20190752 Ver 5_SAW 2019 00296 Request for Modification 10.23.20r_20201023

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, PC
Mr. Scott McLendon
Chief, Regulatory Division
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1343
2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430
Raleigh, NC 27607
PH 919.870.0576
www.geosyntec.com
23 October 2020
Subject: SAW-2019-00296 — Request for Modification. Chemours — Seep C Permit
Modification — Flow Through Cells A, B, and D
Dear Mr. McLendon:
On 5 October 2020 The Chemours Company (Chemours) received authorization from the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for the installation of a flow -through cell in -stream treatment
facility at a location designated as Seep C at the Chemours Fayetteville Works facility (SAW-
2019-00296). The purpose of the project is to comply with a Consent Order (CO) issued on 25
February 2019 by the North Carolina Superior Court for Bladen County and between Chemours
and the State of North Carolina and Cape Fear River Watch. The CO required Chemours to
develop a remedial plan for reducing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
loading from Chemours Fayetteville Work Facility to the Cape Fear River. Four groundwater
seeps that form streams, identified as Seeps A, B, C and D, are located above the Cape Fear River
water level on the bluff face from the facility and discharge into the Cape Fear River.
In accordance with the CO, Chemours is respectfully requesting a modification to the previously
issued authorization to include the installation of similar treatment structures at Seeps A, B, and
D. As with Seep C, these flow -through cells will consist of in -stream filter beds to remove PFAS
from the seeps prior to discharge to the river. An earthen dam will impound water (approximately
6 feet in total height) to provide hydraulic head to allow for treatment with granular activated
carbon (GAC) filter beds. Impounded water will flow through an inlet weir into a series of concrete
basins to hydraulically control surface flow over vertically oriented GAC beds. Water will flow
via gravity drainage through the GAC beds and PFAS compounds will sorb to the media. Effluent
water will collect in a stilling basin, where it will then discharge back into the existing seep
channel. The in -stream structures will be placed generally about 150-200 feet upstream from the
USACE Cover Letter 10.23.20
engineers I scientists I innovators

Mr. Scott McLendon
23 October 2020
Page 2
confluence with the River. Influent and effluent samples will be collected to monitor the PFAS
removal efficiency. GAC media will be periodically replaced.
As with Seep C, it is anticipated that the flow -through cells will operate for approximately two to
three years, at which point a long-term remedy for seeps and groundwater will be constructed. This
long-term remedy is anticipated to withdraw sufficient groundwater via pumping wells such that
the seep baseflow to the four flow -through cells is reduced, and the flow -through cells can be taken
out of service.
A wetlands and waterbodies delineation of the project area was performed by Geosyntec in
September 2020, of which the results are included in the accompanying report. Based on the
results of the wetland delineation, the proposed installation of flow -through cells at Seeps A, B,
and D will directly impact approximately 0.49 acre of palustrine forested (PFO) wetlands and
approximately 170 linear feet of perennial streams. Additionally, approximately 0.78 acre of PFO
wetlands and 940 linear feet of perennial streams will be indirectly impacted by the impoundment
of surface waters resulting from the project.
By way of this letter and the accompanying supporting documentation, including ENG Form 4345,
previous authorizations, and project -specific documentation, we are respectfully requesting a
modification to the previously issued SAW-2019-00296 to include the installation of flow -through
treatment cells at Seeps A, B, and D. If you have any questions or need additional information,
please do not hesitate to contact Spencer Varnado at 225.325.3218 or via e-mail at
svamado (d),geosyntec. com.
aincereiy, Ir f//J�j
f �;_ 1 V L
Spencer D. Varnado
Senior Scientist
Enclosures
USACE Cover Letter 10.23.20
Chris Shores, P.E. (NC, SC, MD)
Senior Engineer/Project Manager
engineers I scientists I innovators

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT
OMB APPROVAL 003
EXPIRES: 28 FEBRURUARY RY 20 2013
33 CFR 325. The proponent agency is CECW-CO-R.
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to average 11 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of the collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense,
Washington Headquarters, Executive Services and Communications Directorate, Information Management Division and to the Office of Management and
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003). Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Please DO NOT
RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of
the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries
Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332. Principal Purpose: Information provided on
this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other
federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by Federal law. Submission
of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permit be issued. One set
of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this application (see
sample drawings and/or instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity. An application
that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO.
2. FIELD OFFICE CODE
3. DATE RECEIVED
4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETE
(ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPLICANT)
5. APPLICANT'S NAME
8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (agent is not required)
First - Christel Middle - Last - Compton
First - Spencer Middle - Last - Varnado
Company - The Chemours Company, FC LLC
Company - Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
E-mail Address - [e-mail]
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS:
9. AGENT'S ADDRESS:
Address- 22828 Hwy 87 W
Address- 2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430
City - Fayetteville State - NC Zip - 28306 Country -US
City - Raleigh State - NC Zip - 27607 Country -US
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOs. WAREA CODE
10. AGENTS PHONE NOs. w/AREA CODE
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
a. Residence b. Business c. Fax
910.678.1213
225.325.3218
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
11. 1 hereby authorize, Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
/7
�dyY2drL
2020-10-23
SIGNATURE OF A LICANT DATE
NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Chemours - Seep C Permit Modification - Flow Through Cells A, B, and D
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable)
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Cape Fear River
Address 22828 Hwy 87 W
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Latitude: -N 34°50'37.75" Longitude: oW 78°50'31.75"
City - Fayetteville State- NC Zip- 28306
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
State Tax Parcel ID Not Applicable Municipality Not Applicable
Section - Not Applicable Township - Not Applicable Range - Not Applicable
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 3

17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From Fayetteville, NC, travel south on North Carolina Highway 87 (Hwy 87) approximately 17 miles to State Route 1303. Turn east onto
State Route 1303 and travel approximately one mile to the Chemours facility main gate. The Site is located east of the facility between it
and the Cape Fear River.
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
See Attachment A
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
See Attachment A
USE BLOCKS 20-23 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
The discharge is necessary to install treatment structures to address the Consent Order between the Chemours Company FC, LLC
(Chemours) and the State of NC and Cape Fear River Watch to address discharges of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances
(PFAS) at the Chemours Fayetteville Works. The CO requires Chemours to develop a remedial plan for reducing PFAS loading from
Chemours Fayetteville Work Facility to the Cape Fear River. Four groundwater seeps that form streams, identified as Seeps A, B, C and D,
are located above the Cape Fear River water level on the bluff face from the facility and discharge into the Cape Fear River. In order to
comply with the CO and address PFAS discharges, structures are proposed to capture surface water for treatment prior to discharge to the
Cape Fear River.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards:
Type Type Type
Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards Amount in Cubic Yards
200 cubic yards concrete 1,600 cubic yards clay 800 cubic yards riprap
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (see instructions)
Acres 0.49 acre permanent wetland fill
or
Linear Feet 170 feet permanent stream fill
23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation (see instructions)
See Attachment A
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 2 of 3

24. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes F—]No IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
The project includes installation of structures at four locaitons (Seeps A, B, C, and D). Chemours received USACE authorization to
construct a structure at Seep C on 10/05/2020 (SAW-2019-00206). This modification request is being submitted to include the installation
of additional structures at Seeps A, B, and D.
25. Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list).
a. Address- The Chemours Company FC, LLC 22828 Hwy 87 W
City - The Chemours Company FC, LLC 22828 State - NC Zip - 28306
b. Address- North Carolina Coastal Land Trust 720 Market Street
City - Wilmington State - NC Zip - 28401
c. Address -
City - State - Zip -
d. Address -
City - State - Zip -
e. Address -
City - State - Zip -
26. List of Other Certificates or Approvals/Denials received from other Federal, State, or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL' IDENTIFICATION DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
NUMBER
See Attachment A
Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits
27. Application is hereby made for permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that this information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent of the
applicant.
2020-10-23 Spencer D. Varnado Date 2 20.10.d 12:13.�rD. Vaniado
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGENT DATE
The Application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
ENG FORM 4345, OCT 2012 Page 3 of 3

