310097_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20201124

U Divisloh'of Water Resources r
-Facility Number; p� 0 Division of Soil and Wgter` Conservation
0 Other'Agency
Type of Visit: U 7Routine
liance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: p ` om, Departure Time: U aw- County: RpL)tJ
Farm Name: a I LL4 K i LPAI YLI Gke' rAYLV n Owner Email:
Owner Name: W I LI.0 AYv► R k 1 L, PMIW Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title:
Integrator:
Phone:
Region: U lam_
Certified Operator: W;\�;,,�,� (L. E 11201{,'K Certification Number: I9 6S79
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
t, Design Current
Swine ° Capacity. Pop. °
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish ap aup
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
. ° Design Current . ° °,° ;°.. .. " Oesign,` Current ,: q;
Wet Poultry. Capacity ° ° Pap.. " „ Cattle -Capacity Pop. = "
Layer
Non -Layer
Design, Current °
Dry Poultry Ca acity °.P.o .
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
M
Turkey Poults
Other
I
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
CeNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
E (o
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
�lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
D4o ❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: — d-o—O-d
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): 19
Observed Freeboard (in): 171-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
❑ NA ❑ NE
VoDNA
❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes �oD ❑ NE
❑ Yes MVU ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [],N/o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EU o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes /No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (' , Vj S 6-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes YNo
[—]Yes jrNo
❑ Yes [y"No
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes gNo
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes E?]-'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [!f No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ff No
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Facility Number: q0 I - Date of Inspection: 8
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑; Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ YesFj],to ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E340 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No lA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes EjjNXo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
Eg-N'E
❑ Yes—Q' ❑ NA
T (I- att -"
❑ Yes E2"No ❑ NA
[-]Yes [�Vo ❑ NA
❑ Yes 13- o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #);, Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. .
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use.additional pages as necessary).
AJJ Tip sU ; I and Se%A *-a �ew-e Sfolr T,� lay o yV
0 = '51 F'= 3,4 .L 's a 4? = 'd, S_o
STD f ki c,60,+ 9odoe
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 'S c N a I e RILH Phone: (Ito) to 17 -qS-7?
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: & 1- ?-9-
Page 3 of 3 21412015