820352_Inspection_20200406

tvision of Water Resources lk, N pc,6 20
Facility Number Km - -3 5 z 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: V xoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access •
Date of Visit: �1 Arrival Time: 0?c( 0 ( '—Departure Time: 6,,15f County: -'I SO O Region: f-. ,4 r
Farm Name: -Tb ` a..Gt\€ri jr..) . ‘, 1 4d_p
Owner Email:
Owner Name:- Ma/ '[Z > hlv r�l . Phone:
.
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:. ( -c c(4-1-1- 64-4/ vi,I. Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t( Integrator: ?ret.0 c6�
Certified Operator: cc .e_ Certification Number: 8 7 a- -
Back-up Operator: Pkili,' 3/ -1 Certification Number: too 3 Zq
r
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
J
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer - Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish : _ Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 1-1 0 0 © 375.5 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.1Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 13-1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA n NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ©4 Z ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EtiNo .❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? `,
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: g3 Z. -3 5 2. Date of Inspection: 47 Ai) 4)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? - s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [E].)4o❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 4 a�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): _
Observed Freeboard(in): 2iS _ 30
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? yJ E ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a 0 Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yeslo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes `t% , ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C(A) r L 4
13. Soil Type(s): 4
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? 7J es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettables ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ('es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. F Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
El Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? s El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? Di Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e7 -3,rj Z Date of Inspection: - O
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes In No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 0 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes alNicr ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ 1'v ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes fj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes EIC ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C- k 6,4 c)(-- 647--2,_0[7 5 ict—S/-e, cc.,
2-76
( Or.Kcct,v,1 F e ect.) IS Ot% \ P 4tio 5 11`C-114-10 101 - 9-5 utc`irt 1u4-1
1.(o-3 0 ,b
Reviewer/Inspector Name: g I t t)()AI Phone:e00--qt(;tf
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: W%_-?i.. �j`#1.,)Date: V aU "
Page 3 of 3 J� 2/4/2015