820325_Inspection_20200731

&Division of Water Resources 4 jjc 3 S 6
Facility Number 2 - 3 Zs o Division of Soil and Water Conservation -t3-6
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: aem ' nce Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:la Tat/zo F Arrival Time: ' • , 30.4 Departure Time:nom County:.c, �P561 Region:F4 y`
Farm Name: I_ ol,yce/`' f%<tt1 e �% 3 Owner Email: _
Owner Name: C 0 h Cu 1 ll 4"e- &-Pevt,5 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C v'+1S gj ct,(l,,✓LCi( - Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t t Integrator: 1 ST"y "e-
J //
Certified Operator: U f FOU4,2-.S� Certification Number: I b 70
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ __ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer _ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish '.3-27 'tS9 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder _
- ,Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys - _
Other Turkey Poults
Other , ,Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? E Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No lE'-IA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ff3 NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: g - Z5 Date of Inspection:3-1.3 1 i
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes E No ❑NA— ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 30
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes (� No El NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) �/
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ®' ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes G No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ELINF6^ ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 17,K A ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C,i 5 s & 0
13. Soil Type(s): Vv cu pj(G0/1.�C>,c
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1±No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable E Yes ❑' ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [( Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA 0 NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [2‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 1 L - 3R.5 Date of Inspection:gizi<ty
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑' ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ID< ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to-secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ©-O ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes El/NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
6jt, iletki tkvi - - 5 C64, c-5--tv7 I 7 -6- `1,•S' 4076
.a_c) " i vv-6,A1-o -4LV c-q- vl 1 )4-9 14A-c-q POS R.&tA ty
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ` V W Phone: i i 43 3-3.33 it
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: "I-) i-L �0 Date: 3 4c(jy �()2-0
III [,
Page3of3 2/4/2015