820309_Inspection_20200827

P ? ,\7r1
Division of Water Resources (2 \' ) 1.1 ,--' (—xd..
Facility Number B z- - - 36`t 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation <1��
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: (Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: V-Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Deniednq Access
Date of Visit: �7,�.1,�(6'20 Arrival Time: ' jS /�— Departure Time: i'`t 5/a County: 5-1/1/1(n''S6 N Region: EA-/
Farm Name: cci �c"--- H 1 �( Owner Email:
Owner Name: EtZ id S ` $ at IA iv ,J.v1i7 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: /✓,
Facility Contact: _S L'# �j q,/l,✓'t c (. Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t Integrator: i 0 01.,1 VA
Certified Operator: G(e,v't /W ©) j Certification Number: Z7 I it
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder g ei) 17 a7 Non-Layer _ Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish )S O' f 1rl'1 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
•
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. _Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish _ Layers _Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers _Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? E Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No Er NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ErNA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes i To ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e 2_ 3 O Date of Inspection ? $C
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ZI_N ❑ NE •
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: /Y
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): ("C 3 tV
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [lcir ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes Er‘o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ ,Pdo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Ta4C ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): G 13 :S
13. Soil Type(s): CA-11A bU
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lia ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 0.1�c ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections z❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Pr, ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes OrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z_- ?)0 cC Date of Inspection: 4/
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [J o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) /
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [a'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
5-6(zele- 11/ 4.64 r'4 (-)3 Le 170
t
,/ I tc-1,12e?(`
TA is, 1'.1 ,: y f o r t7 s 1 fe- l r'`-s 0 > S tilt 1 Vc7 5 Ci
j O-3 0 2 C � S f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: uvvLa/p Phone:910,4'3 i 33
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , �'I LUan Date: Yi 4U)
Cj �V
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015