ S` I l0 Form WS2,ver 9.1
*SOU11 E:Ti. Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanical U=Unknown p.201
*VIGORI'4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0071 X-axis: 190° #stems: 10
map size:
N_� LARGE
• — •
Y:5„•
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted:Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ i..202
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0072 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / i� c
- 41, New lanting date m/yy? / J
heck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Lfr , (f `a Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 2 ((�
1
� y
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601026 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) ��
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.291415 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): I 188
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
1956 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 1.2 3.1 62.0 ❑ ElJ'
1957 Quercus sp. ® R 2.5 4.0 60.0 El0 ^
1958 Quercus sp. ® R 2.9 1.4 21.0 ❑
1959 Prunus serotina O R -6.4 2.9 29.0 ❑
1960 Prunus serotina ® R 0.0 6.1 18.0 0 c)
1961 r, ® R 9.1 1.2 39.0 3-
• 3 -
1962 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 9.0 4.2 72.0 El ❑
1963 Nyssa sylvatica O R 8.6 7.1 52.0 ❑ e, 111 j -
L.1964 Uhnus americana O R 5.9 5.8 22.0 0
❑
1965 Quercus sp. O R 5.7 9.4 28.0 O
1966 Quercus sp. O R 2.3 10.0 42.0 Elprl
1967 Morus rubra ® R 2.3 7.4 62.0 ❑
1968 Liriodendron tulipifera 0 R 0.8 10.0 67.0 ❑ H v V
1969 Unknown sp. ® R 0.9 1.6 67.0 0
#stems: 14 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tt=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.203
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0072 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &sul�aming**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): 0 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm E 1Tcm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS—DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name i sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapl 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>1Ocmor subsample?100%. •1 1.2 ■ ; 10•4 •■.5 I 6 I 8 I 10 FonnWS2,ver 9.1
• •• • • E I
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tublingy R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.204
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, 1 *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0072 X-axis: 188° #stems: 14
map size:
N '� ) LARGE
•
_• i
':5,,,
)tp
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant:L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=TublingzR=bare Rool,M=MechanicallysU=Unknown _ _ p 205
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0073 P. : Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - /®G _ Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: CO 1 < WM
Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 0® C 1 =
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601229 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) I -
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.290858 1 UTM Zone: !!
-Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 187
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data 'Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH N Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
- -1971 Betula nigra ® R 2.8 0.6 98.0 E . _ ❑ ' 1
t
1972 Betula nigra ® R 5.0 0.5 69.0 ❑ r
1973 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 2.6 4.0 52.0 ❑
1974 Betula nigra ( R 4.4 4.5 79.0 0 $p
1975 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 6.2 3.5 68.0 E a
1976 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 6.9 0.8 72.0 ❑ ❑ .1
1977 Quercus sp. ® R 9.9 1.6 42.0 ii ❑ _/
1978 Quercus sp. ® R 9.6 4.7 28.0 E ❑
1979 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 5.2 6.4 20.0 ❑ ❑ 0 1
1980 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 8.9 7.1 32.0 ❑ 0 )
1981 Celtis sp. Q R 4.6 9.2 73.0 E 7v ❑
1982 Cornus amomum ® R 1.6 9.6 50.0 ❑ tU ❑
1984 Cercis canadensis Q R 0.4 8.5 22.0
#stems: 13 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Plated Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant+L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.206
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0073 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampline**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 1000m ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cutoff>10cm or subsample?100%. •! 1.2 • 3 •4 4-.5 t 17 8 ) !O Fom1 W S2,ver 9.1
I. •• • •• •
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.207
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0073 — X-axis: 187° #stems: 13
map size:
N LARGE
- •
(-)
Y:5 nt
• •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ Q 208
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0074 Pa : Role: Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / 42 CIO/ _r MI Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: (,v C,t (,l l A VI / sampled,specify reason below
� � - Notes: P � P fy
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 1 fir) 'Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601329 Datum: NAD83/W ✓/
(dec.deg.or m) -77 290308 UTM Zone: /,_ l
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1'X-Axis bearing(deg): 191
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: r 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 6 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
1986 Liriodendron tulipifera ® H 1.3 2.2 22.0 ❑ r U 1 E
1987 Celtis sp. ® R 0.4 0.4 41.0 ❑ to 0 f
1988 Quercus phellos ® R 2.9 1.3 35.0 ❑ i I
1989 Viburnum denta u1Tt ® R 4.9 2.6 62.0 ❑ . &id ❑
1990 Viburnum dentatum 0 R 1.5 3.8 52.0 ❑ ❑ V
1991 Betula nigra Q R 0.0 5.2 63.0 ❑ -10 ❑ L.
1992 Viburnum dentatum () R 5.0 4.2 52.0 ❑ ❑ /f(f.
1993 Diospyros virginiana 0 R 5.7 0.3 52.0 ❑ El )
1994 Diospyros virginiana ® R 6.4 1.3 50.0 ❑ ❑ Y
1995 Celtis sp. ® R 1.9 9.8 61.0 ❑ n 14
1996 Celtis sp. ® R 8.9 4.2 60.0 ❑
1997 Celtis sp. ® R 7.9 6.0 78.0 ❑ ❑
1998 Celtis sp. ® R 6.7 8.0 62.0 ❑ ❑
1999 Celtis sp. ® R 2.7 10.0 48.0 ❑ _❑ -
2000 Celtis sp. © R 3.6 7.7 58.0 ❑ ❑ 1
2001 Viikupaunrclentatuaki -, ® R 1.3 9.3 62.0 ❑ 65 ❑
2002 Viburnum dentatum © R 0.6 7.3 92.0 ❑ 0
2003 Cercis canadensis O R 2.0 7.1 40.0 ❑ ❑ I
2004 Viburnum dentatum () R 3.4 5.1 45.0 ❑ ❑ `�114,
#stems: 19 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
e
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.209
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1
1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0074 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
pap source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>l0cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cT
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requi red ifcut-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1 102 103 1:•4 N5 I�-!6 u7 113"
I ' I F.0 FonnWS2,ver 9.1
•
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=TublinR,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ _ p.210
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0074 X-axis: 191° #stems: 19
map size:
N_� LARGE
r •
(sk
Y:5n cg
k_
it
a
ER 1
l' ' , (i)
IF e
(0.0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,_M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.211
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0075 Par•i:: Role: Date last planted:
I vi pc_ New...planting date m/yy? I
VMD Year(1-5): I Date: / / '''./, ��i
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: l Jt 6 t.A4 �t Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: /-j--O ()
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601721 1 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) �"
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.289974 UTM Zone:❑ .
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 189
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10, ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH , Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2006 Betula nigra ® R 0.7 0.7 61.0 El To ❑ , Gf
2007 Betula nigra ® R 0.2 4.6 71.0 o ❑
2008 Quercus lyrata ® R 5.7 2.3 48.0 ❑ 7o ❑ 3
2009 Quercus sp. -r+.,:, ,, .1, , ® R 9.1 2.2 41.0 ❑ 4-Pj' ❑ 4
2010 Quercus sp. O R 6.8' 4.0 50.0 El . CI ,
2011 Quercus sp. ® R x.4 7j. 81.0 ❑ (4--". ❑
2012 Quercus sp. ® R 8.3 10.0 41.0 ❑ 0 ❑ 3
2013 Cercis canadensis ® k 5.3 5.9 35.0 ❑ ❑ ?
2014 Betula nigra O R 5.0 ski 74.0 ❑ d f( ElG1
_
2015 Quercus lyrata ® K 1.8 5.9 50.0 0 S f
2016 Quercus lyrata ® R 1.9 9.7 38.0 ❑ ❑ -
2017 Betula nigra 0 R 0.0 6.1 79.0 ❑ Q" ❑ j
#sterns: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare RootM=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 212
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, i ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

