820358_Inspection_20200707

.Aim. , _ iv►sion,of Water Resources S `'f�}2,p
,, ,,,,Factlity Number 9 Z, c. S€ Q D►vision of Soil and Water Conse a ion ? 0
0 Other Agency
0 �
Type of Visit: 9/Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Cc-Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ^j j vL,(2[) Arrival Time: xi,a,o/ Departure Time: atjccip County: -SAYPC6 tV Region: Or
Farm Name: 6 I„...e ( Pc1 Fout t4 5 Owner Email:
Owner Name: M(11 t11a 1l lti.Fti CO Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 4s F 4 °1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t Integrator:\ V(6 "S
Certified Operator: KCAA tell A-v,, Certification Number: Zb 62,8
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
,Design Current -, Design Current `'_ Design Current`,_"
Swine Capacity ,Pop: Wet Poultry Capacity Pop Cattle Capacity Pop
Wean to Finish - Layer Dairy Cow =
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 413 to b - _ Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder �'O D' Poult Ca I'aci Poi Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish ' MIZEIMIE - Beef Stocker
Gilts MI Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars n° •Pullets ,-, Beef Brood Cow
Other "-El Turke Poults
Other .Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes L N r 'E NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ][ ' A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E \TA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No EfiNA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes El5lo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Lere there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes ][ No ❑NA ❑ NE
tate other than from a discharge?
of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

•
Facility Number: 3 Z - 3 5 6 Date of Inspection: .7,f (y t-2,)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA 0 NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No {❑ETA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: P. .11.7
( ^luc l e,-1,4
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): ( ( 6
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yeslo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Yo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ,Pam; Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? v Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes lEllTo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 17 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Windowop El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C 13 0" Se,- O
13. Soil Type(s): Tom ee
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes rj o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 114 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [to ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents �-.�
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? Elfl Yes 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes PE'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes LJ 1V o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 02<lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z-3 5 6 Date of Inspection: 4d.)
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes - to ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes lEi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ElNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ][ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes L_I N73 ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes DN ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
0/V 6—(c(—( qtL 7t 12,`3 ( -1
0 p
(C) 1 3 (-C7z),
G Z ((' .t7 / t
/0
Aol�l d� �'� (7�"'l 1'���
+r,e_
ci10 —3 8 6 sc
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 ") (2 Phone: bto`"133-333
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � ( ` / Date: 7•,i t-/l y W 'O
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015