Attachment A
SAW-2019-00206
Chemours — Seep C Permit Modification — Flow Through Cells A, B, and D
18. Nature of Activity
On February 25, 2019, the North Carolina Superior Court for Bladen County entered a Consent Order (CO)
among The Chemours Company FC, LLC (Chemours) and the State of NC and Cape Fear River Watch to
address discharges of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at the Chemours Fayetteville
Works. Among other things, the CO required Chemours to develop a remedial plan for reducing PFAS
loading from Chemours Fayetteville Work Facility to the Cape Fear River. Four groundwater seeps that
form streams, identified as Seeps A, B, C and D, are located above the Cape Fear River water level on the
bluff face from the facility and discharge into the Cape Fear River. The land use in the area of the seep
discharge is undeveloped woodland, approximately 1,500 feet east of the chemical plant.
Chemours is currently installing a flow -through cell in -stream treatment facility at Seep C to treat the
water prior to discharge (permitted under Section 401 Water Quality Certification #WQC004235,
10/02/2020; and Section 404 USACE Action ID. No. SAW-2019-00206, 10/05/2020). The Consent Order
Addendum requires the Seep A, B, and D flow through cells to be operational (construction complete) by
February, March, and April 2021, respectively. To meet this aggressive schedule, mobilization for
construction of the remaining seeps is time -critical and intended no later than November 17, 2020 (i.e.,
immediately after Seep C is operational).
The proposed flow through cells at Seeps A, B, and D are the same design principal as Seep C, but sized
accordingly to the flow rates at the three remaining seeps. The range of flow at Seeps A, B, and D is fairly
narrow, and roughly 2.5-3 times greater than Seep C. A single, unified design was developed that is viable
for all three of these remaining seeps. As with Seep C, these flow -through cells will consist of in -stream
filter beds to remove PFAS from the seeps prior to discharge to the river. An earthen dam will impound
water (approximately 6 feet in total height) to provide hydraulic head to allow for treatment with granular
activated carbon (GAC) filter beds. Impounded water will flow through an inlet weir into a series of
concrete basins to hydraulically control surface flow over vertically oriented GAC beds. Water will flow via
gravity drainage through the GAC beds and PFAS compounds will sorb to the media. Effluent water will
collect in a stilling basin, where it will then discharge back into the existing seep channel. The in -stream
structures will be placed generally about 150-200 feet upland from the confluence with the River. Influent
and effluent samples will be collected to monitor the PFAS removal efficiency. GAC media will be
periodically replaced.
As with Seep C, it is anticipated that the flow -through cells will operate for approximately two to three
years, at which point a long-term remedy for seeps and groundwater will be constructed. This long-term
remedy is anticipated to withdraw sufficient groundwater via pumping wells such that the seep baseflow
to the four flow -through cells is reduced, and the flow -through cells can be taken out of service.
19. Project Purpose
The purpose of the project is to comply with the CO between Chemours, the State of NC, and Cape Fear
River Watch to address discharges of PFAS at the Chemours Fayetteville Works.

23. Description of Avoidance, Minimization, and Compensation
The project has been designed to minimize stream and wetland impacts while providing a potential
remedy for contaminants as required in the CO. The proposed construction impacts have been minimized
to the extent practicable. Access to the sites will be within existing access roads and staging/parking areas
to be utilized during construction have been sited outside of wetlands and streams to avoid excess
impacts. Chemours will compensate for unavoidable wetland and stream impacts through the purchase
of credits from an approved mitigation bank or purchase of in -lieu -fee mitigation, as required.
26. List of Other Certificates, Approvals
The following authorizations were obtained for installation of the flow -through structure at Seep C.
USACE Individual Permit SAW-2019-00206 (10.05.2020)
NCDEQ WQC004235 (10.02.2020)
NCDPS No -Rise Concurrence (09.25.2020)
Bladen County Floodplain Development Permit (09.29.2020)
Please note the model developed to support the No -Rise evaluation for Seep C included Seeps A, B, and
D.

THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS PROJECT
SEEPS A. B. AND D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
sF,rorad �
-
ParYxefOd
LiIlfngton
N
[mtbage
Ander<an Creek
7^
n�sk Bmgt
c_1
mouneot�
Fare Brvgg,J
'i'4
fibexleen
ce..,y Fayeite'dll!¢
I'll
Makall d
(1_1 Raeford Hope M311s
Clinton
a �T Mi
S
g�
rib
SITE
�ppmpp
lie W Lnmlkrlon
Fairmont
Haabe[h[own
�I7i0oR n
j c�taaee®
L
a
1,mw.r�nww
i+] �,,
3OURCE: U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1" = 30 MILES
N MANT. • H
WILLIS CREEK AND CAPE FEAR RIVER CORRIDOR
FAYETTEVILLE, BLADEN AND CUMBERLAND COUNTIES
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
OCTOBER 2020
LIST OF DRAWINGS
DRAWING NO.
DRAWING TITLE
G-01
COVER SHEET
G-02
NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS
A-01
SEEP A INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
A-02
SEEP A FILTER BED AND GRADING PLAN
A-03
SEEP A INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM CROSS SECTIONS
B-01
SEEP B INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
B-02
SEEP B FILTER BED AND GRADING PLAN
B-03
SEEP B INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM CROSS SECTIONS
D-01
SEEP D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
D-02
SEEP D FILTER BED AND GRADING PLAN
D-03
SEEP D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM CROSS SECTIONS
22828 NC-87
4: ChemourST- FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28306
910.483.4681
PREPARED BY:
ATRIUM AT BLUE RIDGE
Geosyntecl-'- 2501 BLUE RIDGE ROAD, SUITE 430
consultants of NC, P.C. RALEIGH, NC 27607
NC LICENSE NO.: C-3500 AND C-295 919.870.0576
01
SEEP B
C/
SEEP D
{f �Y
LOCATION MAP 16-.�1 1
SCALE: 1" = 3,000' SCALE IN FEET
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

