820318_Inspection_20200817

a - � g ,af..ati+,�;,- t .fir .a A � ,: rg. r��. ua �•-.. -�'f st �;.
{, £ a na .s�s °,� "f.. '- ":ems M € i r a. ,±. .a �„ +ti.3 �a x
. , ." ' _ '� n.�_ W40#i06,7 of:W4011t sou es�t .i- , . ;�
aecility umbe� `fi ? - 5t U , t" ,,, ion o 'wSo andl 6 ,4onservation to ,a. ' �X,•,sn t;
" ' 4 �w s -fib t :_ Ot1[e A RenCy �. r g ae' -: t; � ;.. -i t_tti,c, , fi
�'s4 . _. .Sd 1.�..a�, r. Y>.<o,3s ..._ .a ..ri�..?,...a. �.4,^+s.» x .�'�'u+ �> = r �:.�
ype of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
'.eason for Visit: (?Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
1-1
6
rate of Visit: 11446 f Arrival Time:1,5 �'�( i` Departure Time:BEfflatil �'5 R0 IV Region:gion:
'arm Name: raark1l, Z--7 03 Owner Email: i
Iwner Name: b1 Kt t r IJ o cu ''(, 1.-1.—G Phone:
[ailing Address:
'hysical Address: I,
'acility Contact: '-e-c/k -`"- ( !p)pirdi 15 Title: Phone:
)nsite Representative:
( Integrator: IA( ` Su.Wrell 1
1� k .Z 2eY
:ertified Operator: VN Certification Number:
lack-up Operator: Certification Number:
.,ocation Of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
to
Design Current Design Currentk . :' _ Design- Current
. Swine' capacity Pop Wet Poultry, Capacity ,'Pop. Cattle N_ Capacity%s` Pop.§
C
as , :
�� Wean to Finish Layer �� Dairy Cow
4 Wean to Feeder �' Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish q x Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 2.400 ZV' . Design Currn Dry Cow.
Farrow to Feeder ' D. -.Foul ..,_Ca o aci o+ ^ Non-Dairy _
Farrow to Finish '`� fig Beef Stocker
BoarsNon-La ers Beef Feeder
.•Pullets # Beef Brood Cow
-- _ ..t X .X 'u
k Other_ _ '� � .' m Turke Poults t -t`~ t h 7-6
Other •Other $
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [l'�o ,❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field • ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No Q'NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? .
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 1A ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ No ErC ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were.there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA El NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: R),,- _,31,0pc Date of Inspection: /240(, XI,
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Lo❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No alcik ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes lal-N ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? • ❑ Yes ❑ NA. 0 NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [sz ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 11-15-6- ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below: ❑ Yesdt"i ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑-Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): e 6 5t5-0
13. Soil Type(s): IA) 0-
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?' ❑ Yes [L]- o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 111'1VC ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? .❑ Yes 0.1Klir ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 1-;KO ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑kiGo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ID-.05- ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes El-1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 , 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: . - 3)g— Date of Inspection: /V1/44 W. F-0 Vic
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [INC.
NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes O- T ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? E Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1:aico ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1; o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? E Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#)I Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use.additional pages as necessary):-_
.Ccu( ((— I6--Ir
3z) rik‘t&_ 0442 C-
1 CUO 3 r- 6 g I
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ( vl QT 0 VI`t Phone'l(o 33` 3 3319
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: )(9 U-114Date: 1141
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015