- -
Plot(continued): 20008-01-0075 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) I (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species ill Explanation su bsam piing**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>l0can,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name El Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm Sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Requiredifcrt-off>10cmorsubsample?100%. *1 62 1, 3 F •4• 0.5 i�-!6 I 7 8 1
0 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Pott Tu=Tubline.R=bare Root_M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.213
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, ' *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0075 X-axis: 189° #Stems: 12
map sue:
N 1) LARGE
C
7
r
b
4z
...
.....c..
;1:
A.:,
C.1Y:5n1 �—
b {
I
y'. \ 1
'A
• •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.214
*VIGOR:@excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0076 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
Newanting date m/yy? j /
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / I a /o P i LJCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: !.✓.(,., A - ' Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 'D-1;2>(Cl
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.601962 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) r ra
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.289277 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 63
I
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH a Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m 1cm* 1 cm * 1cm* 1 cm sprout g g
2019 Quercus sp. ® R 2.2 2.7 50.0 0 El
2020 Quercus sp. ® R 5.2 2.3 52.0 ❑ 6 0 El f+'
2021 Ulmus americana Q R 2.6 4.6 40.0 0 4"0 ❑ 3
2022 Quercus sp. Q R 9.5 2.5 40.0 ❑ L,+
2023 Quercus sp. ® R 8.7 5.5 51.0 Elf 5. ❑ 3
2024 Quercus sp. it,. , A.r 1 0 ® R 5.7 5.9 55.0 ❑ SO
2025 Castanea pumila Q R 5.8 9.4 47.0 El 4 5- ❑ =i
2026 Betula nigra Q R 8.2 9.7 82.0 El _ ' ] ,-•
2705 Quercus sp. ® R 0.0 2.3 47.0 ❑ ❑ 0
2706 Quercus sp. ® R 0.1 5.0 26.0 El 0 1
2707 Betula nigra Q R 3.3 9.0 69.0 ❑ 70 ■-� 3
2708 Betula nigra Q R 0.1 8.9 83.0 ❑ ^.n,9 El t r
#stems: 12 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
He
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cim*t 1 DBcm Vigor* Damage* Notes
1._ f
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.215
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0076 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &snlrsam piing**:
1leight Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm 0 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
•
**Required ifcrtoff>10cm or subsample?100%. Si +2 .• 1;4 "5 I:46 17 �8 Imo' I410 Form WS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p 216
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0076 X-axis: 63° N #stems: 12
i map size:
LARGE
• •
Yard
• •
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ba 1 and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.217
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0077 P. -L: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / j. �/ �. New planting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: +/L a4.L.: .e.f
Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: G-ra td #'t
Latitude or UTM-N: '35.602385 Datum: INAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) -77.288634 rs.o El
Longitude or UTM-E: UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 82
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y; 1 101
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
I-Mar 2020 Data 'Z I - THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH f Height DBH Re-
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout Vigor* Damage* Notes
2027 Prunus serotina O R 2.6 2.7 62.0 ❑ .3 ❑ 5
2028 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.4 0.4 60.0 ❑ r [ t.
2029 Platanus occidentalis O R 3.3 4.4 57.0 ❑ _ �_.
2030 Malus angustifolia ® R 5.2 4.6 41.0 ❑ ❑ Lot,
2031 Prunus serotina () R 5.9 3.3 30.0 D ❑ n,
2032 Quercus sp. O it 9.8 5.1 38.0 D ❑ ,�
2033 Quercus michauxii O R 9.4 7.9 68.0 ❑ ❑
2034 Quercus lyrata ( It 6.2 7.0 30.0 ❑ El , )
2035 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 6.4 9.0 23.0 ❑ El
2036 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 9.4 9.5 53.0 ❑ ❑
2037 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 4.1 8.4 30.0 ❑
❑
2038 Quercus sp. ® R 2.9 6.3 42.0
14
2039 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 2.2 7.8 32.0 0 III❑ w
2040 Quercus sp. Q R 0.8 9.8 58.0 0 ^0 ❑ r
#stems: 14 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) H1 cgmht 1 cm
Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Trannplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted;Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 218
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. ' Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0077 Mar 2020 Data 2 THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re-
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout Vigor: Damage* Notes
Explanation of art-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &snbsamd➢ne*:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm 0 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Sifecies Name Lf sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
•
**Requi red if cut-off>10cmor subsample?100%. ■1 1*2 •a r�4*4 `•-•S I 7 i�R I , f 10 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ _ .219
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0077 -- x-axis: 82° N #stems: 14
ED map size:
LARGE
0
r
Y:5n O
•
(0,0) X:5n1 -
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Pow Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.220
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0078 Party: Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - �/,�/L4� New lanting date m/yy?
!l/l i~i yC Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: I �t A Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602696 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.28787 1 UTM Zone: d
Coordinate Accuracy(m): ll X-Axis bearing(deg): 87
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y; 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH , Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2042 Malus angustifolia Q R 0.9 2.6 48.0 0 y 7 I n 7
2043 Betula nigra ® R 1.0 0.2 70.0 ❑ 0
2044 Betula nigra O R 3.4 0.8 82.0 ❑ ❑ Ci
2045 Quercus sp. 0 R 4.4 2.2 30.0 :a
2046 Celtis sp. ® R 4.2 1.3 31.0 ❑ 0
2047 Quercus sp. 0 R 6.3 0.2 50.0 0 n
2048 Betula nigra () R 9.7 0.6 61.0 0 ❑
2049 Quercus sp. ® R 8.8 3.1 22.0 0 r -❑ 1
2050 Quercus sp. O R 8.2 5.6 40.0 ❑ El
2051 Quercus michauxii ® k 6.6 7.3 71.0 ❑ El0
2052 Betula nigra () R 8.0 9.1 41.0 ❑ El
2053 Quercus sp. ® R 5.0 10.0 39.0 ❑ El 0
2054 Quercus sp. Q R 4.7 5.1 41.0 ❑ \1.` I J 0
5-
2055 Quercus sp. 0 R 3.6 8.1 31.0 0 ❑
2056 Betula nigra ® R 4.3 8.8 33.0 ❑ 0r 2057 Quercus michauxii ® k 1.2 7.0 41.0 ❑ 9
2058 Quercus sp. ® R 1.0 5.5 39.0 1
#.stems: 17 Nev. tems,not included last year,but arc obviously planted. if more space need. ,use blank P WS(Planted Woody Stems)Fom:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* tml OM 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
t
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown _p..221
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0078 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampline**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name EMI Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required ifcitoff>10cmor subsample?100%. •I •2 I.3 i*414 H #-!6 1= t4 In) NI FomsWS2,ver9.1
•*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.222
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0078 x-axis: 87° N #stems: 17
(i)
map size:
LARGE
•
121
I
v:5„
4
(0,0) x:5n,
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stakes B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.223
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0079 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - / / New lanting date m/yy? /
�� Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: V. 1-4 Notes: sampled,specify reason below
1 Taxonomic Standard DATE: / `
'Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602747 Datum: 'NAD83/W
' (dec.deg.or m) rya
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.287145 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 79
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10'
i _ ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 2 Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm *1 lcm* 1 cm sprout
2060 Quercus sp. Q R 1.4 1.1 58.0 ❑ F ❑ J
2061 Quercus alba ® R 0.3 2.3 38.0 ❑ ' 0 El 2
2062 Quercus sp. ® R 2.1 2.8 32.0 0 a.,,,.. 3
2063 Quercus sp. ( R 2.3 2.2 20.0 ❑ in -
2064 Quercus sp. O R 3.0 4.7 50.0 n El 0
2065 Quercus lyrata Q Tr 5.5 2.2 50.0 0 - /`i
MEE
2066 Quercus sp. 0 R 0.6 0.4 40.0 ❑ O
2067 Quercus sp. 0 R 6.4 1.0 70.0 ❑ /7-
A'.--- <f,•-- ....
2068 Quercus sp. Q R 8.4 1.9 60.0 ❑ y1i
2069 Quercus sp. ® R 4.7 5.8 50.0
2070 Celtis sp. ® R 8.8 4.4 41.0 0 0/
2071 Quercus sp. O R 8.8 4.2 40.0 ❑ s
2072 Quercus sp. O R 7.3 5.9 50.0 0 •
2073 Quercus sp. O R 7.5 7.0 49.0 0 I=1 1...t.7
2074 Qu (Or( ,h 0 R 7.0 8.3 30.0 0 . .4 , i el.-
2075 Platanus occidentalis \ ® R 6.3 9.6 48.0 ❑ 1 -
2076 14hwarInnericares 0 a t�r,I j ® R 9.2 8.2 37.0 0 ❑ 0
_
2077 Quercus sp. ® R 10.0 8.3 45.0 0 L 7 ❑
2078 Quercus sp. Q R 8.7 6.8 50.0 ❑ Lidf a
2079 Quercus sp. ® R 0.6 5.6 42.0 ❑ p J
2080 Quercus sp. Q R 5.0 2.4 41.0 0 0
2081 Quercus sp. Il�tk,l.M1 -
O R 2.1 7.5 38.0 0 1 6 r�
2082 Quercus sp. 1 Q f; 2.1 8.9 78.0 � 9
2083 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.4 9.7 56.0 0
0
2084 Quercus sp. Q R 1.3 6.7 78.0 0 v.-A
2085 Unknown sp. ® R 3.9 5.3 63.0 ❑ Et ,3,T
2086 Unknown sp. ® R 4.1 6.2 57.0 C)
2087 Unknown sp. Q R 4.0 7.5 55.0 ❑ J
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p•224
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0079 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) I * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
#stems: 28 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) I1 cm*t 1 DBcm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &sulream *:
1lei�ht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm 100 cm sorb- =10
Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
•
**Requiredifcitoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. 01 102 • 3 t•4 O. I 6 I S rr 1310 Form WS2,ver 9.1
• •• • •• • I
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanicaliy,U=Unknown _ p.225
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMa1,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DlSeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Mapof stems onplot 20008-01-0079 X-axis: 79° N #stems: 28
l map size:
CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems U LARGE
marked with lowercase letters(i.e. "A"is different from"a").
f
cki'l
\\
iP
d
1
C
V:5m
d1 ,
® ------)
0
a Q/ k I?
. h
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake_,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tublin R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.226
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MO Wing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LlVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0080 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020 1
New_slanting date m/yy? L
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / /
Taxonomic Standard: - V', 0-e•( f �� Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: t to
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602988 Datum: N AD83/W .
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.286659 UTM Zone: J
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 79 ja:1 S O v ea)5 „1
Plot Dimensions:X:
10 Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data c[ THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH f Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm i * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2088 Platanus occidentalis O R 1.9 0.6 61.0 El r - , •
_
2089 Quercus sp. ® R 1.0 2.1 48.0 ❑ d 3 ❑
2090 Quercus sp. () R 0.8 2.8 40.0 ❑ -❑ d
2091 Mains angustifolia ® R 2.2 4.7 52.0 0 S'v JEl �j
2092 Liriodendron tulipifera CO R 2,.3 2.2 20.0 El f..y
,
2093 Quercus sp. O R 2.1 3.8 22.0 ❑ LI 0
2094 Quercus sp. 0 R 4.3 3.4 42.0
2095 Quercus sp. ( R 4.4 2.3 39.0 ii 9 q
2096 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.4 1.0 52.0 El 2'
2097 Liriodendron tulipifera ( R c, +:9-s 2.9 21.0 0 Li
2098 Quercus sp. O R 6.1 1.3 54.0 � [/ - � �/
2099 Quercus rubra u R 6.8 4.6 72.0
2100 Nyssa sylvatica O R 7.0 0.6 28.0
2101 Quercus sp. Q R 7.9 0.6 45.0 ❑ IV Cl 7
2102 Quercus sp. Q R 8.0 3.4 33.0 ❑ 0 0_
2103 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 9.4 2.0 43.0 0
2104 Quercus sp. © R 8.0 5.3 30.0
2105 Quercus sp. O R 9.1 5.2 48.0 ❑ y
2106 Betula nigra O R 6.3 7.1 58.0 0 0 W"
2107 Quercus sp. O R 3.2 7.7 58.0 ❑ [ I GI
2108 Prunus serotina ® R 9.2 9.7 40.0 ❑ ❑ - ci
•
2109 Prunus serotina O R 6.2 9.7 10.0 ❑ - u
2110 Quercus sp. 9 R 4.7 8.0 52.0 o CI C)
\ 2111 Comus amomum O R 2.3 8.8 60.0 0 LI ?
2112 Quercus sp. ® R 1.1 6.7 40.0 ❑ L.
2113 Unknown sp. r O. R 1.0 5.6 28.0 ❑ -a,C�� _A 7
c { .445�5
2114 Quercus sp. © R 3.9 5.1 50.0 0 0 0 _ 7
•
2115 Quercus sp. ® R 477 5.4 30.0 c{L[ Cl
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tublini'.R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p•227
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0080 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH y ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
#stems: 28 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Explanation of unt-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species 1&su Imam plina**:
j lei:Alt Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name p Sub- 10 cm 50 cm 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. Si 1•2 • 3 .4 1N5 Ir.6 r ti I + 10 Fomi WS2,ver 9.1
OW
E/ 0* • ■■ • H 1J
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically=U=Unknown p.228
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

- N
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0080 X-axis: 79° #stems: 28
map size:
CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems U LARGE
marked with lowercase letters(i.e."A"is different from"a").
•
CD
O
t
Y:5n
O
• •
10.0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Tran plant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,_R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.229
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1—unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the C.VS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0081 Party: Role: Date last planted: 1
New lanting date m/yy? /
VMD Year(1-5): L Date: / / 0 LerIA1 r Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: lv G A.Pi• P - Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: 1_Q(1 `
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603018 Datum: INAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) - I rna
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.286209 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 1 83 ,
Plot Dimensions:X: 10I Y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 9, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm *I lcm* 1 cm sprout
2117 Quercus sp. ® R 0.0 1.3 42.0 0 7 c r [
2118 Quercus sp. ® R 0.2 3.3 30.0 0 3!t ' 3
2119 Quercus rubra ® R 0.9 4.9 4.0 ❑ n r
)
2120 Celtis sp. O R 2.4 2.3 51.0 ❑ n J .
2121 Quercus sp. 0 R 3.8 1.8 43.0 0 _ ❑ a
2122 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 3.3 3.8 32.0 ❑ 33 ❑ �y
2123 Quercus sp. ® R 2.5 4.6 40.0 ❑ V
2124 Quercus sp. 0 R 3.5 4.2 50.0 0 F
2125 Celtis sp. ® It 5.3 2.8 30.0 ❑ 3 o 1-1
2126 Quercus sp. ® R 5.4 4.3 50.0 ❑ El /v'-\
2127 Unknown sp. 01
6 c O R 7.4 3.6 51.0 0 f 7 ❑ 7
2128 Quercus rubra () R 8.9 2.7 62.0 0 i(f El 'f vuf,,,
2129 Quercus sp. O R 8.8 4.6 39.0 0 � ) w
2130 Quercus sp. ® R 6.4 3.8 22.0 ❑
2131 Quercus sp. 0 R 6.6 5.5 31.0 ❑ ❑ w
2132 Nyssa sylvatica O R 6.7 6.5 42.0 ❑ ❑ 0,
2133 Morrus rubra © R 9.2 8.6 43.0 E ❑ kl
`
2134 Quercus sp. L J_(4,l . 0 R 8.7 9.0 57.0 0 _
2135 Platanus occidentalis `� ® R 6.2 8.6 61.0 0 ❑
2136 Quercus sp. ® R 4.7 7.2 33.0 0
2137 Quercus sp. Q R 3.5 6.8 42.0 El I 1 r)
2138 Morris rubra O R 3.4 7.1 60.0 ❑ ❑ O
2139 Quercus sp. O R 0.7 $.5 _ 34.0 ❑ 0 y'r1
2140 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 8.7 0.5 52.0 ❑ CJ ^,
2141 Quercus sp. 0 R 1.3 9.7 30.0 0 11.r El 3
#stems: 25 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
r
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,-U=Unknown _ p.230
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0081 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) 1 (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /Asubsamniine**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑11/cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name CQ sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm ` 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
I
1
I —— _
1 - •-
**Required if cif-off>10cmor subsample?100%. •1 1.2 . 3 I..4 I"5 ID :6 1:7 I:N I:7 110 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant;L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted.Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.231
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. I Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