CONCRETE NOTES HATCH PATTERN LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS
1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION AND/OR ADDENDUM
REFERENCED IN DESIGN STANDARDS ACI 318 AND ACI 301.
2. ADDITION OF WATER TO THE BATCH FOR MATERIAL WITH INSUFFICIENT SLUMP WILL NOT BE PERMITTED, UNLESS THE
SUPPLIER HAS SPECIFICALLY WITHHELD WATER FROM THE BATCH AT THE PLANT. IN SUCH CASE, THE MIX DESIGN AND
TRUCK TICKET MUST CLEARLY STATE THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF WATER THAT CAN BE ADDED TO THE BATCH ON SITE.
IN NO CASE SHALL THE DESIGN WATER TO CEMENTITIOUS MATERIAL RATIO BE EXCEEDED.
3. MECHANICALLY VIBRATE ALL CONCRETE WHEN PLACED.
4. CHAMFER ALL EXPOSED EXTERNAL CORNERS OF CONCRETE WITH 3/4" X 45 DEGREE CHAMFER, UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE.
5. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO DRAWINGS OF OTHER TRADES AND VENDOR DRAWINGS FOR EMBEDDED ITEMS AND
RECESSES NOT SHOWN ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.
6. ALL CEMENT SHALL BE TYPE 1/11, EXCEPT TYPE III MAY BE USED TO PROVIDE HIGH -EARLY STRENGTH FOR 4,000 PSI AT 14
DAYS. COMPLY WITH ACI 318 TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR 14-DAY STRENGTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318 CHAPTER
19.
7. THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR THE
SIZE AND LOCATION OF EMBEDDED ITEMS, OPENINGS, SLEEVES, INSERTS, DOWELS, DEPRESSIONS, ETC. DO NOT CUT
REINFORCEMENT UNLESS INDICATED BY SECTION OR DETAIL. AT LOCATIONS OF CONFLICT, SPREAD THE
REINFORCEMENT TO ACCOMMODATE PLACEMENT. ADD ADDITIONAL BARS IF NECESSARY, TO MAINTAIN SPACING
REQUIREMENTS.
8. CONCRETE CONTAINING SUPERPLASTICIZING ADMIXTURE SHALL HAVE A SLUMP OF 4" ± 1", TO BE FIELD VERIFIED,
PRIOR TO ADDING ADMIXTURE, AND NOT EXCEEDING 8" AT PLACEMENT.
9. STRUCTURAL CONCRETE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING TABLE:
F_ (nHJ PF P DPnDO RTIPC I
MIN 28 DAY
COMPRESSIVE
SLUMPAT
MAXWIC
CONCRETE USE
STRENGTH
PLACEMENT
RATIO
REMARKS
ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE
4,000 PSI
4" ± 1"
0.45
AIR ENTRAINED TO 5%± 1%
10. ALL AGGREGATES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C33.
11. FLY ASH WILL NOT BE PERMITTED.
12. CONCRETE MIX DESIGNS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ACI 318 CHAPTER 9. FOLLOW SECTION 19.2 FOR
AVERAGE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTHS WHEN TEST DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE.
13. ADMIXTURES SHALL NOT CONTAIN MORE THAN 0.1% CHLORIDE IONS AND CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING:
A. AIR -ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES: ASTM C260
B. WATER REDUCING ADMIXTURES: ASTM C494, TYPE A
C. RETARDING ADMIXTURES: ASTM C494, TYPED
14. CURE CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 USING WET CURE OR LIQUID CURING COMPOUND.
15. CURING COMPOUND SHALL CONFORM TO REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C309 AND NOT IMPAIR NATURAL BONDING
CHARACTERISTICS OF SUBSEQUENT COATINGS.
16. CONCRETE FORMWORK FOR VERTICAL LOADS AND LATERAL PRESSURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 347.
17. NONSHRINK GROUT SHALL BE USED FOR PIPE PENETRATIONS. MIX AND PLACE AS RECOMMENDED BY THE
MANUFACTURER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C1107.
18. CONCRETE SLAB AND INTERIOR FACE OF RETAINING WALL SURFACES SHALL BE COATED USING CARBOLINE PLASITE
9029, OR APPROVED EQUAL AS A PRIMER LAYER, AND PLASITE 9060, OR APPROVED EQUAL, AS A TOP COAT. THE
PLASITE 9060 SHALL BE APPLIED IN A MINIMUM OF THREE COATINGS. EXTEND COATING TO THE TOP OF CHAMFERED
EDGE.
STEEL REINFORCING NOTES
1. ALL BARS PER CRSI SPECIFICATIONS AND HANDBOOK. LATEST ACI DESIGN STANDARDS AND DETAILING MANUAL APPLY.
SECURELY TIE ALL BARS IN LOCATION BEFORE PLACING CONCRETE. REINFORCING BAR SPACINGS GIVEN ARE
MAXIMUM, ON -CENTER SPACING.
2. REINFORCING LAP SPLICES IN CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS "B" TENSION SPLICES PER LATEST ACI DESIGN STANDARD
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL SPLICE LOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.
PROVIDE BENT CORNER BARS TO MATCH AND LAP WITH HORIZONTAL BARS AT CORNERS OF INTERSECTIONS OF
FOUNDATIONS.
3. #6 AND SMALLER BARS MAY BE SPLICED USING MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS OR CONTACT LAP SPLICES. BAR LAPS
SHALL BE SECURELY WIRED TOGETHER.
4. REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE COLD BENT. BARS PARTIALLY EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE FIELD BENT,
EXCEPT WHEN INDICATED ON DRAWINGS OR WHEN REALIGNMENT IS NECESSARY. IN SUCH CASES, THE ANGLE OF
BENDING SHALL BE LIMITED TO 45 DEGREES FOR #6 BARS AND SMALLER.
5. ALL REINFORCING BAR HOOKS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE ACI STANDARD HOOKS CONFORMING TO THE
BEND DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 25.3.1 OF ACI 318, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE.
6. STEEL REINFORCING TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING TABLE:
TYPICAL REINFORCING BAR STRENGTHS
REINFORCING#4 AND #6 (NON -WELDABLE)
ASTM A615, DEFORMED
Fy = 6D KSI
REINFORCING (WELDABLE)
ASTM A705, DEFORMED
Fy = 60 KSI
7. PROVIDE THE MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER INDICATED IN THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN A
SPECIFIC SECTION OR DETAIL.
TYPICAL CLEAR CONCRETE COVERAGES
CONCRETE CAST AGAINST AND PERMANENTLY EXPOSED TO
3"
EARTH
FORMED CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER -#6
2"
BARS
FORMED CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER -#4
1 m"
BARS
ALL OTHERS PER LATEST EDITION OF ACI 318 DESIGN
STANDARD
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH EMBEDMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS BOLTS AND FASTENERS FOR SECURING PIPE
HANGERS, PIPE STANDS, AND OTHER EQUIPMENT THAT REQUIRES BOLTING TO CONCRETE.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH EPDXY RESIN FOR ANCHORING BOLTS AND FASTENERS TO CONCRETE. EPDXY RESIN
SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM C881.
CONCRETE
GRAVEL
PIPE EMBEDMENT FILL
RIPRAP
SUBGRADE
TRENCH BACKFILL / EARTHEN FILL
DETAIL AND SECTION IDENTIFICATION LEGEND
2
DETAIL NUMBER
13
DRAWING ON WHICH ABOVE
DETAIL IS PRESENTED
DETAIL NUMBER
2
DETAIL
DRAWING ON WHICH
5
TITLE OF DETAIL
ABOVE DETAIL WAS
FIRST REFERENCED
SCALE: 1" = 1'
EXAMPLE: DETAIL NUMBER 2 WHICH IS
PRESENTED ON DRAWING NO. 13 WAS FIRST
REFERENCED ON DRAWING NO. 5.
SECTION LETTER
START OF SECTION (0-00) END OF SECTION
A A
9 9
DRAWING ON WHICH ABOVE
SECTION LETTER SECTION IS PRESENTED
A DETAIL
DRAWING ON WHICH 5 TITLE OF DETAIL
ABOVE SECTION WAS FIRST REFERENCED SCALE: 1" = 100' (HORIZONTAL); 1" = 20' (VERTICAL)
EXAMPLE: SECTION LETTER "A" WHICH IS
PRESENTED ON DRAWING NO. 9 WAS FIRST
REFERENCED ON DRAWING NO. 5.
AASHTO AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS
APP APPROVED BY
Q CENTER LINE
DRN DRAWN BY
DWG DRAWING
E EAST OR EASTING
EL ELEVATION
FT FEET
HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE
H:V HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL LENGTH RATIO FOR A SLOPE
HWY HIGHWAY
IN INCH
INV INVERT
MAX MAXIMUM
MIN MINIMUM
MSL MEAN SEA LEVEL
N NORTH OR NORTHING
NAD NORTH AMERICAN DATUM
NAVD88 NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
NCDEQ NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
NO. NUMBER
NPDES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
N.S.A. NATIONAL STONE ASSOCIATION
NTS NOT TO SCALE
OC ON CENTER
OZ OUNCE
PFAS PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES
PROJ PROJECT
RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
RD ROAD
REV REVISION
S SOUTH
SWP STORMWATER PIPE
TYP TYPICAL
U.S. UNITED STATES
USEPA UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
W WEST
W.S. WATER SURFACE
% PERCENT OR PERCENTILE
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

6 7 8
A
B
C
D
8E
1 2 13 14 5
o
W W W W\
W W W W W
o
\
LEGEND
o
W W
o
oN
TOTAL TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT = 0.44 AC
EXISTING CONTOUR
W W W
uJ
TOTAL TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT = 295 LF
II, oe
I
40 FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR
TOTAL PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT = 0.35 AC
W W
I
DIRECT FILL IMPACT (DARK RED) = 0.09 AC
EXISTING CLEARED AREA
INDIRECT IMPACTS (LIGHT RED) = 0.26 AC
TOTAL PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT = 570 LF — — PROPERTY LINE
W W Y Y
\
1
DIRECT FILL IMPACT (DARK BLUE) = 90 LF
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE W W
\
-N- INDIRECT IMPACTS LIGHT BLUE = 480 LF
( ) EXISTING ROAD
SEEP CHANNEL / RIVER
SILT FENCE W W W W
IW \
\ EXISTING ROAD \
WETLANDS
.v
EXISTING
CLEARED AREA
W�
/ W y
W W
W f
O
\ INDIRECT WETLAND IMPACT
°
L EQUIPMENT AND
MATERIAL DIRECT FILL WETLAND IMPACT
W '�—� W
STAGING AREA
NOTES:
�
8 0
o o ,
� 1. GRID COORDINATE SYSTEM CORRESPONDS TO NAD83, NORTH CAROLINA.
°opo9oSoo o o °<
8°oo o ° �s '°�
a�,
� MAINTENANCE PLATFORM 2• ELEVATIONS PRESENTED ARE IN FEET, NAVD 88.
(NOTE 5)
\
10,0 °S°o° 808 °
°oOao°EL41
o
Oo� °oo ogo�
.35 3. TOPOGRAPHIC, ROADS, BUILDINGS, AND PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM
FREELAND-CLINK SCALES &ASSOCIATES, INC. OF NC. SURVEY OF THE CHEMOURS
/
(JPI W W--•__.\
W '° °� °o 000 ° °
FILTER BED
AND SPILLWAY FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE DATE 7 JANUARY 2019.
Nt
(NOTE 4)
4. BYPASS SPILLWAY AND SLOPES SHALL BE ARMORED WITH 12-INCH THINK (MIN) LAYER OF
RIPRAP AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
C o
o
r-
D 5. MAINTENANCE PLATFORM SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A 6-INCH (MIN) LAYER OF AGGREGATE
TAND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
W
des
m
D 6. DISTURBED AREAS NOT SURFACED WITH AGGREGATE OR CONCRETE WILL BE SEEDED AND
A
. FILTER BED OVERTOPPING
W
MULCHED UPON DISTURBANCE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED
1 < AND MONITORED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL RESTORATION.
N 3985
EL
WJW
41.35 W W W W
W j
1 �
7. APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEP C IMPACTS
DELINEATED BY PARSONS (WOTUS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS, FLOW
BEGIN BYPASS
v v
O
1�EL
/
40.35 v v
I THROUGH CELLS, SEEP C PILOT STUDY. AUGUST 2020). APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS
\
I'- —
t
AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEPS A, B, AND D DELINEATED BY GEOSYNTEC,
0 SEPTEMBER 2020 OF THE US FINDINGS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
(WATERS
1
FILTER BED IMPOUNDMENT
\
EL 38.35 - �
I PROJECT, BLADEN/CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. OCTOBER 2020).
0 100 200
i
WETLANDS
(NOTE 7)
SCALE IN FEET
/)p '='
\ A 10.23.20 PERMIT SUBMITTAL JFH CAS
Y W W
-Y
Y W
REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRN APP
ATRIUM AT BLUE RIDGE
GeOSYCiCeC GeosyntecConsultantsofNC,P.C• 2501 BLUE RIDGE ROAD, SUITE 430
NC license No.: C-3500 and C-295 RALEIGH, NC 27607
COI1SL11�C1T1tS
3
919.870.0576
TITLE:
SEEP A INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
W
y W W
W W
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
I PROJECT: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
SEEPS A, B, AND D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
SITE:
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE
y
y \
\
\ DESIGN BY: CMDS DATE: OCTOBER 2020
W W
\
Y W \
\
I 1 DRAWN BY: JFH PROJECT NO.: TR0795
CHECKED BY: JWE FILE: TR0795-A01.DWG
L L
W
L W
W
REVIEWED BY: JJD DRAWING NO.:
+ ��
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APPROVED BY: CAS A-01
1 1 2 3 1 4 1 5 6 1 7 1 8

