820339_Inspection_20200806

vision of Water Resources 6(y,v5 b 4_t. 6'ZO
Facility Number e2 - �Is 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation � '
0 Other Agency ) (�J)
Type of Visit: CD- ompl'ance Inspection 0,Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up •0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: (241t.)‘ 2.0 1.2'0Arrival Time:ME j Departure Time:`rri I' County: yofp-soft) Region:
Farm Name: (i 114/44 -re2-0 s (140 Owner Email:
Owner Name: ` t;/'L/[e0 (�.fh�c. Lail) /I_v Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C 4)-65 6 4lkU/ 1GJ( Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t C Integrator: Pile0
Certified Operator: C 114,41.85 t j / ( Certification Number: ff G 6
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
/I Latitude: Longitude:
4 c a.4, ,t. P�-�'�' ?. �i otitel qkaA
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish _Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean (90 `2--teto Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I l o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ®' l�A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E lit' ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No DZ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EKT7o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: tZ., - 331 Date of Inspection: , -0 WM)
Waste Collection&Treatment ,--� �T�
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes E ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Ir❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes "v ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or,enviro ental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? es Eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes W I)10, ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? �/
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ITIZ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window f ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C 8 S( 0 '1q 7'1 p e�
ci,)lJ LrCt,
13. Soil Type(s): a, 0 104
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Dco ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 'v ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Ir7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? 0 Yes I! ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑.Nc ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Oil o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: EY'z- 3, Date of Inspection: i'4-t, 20 761
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [i'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 54 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �] o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues IT
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes /4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes CIAO ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes J.IQo . ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
(-61,4"I 0 I(r) Lci2 (9„,,j_,,,r 0, IL-1 o
kea
elf&((foie cevevi,
P o
Al-r, �ft "7(s C �4�lv� Sr� €c V 1St 1,
qco- 3o - & 5 (
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 0-( Li. 10 Olt orl p Phone: GI O 3 3 33 3(1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: LJ� j Date: V 6
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015