820236_Inspection_20200731

EY-Division of Water Resources 3 40,/ �zo
Facility Number B 2, - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation V''
0 Other Agency 6.0
Type of Visit: 0-Com ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:[ (3—w114 Arrival Time: LI (- k Departure Time: /130 /7 County: 64111,P5oI Region: FP/
Farm Name: Lo1 � rw41W LLC- L 5 Owner Email:
Owner Name: 0,9 hCt,rt-`r-- (JvG =Fln,VYY‘ Phone:
Mailing Address: rJ
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C f i5 `Zr‘Cv Et Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t ( Integrator: FV -5
Certified Operator: Certification Number: t`i3 2 41
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish (41(l 2 tI7.73 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers _ Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
•
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes aNe- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑11A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No 12- ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No []NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes L'J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - 23 Date of Inspection:Si:�c e' )
Waste Collection&Treatment l
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No 'A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 8
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes la No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Er<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IJ 1V o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) �.
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Cl< ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Il o ❑ NA ❑ NE -
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): g 8 Ud P
13. Soil Type(s): 14 c•.- p
1 l C +dc
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes "v ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [i o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes I;"1Vo- ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [E]N ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑.Ndb ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 1E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes IE<To El NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2,3 W Date of Inspection: el
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �dt 5 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes aNe- ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes D ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes MSc ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 1;1,I6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes lqNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ ICIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ®moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
&A/h-c9-k. 1740-3tc 8 5L1 e- stk. o L? e_:3, 0-- 3,7 416Sa
4,0 C l"i " `'� F,ram,�i'1'tlil'U� CaV�2r� ciil LT04 , Bati
Kg. RD At -p,rt`.- 10 im--(`\ poc+ cV c, •• Jl`fift
�Y,ll 040 3 0$-6ss5 (
Reviewer/Inspector Name: gj L k „ay Phone:ctj 0- 113 3"3 3 tf
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: G arafrDate: � cao 2l7
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015