83° N #stems: 25
Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0081 X-axis: I map size:
LARGE
• ,
1':Sn j
\,,C\
(ig"
(k.
1 O
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tublina,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.232
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0082 Party: Role: Date last planted: . 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: ' / / -} / / � /-i f[ New /lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: 4- Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: -
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603368 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) `'`'`
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.285218 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 84
Plot Dimensions:X: i 10 Y: 1-10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH 9, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2143 Morus rubra () R 0.0 1.4 58.0 ❑ p J
2144 Moms rubra ® R 3.3 1.1 62.0 0 n
2145 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.7 4.8 50.0 ❑ t o
2146 Betula nigra Q R 2.5 4.6 80.0 0 t 3
2147 Platanus occidentalis ® R 3.5 4.6 63.0 ❑ $a•-• 3
2148 Platanus occidentalis O R 8.6 1.4 32.0 0y p
2149 Moms rubra ® R 8.4 3.2 ' 48.0 ❑ El 1'lt `
2150 Morus rubra ®1 R 6.3 6.1 45.0 ❑ ❑ 9
2151 Ik.1..1,...i5.4 0`c9 L Q R 6.4 5.0 62.0 ❑ 64" 1 III
2152 Platanus occidentalis () R 8.4 5.8 40.0 ❑ El 01
•
2153 Betula nigra O R 9.6 6.1 52.0 0 TO 0 I
2154 NyssrSplvatica ® R 8.9 8.8 64.0 n `6" (- ❑ I
2155 Quercus sp. ( ) R 9.3 10.0 51.0 ❑ ❑ a 1
2156 Crataegus marshallii (D R 6.1 8.9 62.0 ❑ r
2157 Nyssa sylvatica O R 4.6 6.8 51.0 ❑ Z'
2158 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 2.1 6.5 38.0 0 3.;- 1=1d.
2159 Quercus sp. () R 2.2 9.7 62.0 0 1=1 -
2160 Unknown sp. ® R 1.0 7.1 33.0 ❑ D
#stems: 18 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage Notes
*SOURCE:Ti=Transplant,L=Live stakes B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.233
*VIGOR:4-excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0082 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y i ddh Height DBH ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
•
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &sabeampling**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 1000m ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Q sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sap! 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
I —
**Requiredifcttoff>10cmorsubsample?100% *1 :2 {•3 414 N �-•5 6 =7 113' M+ 1310 Fonn WS2,ver 9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.234
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0082 'x-axis: 84° N #stems: 18
CID
map size:
LARGE
Noc
il A
'4\''
4 4\ ch
Y:5n,
(::-4 k Ic'
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted.Tu=Tubling_R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.235
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0083 P.]r1\: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / / / New...planting date m/yy? /
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603483 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) i'U.
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.284472 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 84
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH y Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2604 Quercus sp. O R 5.7 2.8 48.0 El - 5)- ❑
2605 Quercus rubra 0 It 7.7 0.6 48.0 ❑ 12e
2606 Viburnum dentatum © R 8.8 4.6 28.0 ❑
2607 Quercus sp. ® R. 2.0 2.7 42.0 El _
2608 Moms rubra ® R 7.4 6.7 61.0 wI=179
2609 Morus rubra n R 10.0 6.9 50.0 n .L./
2610 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 8.4 7.9 51.0 ❑ u
2611 Quercus alba ® R 6.9 9.1 47.0 ❑ (1
2612 Platanus occidentalis ® R 4.0 7.3 50.0 ❑ co `
2613 Moms rubra ® R 4.5 6.1 51.0 ❑ I.{ T
2614 Quercus sp. O R 2.6 8.8 45.0 ❑ LT al.
#stems: 11 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.236
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LWESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0083 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH f,IT, ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) * (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species Explanation of/&su beam piing"toff
height Cut-Off(All sts shofterthanthisareiguored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm 050cm ❑ 100cm 0 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 0 sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
I{ —
**Required if cut-off>10cm or suhsample?100%. 01 i 0 2 • 3 1•*4 4I-.S 1 -.6 1=7 138 I NI FonnWS2,ver9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stakej_B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.237
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0083 X-axis: 84° N #stems: 11
U map size:
LARGE
0
CD
•
\:5n1
o
(0,0) X:_5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ E).238
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0084 Pa : Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: ' / / - / / New...planting date m/yy? /
_ Check box if plot was not
1
Taxonomic Standard: F r = Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603755 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: -77.283834 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 731 Plot Dimensions:X: 10 y: 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source*
X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.lm 0.lm lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout
2616 Quercus alba ® R 0.3 0.8 60.0 El El ' 0
2617 Quercus alba ® R 4.4 1.1 35.0
2618 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 3.6 4.1 42.0 0 ID 0
2619 Diospyros virginiana ® R 0.2 4.1 29.0 El DI _4'f
2620 Quercus sp. O It 5.2 3.5 33.0 ❑
2621 Nyssa sylvatica ® R 8.4 2.7 61.0 10 ❑ f
2622 Quercus rubra () R 8.1 1.9 27.0
2623 Diospyros virginiana O R 5.8 4.6 35.0 Iii0 ® '
2624 Liriodendron tulipifera ® R 8.5 5.0 37.0 0 0
2625 Quercus sp. ® R 7.0 4.2 31.0 ❑ El
2626 Platanus occidentalis Q R 6.0 7.2 25.0 n ___J 0
Prunes
2627 serotina O R 5.8 7.0 84.0 ❑ -J
2628 Prunus serotina ® R 7.0 8.4 72.0 ❑ H J
2629 Quercus sp. O R 8.7 6.1 40.0 ❑ 0
a�
2630 Platanus occidentalis O R 8.4 7.8 24.0 0 ,,5-
2631 Viburnum dentatum ® R 4.1 5.7 48.0 0 S'0 3
2632 Platanus occidentalis Q R 2.9 6.3 74.0 0
2633 Prunus serotina O R 3.0 8.0 45.0 ❑
2634 Prunus serotina Q R 0.2 7.9 75.0 0 . ❑ ►t'.1
#stems: 19 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
Species Name Source* (m) (m Height DBH
) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 (-
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ p.239
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0084 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems — tallied by species &su bsam piing**:
I leiht Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS — DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name Ei Sub- 10 cm 50 cm- 100 cm sub_ =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm saps 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
- r
**Requi red if cut-off>l0cmorsubsample?100%. •1 I•2 ■3 j •4 .05 1 6 1 8`rt) V:10 FormWS2,ver9.1
• •• ■ •■
*SOURCE Tr—Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanicallv U=Unknown p.240
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0084 - X-axis: 73° N #stems: 19
map size:
LARGE
S - 111
}}
el
•c
if-2)
Y:Sm �� (�
VJ
® df
0
• i
(o,o) x:5ni
*SOURCE:Tr—Transplant L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.241
*VIGOR:4—excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0085 Party: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / / / New Elanting date m/yy? / i
u Check box if plot was not I
Taxonomic Standard: w<<,e,Li:.1 �, Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ?t.c1 n`
Latitude or UTM-N: '35.603578 Datum: NAD83/W
(dec.deg.or m) f,v
Longitude or UTM-E: 77.282817 UTM Zone:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 11 X-Axis bearing(deg): 125
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: . 10 ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH F, Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2636 Ulmus americana Q R 0.9 2.1 43.0 ❑ El 0
2637 Betula nigra () R 2.6 2.2 72.0 ❑ El a -
2638 Quercus sp. ® R 2.6 3.7 44.0 a
2639 Nyssa sylvatica O R 4.0 2.2 43.0 0 _
2640 Betula nigra () R 6.3 3.2 81.0 ❑ 70
2641 Quercus sp. ® R 7.1 4.0 43.0 0 'l y _' H 5
2642 Betula nigra O R 9.3 3.3 72.0 El1❑H C.
2643 Liriodendron tulipifera O R 6.6 2.1 20.0 ❑ El .D
- Q
2644 Liriodendron tulipifera () R 9.2 1.9 20.0 ❑
2645 Diospyros virginiana Q R 8.3 5.0 87.0 ❑ r:7
2646 Liriodendron tulipifera Q R 5.7 5.3 18.0 ❑
2647 Platanus occidentalis O R 7.8 7.3 53.0 Li l-�/
2648 Quercus sp. Q R 9.5 6.0 27.0 ❑ I__I vti
2649 Platanus occidentalis © 1: 9.6 8.3 62.0 ❑ 6 q CI 3
2650 Platanus occidentalis O R 7.0 8.5 54.0 ❑ ❑ -
2651 Corpus amomum ® R 8.4 9.6 50.0 0 q1 U ❑
2652 Ulmus americana ® R 5.9 9.8 82.0 O Cl PLi
2653 Q�, ® R 5.0 9.4 50.0 0 .:.1--' c '1
2654 Quercus sp. ix ® R 6.8 5.9 33.0 0 o
2655 Quercus sp. ® R 3.7 9.6 23.0 ❑ R C.)2656 Platanus occidentalis ® R 0.5 9.1 46.0 0,
2657 Quercus sp. ® R 1.0 5.9 33.0 ❑ tvt _
2658 Moms rubra O R 2.3 5.8 50.0 El ' v
2659 Quercus sp. R 4.0 6.2 25.0 d
®
2660 Prunus serotina () R 0.1 6.3 31.0 ❑ r A
#stems: 25 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* DBHcm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*SOURCE:Ti--Transplant,L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.242
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1-unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0085 Mar 2020 Data o THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH *
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species &subsampling**:
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES —DBH
Species Name 1E1 Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Re qui red if cut-off>10cm or subsample?100%. ■i I■2 ■ 3 I 4 ,0.405
111.06
I 8 10 Form W S2,vet.9.1
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p 243
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CAS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0085 x-axis: 125° N #stems: 25
LmapARGE sue:
I( )
C
1
0
�BPI
a {
p x
c(1)
f
--) •
(0,0) X:51,
•
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant.L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap P=Potted Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.244
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0086 Part : Role: Date last planted: 03/2020
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / - 1- 4V / ,e w( New...planting date m/yy?
n Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: p' (A41 - ` Notes: sampled,specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE: (r.:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.603258 Datum: NAD83/W , a
(dec.deg.or m) -77.28241
Longitude or UTM-E: UTM Zone: IIII
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1'X-Axis bearing(deg): 121
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: 10'
❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z 0 THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH m I Height DBH Re- Vi or Dama e* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm * lcm* 1 cm sprout g g
2662 Quercus sp. ® R 2.4 3.1 37.0 ❑ .0
2663 Cephalanthus occidentalis 0 R 5.5 1.9 31.0 ❑ CO ❑
2664 Quercus sp. it:vf ifj.e ® R 6.4 3.4 30.0 ❑ [ C ❑ '
2665 Quercus sp. 19 km.��1 ® R 6.8 6.3 42.0 ❑ - a 0 '
2666 Ulmus americana 0 k 6.0 8.1 83.0 0 ❑ f)
2667 Platanus occidentalis O R 8.9 8.3 108.0 DBH?❑ ❑ ',
2668 Betula nigra ® R 3.5 8.6 56.0 ❑ µ ❑ 7
2669 Betula nigra O R 0.5 8.4 91.0 ❑ C1ol, L�__1 f
2670 Quercus sp. © R 3.0 7.1 34.0 0 4 , W
#stems: 9 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS I Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* I cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
planation of cut-0ff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species ,Fix,snbsam�lin$**:
height Cut-Off(All stems shoiterthan thisareignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS -HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS -DBH TREES -DBH
Species Name Q Sub- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- sub- =10
c Seed 50 cm 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
r
•
**Requi red ifcitoff>10cmor subsample?100%. al 102 a 3 I••4 *1k 6 L
7 nti , 10 FormWS2,ver9.1
•• •• • i
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant.L=Live stake.B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Roots M=Mechanically,U=Unknown _ _ p.245
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, I *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0086 X-axis: 121° N #stems: 9
map size:
LARGE
I
a '
Y:5n
•
(0.0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root.M=Mechanically,U=Unknown_ p 246
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, t*DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data(VMD)Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 20008-01-0087 Pam: Role: Date last planted: 03/2020 •
VMD Year(1-5): 1 Date: / / / / .2� [.b7 New...planting date m/yy? /
LiCheck box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: sampled,specify reason below
Notes: P P fY
Taxonomic Standard DATE: ,
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.602937 Datum: NAD83/W i
(dec.deg.or m) -77.281598 UTM Zone:
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy(m): 1 X-Axis bearing(deg): 1411
Plot Dimensions:X: 10 Y: IO ❑Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis(Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Mar 2020 Data Z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2672 Morus rubra ® R 1.1 0.4 47.0 ❑ ❑ C.!
2673 Quercus michauxii ® R 3.6 0.0 73.0 ❑ _ ❑
2674 Morus rubra O R 4.1 0.3 53.0 ❑ A
2675 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 4.4 3.4 48.0 ❑ (;
2676 Platanus occidentalis 0 R 1.0 3.4 51.0 ❑ El a
2677 Mors rubra ® R 6.9 0.5 47.0 ❑ ❑ --TL -
2678 Moms rubra () R 9.5 0.7 50.0 ❑ -, .. ❑ -.
2679 Quercus sp. ® R 9.6 0.2 47.0 ❑ ❑ J
2680 Platanus occidentalis ® R 7.9 3.4 26.0 ❑ ❑ pi
2681 Quercus sp. ® R 9.0 5.3 35.0 ❑ tt.t ❑ 3
2682 Quercus alba QI R 5.2 5.4 36.0 ❑ 1} E 3
2683 Quercus sp. (a R 6.5 6.5 40.0 ❑ 'i.1-- ❑ u
2684 Quercus rubra Q R 10.0 7.0 33.0 ❑ _ ❑ d 1
2685 Quercus sp.c kke404 O R 6.9 9.6 29.0 ❑ -)d. ❑ _f
2686 Frangula carolinian/ O R 2.1 8.4 36.0 ❑ '�10 ❑
2687 Quercus sp. O R 0.8 9.7 40.0 ❑ ❑ 0
2688 Quercus sp. ® R 3.5 6.8 35.0 ❑ n 0
2689 Quercus sp. ® R 1.8 5.0 38.0 ❑ ❑ J
2690 Frangula caroliniana O R 5.1 9.8 35.0 ❑ ❑ 41
#stems: 19 New Stems,not included last year,but are obviously planted. If more space needed,use blank PWS(Planted Woody Stems)Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
I
*SOURCE:Tr-Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap.P=Potted,Tu=Tubling.R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.247
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Plot(continued): 20008-01-0087 Mar 2020 Data c THIS YEAR'S DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
ut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species /*I Explanation ampi of
Height Cut-Off(All stems shorter than this are ignored. If>10cm,explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
SEEDLINGS —HEIGHT CLASSES SAPLINGS —DBH TREES — DBH
Species Name p sorb- 10 cm- 50 cm- 100 cm- Sub- =10
c Seed 50 CM 100 cm 137 cm sapi 0-1 cm 1-2.5 2.5- 5- (write DBH)
**Required ifcrioff>10cm or subsample?100%. I•• •• I•••k •2 • 3 ••4 NS �•6 8 ` 1410 Form WS2,ver 9.1
I• ••
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically.U=Unknown p.248
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver.2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20008-01-0087 X-axis: 141° #stems: 19
N 0 map size:
LARGE
a � o
r -C)
Y:5n
cl)
•
•
(0,0) X:5m
*SOURCE:Tr=Transplant,L=Live stake,B=Ball and burlap,P=Potted,Tu=Tubling,R=bare Root,M=Mechanically,U=Unknown p.249
*VIGOR:4=excellent,3=good,2=fair, i *DAMAGE:REMoval,CUT,MOWing,BEAVer,DEER,RODents,INSects,GAME,LIVESTock,Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year,0=dead, I ANIMal,Human TRAMpled,Site Too WET,Site Too DRY,FLOOD,DROUght,STORM,HURRicane,DISeased,VINE
M=missing. Strangulation,UNKNown,specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if>2.5m and 50cm if>4m. Printed in the CVS-EEPEntry Tool ver.2.3.1