W }L W W W W p W W I \
W W / 4✓ L0CD
W W \
W W S W W W W \
W W LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
W W W W W W W W 00 I
o °
W W W W W W41
W W W W W W W / G1 d O o
W W W W W �Oo°o0 °0
SILT FENCE
o e ° ° °Oggg °°
0 0
W W
W W
W
W W
0 0 0 °y' '
OSW
°o$D.°000
W W
W W
W W
4080p
W W W
W
W
W W
O
CO go Q �a
W W W
W W W
W W
W
W
W W
W W
o O p D
900o(pl°
i
/jvY
D °o 00 0
D0o°O��D
LL I
W W W
W
W
W W
/�W
tG °Oo 00 0°° O
1 r
W W W
W W
�J//
O /
W v y
°OpO 0 0/�00°oa O
0°°° °900%o °o Nn
W W W
.y
+
$�,o �° °oDo QO
0000 n
000 og°o°a
y� VW
W
W
g°
\
N39F7°po
po00�o0o pO%opo
°Y°0 °po 00°o°-p °
C.
D
L0
(14
\ N \
W
EXISTING ROAD
1 -N-
I
1
EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL
STAGING AREA
1 \ \
Q°
°O"'o0od°o oa 0°00°o p0oo0
fiJ o O o 0 0 0 0 0 <O
,(
°oo 000
��
oDo oO Odo ooO oO�a° °°oDo
op° F\
to
o°00°o0°°poo°oOooQo SF
°° ° °44 ° S a oa a ° )o $ ° \ SF \ 0
00 0 ° �o ogo 0°8 o S
\
W WCO
°000 o
LL ° o°O OO� °04°00° �0°00 o°°poo°00000 o \SF�
00°o8o°O°oo -,0,-0° 48
0 °p �Ooo 0
<
o°Oo0°8o$
\
°Ooop000°o°o°o o°o0�°000° oS0°oQ000°oOOo°°So°oa000 !
F
40� f�
W W W W
° o °o 0 00 ° °o S °°go o °000°0 00 °o°S o °° 0 0 °oo p °o°$ C
\ o$u °0 ° 00 00° oo °00 0 ° �° °o a
O �gO°o°po 0 0° 0 0°0 °oa 0 °oo Q0 o 0 (50;o O o o O o o0 °o oO Oa O Q o°poo o
SF °poo°°°°0°oo°Oo0°°o0°00 °000°0°$°°o o0°oa °p O00 ago 0 , I:"00
00 0g,80 °o SD 0°
<O��F o°00 oQ�a�o OSOOo �Q o�°a o8�o p0°�$o0
°Qop
w W W
W
Qo0
00 000
°a00000
oSo°°000°o°°000 0 000° B °pooBoS°o°°
o�O O o$D°o °O aa° oOO oo oa°c
$Do oo
°p OO Oao o p0° °oo
° A-03 So °° o° g
o0 poo° °o
W
W W
0 0 ° O °o °°o
°
° O ° °oD p0
42 o0°o°p °o °oO°000a°°°8o°
\
W
W W W
° °° °o 0
SF\ OoO °
oBo$°0°°$O°o0
00 0
W
\T
A
°2 W
A 03
FILTER BED OVERTOPPING
EL 41.35
BEGIN BYPASS
EL 40.35
FILTER BED
IMPOUNDMENT
EL 38.35
W W
M m
W W W 41 �a-
FE ,
\ W W W W rW W
O W W W
F�
W •_J\,1
aw r
o
--
W W W 44
W W 46
48
50
A 03 SF_,Sf_�
W ,
W W
W WETLANDS
(NOTE 7)
W W
W W V W
W W W
W W W V W
W W
W W Y V
W I
.1,
V
M M—
I
MAINTENANCE PLATFORM \
(NOTE 5)
EL 41.35 1
I
<O I I
N � I
I I
r-
T O IFILTER BED
ul AND SPILLWAY 1
O I
LL I D
m
A m
W A-03 D
VW )
m
W W I
ry
\ 42
40
W W W
W W W W W
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR
FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR
EXISTING CLEARED AREA
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING ROAD
SEEP CHANNEL / RIVER
WETLANDS
INDIRECT WETLAND IMPACT
DIRECT FILL WETLAND IMPACT
mG
NOTES:
1. GRID COORDINATE SYSTEM CORRESPONDS TO NAD83, NORTH CAROLINA.
2. ELEVATIONS PRESENTED ARE IN FEET, NAVD 88.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC, ROADS, BUILDINGS, AND PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM
FREELAND-CLINK SCALES & ASSOCIATES, INC. OF NC. SURVEY OF THE CHEMOURS
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE DATE 7 JANUARY 2019.
4. BYPASS SPILLWAY AND SLOPES SHALL BE ARMORED WITH 12-INCH THINK (MIN) LAYER OF
RIPRAP AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
5. MAINTENANCE PLATFORM SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A 6-INCH (MIN) LAYER OF AGGREGATE
AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
6. DISTURBED AREAS NOT SURFACED WITH AGGREGATE OR CONCRETE WILL BE SEEDED AND
MULCHED UPON DISTURBANCE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED
AND MONITORED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL RESTORATION.
7. APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEP C IMPACTS E
DELINEATED BY PARSONS (WOTUS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS, FLOW
THROUGH CELLS, SEEP C PILOT STUDY. AUGUST 2020). APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS
AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEPS A, B, AND D DELINEATED BY GEOSYNTEC,
SEPTEMBER 2020 (WATERS OF THE US FINDINGS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
PROJECT, BLADEN/CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. OCTOBER 2020).
0 40 80
SCALE IN FEET
O \
v I
BYPASS SPILLWAY
EL 40.35 I 1
(NOTE 4)
I
II 1
I
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
E
A 10.23.20 PERMIT SUBMITTAL JFH CAS
REV I DATE I DESCRIPTION DRN All
ATRIUM AT BLUE RIDGE
Geosyntec Geosyntec, Consultants ofNC,RC. 2501 BLUE RIDGE ROAD, SUITE 430
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 RALEIGH, NC 27607
COI1Sl1�ik1T1tS 919.870.0576
"ITLE:
SEEP A FILTER BED AND GRADING PLAN
'ROJECT: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
SEEPS A, B, AND D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
3ITE:
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE
DESIGN BY: CMDS DATE: OCTOBER 2020 E
DRAWN BY: JFH PROJECT NO.: TR0795
CHECKED BY: ME FILE: TR0795-AO2.DWG
REVIEWED BY: JJD DRAWING NO.:
APPROVED BY: CAS A-02

