310589_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201120

UDivision of Water Resources
facility -Number 3 l_ S8 O-Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency.. ,
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: (3 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I( —gyp —gyp Arrival Timer ra Departure Time: County: L-)o fL10
Farm Name: Yvon ag.A►J GN — A d l3 Owner Email:
Owner Name: 5-r PH! f^J M W h i -t`I' , e j d Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
a
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Region: W I RG
Certified Operator: S}Ne M w i1�giej j Certification Number: 1 "g"3d3
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
° Design Current Design Current Design .�Cpxrenf
Swine Capacity .Pop. Vtrei,ponitry Capacity.. ;Pop. ` Cattle ` ` ; Capacity Pop
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 3 aSSoZ
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
oars
Other
Other
Layer
Non -Layer
Design . Current
nry Poultry Capacity- . Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
[3/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? 1
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
a<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
EKo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
940
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
[v�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of inspection: — dD
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
al/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: J�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 1 q, S
Observed Freeboard (in): �' 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
[—]Yes
R"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
2/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the strictures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes M/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste strictures require ❑ Yes LJ ivo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Z["No NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E�/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes EeNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
s
❑ Yes
[�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
�fo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes D4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes KO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 1' 1 - 5%9 1 jDate of Inspection: -jko-2�o2�d
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [�NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA �NE
❑ Yes [No
ElYes ErN,'o
❑ Yes F�j <
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other commehts.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary)..
Work ova f a-'('e svo+" S ari` L-aye'r\
L r.\ 0=4,3 T= 5, 1
L r3 S .Z P-_ L.o
VPp-wr6 GAwN P +> -k ,Ywre ('e-1ec.-� iv2 of PUI s ar.ci
Reviewer/Inspector Name: -S e %A tit jam¢ Y1 n
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
&'V%1 O(Ves'n Mctv,\C)es .
Phone:
Date: J F XO-a2aad
21412015