Appendix C: NC DWR Stream Determination & DWR Piedmont Natural Gas Correspondence
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix C:NC DWR Stream Determination
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

.t. t
1,1 a
ROY COOPER
Governor f ier:A1
MICHAEL S.REGAN A�A
Secretary a± `
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
May 29, 2019
Raymond Holz DWR Project#: 2017-1122v2
Restoration Systems,LLC
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211
Raleigh,NC 27607
(via electronic mail: [e-mail])
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset—GUC/City of Greenville Site
Re-evaluation of Feature 5 from letter dated March 25, 2019
Tar-Pamlico River Basin—03020103 HUC
Located near Aqua Lane& Sunnyside Rd, Greenville,NC
Pitt County
Dear Mr. Holz,
On March 25,2019, a Site Viability for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset was issued to Restoration
Systems, LLC (RS)by the Division of Water Resources (DWR) for the GUC/City of Greenville Site. On
May 14, 2019,you submitted a request to Katie Merritt with DWR to re-evaluate the hydrologic
connection of Feature 5 to Feature 6A. Supporting information was provided to Ms. Merritt on May 9,
2019,which included site photos and a video. This information confirms there is a hydrologic connection
between Feature 5 and Feature 6A and is therefore viable for riparian restoration. This mitigation
determination replaces only the mitigation determination made for Feature 5 in the letter dated March 25,
2019. All other mitigation determinations made on March 25, 2019 remain the same.
This evaluation was made from Top of Bank(TOB) and landward 200' from each feature for buffer
mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits
pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
Feature Classification 'Subject Riparian Land uses adjacent to Buffer 2Nutrient 3Mitigation Type Determination w/in riparian
ID in the field to Feature Credit Offset Viable areas
Buffer (TOB-200'l Viable at 2.273.02 Re-evaluation
Rule lbs/acre
5 Ditch No Mostly maintained grass used No Yes Forested Fringe—No Credit
>3'depth historically as land application of (See Note)
biosolids&agriculture;parts of the Fields-Restoration site per 15A NCAC 02B
ditch have a narrow&forested .0295(n)
fringe
Farm path crossing labeled"X"on Note:This feature may be impacted by the PNG
maps attached is within existing Line 42 maintenance easement&the proposed
PNG Easement for Line 42&has a PNG line 24. Therefore,it cannot be used as a
compromised culvert that needs to Restoration Site until compromised culverts are
be replaced. Banks are unstable and replaced,PNG Line 24 has been constructed&no
will require stabilization efforts. longer needs their construction easement and all
overhead utility lines are removed.
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated November 22,2017 using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle
topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS.
2 NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nitrogen Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment.
Phosphorus may be calculated separately.A meeting held between DWR personnel on October 17,2017 resulted in approval to use this method on
the subject property.
'Evidence of gas lines and above ground utilities were observed on and around the subject property. Information from RS was provided January 22,
2019 showing all locations of existing and proposed utilities and their associated temporary&permanent easements.
ODE��,- North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
wJ) 512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLINA
wvana»nt or amroeo,.w waeni 919.707.9000

GUC/City of Greenville Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
May 29, 2019
Maps for reference are attached to this letter and were initialed by Ms. Merritt on December 20, 2017,
March 12, 2019 and May 29, 2019. This letter should be provided in all stream and wetland, buffer
and/or nutrient offset mitigation plans for this Site.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this site to generate nutrient offsets or buffer
mitigation credits. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295,a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan
shall be submitted to DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in
riparian areas and/or surface waters for buffer mitigation credit.Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B
.0240,a proposal regarding a proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit
shall be submitted to DWR for approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters.
All vegetative plantings,performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian restoration,
enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to be eligible for
buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. Any site constraints found on the property must be
presented to DWR for a full evaluation and final mitigation determination. For any areas depicted as not
being viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0240. A Mitigation Banking
Instrument approved by the DWR will be required for this site to be eligible to use as a mitigation bank.
This viability assessment will expire on March 25,2021 or upon the submittal of an As-Built Report to
the DWR, whichever comes first. Please contact Katie Merritt at(919) 707-3637 if you have any
questions regarding this correspondence.
Sincerely,
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
KAH/km
Attachments: Figure 1 (Existing Site Conditions), GUC WWTP Property Boundary, Topographic Map w/
Stream Determination, Piedmont Natural Gas Line 24 Project PCN Exhibit
cc: DWR File Copy(Katie Merritt)
Jason Manning, GUC (via email: manninmj(c)guc.com)
Nathanial Thornburg DWR Central Office(via email: nathaniel.thornburg(oncdenr.gov)
WaRO DWR Regional Office—David May/Robert Tankard/Anthony Scarborough
Page 212

mil/ i _, _ \.
4ROY COOPER . ,� Van1
Governors l i / j
MICHAEL S.REGAN
Secretary }fwo,,,,,weo,`. -
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROL+NA
Director Environmental Quality
March 25, 2019
Raymond Holz DWR Project#: 2017-1 122v2
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St., Suite 211
Raleigh,NC 27607
(via electronic mail: rholz(a),restorationsystems.com )
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset—GUC/City of Greenville Site
Tar-Pamlico River Basin—03020103 HUC
Located near Aqua Lane& Sunnyside Rd,Greenville, NC
Pitt County
Dear Mr. Holz,
On September I, 2017, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources(DWR),received a
request from Greene Environmental Services, LLC (GES) for a site visit near the above-referenced
site in the Tar-Pamlico River Basin. The request was for DWR to determine the potential for riparian
buffer mitigation and nutrient offset on adjoining lands currently owned by the City of Greenville
near the Wastewater Treatment Plant(WWTP). On November 14, 2017, Ms. Merritt performed an
onsite assessment of the subject site and identified the following site constraints in correspondence to
Jeff Becker with GES on January 16, 2018:
• UTILITIES: Natural gas lines and other utility lines are present throughout the
property both underground and above ground. Their specific locations and associated
easements were unknown at time of site visit.
• PERMITS: State,Federal and/or Local permits may be associated with this property.
Wetland delineation flagging was observed onsite and gas lines were seen crossing
wetlands. No knowledge of permits obtained for impacts associated with streams,
wetlands or buffers was provided to Ms. Merritt onsite to confirm compliance with
regulations.
• EXISTING PATHS & ROADS: The City of Greenville owns this property and has
used the land for applying their biosolids associated with the WWTP. Existing dirt
paths and deeded access roads are present and are adjacent to ditches and streams
onsite where mitigation would be proposed.
Due to the magnitude of site constraints noted above, Ms. Merritt was unable to complete a viability
assessment review of the site for GES. On January 22, 2019, Ms. Merritt received another site
viability request for the subject site,but from Restoration Systems, LLC (RS). The request from RS
included a landowner authorization form authorizing RS to act on behalf of the City of Greenville for
a viability assessment on their property, which is more accurately shown on the attached map
labeled,"Figure 1. Existing Site Conditions". RS also provided information regarding all the
utilities, permits and deeded access easements associated with the subject site. On March 13, 2019,
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
D - -) 512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh.North Carolina 27699-1617
E7,
°'o"mimm'aw""u"" ` /✓ 919.707.9000

