The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About110006_Inspection_20201201 (2)0 Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 110006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC110006 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Date of Visit: 12/01/2020 Entry Time: Farm Name: T&C Dairy Owner: George A Nesbitt Mailing Address: PO Box 936 Physical Address: 440 Lower Brush Creek Rd 12:00 pm Inactive Or Closed Date: County: Buncombe Region: Asheville Exit Time: 1:00 pm Incident #: Owner Email: Phone: 828-628-2852 Fletcher NC 287320936 Fletcher NC 28732 Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 28' 35" Longitude: 82' 26' 05" 436 Lower Brush Creek Rd, Fletcher. 4 miles SW of Fairview, 6 miles east of Fletcher, turn at Oak Baptist Church on to Lower Brush Creek Rd. Go to dirt Rd 4th drive on left. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Records and Documents Certified Operator: George A Nesbitt Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Primary Inspector: Inspector Signature: Secondary Inspector(s): Timothy R Fox Waste Col, Stor, & Treat 0 Waste Application Operator Certification Number: 21355 Title Phone Inspection Summary: Tim Fox with ARO inspected the site. Tony Nesbit assisted during the inspection. Soils will be due in 2021. Calibration records due by December 31, 2020. Phone: 828-296-4500 Date: We discussed the one year extension for credit hours for the 3 year period 2018-2020 to obtain 6 hours for recertification purposes. We also discussed Attachment A requirements which are not required until further resolution and notification. Page 1 of 5 Permit: AWC110006 Inspection Date: 12/01/20 Regulated Operations Cattle Owner: George A Nesbitt Facility Number: 110006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Design Capacity Current promotions Cattle -Milk Cow 300 I 300 Total Design Capacity: 300 Total SSLW: 420,000 Waste Structures Effective Built Closed Designated Observed Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard Waste Pond SLURRY POND 01/01/1996 D1/01/1989 22.80 Page 2 of 5 Permit: AWC110006 Owner: George A Nesbitt Facility Number: Inspection Date: 12/01/20 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: 110006 Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ MEI ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ MEI ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage) Page 3 of 5 Permit: AWC110006 Owner: George A Nesbitt Inspection Date: 12/01/20 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: 110006 Reason for Visit: Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat, Barley, Oats) Crop Type 3 Fescue (Hay) Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Page 4 of 5 Permit: AWC110006 Inspection Date: 12/01/20 Owner: George A Nesbitt Facility Number: 110006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Records and Documents Crop yields? 120 Minute inspections? Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑■❑❑ ❑■❑❑ Page 5 of 5