820218_Inspection_20200825

7" f—;
C 4, , °: 7,_ Y Division of Water Resources`" ! ,
Facility Number , 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
,, ._. , . _17 0;Other`Agency. ".
Type of Visit: ST ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ;tine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:I/AZ Departure Time: Z :7 D County: Region:
Farm Name: / r„.\71e. l aT" Owner Email:
Owner Name: cp''' f4%J , c'_ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: `/-i tu,e X� Title: . Zjf7Yl"— Phone:
Onsite Representative: �`" _ Integrator: /,.T
'�1
Certified Operator: ��.�� •j Certification Number: ? _3C�✓.---
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
f Design Current r ;Design. Current • -1 Design Currrent
Swine ' Capacity Pop Wet-Poultry Capacity Pop Cattle -� Capacity Pop
Wean to Finish Layer v� Dairy Cow
f U Z'"
an to Feeder Q C) Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder :DO Poultry °..Capacity Pop Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker _
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other �a ;z 4 ,_ ; „ _ Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
%
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Eio ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes L No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Q'�._ - it Date of Inspection: f3"--2 =,,i�t -
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ( 4t) 1r � U .- ) ,6•�
Spillway?: (7e7,-)
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): /
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [1Yes 'j�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes (3'1\To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 12 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EK ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): 7/1/#2,-X)Cles/ 1
13. Soil Type(s): > /A`I� J�ILt-
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 121 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes I2 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 126.o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑igo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Li No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: f 2- - ,-/,6/ Date of Inspection: if' ,j'r-
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2K ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check 2 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
•
❑-I<n-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: /j / //
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes EJ 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 12Yo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes IFKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1Z6lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 4Q ll'e ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes la10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#)y ExpIain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments
Use drawn sot.facili fo;better eg lanaituations'use additional a es as necessa
a-e, c 7/,tear-,T f,-, l ,r ,,sfLG - - ci% 'z g�i fis , '
tut j) ch,gTti 5i 75- �u r; ee ;, J.
,- `tM h i
u�4�� fljo Greer
C, f1„ ,v(2 ;, b cv,K G70,,2)'1--
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 5 G`C C.....3 '
�j�-- Phone: *730 /3i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: D- ���.0
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015