GUC/City of Greenville Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 25,2019
RS provided site photos showing existing conditions of the riparian areas adjacent to each feature
onsite. When comparing these photos to notes taken during Ms. Merritt's original site visit in 2017,
no land use changes appear to have occurred. With all the information provided by RS, Ms. Merritt
was able to complete the viability assessment for the subject site.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank(TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240.
Feature Classification 'Subject Riparian Land uses Buffer 2Nutrient °Mitigation Type Determination w/in
ID in the field to adlacent to Feature Credit Offset Viable riparian areas
Buffer (TOB-200') Viable at 2,273.02
Rule lbs/acre
1 Ditch No N/A No No N/A
(WWTP
effluent
channel)
2 Stream Yes Maintained grass most 3Yes Yes(non- Forested fringe—Preservation Site per 15A
recently used as land forested areas NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
application of biosolids, only)
used historically for Fields=Restoration site per 15A NCAC 02B
agriculture,narrow .0295(n)
forested fringe upstream
(5-10'wide);50'PNG All areas within existing easements(PNG&
#42 gas line crossing; Utilities)must be excluded from the
120'overhead utility Restoration and Preservation Site
line downstream
3&4 not evaluated N/A N/A N/A N/A Out of project boundary
(see map)
5 Ditch/ No Maintained grass used No No Gas line crossing is not culverted;feature is
wetland historically as land not hydrologically connected to downstream
application of biosolids ditch 6A
&agriculture
6A Ditch No Maintained grass used No Yes Restoration site per 1 SA NCAC 02B.0295
South of >3'depth historically as land (n)
gas line application of biosolids
berm &agriculture;farm Cannot be used as a Restoration Site until
path,overhead utility after PNG has constructed the pipeline and no
line,and a temporary longer needs their construction easement and
construction easement the overhead utility line is removed. Utility
for PNG#24 gas line lines&farm path are proposed to be
removed.
68 Stream Yes 3Yes Yes(non- Forested Areas—Preservation Site per 1 SA
At DWR Maintained grass used forested areas NCAC 02B ,0295(o)(5)
"I"Flag historically as land only)
(see map) application of biosolids Fields-Restoration site per 15A NCAC 02B
&agriculture;farm .0295(n)
path,overhead utility
line,and a temporary Cannot be used as a Restoration or
construction easement Preservation Site until after PNG has
for PNG#24 gas line; constructed the pipeline and no longer needs
partially forested near their construction easement and the overhead
confluence w/7A utility line is removed. Utility lines&farm
path are proposed to be removed.
Page 214

GUC/City of Greenville Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 25,2019
Feature Classification 'Subject Riparian Land uses Buffer 2 Nutrient 4Mitigation Type Determination w/in
ID in the field to adiacent to Feature Credit Offset Viable riparian areas
Buffer (TOB-200'l Viable at 2,273.02
Rule Ibs/acre
7A Stream Yes maintained grass used 3Yes Yes(non- Forested fringe—Preservation Site per 15A
At DWR historically as land forested areas NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
"P"flag application of biosolids only)
(see map) &agriculture;forested Fields-Restoration site per 15A NCAC 02B
fringe from 5-15'from .0295(n)
TOB;temporary
construction easement Cannot be used as a Restoration or
for PNG#24 gas line Preservation Site until after PNG has
constructed the pipeline and no longer needs
their construction easement. Utility lines&
farm path are proposed to be removed.
7B Stream Yes Combination of mature 3Yes Yes(non- Forested Areas—Preservation Site per 15A
(see map) natural forest and forested areas NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
maintained grass used only)
historically as land Fields-Restoration site per 15A NCAC 02B
application of biosolids .0295(n)
&agriculture
8 Stream Yes Combination of mature 3Yes Yes(field Forested Areas—Preservation Site per 15A
natural forest and only) NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
maintained grass most
recently used as land Fields=Restoration site per 15A NCAC 02B
application of biosolids, .0295(n)
used historically for
agriculture
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated November 22,2017 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS.
2 NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nitrogen Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment. Phosphorus may be calculated separately.A meeting held between DWR personnel on October 17,2017 resulted in
approval to use this method on the subject property.
3The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of
buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC.0295(o)(5)and 15A NCAC.0295(o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation only site to comply with this
rule.
4Evidence of gas lines and above ground utilities were observed on and around the subject property. Information from RS was
provided January 22,2019 showing all locations of existing and proposed utilities and their associated temporary&permanent
easements.
Maps for reference are attached to this letter and were initialed by Ms. Merritt on December 20, 2017
and March 12, 2019. This letter should be provided in all stream and wetland, buffer and/or nutrient
offset mitigation plans for this Site.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this site to generate nutrient offsets or mitigation
credits. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be
submitted to DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas
and/or surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0240, a proposal
regarding a proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to
DWR for approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
Page 314

GUC/City of Greenville Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
March 25,2019
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. Any site constraints found on the
property must be presented to DWR for a full evaluation and final mitigation determination. For any
areas depicted as not being viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different
measure, along with supporting calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load
reduction, for review by the DWR to determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A
NCAC 02B .0240. A Mitigation Banking Instrument approved by the DWR will be required for this
site to be eligible to use as a mitigation bank.
This viability assessment will expire on March 13, 2021 or upon the submittal of an As-Built
Report to the DWR, whichever comes first. Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you
have any questions regarding this correspondence.
Sincerely,
vol?..10,00
Karen Higgins, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
KAH/km
Attachments: Figure 1 (Existing Site Conditions), GUC WWTP Property Boundary, Topographic
Map w/ Stream Determination, Piedmont Natural Gas Line 24 Project PCN Exhibit
cc: DWR File Copy(Katie Merritt)
Jason Maiming, GUC (via email: manninmjAguc.com)
Nathanial Thornburg DWR Central Office(via email: nathaniel.thornburg@,ncdenr.gov )
WaRO DWR Regional Office—David May/Robert Tankard/Anthony Scarborough
Page 414

6{/m{
•
!.
/\ !e )/a I:0 .g,...,;., J\
, $2 ©
�,
k \ C
} ) ,
e
lig , r.,.
!,
• .
'I..l..
/ ( ..
.
` ) \'
. § § N
\
j
\
!
0, < \5 ®A\
°! /§$l
. - ! ® " ƒ _\ , \
y /. ){ . eR 5 i
{/ , 2g/ &
° . k\ J} ) E ,` /
\ \
8
�' \} ` . :.
. \ \ \>
/ � . z \ .\:_, -
/ � }. $ 6
Z , lbi•-:dli:1•
| ik �
\ (\
�a .o
� 1 '*
!' \ 3 ;. a.44
P
.
' ,. (115 \ g
1.' co
e
» f / Ii
Illidil
\ ( § {
§ �{ §
,| a)! { CO \
0� � � -co k $
4! i
- . § {
{ _ \ \ / ) k :
' f) 9 f ; { - 1
3 ! £ ;
- ` ; , r - t k / /
` § k -
\ 2 / / \ § 1 q § J
| | | u .

Et)
. ,
• - .41•,.:•,t; • -, ,•••
,..._. _
..„._
%
• , \
CD ,
• .. 1.•'—0.', , -'5 inivo . .1'i i a -
k i
/:..)
p—d
3 13'. ' 5 •3 • ...,
1 ,
, ilit
. j• 7, AL 1/ ^,'''' f .— ' ' " ..
I...
F._-_.
f
......)
(
..I ,. . ......)
• :.- ".
_ ....
, p--• I.
. _..
. .. .,,.._.... , 1
,,- -: .- i ill ; - .,.,-. • • ,,A, /.1t---;t.,.
Ir J,,,,,,,,--— i ...?'",,,:::•.. , T.'.. , -,...... Ali 9
i\
2
,. , 't-,,. i•:-„,\,,
• ..
, .
,.. k
0
.. 2, ,,-,.j. \•16 -".
t .,
"'.4`. '";-k-,i -- .i• '-'.,
...2
. .4 (15
•
1... r..4
,._._.,
..,,...
‘1,-• • d)
Ni t
... • .
.I OA
.>"1 ' k • ,
1
C
. -- . .., c.)
• .=,..
• • ,
•
, _.L.
k -7,-,* k
i i‘... ‘ C.,:_i)..... ,..,, .„, )
‘.,
1
i
_ •
. \
0
• '1. _._ ii
-
- -+----• ._.,•-•-•-,,T,•_,. --..-7,,; \ - i i
I / — --)
,
1,,,,....1; ,,
...-.
t
if
C........)
\it
g. • ..•
! ,,,, ...,„„,,„.......00°46,••
c., i /
, ,..
.
k:-.
, ,..
S - I +---- -.;
IL
, ......•
-
• _1''- ' .".4/IPIP'
..... :
,'
,..t • •
•
.. ;, ----
r.
N.., ../. 1
1 i
.. , . „..\.____.•
1 .._. „..,
-\ ,., ...,....„.,.- •,0 .,.. „Le...
(-13
-• ' j.:....$•.: .
V .........,
. ,......
... ...t..';',
- ;•.' . /Z .•0.'!-,.t cpp,- -
r i,j 1,•.-,', ,., „:•_'-', ,6 / .: „•••
._... . 41ti-4'1
...- ..,,•,.,

t
..t, i R ',i ij. ,qg Sr { ,. ' { 4,, It, r 4 I 1 1
k)11 ,;\ —04' \'„ ' li' 1 1.P : 10 A e
4- ,, 414
1I!I' +s
p,C Y I 'i1 P.., ,„ / ''' I 1i I f 41 a�'i4I ' " '
' I
..ii 0 , ...„...,. 00
- , f, . . j- 4 1
l
,y,.,„,„.ii 14 D i
.(11). N— CP
iCe
N .....
__. . _
_ _ __
' 4 I
k r ..„...
w :_ a 1� If
: I,
c:„ 1
, !
cu
`
fr f� G5 6s s, ' I ' 0111,(11—Aii -li.deLo " : . it t 1 I l'a
1 • MI `o J p ai r
�dv (/) b {
l rl Cr
+ r ;`[ tr- N, \
It, j
0 1,r.
r+r m yilliii;
- 1* }1.3 1
)i r ' /'' ' '''1 Ci 6 / /1 1 I
--':',- __ ''' / i
`\, r :,1117 r
a _p �� 1/p' �1
�j. ,; ply ciN '. /� 6 i f(,';

. .r� .n {_ f' ',IF,
i CO
tel
Sun�Y 5 Rd�SR_1555) „ � �. o •
ar
idg � ' r la
Al.
I
ECI co
1 of i*>y.� a o
II ra co �d LLL .0 N
m oQ .�
Ck F E c O V. I
I
,, I t=/1 z Z
I� it". uj
1
EN
1
i I—
d ga. ) r:'
I ' .
,..
. ) ,
aE
,�
M J_a rh
40 w `a 6- O�i
OF OL r
iviv
X�fZ0
co Lilo: C O� ; VQ
a,
RI in CO
il
E �.nY a 0
. t.
�^ V Z l
tioE t5 .' i
Y : E a Eo.
~ V/M m ay�i a o km)
f I- •
w w .-CL a V
z 0 E �i v E Q
•
'E'E 2 I-- ._ }tcC
a it, 2 m ao
a o 0
. E m as a�a� 0 Vl
{ a z
a �. I � i.
76 NEsL E 0
� � C6 I I
CU
•
E o LU
. i ! 1-'# ' J co v o ECL
y 0 Z'C] ¢Q- c-n 2'
LL �a S E A E E E E A
o p ,c 0. E o
a • E a o .� "4 0 L,rd .,o m a
r O C3 E E
N RN'i d i •�- a? N H
Q 0 - d{� `p�' O L C N
�a,,nr, E oo.w x�u =�v c c
E o r� '� t-- '-' aaa IVI d0'a as
c�
01.
��a hG
co
tel IN
R _ __ e - '�j E C d.ro N Ea
dO1
os
m m
� : E a ..O. rcti'c 7
a a r " ° " a �i �c 0 7 y • to
E o F, i ��,,,: u E�` $o v o.G w M E
II-
6 E t04 a w La o `o 0 mvii�
` la
�, U E, W N R rn a s r c
\l\ [* m Q E y.o�- d p R u _a a a O ry OC
O N O. a Q 2 c H F4J a
•
• EFo n �.. t
•
�_U . i ";
3'OAP" .

