820273_Inspection_20200805

('Division of Water Resources C` (4,0G
Facility Number et—I - 2-73 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: E(Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: (9 Arrival Time: ,g0 Departure Time: r�i, County: 5(1-1.'(f��/1�' Region:``�'y
Farm Name: (31 Gc (..-VI'1 y , i✓' 'Z. #-62-, Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1, p v,.7 [ I -e- (Ci IV Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:Facility Contact: GC.c- f. 5 gGtrt t)i(i€ Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: L( Integrator: I°1/l Y�j �J Y'_
Certified Operator: t �Cr?r/ Certification Number: 1V/
CtlirEetr-
Back-up Operator: ;' I K(-C c '1 ✓t- Certification Number: T. y- 0 z-
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer ' Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
_ -
Feeder to Finish 'y� l) p 2,,I T Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder _ Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. _ Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers _ _ Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
_Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ZPdo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 'IA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) E Yes ❑ No LJ< ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1E1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts'to the waters ❑ Yes [-f N/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: WZ -.'73 Date of Inspection: S74.4)6 Z 0 20
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes "" ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?. ❑ Yes ❑.N ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 13 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes IT< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IZIAvo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C- 8-- cc 6- 0 'H
13. Soil Type(s): g tA0� (—)et
/
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes lE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes f o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 8 2.- Z 73 Date of Inspection: .5
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes III< ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [�i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Ltd 1VU ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 111'1Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes f o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes E \ El NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ctvict ai 30 / /9 C Ic y� uv-fi-e7 l2 l O--s 3 G
(267, 6 ti.-4e_ur•eyriteit,--rei
Coq,* 1/4/1-k c vc,70,,e 5 r c..t.
.pots, W( s a it y Koa 6^ o /0 a.-4- 3(0-p
VVA 6-`(.- t 14 0P-k 6 11-06--
Reviewer/Inspector Name: t �b on L, p Phone:iv° 43 3-3 5
ci
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: sC.; -Le J 4AkUU 4-b&--
Date:e ZV
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015