820274_Inspection_20200818

I h'V\ S I 'c 1N6 2,6
division of Water Resources
Facility Number r - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: C'`•) Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: IV,LU b 249 Arrival Time: /j$ ow t Departure Time: II'e uu0' CountynAl.Pc'O r•U Region:F-4y
Farm Name: Ay),4 �1i SL"=� L�t/(/I Owner Email:
Owner Name: 0 5��6�1 rc a a S-eci Phone:
Mailing Address: 1
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: a94../• N Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: 146
Certified Operator: Certification Number: /7 v 2"Z
Back-up Operator: [ Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Zs&J t9tl /5 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry, Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts _ Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
•
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1E1�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ -NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ NoA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No RKAT ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: l` 2- 'Z 7 Date of Inspection:''}ce (U 6` irf...)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes n'" ❑ NA' ❑_NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0.4.4A---0 NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z i
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes t o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes fie—❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes a1`'c ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes QjN ❑ NA n NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C—43 S& gay'
13. Soil Type(s): .q 0 4)
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ®allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes • o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 04C 1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ID(IC ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes , O/ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 2'5 0 NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes LJ l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes DINo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: G> 2 - j7Lf Date of Inspection:/0 [tb(3 zI
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes To NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check E Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes In'5Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Et No ❑ NA E NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes laic,-
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [D,Pdo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ly 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes nco ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 0' ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ©VVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ce1,1 V-CV (c`-v 1 S1,4,e
Reviewer/Inspector Name: { L� b \�, /J Phone:CtO %' 33 3L f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� e4141 Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015