820235_Inspection _20200825

rye .- 6-----1 �v
= r V 1uivlsion of water Resource$ , y
"'Facility Number , 7`.7,r 0 Division of Soil AO Water Conservation .
r .. € as : - 0 Other A enc : '"p_', - .__
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:I b` 0 Arrival Time: �'7 Departure Time:I//'..5O County: Region: /.9 1'
Farm Name: Ce07/ebd-4 i/ / ki Owner Email:
Owner Name: Ez)I i0 76.7,-- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: (U'o I(i p- t_ 41'7 Title: .7 re Phone:
Onsite Representative: _ _ Integrator: (- 61? J"ej
Certified Operator: ( rf Certification Number: /4 2'
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
,„,
,:-f::,::,:,:,,,,:.:::,.4,r,„-,. ,,f:,„r,t,-_,-,, :,.,,,,,,,,,,_;,-:„-, ,,,,,,„:„:„ .„., ,,::,,,,J,,:=„.,„,:,:,,:tM,,,
Design Current ._ ., Design`: Current Design Current
SWiue I- Capacity Pop Wet Poultry Capacity Popy , . Cattle t_Capacity Pop
-=_= Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder y0 47 Non Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean w.Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder n' I)za. Poul ,' `Cass aci .: Poi ; ,-. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish y .• Beef Stocker
= Gilts •Non-La ers �� Beef Feeder
_ Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Other = :, ,',- •Turke Poults
Other ,•Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
.1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 121 l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ��-- 31,' Date of Inspection: 5
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes IJ l ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: icod l 42-
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 13 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 'es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes LCJ 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑/1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Erg( ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): /`/ rG/if.24 Ap i u�"io/� f�
13. Soil Type(s): AJ&?r/ /ate/AhQ
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Er< ❑ NA El NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? •
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes as-0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o El NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents ,-
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? El Yes ET ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q'Nio o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes EK10 ❑ NA ❑ NE .
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 5 9235 Date of Inspection: ,57-
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Ere ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ere ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer:to question#):°Explaui any<YES auswersand/or aiuy additional recommendat Ms orlany other comments
U se drawings of facility to better explain`situations(Use
'aaddiitional:pages°as necessary).
lr / u.X e''z J4 t z-a?
,94,_ea747-r-DI
Reviewer/Inspector Name: �y ��. Phone: 5X1V- 3 22-0/57
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: lr--;;6- 3, 7
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015