820237_Inspection_20200731

®tiivision of Water Resources w(sKs 3 L1 20 1
Facility Number 2- - �.�7 ' 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Y� j�
0 Other Agency l�i..!
Type of Visit: Q,eam iance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: IMPliMe DArrival Time: ' ''0 ,,i' Departure Time: Y.as If' County: 54-YYl j0 Region:F/¢y
Farm Name: L d4 e„ fyii&q (.(-C- /-1 ' Owner Email:'
Owner Name: toCeleVy1- L- .1-10(7 red-'n1 Phone:
Mailing Address: - , -
Physical Address: -
Facility Contact: C-ct-` -i f &Atl)t(A, Title: Phone: .
Onsite Representative: I( Integrator: Fr-5-
Certified Operator: J i ` Certification Number: /( 3 147
b
Back-up Operator:C V i54.Q.rc4 rs).ec Certification Number: f 60 6e7 0
Location of Farm: . Latitude: - Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish, 41-(1,2-- III,in Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other ,Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts .
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ©'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No III-NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) . ❑ Yes 0 No ['NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No lA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes O-o ❑ NA ❑ NE -
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters _ ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 - 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: V z- Z.3 7 Date of Inspection:3(s�l7 7-0
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes E.Nt❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No El—NA— ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
•
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ _N r ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EP< ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 1114o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ®X ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Al
i £(�O
13. Soil Type(s): 0 4(1
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ®' 0 NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑A ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes K) ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes la-I ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0— ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes EFICie— ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1;1' ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ®-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes L`J 1Vo ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: (jj.Z- l7 Date of Inspection: S(,4L7
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [ — ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [�N - ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes E—❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1;1,...No- ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [] ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'To ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C01/1 f c4c--18 f -tFs- i 6�3� `� 4, g• 3ery
l . -c0 a.%14
11. 1 ,r-i g7�-40 5 k.5 �c'I r°� a�c� wt-� CD 5. c Cluck,
P �
e( 410--3 o e --g g 5(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 a D V a-p Phone: IO L 33 3 3 3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: E. Li,' �� -
1. Date: ` Cwl 2
U�L1�
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015