820232_Inspection_20200827

L { cam-'-0 ��-'
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number Z - 3 Z 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: '` Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
U YDate of Visit: Arrival Time: " �j Departure Time:��� County: S'/�n1PSot1? Region: ��'
Farm Name: &a-N`-l —60141 t i'"1' Owner Email:
Owner Name: FR)V.�ST .'S Nit!J 1 FccJ -15 .,v Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: e04-15 a„,`'^wt(di Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t Integrator: -.S:4.14.Lt
Certified Operator: G 1 ' No r`r\`S Certification Number: 2-7/b,6
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish _ Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder _ Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder (,),,if ,c--2497 Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish _ Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars I Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults _
Other Other -
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes O ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [1 ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No le NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No NA 0 NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IZI,o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes u No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 042.... - Z3 L Date of Inspection:027 41V17-2Zo20
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No- []-N7 T ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2- e U
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) -
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? '❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®' ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® O ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C -SLr 0 -
13. Soil Type(s): l -11)y
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ gO ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ItrIZ ❑ NA El NE
acres determination? /
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes LJ 1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents ,--,,�
l�o
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes L� ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [J�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design El Maps El Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. El Yes [/No ❑ NA El NE
El Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis El Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 13<lzo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: )Z- Z Z Date of Inspection: R7 4-06 7.e210
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [LNG ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon •
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 111Alc ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes PIZ ❑ NA El NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes IIK ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31..Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes lalo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �N ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes D7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cw1113 i, 4 t al ,e--+ + `5C - 1 I - - (
1 7 P r
1—t-,,c d 3, ok z,,,,eil emf eautellf47-cL4 ( i •& 7 6,
, 4 �- --,(p� (i- titt (95. cif
[ ,5 ki.t4A K- r^°"'
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 t t,1 ' ) t vt(, Phone:ej(0.433i3 c3 3
(t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: b irul,v Date: D V V2'1
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015