820254_Inspection_20200812

N
_
�
`� ,. `° `i • a?•3- �'� '��a.xztSGe. dui - —_.._. "3.'Yti'''- ''' 1 s9 4' kX'*�.
pe of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
ason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
to of Visit: grafgrA., Arrival Time:I 1/(13,4 Departure Time:I.1/s24 I County: S'A.tfk od) Region:Far,
rm Name: *0 C.014.s Kitov A(40seete-L, Owner Email:
p � i
vner Name: V o g k `fej t, t a •f 1/.....LC, Phone: 1
i
ailing Address:
t
. j
ysical Address: i
1
cility Contact: M itikev'- gaff"(S Title: Phone:
t c rYI�3 —S 4' 4 �� i
mite Representative: Integrator: 1
;rtified Operator: {0 V 'fD("4 Certification Number:
ick-up Operator: Certification Number:
I
1
)cation of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
i
3
I
I
ems.Aga t a �"" + fie* .7�� e a;; o- �47-ems,,k�, ` {-,� � � ,,, �, t 4 9 ?� r r. «`= K
fi A.ab F,, c^"- -.--Y_, Ste:"-'' 49 �........a. Y<
ti III Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder 00 � ® S,3 ,Non-La er S Dai Calf ;
`I"Fe ' :' ;I.Da' Heifer
Feeder to Finish a� `
tre
�Farrow to Wean ��"-- ' U D Cow -
•UFarrowto Feeder : 0 ...-i 41, . 1• _. ° UNon-Da'
■Farrow to Finish -- U �Beef Stocker --
Gilts Non-Layers ■Beef Feeder •
7404
Beef Brood Cow
p, Boars Pullets -- •4. ;�
` ---. ��wk. Turke s _
!"` 's :' ',' um Turke Poults
— ■Other " 4,� :,4,` 4A, ,-. el-1-1
PIM Other ,-�. '
)ischarges and Stream Impacts �� ❑ ❑
i..Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes NA NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes E NoA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No vA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No aI�A ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0-115 ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ©-No ❑ NA D NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
i
2/4/2015 Continued
Panelof3 1.

'Facility Number: • et- !Date of Inspection: 'g (Z--20 x1)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes []' 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [1 A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 2-.-
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 °l 3-7
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [J.PN-- ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes e'no ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
Cao any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'r ❑ NA ❑ NE
-(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) ,
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ff<❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [„T ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑'Yes Er5Cr❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C 6 5 ( d P
13.Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [ -Nio ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [•Ido ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes []-15-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes aici6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? , ❑ Yes a b ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Io El NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ -PFe- ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers El Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [�}/lco ❑ NA 0 NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

� ��-
Facility Number: � - Zir� Date of Inspection: 41'
?4.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes aI415— ❑ NA ❑ NE
?5.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes c❑o2‹.... ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: -
•
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IaNe' ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ado ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [ _NY El NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [J t5 n NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑,N❑ NA ' ❑ NE `
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?" ❑ Yes ❑ NA E NE
(
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑.PrO ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑.Yes ❑�I Ts- ❑ NA ❑ NE
',_-� n an .,addit�on_ahrecam rtendatiaai�sto 'an "o#4—:4 oinmeq s�'-a;� __
Gominenl_s refer5to question.#):E Iam any YE5 ansvYers and/o y ry p . Y Q`SY%1T :
- ,vj�
ig
-- - - -�- a s•asnecessa` - - >.._,.:��..��.:,-.t�' :�:�;:n:•::>;._F_-,�_:r-.,�y�-
Use°,dra�uings�of>facility�fo,tie�ter�ezpIain�siti�atons,,(iiseadchtional:p .ge ; _ .,___. -�ry} .._.,�
Re-wkof-c- -1-pec qtar te.-12:1/617
`y_ttoc {Aid 'o v - ` ,a
ca 0((0--303- 6E5f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �� ( O Al 9- ? Phone:, ' (O` 3 3- 3331
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .'"A
"OJLMAP, Date: I J CJ
2/4/2015
Pnuo 7 nf3