6 Mc STATE�,
4 Mnv zo.r»r44.
y
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN n.' . - _;»6,`Q
Secretary ', QOA .*.ac
se N1 V19,
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
March 5, 2020
Piedmont Natural Gas
Attn:Aaron Weldon
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, NC 28210
Subject: 401 Water Quality and
Buffer Authorization Certification Inspection
Piedmont Natural Gas Line 439 Replacement Project
DWR Project# 18-1640 V3
Dear Mr.Weldon:
On March 3, 2020, Anthony Scarbraugh of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) meet with Michael
Parham and Todd Moody of Duke Energy, Daniel Craft of Contract Land Staff, LLC and Irby Heflin of
Meridian Construction Consultants, LLC to inspected stream, wetland and buffer crossings for the natural
gas line replacement project on the subject property located at 2242 and 0 Sunny Side Road near City of
Greenville, Pitt County. The subject properties are owned by the City of Greenville and known as Pitt
County Tax Parcel Nos. 33065 and 48152, respectively. This project was inspected for compliance with
the General Water Quality Certification (GC) #4133 and Buffer Authorization with Additional Conditions
issued on October 28,2019 for the proposed project. Please note,this inspection was conducted to satisfy
a condition of the Bank Parcel Development Package and Mitigation Bank Instrument for the proposed
Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Bank known as GUC Buffer& Nutrient Bank Parcel stating
that compliance with the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Authorization with additional
conditions must be satisfied prior to the implementation of the project.
The GC approved impacts on the subject property of 50 linear feet of stream, 1.10 acres of wetland, and
19,791 square feet of buffer impacts to complete your project as described in your application received
by DWR on September 19, 2019 with subsequent information received on October 23, 2019.
The inspection revealed that the project has been completed on the subject parcels. Impacts did not
exceed beyond the footprint of those approved. The inspection revealed that the inspected portion of
this project is currently compliant with the GC#4133 and buffer authorization.
As a reminder, if you change your project you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new
application. If the property is sold,the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval
letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. Upon completion of all work approved
within the 401 WQC, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the enclosed
certificate of completion to the 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Resources,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617.
,D_E Q North a Dtment ironmeal Quality Division W Resour
��O WashingtonCarolin Regionalepar Office of 943Env Washingtonnt Square Mall isI Washingtonofater ,Northces Carolina 27889
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Duality 252.946.6481

Violations of any condition set forth in the Certifications and Additional Conditions may result in
revocation of this Certifications and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorizations to
proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to water and buffer as depicted in your
application and as authorized by this Certifications shall expire upon the expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit and Buffer Authorization.
Should you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact me at(252) 948-3924.
Sincerely,
47 sz G
Anthony Scarbraugh, Environmental Specialist II
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure: Certificate of Completion
cc: Laserfiche
Emily Thompson, USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office (via email)
Shelton Sullivan, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit (via email)
Katie Merritt,401 & Buffer Permitting Unit (via email)

Appendix D: 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule—CMB rule)(effective date—
October 24, 2014)
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: 15A NCAC 02B.0295
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

15A NCAC 02B.0295 MITIGATION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR PROTECTION AND
MAINTENANCE OF RIPARIAN BUFFERS
(a) PURPOSE. The purpose of this Rule is to set forth the mitigation requirements that apply to applicants listed in
Paragraph(c)of this Rule and to set forth requirements for buffer mitigation providers.
(b) DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this Rule,these terms shall be defined as follows:
(1) "Authority"means either the Division or a local government that has been delegated or designated
pursuant to Rules .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267,or .0607 of this Subchapter to implement the
riparian buffer program.
(2) "Compensatory Buffer Mitigation Bank" means a buffer mitigation site created by a mitigation
provider and approved for mitigation credit by the Division through execution of a mitigation
banking instrument.
(3) "Division" means the Division of Water Resources of the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
(4) "Enhancement Site" means a riparian zone site characterized by conditions between that of a
restoration site and a preservation site such that the establishment of woody stems (i.e., tree or
shrub species)will maximize nutrient removal and other buffer functions.
(5) "Hydrologic Area" means the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD), located at no cost at
http://data.nconemap.com/geoportal/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid={16A42F31-
6DC7-4EC3-88A9-03E6B7D55653} using the eight-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)prepared
by the United States Geological Survey.
(6) "Locational Ratio" means the mitigation ratio applied to the mitigation requirements based on the
location of the mitigation site relative to the impact site as set forth in Paragraph(f)of this Rule.
(7) "Mitigation banking instrument" means the legal document for the establishment, operation, and
use of a mitigation bank.
(8) "Monitoring period" means the length of time specified in the approved mitigation plan during
which monitoring of vegetation success and other anticipated benefits to the adjacent water as
listed in the mitigation approval is done.
(9) "Non-wasting endowment" means a fund that generates enough interest to cover the cost of the
long term monitoring and maintenance.
(10) "Outer Coastal Plain" means the portion of the state shown as the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain
(63) on Griffith, et al. (2002) "Ecoregions of North and South Carolina." Reston, VA, United
States Geological Survey available at no cost at
http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/ncsc_eco.htm.
(11) "Preservation Site" means riparian zone sites that, as determined by a site visit conducted by the
Authority, are characterized by a forest consisting of the forest strata and diversity of species
appropriate for the location.
(12) "Restoration Site" means riparian zone sites that are characterized by an absence of trees and by a
lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems (i.e., shrubs or saplings) or sites that are
characterized by scattered individual trees such that the tree canopy is less than 25 percent of the
cover and by a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems(i.e.,shrubs or saplings).
(13) "Riparian buffer mitigation unit"means a unit representing a credit of riparian buffer mitigation as
set forth in Paragraph(m)of this Rule.
(14) "Riparian wetland" means a wetland that is found in one or more of the following landscape
positions:
(A) in a geomorphic floodplain;
(B) in a natural topographic crenulation;
(C) contiguous with an open water equal to or greater than 20 acres in size;or
(D) subject to tidal flow regimes excluding salt/brackish marsh wetlands.
(15) "Stem"means a woody seedling,sapling, shrub,or tree,no less than 10 centimeters in height.
(16) "Urban"means an area that is either designated as an urbanized area under the most recent federal
decennial census available at no cost at http://www.census.gov/or is located within the corporate
limits of a municipality.
(17) "Zonal Ratio" means the mitigation ratio applied to impact amounts in the respective zones of the
riparian buffer as set forth in Paragraph(e)of this Rule.
(c) MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS. Buffer mitigation is required when one of the following applies:

(1) The applicant has received an authorization certificate for impacts pursuant to Rule .0233, .0243,
.0250, .0259, .0267, or .0607 of this Subchapter and is required to perform mitigation as a
condition of the authorization certificate;or
(2) The applicant has received a variance pursuant to Rule .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267,or.0607
of this Subchapter and is required to perform mitigation as a condition of a variance approval.
Any applicant covered under this Paragraph shall submit to the Authority a written mitigation proposal that
calculates the required area of mitigation and describes the area and location of each type of proposed mitigation.
The applicant shall not impact buffers until the Authority approves the mitigation plan and issues written approval.
(d) AREA OF IMPACT. The Authority shall determine the area of impact in square feet to each Zone as defined
by the applicable Rule .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267,or.0607 of this Subchapter of the proposed riparian buffer
by adding the following:
(1) The area of the footprint of the use impacting the riparian buffer;
(2) The area of the boundary of any clearing and grading activities within the riparian buffer
necessary to accommodate the use;and
(3) The area of any ongoing maintenance corridors within the riparian buffer associated with the use.
The Authority shall deduct from this total the area of any wetlands that are subject to and compliant with riparian
wetland mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 02H .0506 and are located within the proposed riparian buffer
impact area.
(e) AREA OF MITIGATION REQUIRED ON ZONAL MITIGATION RATIOS. The Authority shall determine
the required area of mitigation for each Zone by applying each of the following ratios to the area of impact
calculated under Paragraph(d)of this Rule:
Basin/Watershed Zone 1 Ratio Zone 2 Ratio
Neuse River Basin(15A NCAC 02B .0233) 3:1 1.5:1
Catawba River Basin(15A NCAC 02B .0243) 2:1 1.5:1
Randleman Lake Watershed(15A NCAC 02B .0250) 3:1 1.5:1
Tar-Pamlico River Basin(15A NCAC 02B .0259) 3:1 1.5:1
Jordan Lake Watershed(15A NCAC 02B .0267) 3:1 1.5:1
Goose Creek Watershed(15A NCAC 02B .0607) 3:1A
A The Goose Creek Watershed does not have a Zone 1 and Zone 2. The mitigation ratio in the Goose
Creek Watershed is 3:1 for the entire buffer.
(f) AREA OF MITIGATION REQUIRED ON LOCATIONAL MITIGATION RATIOS. The applicant or
mitigation provider shall use the following locational ratios as applicable based on location of the proposed
mitigation site relative to that of the proposed impact site.Locational ratios shall be as follows:
Location Ratio
Within the 12-digit HUCA 0.75:1
Within the eight-digit HUCB 1:1
Outside of the eight-digit HUCB 2:1
A Except within the Randleman Lake Watershed. Within the Randleman Lake Watershed
the ratio is 1:1.
B Except as provided in Paragraph(g)of this Rule.
(g) GEOGRAPHIC RESTRICTIONS ON LOCATION OF MITIGATION. Mitigation shall be performed in the
same river basin where the impact is located with the following additional specifications:
(1) In the following cases, mitigation shall be performed in the same watershed where the impact is
located:
(A) Falls Lake Watershed,as defined in Rule .0275 of this Section;
(B) Goose Creek Watershed,as defined in Rule .0601 of this Subchapter;
(C) Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed,as defined in Rule .0248 of this Section;
(D) Each subwatershed of the Jordan Lake watershed, as defined in Rule .0262 of this
Section;and
(E) Other watersheds as specified in riparian buffer protection rules adopted by the
Commission.
(2) Buffer mitigation for impacts within watersheds with riparian buffer rules that also have federally
listed threatened or endangered aquatic species may be done within other watersheds with the

same federally listed threatened or endangered aquatic species as long as the impacts are in the
same river basin as the mitigation site.
(h) MITIGATION OPTIONS FOR APPLICANTS. The applicant may propose any of the following types of
mitigation:
(1) Riparian buffer restoration or enhancement pursuant to Paragraph(n)of this Rule;
(2) Payment of a compensatory mitigation fee to a compensatory buffer mitigation bank pursuant to
Paragraph (i) of this Rule or payment of a compensatory mitigation fee to the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund pursuant to Paragraph (j) of this Rule. Payment shall conform to the
requirements of G.S. 143-214.20;
(3) Donation of real property or of an interest in real property pursuant to Paragraph(k)of this Rule;
(4) Alternative buffer mitigation pursuant to Paragraph(o)of this Rule;or
(5) Other buffer mitigation as approved by the Environmental Management Commission as a
condition of a variance approval.
(i) PURCHASE OF BUFFER MITIGATION CREDITS FROM A PRIVATE OR PUBLIC COMPENSATORY
BUFFER MITIGATION BANK. Applicants who choose to satisfy some or all of their mitigation by purchasing
mitigation credits from a private or public compensatory buffer mitigation bank shall meet the following
requirements:
(1) The compensatory buffer mitigation bank from which credits are purchased shall have available
riparian buffer credits approved by the Division;
(2) The compensatory buffer mitigation bank from which credits are purchased shall be located as
described in Paragraphs(e),(f),and(g)of this Rule;and
(3) After receiving a mitigation acceptance letter from the compensatory buffer mitigation bank,proof
of payment for the credits shall be provided to the Authority prior to any activity that results in the
removal or degradation of the protected riparian buffer.
(j) PAYMENT TO THE RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION FUND. Applicants who choose to satisfy some or
all of their mitigation requirement by paying a compensatory mitigation fee to the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund
shall meet the requirements of Rule .0269 of this Section. Payment made to the NC Division of Mitigation Services
(DMS) shall be contingent upon acceptance of the payment by the DMS. The DMS shall consider their financial,
temporal, and technical ability to satisfy the mitigation request to determine whether they shall accept or deny the
request.
(k) DONATION OF PROPERTY. Applicants who choose to satisfy their mitigation requirement by donating real
property or an interest in real property to fully or partially offset an approved payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund pursuant to Paragraph(j)of this Rule shall do so in accordance with 15A NCAC 02R.0403.
(1) MITIGATION SITE REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICANTS AND MITIGATION PROVIDERS. For each
mitigation site proposed by an applicant or mitigation provider under Paragraphs (n) or (o) of this Rule, the
Authority shall identify functional criteria to measure the anticipated benefits of the mitigation to the adjacent water.
The Authority shall issue a mitigation determination that specifies the area,type, and location of mitigation and the
water quality benefits to be provided by the mitigation site. All mitigation proposals shall meet the following
criteria:
(1) The location of the buffer mitigation site shall comply with the requirements of Paragraphs(f)and
(g) of this Rule. In the Catawba watershed, buffer mitigation may be done along the lake
shoreline as well as along intermittent and perennial stream channels throughout the watershed.
(2) The mitigation proposal shall include a commitment to provide:
(A) a perpetual conservation easement or similar preservation mechanism to ensure perpetual
stewardship that protects the mitigation site's nutrient removal and other water quality
functions;
(B) a non-wasting endowment or other dedicated financial surety to provide for the perpetual
land management and hydrological maintenance of lands and maintenance of structures
as applicable;and
(C) financial assurance in the form of a completion bond, credit insurance, letter of credit,
escrow, or other vehicle acceptable to the Authority payable to, or for the benefit of,the
Authority in an amount sufficient to ensure that the property is secured in fee title or by
easement, and that planting or construction, monitoring and maintenance are completed
as necessary to meet success criteria as specified in the approved mitigation plan. This
financial assurance obligation shall not apply to the NC DMS.