,
60 60
H INLET WEIR 47.67' TOP OF FILTER BED
W PERIMETER WALL w
uJ 50 EXISTING EL = 38.35 EL - 41.35 50 LL'
IL GROUND LL
RIPRAP
OZ 40 ARMORED SLOPE ARMORED SLOPE 40 O
JJ
Q --- -L Q
-i 30 8.17' TOP OF SLAB 30 J
uJ EL = 33.85 uJ
20 20
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
DISTANCE (FEET)
SEEP A - SECTION A
60 60
MAINTENANCE PLATFORM
BYPASS SPILLWAY
EL = 41.35 22,
W 50 -- - _ /-EL = 40.35
5% - 50 IW
� \ Lu
Q 40 EXISTING 40 OZ
Q GROUND Q
-i 30 BOTTOM OF SLAB 30 J
Lu 8 17' INLET WEIR EL = 38.35 EL = 33.18 uJ
20 20
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
DISTANCE (FEET)
SEEP A - SECTION B
0 20 40
SCALE IN FEET
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

6 7 8
1 1 2 3 14 5
N 398000
IV
�
_�
W W
W
LEGEND
TOTAL TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT = 0.20 AC
v
v v
o
o
_)
EXISTING CONTOUR
N
04
TOTAL TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT = 305 LF
oN
LU
9
W
W W 04
"� LU
I 40 FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR
TOTAL PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT = 0.47 AC
I DIRECT FILL IMPACT (DARK RED) = 0.23 AC EXISTING CLEARED AREA
W W
INDIRECT IMPACTS (LIGHT RED) = 0.24 AC
W
W
I — —
TOTAL PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT = 540 LF PROPERTY LINE
WETLANDS
(NOTE 7)
111 DIRECT FILL IMPACT (DARK BLUE) = 80 LF
-N- INDIRECT IMPACTS (LIGHT BLUE) = 460 LF EXISTING ROAD
W
W W W
SEEP CHANNEL /RIVER
�
W Y
W
W W
\ W W W WETLANDS
W W y
W W W Y Y
W W
I \
3 7 0
1
INDIRECT WETLAND IMPACT
DIRECT FILL WETLAND IMPACT
W W W
W W W W
FILTER BED OVERTOPPING
EL 42.35
v
s II l�llll
I
v
BYPASS SPILLWAY NOTES:
W
(NOTE 4)
BEGIN BYPASS
EL 41.35 \ 1. GRID COORDINATE SYSTEM CORRESPONDS TO NAD83, NORTH CAROLINA.
EL 41.35
�
/� . �
\ 2. ELEVATIONS PRESENTED ARE IN FEET, NAVD 88.
FILTER BED IMPOUNDMENT
y IV FILTER BED 3. TOPOGRAPHIC, ROADS, BUILDINGS, AND PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM
EL 39.35
W v- ­1-1 —1 FREELAND-CLINK SCALES & ASSOCIATES, INC. OF NC. SURVEY OF THE CHEMOURS
+ 'k W
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE DATE 7 JANUARY 2019.
SPILLWAY SLOPES SHALL OF
4. BYPASS AND BE ARMORED WITH 12-INCH THINK (MIN) LAYER
y/ MAINTENANCE PLATFORM RIPRAP AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
/
/
F(NOTE
y 1�
5)
97
�W
y
J i EL 42.355. MAINTENANCE PLATFORM SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A 6-INCH (MIN) LAYER OF AGGREGATE
1
AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
v41 IV
6. DISTURBED AREAS NOT SURFACED WITH AGGREGATE OR CONCRETE WILL BE SEEDED AND
-�S Doo N � MULCHED UPON DISTURBANCE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED
m AND MONITORED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL RESTORATION.
080 op
0 le T
P
opo� op oa 7. APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEP C IMPACTS
DELINEATED BY PARSONS (WOTUS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS, FLOW
SILT FENCE
�P\
o ° co °� °° ° °° ° m THROUGH CELLS, SEEP C PILOT STUDY. AUGUST 2020). APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS
pp°o°o00°
LIMIT
\I
y w
OF DISTURBANCE
I gc°goQo°°8c°S°o°o° I A AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEPS A, B, AND D DELINEATED BY GEOSYNTEC,
s\ �° SEPTEMBER 2020 OF THE US FINDINGS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
y a8c°OcOa�o °�c (WATERS
PROJECT, BLADEN/CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. OCTOBER 2020).
oC OoaO °o oC°°C
°oa
w W W\
EQUIPMENTAND
"MATERIAL STAGING AREA
op °o I 0 100 200
N 397250
SCALE IN FEET
Y W W A 10.23.20 PERMIT SUBMITTAL JFH CAS
\ W W Y Y
EXISTING CLEARED
_ AREA y,
REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRN APP
I W W W \ ATRIUM AT BLUE
',
I + -, � Geosynte GeosyntecConsultantsofNC,P.C. 2501 BLUE RIDGE ROAD, SUITE RIDGE 30
` 4, W W W
I
1 �Y W W W I con NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 RALEIGH, NC 27607
919.870.0576
1
W W W W
W W W W _
Y Y Y Y
1 TITLE:
1 W Y Y Y I SEEP B INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
Cn 0 0
1 I I WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
PROJECT: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
� i
W
W W SEEPS A, B, AND D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
Y W W Y
1
W Y1 W Y SITE:
1
W W W
W W I IW W W W 1 FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE
DESIGN BY: CMDS DATE: OCTOBER 2020
Y W YY
Y Y 1V Y W W I
I DRAWN BY: JFH PROJECT NO.: TR0795
Y Y Y
L Y W W
W W I W Y W W
y I W I CHECKED BY: JWE FILE: TR0795-B01.DWG
N 397000
\ = = =
I I = REVIEWED BY: JJD DRAWING NO.:
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APPROVED BY: CAS B-01
1 1 2 1 3 4 5 6 1 7 1 8

t
N 39765
W \ W\ \
O
W W\ N W W W W W (V
W W W W O Oy W W y W W
\\]\ DJ w
/ �qa W I WETLANDS
(NOTE 7)
W W 36m--, W W W W WYc,
W W W BYPASS SPILLWAY W ^ I
W W W W W W W (NOTE 4) W W W /JI
W B W W W EL 41.35 W w W W
B-03 W W W W W W W W W
W WLO $ W W W W W W W W ✓W W
O J� L SF W W W W W W W W W W W W W -
'77 \\ SFO y W
I I 6
FILTER BED W W W I
W 'AND SPILLWAY +
T W 41 W W
I\ O
W
W A
B-03 \ W W
J W W W W W W
Ai9 o W W �o W MAINTENANCE PLATFORM
_ W I►. P W W W W (NOTE 5)
\4 x\�W\
6� B-
03 � sT
IW 0�1
N 397500 W W W
sT
IO
W J W W W �-
0
W W W W W \ T B
B-(
W W W W W W r
W W W W W
W W W W Y W
W W W W
W EL 42.35 \ I A
T �L
Co
D A
/
co
A4/ co
SILT FENCE
W W W W N r
°P'' LIMIT OF
W W W W 46 I DISTURBANCE 0 °`
°
W W W FILTER BED
W W OVERTOPPING \ Qn r/ac°oa
W W W EL42.35 0 ° f D°800g
W W TI
W
° o 0 o C o
W W W W BEGIN BYPASS N r /opo °00D°a°o'
W W W W W EL41.35 r0 48 to 4 \ oD°S°0000$o
W W W W I \\ I O °0
°poCo00o
°p0<
° °
W W W W N', s !� °poC°oOpoAO°o0
o ° ° o
T O 6j °oOpo op$°p°°a
°Ooo
oVo o.o
°o 0°Qo°pc'.
a o0°8 D°S ° c
00 o°o0$
O o oo°poo0
po° oDSgo°
/ao o°o$opo°o°
°°00 o0�0 C oa
Gj °p 0D 0o0C o
°oo ogp°O$Op°oo D
i 000o°�0°aoo o°geD°.0
BcS00000poSoB°o°°
Dc° ° o
0000°�0°oQ °o°oo°�o
4, °o oOo p0 oa Co 00°
00 oopo opa°oCo�o°°oop
o C °00 O °o
ooo000oo $°o0Q O
0 o8Do 0 0
>op°o0oC° o oo SDoo°o Opa00�0°°o�op°Co�00°°0S
0oo0ppCO 0ooDO°Op0o° op0° n°Ro0n°000000�c
;(
FILTER BED IMPOUNDMENT °° ° °°O 0 o°°gDg 10°,6°°o°oo,
EL39.35 oo\\s,� I � � So°SOae, ,�oo°o8D°°oo
o°pOpo pO p°oC o0o
W W W W W W <O sc I / °o0 8 °o
Q\ o D 0° oo °0 0 o°Opo C
0
00°00000 ooD o�°o
W W W W W W <'spa 0�o °o op a.
oD 0 °
W W W W W W O� I °o0p°oO opo Qa
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
EQUIPMENT AND
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
MATERIAL STAGING AREA
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W I
I
EXISTING CLEARED
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
AREA I
\
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
I
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
W W 6
Co
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
W W
I
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W
W W W
W W W
I
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W W
N
725Q,
W
W
W
W
W W
W W W
40
NOTES:
LEGEND
CONTOUR
FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR
EXISTING CLEARED AREA
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING ROAD
SEEP CHANNEL / RIVER
WETLANDS
1Er
INDIRECT WETLAND IMPACT
DIRECT FILL WETLAND IMPACT
1. GRID COORDINATE SYSTEM CORRESPONDS TO NAD83, NORTH CAROLINA.
2. ELEVATIONS PRESENTED ARE IN FEET, NAVD 88.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC, ROADS, BUILDINGS, AND PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM
FREELAND-CLINK SCALES & ASSOCIATES, INC. OF NC. SURVEY OF THE CHEMOURS
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE DATE 7 JANUARY 2019.
n I 4. BYPASS SPILLWAY AND SLOPES SHALL BE ARMORED WITH 12-INCH THINK (MIN) LAYER OF
m RIPRAP AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
I n
I 5. MAINTENANCE PLATFORM SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A 6-INCH (MIN) LAYER OF AGGREGATE
I ,,j AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR,
I G
A 6. DISTURBED AREAS NOT SURFACED WITH AGGREGATE OR CONCRETE WILL BE SEEDED AND
II MULCHED UPON DISTURBANCE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED
AND MONITORED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL RESTORATION.
I 7. APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEP C IMPACTS E
\� I DELINEATED BY PARSONS (WOTUS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS, FLOW
I THROUGH CELLS, SEEP C PILOT STUDY. AUGUST 2020). APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS
AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEPS A, B, AND D DELINEATED BY GEOSYNTEC,
I SEPTEMBER 2020 (WATERS OF THE US FINDINGS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
D PROJECT, BLADEN/CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. OCTOBER 2020).
II I 0 100 200
P I SCALE IN FEET
.m
o°opo°OQ, 60 00°o CO,. oO o°pD OoO°o� opp°o°op °o 0O
oopo°OoL
°°O oo00°ao OC o°po0°°°0 0 �OoO a°o0°°o oO po OD o
oOQo°$Do DO°0O°o°op°°o° p°�pp°°p OOo °p°
oC
o°R 60000Ono �o R40noo o00
I W W W W W
IW W W W
I W W W W W
W W W W W N
IW W W W W W
W W W W W W W w
> I
J I
\j
I
OI W0))
I
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
E
A 10,23.20 PERMIT SUBMITTAL I JFH I CAS
REV I DATE DESCRIPTION DRN APP
ATRIUM AT BLUE RIDGE
Geosyntec GeosyntecConsultantsofNC,P.C. 2501 BLUE RIDGE ROAD, SUITE 430
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 RALEIGH, NC 27607
COI1SL111T1tS 919.870.0576
'ITLE:
SEEP B FILTER BED AND GRADING PLAN
'ROJECT: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
SEEPS A, B, AND D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
3ITE:
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE
DESIGN BY: CMDS DATE: OCTOBER 2020 E
DRAWN BY: JFH PROJECT NO.: TR0795
CHECKED BY: JWE FILE: TR0795-BO2.DWG
REVIEWED BY: JJD DRAWING NO.:
APPROVED BY: CAS B-O2

