820314_Inspection_20200824

e Division of Water Resources )31 t y1k S 2..,
s I`ti' ' 2-a ,
Facility Number b Z - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
1 0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: a Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 05 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Region: FJ Date of Visit: Flamm Arrival Time: J UFO a� Departure Time: l rv'7,r}- County: t-Y
Farm Name: J - '�'\ \�G tc 5�%1'� « I� Owner Email:
Owner Name: l( Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: [ /7
Facility Contact: 5 `��1� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: i( Integrator: , ) 2 400
Certified Operator: 7110 AA0-c ,S Certification Number: 2S 2 S
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 0,7 ct: 61 9'10 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EllcIF ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No El-NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No s-NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q-NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes - No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z. Date of Inspection: -1 19 2 G—`'(; ')
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0-N-A- ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): / Gi 3_5
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a E Yes 6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA n NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [1'&.--o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN E PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus E Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): -C 3 0 1-( •
13. Soil Type(s): /Y P1 G-0
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes a-Ixrci ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable 0 Yes [G]-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ErISIo E NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes. ❑rao ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design E Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ®''lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis E Soil Analysis E Waste Transfers E Weather Code
E Rainfall ❑Stocking E Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 0 Yes 0/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Er No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: i. - .A Date of Inspection: gg 4t)-6---ZCIO`j
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? J ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [-'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes IleNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ° ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
awl r (-e44 fob -
I 5 on o16 0 e✓, Q-e 2_
Cat (i bes(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: (1\ "1-"' Phone: yl 0"
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l%^' 1')� Date: a q 2 lot
Page Pag 3 2/4/2015