(3) Diffuse flow of runoff shall be maintained in the riparian buffer. Any existing impervious cover
or stormwater conveyances such as ditches, pipes, or drain tiles shall be eliminated and the flow
converted to diffuse flow. If the applicant or mitigation provider determines that elimination of
existing stormwater conveyances is not feasible, then they shall include a justification and shall
provide a delineation of the watershed draining to the stormwater outfall and the percentage of the
total drainage by area treated by the riparian buffer with the mitigation plan specified in Paragraph
(n) or (o) of this Rule for Authority approval. During mitigation plan review and approval, the
Authority may reduce credit proportionally.
(4) Sewer easement within the buffer. If the proposed mitigation site contains a sewer easement in
Zone 1, that portion of the sewer easement within Zone 1 shall not be suitable for buffer
mitigation credit. If the proposed mitigation site contains a sewer easement in Zone 2,the portion
of the sewer easement in Zone 2 may be suitable for buffer mitigation credit if:
(A) the applicant or mitigation provider restores or enhances the forested buffer in Zone 1
adjacent to the sewer easement;
(B) the sewer easement is required to be maintained in a condition that meets the vegetative
requirements of the collection system permit;and
(C) diffuse flow is provided across the entire buffer width.
(5) The applicant or mitigation provider shall provide a site specific credit/debit ledger to the
Authority at regular intervals as specified in the mitigation plan approval or mitigation banking
instrument once credits are established and until they are exhausted.
(6) Buffer mitigation credit, nutrient offset credit, wetland mitigation credit, and stream mitigation
credit shall be accounted for in accordance with the following:
(A) Buffer mitigation used for buffer mitigation credit shall not be used for nutrient offset
credits;
(B) Buffer mitigation credit shall not be generated within wetlands that provide wetland
mitigation credit required by 15A NCAC 02H .0506;and
(C) Buffer mitigation credit may be generated on stream mitigation sites as long as the width
of the restored or enhanced riparian buffer meets the requirements of Subparagraph(n)(1)
of this Rule.
(m) RIPARIAN BUFFER MITIGATION UNITS. Mitigation activities shall generate riparian buffer mitigation
units as follows:
Mitigation Activity Square Feet of Riparian Buffer
Mitigation Buffer Mitigation Units Generated
Restoration Site 1 1
Enhancement Site 2 1
Preservation Site on Non-Subject Urban Streams 3 1
Preservation Site on Subject Urban Streams 3 1
Preservation Site on Non-Subject Rural Streams 5 1
Preservation Site on Subject Rural Streams 10 1
(n) RIPARIAN BUFFER RESTORATION SITE OR ENHANCEMENT SITE. Authority staff shall make an on-
site determination as to whether a potential mitigation site qualifies as a restoration site or enhancement site as
defined in Paragraph(b)of this Rule. Riparian buffer restoration sites or enhancement sites shall meet the following
requirements:
(1) Buffer restoration sites or enhancement sites may be proposed as follows:
Proposed
Buffer width(ft) Percentage
of Full Credit
Less than 20 0%
20-29 75%
30-100 100%
101-200 33%

(2) The applicant or mitigation provider shall submit a restoration or enhancement mitigation plan to
the Authority for written approval. The plan shall demonstrate compliance with the requirements
of this Paragraph and Paragraphs(1)and(m)of this Rule and shall also contain the following:
(A) A map of the proposed restoration or enhancement site;
(B) A vegetation plan that shall detail the activities proposed to ensure a final performance
standard of 260 stems per acre at the completion of monitoring. The final performance
standard shall include a minimum of four native hardwood tree species or four native
hardwood tree and native shrub species, where no one species is greater than 50 percent
of stems. Native hardwood and native shrub volunteer species may be included to meet
the final performance standard of 260 stems per acre. The Authority may approve
alternative vegetation plans upon consideration of factors, including site wetness and
plant availability,to meet the requirements of this Part;
(C) A grading plan (if applicable). The site shall be graded in a manner to ensure diffuse
flow through the entire riparian buffer;
(D) A schedule for implementation, including a fertilization and herbicide plan if applicable;
and
(E) A monitoring plan to document whether the site is expected to meet the final performance
standards as defined in Part (n)(2)(B) of this Rule and other anticipated benefits to the
adjacent water. The plan shall include a proposed schedule and method for monitoring
the vegetative status of the restoration or enhancement site for five years, including the
health and average stem densities of native hardwood tree or tree and shrub species that
are to be counted toward the final performance standard.
(3) Within one year after Authority approval of the mitigation plan, the applicant or mitigation
provider shall present documentation to the Authority that the riparian buffer has been restored or
enhanced unless the applicant or mitigation provider requests, and the Authority agrees in writing
prior to that date,to a longer time period.
(4) The applicant or mitigation provider shall submit written annual reports, unless an alternative
schedule has been approved by the Authority during the mitigation plan approval, for a period of
five years after completion of the activities identified in Part (n)(2)(B) of this Rule at the
restoration site or enhancement site showing:
(A) compliance with the monitoring plan approved pursuant to Part (n)(2)(E) of this Rule;
and
(B) that diffuse flow through the riparian buffer has been maintained.
If the Authority determines that the native hardwood tree or tree and shrub species at the site are not
expected to meet the final performance standards listed in Part (n)(2)(B) of this Rule, then the Authority
may require that the applicant or mitigation provider replace trees or trees and shrubs as needed during that
five-year period. If the Authority determines that diffuse flow through the buffer is not being maintained,
then the Authority may require that the applicant or mitigation provider restore diffuse flow. If the
Authority determines that the final performance standards listed in Part(n)(2)(B)of this Rule have not been
achieved at the end of the five-year monitoring period, the Authority may require additional years of
monitoring. The Authority shall make determinations referenced in this Subparagraph on a site specific
basis based on the annual reports, any supplemental information submitted by the applicant or mitigation
provider,or a site evaluation by the Authority,
(o) ALTERNATIVE BUFFER MITIGATION OPTIONS. Alternative buffer mitigation options are detailed in this
Paragraph. Any proposal for alternative buffer mitigation shall be provided in writing to the Division,shall meet the
content and procedural requirements for approval by the Division, shall meet the requirements set out in Paragraphs
(1) and(m) of this Rule and the requirements set out in the named Subparagraph of this Paragraph addressing that
applicable alternative buffer mitigation option:
(1) Retroactive Credit. Alternative buffer mitigation sites constructed and within the required
monitoring period on the effective date of this Rule shall be eligible for use as alternative buffer
mitigation sites. Alternative buffer mitigation sites that have completed monitoring and were
released by the Division on or within the past 10 years of the effective date of this Rule shall be
eligible for use as alternative buffer mitigation sites. All alternative buffer mitigation site
proposals submitted under this Subparagraph shall meet the following:
(A) A map or maps of the proposed alternative buffer mitigation site;

(B) Documentation of pre-existing conditions showing that the proposed alternative buffer
mitigation site met the criteria to qualify for the applicable alternative buffer mitigation
type identified in the applicable Subparagraph of this Paragraph;
(C) Documentation of the activities that were conducted at the proposed alternative buffer
mitigation site to meet success criteria identified in the applicable Subparagraph of this
Paragraph;and
(D) Documentation that the proposed alternative buffer mitigation site met the success
criteria identified in the applicable Subparagraph of this Paragraph.
These alternative buffer mitigation sites shall receive credit in accordance with the criteria set
forth in Paragraph(m)and Subparagraph(n)(1)of this Rule.
(2) Coastal Headwater Stream Mitigation. Wooded buffers planted along Outer Coastal Plain
headwater stream mitigation sites may also be approved as riparian buffer mitigation credit if the
site meets all applicable requirements of Paragraph (n) of this Rule. In addition, all success
criteria specified in the approval of the stream mitigation site by the Division shall be met. The
area of the buffer shall be measured perpendicular to the length of the valley being restored. The
area within the proposed buffer mitigation site shall not also be used as wetland mitigation.
(3) Buffer Restoration and Enhancement on Non-Subject Streams. Restoration or enhancement of
buffers may be conducted on intermittent or perennial streams that are not subject to the applicable
Rule .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267, or .0607 of this Subchapter. These streams shall be
confirmed as intermittent or perennial streams by Division staff certified per G.S. 143-214.25A
using the Division publication, "Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and Their Origins (v.4.11, 2010)" available at no cost at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ws/401/waterresources/streamdeterminations. The proposal
shall meet all applicable requirements of Paragraph(n)of this Rule.
(4) Preservation of Buffer on Non-Subject Streams. Preservation of buffers on intermittent or
perennial streams that are not subject to the applicable Rule .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267, or
.0607 of this Subchapter may be proposed in order to permanently protect the buffer from cutting,
clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer.
These streams shall be confirmed as intermittent or perennial streams by Division staff certified
per G.S. 143-214.25A using the Division publication, "Methodology for Identification of
Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (v4.11, 2010)." The preservation site shall
meet the requirements of Subparagraph(n)(1) of this Rule and the requirements set forth in 15A
NCAC 02R .0403(c)(7), (8), and(11). The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation
site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation.
(5) Preservation of Buffers on Subject Streams. Buffer preservation may be proposed on streams that
are subject to the applicable Rule .0233, .0243, .0250, .0259, .0267,or.0607 of this Subchapter in
order to permanently protect the buffer from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar
activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer beyond the protection afforded by the
existing buffer rules on sites that meet the definition of a preservation site. The preservation site
shall meet the requirements of Subparagraph(n)(1) and the requirements set forth in 15A NCAC
02R.0403(c)(7),(8),and(11). The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall
comprise of no more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation.
(6) Enhancement of grazing areas adjacent to streams. Buffer credit at a 2:1 ratio shall be available
for an applicant or mitigation provider who proposes permanent exclusion of grazing livestock
that otherwise degrade the stream and riparian zone through trampling, grazing, or waste
deposition by fencing the livestock out of the stream and its adjacent buffer. The applicant or
mitigation provider shall provide an enhancement plan as set forth in Paragraph(n) of this Rule.
The applicant or mitigation provider shall demonstrate that grazing was the predominant land use
since the effective date of the applicable buffer rule.
(7) Mitigation on ephemeral channels. For purposes of riparian buffer mitigation as described in this
Part, an"ephemeral channel" is defined as a natural channel exhibiting discernible banks within a
topographic crenulation (V-shaped contour lines) indicative of natural drainage on the 1:24,000
scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle topographic map prepared by the U.S. Geologic Survey, or as seen
on digital elevation models with contours developed from the most recent available LiDAR data,
available at no cost at http://www.ncfloodmaps.com/lidar.com. Ephemeral channels only flow for
a short period of time after precipitation in the drainage area and do not have periods of base flow