60 1 1 60
INLET WEIR 47.67' TOP OF FILTER BED
W EXISTING EL = 39.35 PERIMETER WALL W
uJ 50 GROUND EL = 42.35 50 uJ
LL RIPRAP RIPRAP LL
Z ARMORED SLOPE Z
Q 40 ARMORED SLOPE 40 Q
Q ----- Q
J 30 8.17 TOP OF SLAB 30 J
uJ EL = 34.85 uJ
20 20
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
DISTANCE (FEET)
SEEP B - SECTION A
60 60
-1 BYPASS SPILLWAY MAINTENANCE PLATFORM
I j 50 EL = 41.35 22 EL = 42.35 F
W 50 W
LL --- 5% LL
Z Z
0 40 _ _ _ _ 40 p
Q EXISTING -- ------ ----- Q
GROUND 8.17'
J 30 BOTTOM OF SLAB 30 J
W EL = 34.18 INLET WEIR W
EL = 39.35
20 20
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
DISTANCE (FEET)
SEEP B - SECTION B
0 20 40
SCALE IN FEET
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

c
1©
IW
I N 395500
\
O
cn
N
�
1
o
N
\
w
\ WETLANDS
1 (NOTE 7)
II Ann
FILTER BED OVERTOPPING _
EL 41.35
I
I
BEGIN BYPASS
EL 40.35
o 0
W W
1 EXISTING ROAD NW1, P/
1 C MAINTENANCE PLATFORM
(NOTE 5) °j
1 EL 41.35
� LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
SILT FENCE
EQUIPMENT AND
MATERIAL STAGING AREA
c EXISTING CLEARED AREA
� lco L0
C:>
� D
FILTER BED IMPOUNDMENT I
EL 38.35
I
BYPASS SPILLWAY
(NOTE 4)
EL 40.35
I I
FILTER BED I m
AND SPILLWAY
a
A
W
00 ° 8co
-- 0°Oo�
a p oap°pO o o 0-oo0oO° °o�o°�c-0 6opa (Ycae
„
p11
c c Ap-°0
�oc°S o0oc
°°0°.,G0
ooC
�I
I
I
°o pO AI
° °aC°o o0°p
Oo pO poco o0°O�
i
LEGEND
I U I AL I tlVIt'UK/AKY VVt I LA114U IIVIt'/it, I = U.Ub /At,
EXISTING CONTOUR
TOTAL TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT = 0 LF
40 FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR
TOTAL PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT = 0.45 AC
DIRECT FILL IMPACT (DARK RED) = 0.17 AC
— EXISTING CLEARED AREA
INDIRECT IMPACTS (LIGHT RED) = 0.28 AC
TOTAL PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT = 0 LF
— — PROPERTY LINE
DIRECT FILL IMPACT (DARK BLUE) = 0 LF
INDIRECT IMPACTS (LIGHT BLUE) = 0 LF
EXISTING ROAD
O
O
O
cM
LO
0
N
w
SEEP CHANNEL / RIVER
W W W W W WETLANDS
INDIRECT WETLAND IMPACT
DIRECT FILL WETLAND IMPACT
NOTES:
1. GRID COORDINATE SYSTEM CORRESPONDS TO NAD83, NORTH CAROLINA.
2. ELEVATIONS PRESENTED ARE IN FEET, NAVD 88.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC, ROADS, BUILDINGS, AND PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM
FREELAND-CLINK SCALES & ASSOCIATES, INC. OF NC. SURVEY OF THE CHEMOURS
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE DATE 7 JANUARY 2019.
4. BYPASS SPILLWAY AND SLOPES SHALL BE ARMORED WITH 12-INCH THINK (MIN) LAYER OF
RIPRAP AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
5. MAINTENANCE PLATFORM SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A 6-INCH (MIN) LAYER OF AGGREGATE
AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
6. DISTURBED AREAS NOT SURFACED WITH AGGREGATE OR CONCRETE WILL BE SEEDED AND
MULCHED UPON DISTURBANCE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED
AND MONITORED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL RESTORATION.
7. APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEP C IMPACTS
DELINEATED BY PARSONS (WOTUS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS, FLOW
THROUGH CELLS, SEEP C PILOT STUDY. AUGUST 2020). APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS
AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEPS A, B, AND D DELINEATED BY GEOSYNTEC,
SEPTEMBER 2020 (WATERS OF THE US FINDINGS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
PROJECT, BLADEN/CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. OCTOBER 2020).
0 100 200
SCALE IN FEET
�-� t n
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
A 10.23.20 PERMIT SUBMITTAL JFH CAS
REV DATE DESCRIPTION DRN APP
ATRIUM AT BLUE RIDGE
Geos Mtec GeosyntecConsultantsofNC,P.C. 2501 BLUE RIDGE ROAD, SUITE 430
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 RALEIGH, NC 27607
COI1SL111T1tS 919.870.0576
TITLE: SEEP D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACTS
PROJECT: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
SEEPS A, B, AND D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
SITE:
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE
DESIGN BY: CMDS DATE: OCTOBER 2020 I
DRAWN BY: JFH PROJECT NO.: TR0795
CHECKED BY: JWE FILE: TR0795-D01.DWG
REVIEWED BY: JJD DRAWING NO.:
APPROVED BY: CAS D-01

