310655_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200924

(Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ° Aj - LSP �J .0 Division° of Soil and'Water`Conservadon y
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 CoHance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 7'Rputine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: O Arrival Time: oo Departure Time: a"^ County: ivy Region: W ) go
Farm Name: S oaY\ 13'Ro1"N U-5 Owner Email:
Owner Name: 1` 014 M SLOAiJ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design • Current
Swine Capacity. ° Pop.°
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish o?44O
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design,,
Current:
Viet Poultry.
Capacity
Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design
Current
Dry Ponlfr"v
C.anaeity
Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
° ° ° • � . Design ° ° CurrentA
Catty° )Capacity ° Pop,,
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
dNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
N ❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
YNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
�o ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
�4'❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 3 - G55 Date of Inspection:9 -2y-;L0-. 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
to
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): q—
Observed Freeboard (in): a�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
EK0
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
N
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or envir nmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [] No . ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require -t!KTes [`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T 1�la"d�o
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? [Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ff No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA WNE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
oes record keeping neYweekly
provement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
VW
aste Application Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
Q Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Surve
22. Did the facility fail' to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA [NNE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: ?j I - 5.5 jDate of Inspection: 9-ay--a� o
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Ef(No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 2No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[ io
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[!�'No
A
❑ NE
s fl-IZ-ac
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
E3<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
21'/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
E34E
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Ej<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[]/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
®/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
FAYLM WA5, Dt PoWUSfEa IN 0 11
Qr� s �o �� �j�o.',�M1ia� r,erQ C'C.C:Q ► I' h5 +6 'f b e .�ervr, .+j
—.LA Goo►.) IS i
�e i;';eld TGC+1ov-, of fiHc 'inSpeCt;on \Jc5 pes!�&rvmj- oh 4'-'aN-a05L.6 w;h, �tcwer op
-ToseP� Lwn;et✓ Mvl idle o}fea,n S �r8re rr;ade -� ce$cte�le �eco�ds �r`dll +�e Gwh05,
A,�c, a vrr 1r� �CBrO�,
�wrz INFoRmtrD Mr, SLCrA►J Abaau - SUAVCWnq o. Zero alniwW perV1'N1+ allot op$icanS
Glas11rO
S? `1 �e1cQ }�S CGwS ✓ f �► 1 , bv�' (n0.�n��v,Ql�CC' ► 5 IweAed .
COrri5,0 l I i t!, S�tpe r`Vs drs
Reviewer/Inspector Name: So N 0 F,e p "� Phone: Cq 1 o) ( I + -Q 5-7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: I I - I (o'aD-ITi
Page 3 of 3 21412015