310849_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201120

:.GrDivisioii.of Water Resources
Facility�Number � - ®� ;` ° ° � Q Division of Soil, and Water Conserva`tiozi �
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: & Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance G Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:-ab-aoa Arrival Time: ° a.Q Departure Time: _�_� A� �7 County: L_ZQL/►J Region: W IPO
Farm Name:
5�jyiL�kj
CANgh,0.„o,�, �,.rw.
Owner Email:
Owner Name:
SArmy
C"lenay'.,�
Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: C; A Ag,/1 V 2 naU`�1.
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
.Swine- °
Design Current .
'Capacity Pop:
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish p
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other_
Other
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number: 99ss a_t
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design : •Current.
WettPoultrya ° •Capacity ° Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canaeity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Longitude:
Design, Current.'
Cattle` ; °Capacity°, 'Pop.. �.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
�zo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
[]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
�/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: — a0-2-0 U
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [ ?r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes E94o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 9
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes EyNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes F3 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application �--,�
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E;Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): P,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [D]"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents ��
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes LK l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design [:]Maps [—]Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes U lac ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes Fto ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 13, 1 - g tj q jDate of Ins ection: 11 ,d-6 '
Qd
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑Yes
�❑
NA
❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes CEO
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in -charge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes ❑ No
E6<A
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[-]Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E;�4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[-]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA DE
[:]Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes F2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 2To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of ,facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
leaf/-[;ejrj AS (egveS_e-J, fti0ly.
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 7:S_o W 0 R7 mLl
Phone: CRI°) 617- 957-7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: 1 J - ac - d-0_-10
21412015