O
04
LO
FILTER BED N
y OVERTOPPING LU
EL 41.35
y W BEGIN BYPASS
EL 40.35
W •Y
v W FILTER BED IMPOUNDMENT
EL 38.35
W Y W W B
W W W W W D-03 BYPASS SPILLWAY
W W W O (NOTE 4)
P v W W sF to EL 40.35
\t FILTER BED
W W •Y •Y •Y •Y W W /Q °j F
AND SPILLWAY
1 W Y A Y Y W O +
v v v D-03 v v 9 5� v N
•Y •Y •Y •Y •Y •Y •Y •Y v •Y W \ O
W •Y W W W W •Y •Y A
•Y W •Y •Y •Y •Y •Y •Y � •Y 1� \\
11 W W � W •Y �W �
+L/ W •Y W •Y •Y •Y Cy
v W vsr B
/ 1
MAINTENANCE PLATFORM ,-T
(NOTE 5) °p
EL 41.35 I
I i0
o
(n
T
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE I o
�I 46 TI�
U) L— SF_
T
SILT FENCE
I —
o cn 00 h � N �O
— — — — — —
— — —
EXISTING CLEARED AREA EQUIPMENT AND
MATERIAL STAGING AREA
N 395500
W
W `W
I
I II
Cb
I
I I
I
I
I �
n
T
WETLANDS I j
(NOTE 7)
W
W
W W
/ Jy 00
M co v D-03
•Y I W •Y •Y W •Y W
•Y \ W •Y •Y
W�� •Y •Y •Y •L W
•Y� •Y •Y W •Y
W
m
W
_ � W
•Y W I
W +
°D
8pN I
I
LOELOD LODSLO
L�F S_SFo°0.SF—S°0D 0
Oa °o°000o p °� a pOo o °o0°poC ° oo °oa oo
oD 0 D o0 080°00oBDo 0000 °ppoOOo oD°O0°o ° \°
° o0 020 0 °o0°QO p�D°°°Oo°0°o 0Oo0 0 °oC°o I
° p°dooOg°�a 00 poD°o °0°Oo0°o opo 00 o°po0o°0° (P�
o O° o 0 0 o-q0 ° C O p o 0o O o°o D
00°oDo 00 °O o0 oa�o�oBC _°poo \
00 0�00 �a°0 °o° p °°D O o °0 0 0 0 000 0000 �, 000°00° p 0 \yam- t°
00Oo0 o $0°p00 p0 °0°o DO O0o0 °o O°O0° p 'n
00 °00 0 °D°o 00 o°SD 0 oC 0D00 0 oDo I P
0 o O op° o 0o0 O
0o° �0°0 °o° p °g� 0 p °o C o 0 O o00 �0 0 �a°0 ao° p°00 °�
oo0oa�00oo00.Qo°o0---a00°�o000GS
00°$0°op� 'r
Poo.00q,80 0o000°, °O 0o °000°0 ofo oo °00 °00°0°o C I O
°°Ooo 0°00000o D 0p°0°o Ojog 0 o °p 00 P
°p°po0o oogo00 000°o°$O°p0�°o0opoOoDo o00 a°0°0p (nl
o00 08
°o Oog90-00 SIP o°¢°O'0 oOop° °8D°$ T
Oo°p0°p 000i o� 0p po00 o�p°oo°0°po° Ir
0 D Oo oa °oo 0 oD °0 J
�o oC OoQ ooDo oO poD o�o°O°o 0Do°0oNboo5� O
00
Q0 o°OpG. o0°oa° oo Ooo 000°0 °°poDoo
°0 °°p°00°000 o0o ooO ° 00°O o°000°0° 5�0
0 o O op° ooDo 00 ° ° I
°00 °po °° 0 0° 0 0 0 o D
0 J
—SF LOn S� SOS SF LO SF LOCL�
°�- li
40
LEGEND
EXISTING CONTOUR
FINISHED GRADE CONTOUR
EXISTING CLEARED AREA
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING ROAD
SEEP CHANNEL / RIVER
WETLANDS
INDIRECT WETLAND IMPACT
DIRECT FILL WETLAND IMPACT
1. GRID COORDINATE SYSTEM CORRESPONDS TO NAD83, NORTH CAROLINA.
2. ELEVATIONS PRESENTED ARE IN FEET, NAVD 88.
3. TOPOGRAPHIC, ROADS, BUILDINGS, AND PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM
FREELAND-CLINK SCALES & ASSOCIATES, INC. OF NC. SURVEY OF THE CHEMOURS
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE DATE 7 JANUARY 2019.
4. BYPASS SPILLWAY AND SLOPES SHALL BE ARMORED WITH 12-INCH THINK (MIN) LAYER OF
RIPRAP AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
5. MAINTENANCE PLATFORM SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A 6-INCH (MIN) LAYER OF AGGREGATE
AND UNDERLAIN WITH A GEOTEXTILE SEPARATOR.
6. DISTURBED AREAS NOT SURFACED WITH AGGREGATE OR CONCRETE WILL BE SEEDED AND
MULCHED UPON DISTURBANCE. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED
AND MONITORED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL RESTORATION.
7. APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEP C IMPACTS
DELINEATED BY PARSONS (WOTUS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS, FLOW
THROUGH CELLS, SEEP C PILOT STUDY. AUGUST 2020). APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WETLANDS
AND STREAMS ASSOCIATED WITH SEEPS A, B, AND D DELINEATED BY GEOSYNTEC,
SEPTEMBER 2020 (WATERS OF THE US FINDINGS REPORT, CHEMOURS FAYETTEVILLE WORKS
PROJECT, BLADEN/CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. OCTOBER 2020).
0 100 200
SCALE IN FEET
I I
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
A 1 R102320PERMITSUBMITTAL H CPS
TN APEV DAE DESCRIPTION DRATRIUM AT BLUE RIDGE
Geosyntec GeosyntecConsultantsofNC,P.C. 2501 BLUE RIDGE ROAD, SUITE 430
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 RALEIGH, NC 27607
COI1SL111T1tS 919.870.0576
TITLE:
SEEP D FILTER BED AND GRADING PLAN
PROJECT: THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
SEEPS A, B, AND D INTERIM REMEDIATION SYSTEM
SITE:
FAYETTEVILLE WORKS SITE
DESIGN BY: CMDS DATE: OCTOBER 2020 i
DRAWN BY: JFH PROJECT NO.: TR0795
CHECKED BY: JWE FILE: TR0795-DO2.DWG
REVIEWED BY: JJD DRAWING NO.:
APPROVED BY: CAS D-02

60 60
INLET WEIR TOP OF FILTER BED
EL = 38.35 47.67' PERIMETER WALL
uJ 50 EXISTING 50Lu
W EL = 41.35 W
GROUND RIPRAPLL
Z ARMORED SLOPE RIPRAP Z
O 40 ARMORED SLOPE 40 O
J 30 8.17' TOP OF SLAB 30 J
W EL = 33.85 w
20 20
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
DISTANCE (FEET)
SEEP D - SECTION A
H H
W W
Lu u1
u- u-
Z Z
O O
a a
W W
J J
W W
60 60
BYPASS SPILLWAY MAINTENANCE PLATFORM
22' EL = 41.35
50 EL = 40.35 50
40 40
EXISTING ��__--� _
30 GROUND 8.17' 30
BOTTOM OF SLAB--,z INLET WEIR
EL = 33.18
20 EL = 38.35 20
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
DISTANCE (FEET)
SEEP D - SECTION B
0 20 40
SCALE IN FEET
PERMIT DRAWING - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Prepared for:
Chemours Fayetteville Works
22828 NC-87
Fayetteville, NC 28306
WATERS OF THE U.S. FINDINGS REPORT
Chemours Fayetteville Works Project
Bladen and Cumberland Counties, North Carolina
Prepared By:
GeosyntecO'
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295
2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Project Number TR0795
October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosynwc Consahan(s of NC, PC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Site Description.................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Background...........................................................................................................1
1.3 Objectives............................................................................................................. 2
2 WETLAND AND STREAM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ......................... 2
3 FINDINGS................................................................................................................4
3.1 Wetlands, Streams and Other Waters Assessment ............................................... 4
3.1.1 Wetlands........................................................................................................... 5
3.1.2 Streams and Other Waters of the U.S............................................................... 6
4 CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................9
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Wetlands Identified Within the Survey Area
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 USGS Site Location Map)
Figure 2A/B Aerial Imagery Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A — Wetland and Water Resources Data Forms
Appendix B — Representative Photographs
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 i

