820271_Inspection_20200818

►uu' I f�UCH
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number j� 2-. - 2-7 1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 'Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: f e P 2.� Arrival Time: 5u t1 A- Departure Time: q'rOU ' County: O1 p(1' r') Region: t J r(
Farm Name: VIA Owner Email:
Owner Name: I-i(? S L 2( '` f1 C. Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 0©0 IV i Y' '►1() Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: L( Integrator: Y7' *t (a 041_5
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 1 U 417
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow _
_Wean to Feeder _ Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 2-7 6 a 6 i Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
•
Farrow to Finish Layers _ Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys •
Other Turkey Poults _
L Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No UA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No Q1 A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No all-A ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 0 a- 2-7 Date of Inspection: 1C2 !—L (9-70 261
Waste Collection&Treatment /
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [�-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z 2. g
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑' ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ 6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ < ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Wkr ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes EL› ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C S O ii cf-P
13. Soil Type(s): - (A c —
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes l ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes J- c1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or ❑mo wettable ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [C],Nff ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [Die-- ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ®ado ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes LiEvo ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: f3 Z - f Date of Inspection: /06 702'
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E'go ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Q4Vow ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [�]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C°111 (0`1'14"9/1 b- kt-LQ-It
eAt 64O � � � � � � 5�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: � ( U, ( Phone l 0- l a 33 3c(
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: c fln U ZJ�O
• Date:
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015,