sustained by groundwater discharge. The applicant or mitigation provider shall provide a
delineation of the watershed draining to the ephemeral channel. The entire area proposed for
mitigation shall be within the contributing drainage area to the ephemeral channel. The ephemeral
channel shall be directly connected to an intermittent or perennial stream and contiguous with the
rest of the mitigation site protected under a perpetual conservation easement. The area of the
mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent of the total area of
buffer mitigation. The proposal shall meet all applicable requirements of Paragraph (n) of this
Rule for restoration or enhancement. The proposal shall meet all applicable requirements of
Subparagraph(o)(4)or(o)(5)of this Rule for preservation.
(8) Restoration and Enhancement on Ditches. For purposes of riparian buffer mitigation as described
in this Part, a"ditch" is defined as a man-made channel other than a modified natural stream that
was constructed for drainage purposes. To be used for mitigation, a ditch shall meet all of the
following criteria:
(A) be directly connected with and draining towards an intermittent or perennial stream;
(B) be contiguous with the rest of the mitigation site protected under a perpetual conservation
easement;
(C) stormwater runoff from overland flow shall drain towards the ditch;
(D) be between one and three feet in depth;and
(E) the entire length of the ditch shall have been in place prior to the effective date of the
applicable buffer rule.
The width of the restored or enhanced area shall not be less than 30 feet and shall not exceed 50
feet for crediting purposes. The applicant or mitigation provider shall provide a delineation of the
watershed draining to the ditch. The watershed draining to the ditch shall be at least four times
larger than the restored or enhanced area along the ditch. The perpetual conservation easement
shall include the ditch and the confluence of the ditch with the intermittent or perennial stream,
and provide language that prohibits future maintenance of the ditch. The proposal shall meet all
applicable requirements of Paragraph(n)of this Rule for restoration or enhancement.
(9) Stormwater Treatment Options. All stormwater treatment options shall meet the following
requirements:
(A) Structural options already required by other local, state, or federal rule or permit cannot
be used as alternative buffer mitigation credit, except to the extent such measure(s)
exceed the requirements of such rule or permit. Stormwater Best Management Practices
(BMPs), including bioretention facilities, constructed wetlands, infiltration devices and
sand filters are all potentially approvable BMPs by the Division for alternative buffer
mitigation credit. Other BMPs may be approved only if they meet the nutrient removal
levels outlined in Part(o)(9)(B)of this Rule. Existing or planned BMPs for a local, state,
or federal rule or permit may be retrofitted or expanded to improve their nutrient removal
if this level of treatment is not required by other local,state,or federal rules. In this case,
the predicted increase in nutrient removal may be counted toward alternative buffer
mitigation credit;
(B) Minimum treatment levels: Any structural BMP shall provide at least 30 percent total
nitrogen and 35 percent total phosphorus removal as demonstrated by a scientific and
engineering literature review as approved by the Division. The mitigation proposal shall
demonstrate that the proposed alternative removes an equal or greater annual mass load
of nutrients to surface waters as the buffer impact authorized in the authorization
certificate or variance, following the calculation of impact and mitigation areas pursuant
to Paragraphs(d),(e),and(f)of this Rule. To estimate the rate of nutrient removal of the
impacted buffer,the applicant or mitigation provider may use the "NC Division of Water
Quality — Methodology and Calculation for determining nutrient reductions associated
with Riparian Buffer Establishment" available at no cost at
http://portal.nc denr.org/c/do cument_library/get_file?uuid=5 5 c3 7 5 8 f-5 e2 7-46cf-823 7-
47f890d9329a&groupld=38364. The applicant or mitigation provider may propose an
alternative method of estimating the rate of nutrient removal for consideration and review
by the Division;
(C) All proposed structural BMPs shall follow the Division's "2009 Stormwater Best
Management Practice Design Manual" available at no cost at

http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/]r/bmp-manual. If a specific proposed structural BMP is not
addressed in this Manual,the applicant or mitigation provider shall follow Chapter 20 in
this Manual for approval;
(D) All structural options are required to have Division approved operation and maintenance
plans;
(E) All structural options are required to have continuous and perpetual maintenance and
shall follow the Division's "2009 Stormwater Best Management Practice Design
Manual";
(F) Upon completion of construction,the designer for the type of BMP installed shall certify
that the system was inspected during construction and that the BMP was constructed in
conformity with plans and specifications approved by the Division;
(G) Removal and replacement of structural options: If a structural option is proposed to be
removed and cannot be replaced on-site, then a structural or non-structural measure of
equal or better nutrient removal capacity,as determined by calculations submitted to and
approved by the Division,in a location as specified by Paragraphs(f)and(g)of this Rule
shall be constructed as a replacement;
(H) Renovation or repair of structural options: If the applicant, mitigation provider, or the
Division determines that a structural option must be renovated or repaired, it shall be
renovated to provide equal or better nutrient removal capacity than as originally
designed;and
(I) Structural options, as well as their operation and maintenance, are the responsibility of
the landowner or easement holder unless the Division gives written approval for another
responsible party to operate and maintain them. Structural options shall be located in
recorded drainage easements for the purposes of operation and maintenance and shall
have recorded access easements to the nearest public right-of-way. These easements
shall be granted in favor of the party responsible for operating and maintaining the
structure, with a note that operation and maintenance is the responsibility of the
landowner,easement holder,or other responsible party.
(10) Approval for other alternative buffer mitigation options. Other alternative riparian buffer
mitigation options not specified within this Rule may be submitted to the Division for review and
recommendation to the Environmental Management Commission on a case-by-case basis. Any
proposal submitted under this Paragraph shall provide documentation or calculations to
demonstrate that the proposed alternative mitigation option removes an equal or greater annual
mass load of nutrients to surface waters as a riparian buffer. Upon completion of the Division's
review, and prior to recommendation to the Environmental Management Commission, the
Division shall issue a 30-calendar day public notice through the Division's website and the
DWRwetlands Listserve. Division staff shall present their recommendations,including comments
received during the public notice period, to the Environmental Management Commission for a
final decision. If approved by the Environmental Management Commission,the alternative buffer
mitigation option may be proposed by other applicants and mitigation providers.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-214.1; 143-214.5; 143-214.7; 143-214.20; 143-215.3(a)(1); 143-215.6A; 143-
215.6B; 143-215.6C; 143-215.8A; 143-215.8B; 143-282(c); 143B-282(d); S.L. 1998-221; S.L.
1999-329, s. 7.1; S.L. 2001-418, s. 4.(a); S.L. 2003-340, s. 5; S.L. 2005-190; S.L. 2006-259; S.L.
2009-337;S.L. 2009-486;S.L.2014-95;
Temporary Adoption Eff. October 24, 2014;
Eff.November 1, 2015.

Appendix E: 2021 Adaptive Management Figure
GUC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix E: 2021 Adaptive Management Figure
MY1 Monitoring Report—December 2020

Legend - -
Existing Riparian Forest:2.10 Acres "` " "
n GUC-As-Built CVS Plot Locations(87 total)
Top of Bank to 50-Feet _.
0
- • — Top of Bank to 100-Feet �y�
- • • Top of Bank to 200-Feet yJ� ,.
Top of Bank(TOB)of Bank Parcel Hydrologic Features
Parcel Features-Top of Bank
Recorded Conservation Easement:97.14 Acres ,
OFee-Simple Tracts
Zone 5 4
h 67 • -- 651'
Acres= 10.4 O.`; � • �
Ave Stems/Plot=314 • �x`: - 66• •
e' Add 220 stems/acre �' „
Spacing= 11'x 20' �� ' 28 !i • e
Total=2,300 stems �27 - Q' 30 29� ~
•
2 1 Zone 1 1, " .f` ' • . •
uCe'� / . ' ,63i. mT
!g'Q • ' Feat �C� Zone• e
Zone 1 =5.47 Acreas �� 31
• 1D ' ! , Ave. Stems/Plot=245 Cj25� 26 32 ! ' Acres=51.6 _
6 13 Add 250 stems/acre 24 9' Ave Stems/Plot=374 - 62 ' . %
7 Spacing= 11'x 1T d �i .• ' .} Add 220 stems/acre �61
fi I I Stems needed= 1,300 stems ' ' '
4I Zone 6 I Total Spacing11,352 stems 60` t 1
- I I I O•. ` — • kD
33
• 1 I Zone 2 Acres=7.8 lel 11•
59
I �� I i Ave Stems/Plot=178 • - 58' •
• Q 0 Acres=2.62 Add 400 stems/acre 53
' 8 , 1E J Spacing= 11'x 10' �I g. •Q {
m -, Ave Stems/Plot=296 r 57�
Total-3,120 stems
N�5- Add 200 stems/acre e �M .. ■ . ��� �
. . Spacing= 11'x 20' ,, , I - •- 50 5,1 • ,52 ; _ '
Total=570 stems opt Q
211 I o.. •I �' �tCea .❑•�.•. afp/0,, `55 . 56
°eu. I ci Zone 8 - P.� - ��B �' ! !
I I IC} 0� • , �eatu<e 83 84 O N. ,91i•� !
I9 Area not planted during ED I T.
3i I Acres=51• .6 8 9� - 0 85 ' •86.`-ah
•
inital site planting in 03/2020 , . Ave Stems/Plot=374 �� 82 d• `
I 20 I Add 220 stems/acre ■ 1_7.,..,',.....;14_
_ `
❑I Acres=0.75 acres Zone 7 36 Spacing= 11'x 20' ( 79 81 J ~�87>
10 I • Add 600 stems/acre 191 Total= 11,352 stems 8 - ,6- ' 80 Zone 8 •
•
- I Spacing=8'x 9'• Acres=3.25 I ❑ I T 137 w. . m Total=300 stemsAve Stems/Plot=94 I I vlf I ❑ _Acres 51.6
Add 500 stems/acre c I I CY ImoAve Stems/Plot=37411 I I Spacing= 11'x 8' I I ml �45 f 77Add 220 stems/acre
I Total= 1,625 stems D, W 138 �'` ! Spacing= 11'x 20'
12 Zone 3 18 I pi 43� ��! 75 ! f . 0 6 Zone 10 Total= 11,352 stems
•
1111 Ave. Stems/Plot=680 • I I w I t 40 410 •9 Acres=2.1
I .. I No planting I i
3 I _ — 42_ !74!II1 �Q� Y — Stream — �73, n Add 500 stems/acre
I Featurer7Ay • ! • Spacing= 11'x 8'
1 Zone 4 1 — — 69 . -•0'-71�
Total 1 050
27 -0. � b 70 Acres= 1.59 Zone 9
13 14 = 41,
•7'Ave Stems/Plot=202
1'-•
,
16 Add 400 stems/acre .., 'l " Acres=4.78
. N1.11L Spacing= 11'x 10' Ave Stems/Plot=137
Total=630 stems Add 400 stems/acre
• Spacing= 11'x 10'
Total= 1,900 stems r
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC SCALE: 1 in=458 ft "a
7pGUC
1101 HAYNES ST,SUITE 211 DATE: 12-2020 Buffer& Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
RALEIGH,NC 27604
PHONE: [phone] SITE: GUC-00 i 2021 Adaptive Management Plan
. . FAX: [phone]
r Aerial Imagery:
This map antl all tlala contain gd wtihin are supplietl as is ws no warranty.Restoration Systems,LLC expressly
�i the s ims esponssibilityfor hamages or liability from any claims that may arise out oft he use or misuse of this map.It is (c) services.nconem ap.gov
RESTORATION the sole responsibility of the user to determine if the data on this map is compatible with the user's needs.This map Feet z �r-, SYSTEMS I LLC was not created as survey data,nor should it be used as such.It is the user's responsibility to obt ain proper survey Coordinate System:
data,prepared byalicensed surveyor,where required by law. 0 120 240 480 720 960 NAD 1983 SP NC FPS 3200 Ft.