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, PC
INTRODUCTION
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. (Geosyntec), on behalf of Chemours Fayetteville
Works (Chemours), conducted wetlands and waterbodies delineation at a section of
Chemours Fayetteville Works adjacent to the Cape Fear River, a 137.6-acre Project Area
in Fayetteville, Bladen/Cumberland County, North Carolina (Site) (Figure 1). Below is a
summary of the site conditions documented during field surveys, a project background,
and the objectives of this work.
1.1 Site Description
The Site is located in southern Cumberland and northern Bladen County, approximately
ten miles south of the town of Fayetteville (Figure 1). The north boundary of the Site
begins along the southern edge of Willis Creek and the Site continues south, bounded on
the east by a Cape Fear River, on the west by the plant Chemours plant facility, and on
the south by Glengerry Road/Bill Hall Road. Current land use includes woodlands, a
water treatment facility, monitoring wells, and access roads. A per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) containment system is being built on -site at this time.
The 137.E-acre ecological survey area (Figure 2), is composed of mixed hardwood/pine
forest habitat, monitoring wells, a water treatment facility, and several unimproved access
roads. Forested habitat within the Site is primarily mid- to late successional that naturally
regenerated following historic logging activities. Dominant canopy species include box
elder (Acer negundo), red maple (Acer rubrum), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum),
northern red oak (Quercus rubra), and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Midstory
species include red maple (Acer rubrum), ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua), and invasive shrubs such as Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense).
1.2 Background
In response to a Consent Order entered into between Chemours and the State of North
Carolina and the Cape Fear River Watch, Chemours contracted Geosyntec to perform a
wetlands and waterbodies investigation to collect data for the planning of proposed
remediation activities on the property and future regulatory correspondence. The project
is collectively known as the Chemours Fayetteville Works Project.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 1 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntee Consultants of NC, PC
1.3 Objectives
The objective of the wetlands/waters delineation and protected species survey was to
identify wetlands and other waters (streams, open waters, etc.) within the ecological
survey area and provide a general characterization of their condition (forested/scrub-
shrub/herbaceous, degraded/pristine), and provide a preliminary determination as to their
anticipated jurisdictional status. Experienced Geosyntec biologists conducted the
wetlands and waters surveys from September 14 to 17, 2020.
The remainder of this report summarizes the methodology used in the wetland and stream
assessment, delineation results, and summary of findings.
2 WETLAND AND STREAM ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
In general, wetlands and other waters of the United States (U.S.) are federally protected
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The definition of wetlands (40 Code
of Federal Regulations §230.3(t)) is "those areas that are inundated or saturated by
surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under
normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in
saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar
areas."
Geosyntec performed a wetlands/waters delineation of the Site in accordance with the
three -parameter methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual' (Manual), the Regional Supplement to the
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain
Region 2, and per recent guidance issued jointly by the U.S. Environmental Protection
1 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Department of the Army,
Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. 117 pages.
2 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble.
ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 2 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntee Consultants of NC, PC
Agency (EPA) and the USACE that resulted from the Rapanos vs. U.S. and Carabell vs.
U.S. Supreme Court decisions3.
The three parameters required for identifying a jurisdictional wetland are as follows:
The presence of hydrology - At each data point, the delineator evaluates the area
for evidence of hydrology. The Manual identifies both primary and secondary
hydrologic indicators, where one primary indicator or two secondary indicators
must be evident. Some examples of wetland hydrology indicators include
saturation in the upper 12 inches of the soil profile, inundation, water marks on
vegetation, drift lines, sediment deposits, drainage patterns, oxidized root
channels, and waters stained leaves.
• The presence of hydrophytic vegetation - Plant species are assigned a regionally
based facultative status, by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which
describes a particular species' tolerance of water. A plant's facultative status
suggests habitat preference(s) in a given region with respect to its aptitude to grow
in low -oxygen (anaerobic) conditions. Hydrophytic, or "water loving", vegetation
are those plants which have adapted to growing in the anaerobic conditions
associated with prolonged saturation or flooding. Hydrophytic species can have a
facultative status of "facultative" (FAC), "facultative wet" (FACW), or "obligate"
(OBL). If, after defining a study plot that contains vegetation representative of
the larger area being described and identifying all species within it, 50 percent or
greater of all identified species have an assigned facultative status of FAC, FACW
or OBL, wetland vegetation criteria is met.
The presence of hydric soils - Evaluating the presence of hydric soils requires that
the delineator sample the upper 12 inches of soil to obtain a profile description
and identify hydric soil indicators, such as histosols, histic epipedons, sulfidic
odor, aquic moisture regime, reducing conditions, gleyed or low-chroma colors,
concretions, etc. In most cases, hydric soils are most efficiently identified by the
3 Rapanos, John, et al. v. United States. 2006. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Docket Number 04-1034
Carabell, June, et al. v. United States. 2005. 61 Circuit Court of Appeals. Docket Number No. 04-1384
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 3 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, PC
profile description, where the soil coloration is compared to the Munsell Color
chart system to determine if the material meets hydric conditions.
An area is classified as a wetland only in instances where all three parameters exist (under
normal circumstances). If one or more criteria are absent, then the area is deemed an
upland. To sufficiently justify the wetland boundary line, a wetland data point and an
upland data point are obtained at each respective location (a minimum of one pair of data
points per wetland). As the delineator reviews the area and obtains data points, visible
indicators (e.g., abrupt changes in vegetation, elevation, surface water, etc.) often become
apparent, allowing the delineator to more efficiently establish the wetland boundary.
Streams were classified and characterized using North Carolina Division of Water
Quality Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their
Origins ¢. This method entails calculating a score for each stream based on its
characteristics. Streams with a score above 30 are considered perennial, 19 to 30 is
considered intermittent, and below 19 is ephemeral in nature.
Geosyntec biologists conducted on -site wetland assessments in accordance with the
methodologies prescribed by the USACE and EPA pursuant to Sections 401 and 404 of
the CWA. During the on -site wetland assessments, Geosyntec located and delineated the
boundaries of jurisdictional features within the ecological survey area as depicted in
Figure 2. Geosyntec flagged the boundaries of all delineated features with sequentially
numbered, high -visibility flagging (pink for wetlands; blue/white for streams) and
recorded the flag locations with Global Positioning System (GPS) units with submeter
capabilities (Manufacturer/Model: Trimble R-1 receiver and Trimble Geo-Explorer 7x).
3 FINDINGS
3.1 Wetlands, Streams and Other Waters Assessment
Seven wetlands and eleven streams, with one being the Cape Fear River and another
Willis Creek, were delineated within the ecological survey area; all of which are identified
in Table 2 and depicted on Figure 2. Geosyntec completed Wetland Determination Data
Forms and NC Stream Assessments (Appendix A), where appropriate, and documented
a NC Division of Water Quality. 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Streams and their Origins, Version 4.11. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality. Raleigh, NC.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 4 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntee Consultants of NC, PC
conditions observed during the assessments (Representative Site Photographs, Appendix
B).
3.1.1 Wetlands
Wetland 1: 0.7-acre Forested Wetland or Palustrine Forested (PFO)
Wetland 1 is a forested wetland associated with the Cape Fear River, a Water of the U.S.,
through a nexus with the 100-year floodplain and upland headwater seeps. Vegetation
was consistent with that of a PFO wetland, consisting of bald cypress and box elder, with
an understory of cut -grass (Leersia oryzoides). All of the species identified within
Wetland 1 were facultative to obligate wetland plants. The wetland exhibited hydrology
in the form of perennial seep heads.
Wetland 2: 4.7-acre PFO
Wetland 2 is a forested wetland associated with the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River, Stream 1, Stream 2 and Stream 3. Vegetation was dominated by red maple and
sweetgum, with an understory of stilgrass (Microstegium vimineum) and river oats
(Chasmanthium sessiliflorum). All species identified within Wetland 2 were facultative
to obligate wetland plants. The wetland exhibited hydrology in the form of high water
table and upstream seep heads.
Wetland 3: 2.74-acre PFO
Wetland 3 is a forested wetland associated with the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River, Stream 4, and Stream 5. Vegetation was dominated by green ash (Fraxinus
pennsylvanica) and bald cypress, with a sparse understory of swamp smartweed
(Persicaria hydropiperoides). All species identified within Wetland 3 were facultative to
obligate wetland plants. The wetland exhibited hydrology in the form of shallow water
table and seep head flow from upstream.
Wetland 4: 0.51-acre PFO
Wetland 4 is a forested wetland associated with the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Vegetation was dominated by bald cypress and sweetgum, with herbaceous
vegetation consisting of Cherokee sedge (Carex cherokeensis) and sensitive fern
(Onoclea sensibilis). All species identified within Wetland 4 were facultative to obligate
wetland plants. The wetland exhibited hydrology in the form of flow from five seep heads
upstream.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 5 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntee Consultants of NC, PC
Wetland 6: 4.63-acre PFO
Wetland 6 consists of both herbaceous and forested wetlands associated the 100-year
floodplain of the Cape Fear River, Stream 5, Stream 5 tributaries, Stream 6, Stream 7,
and Stream 7a. The trees within the herbaceous wetland were recently harvested at the
time of survey. Primarily vegetation within the emergent wetland portion was dominated
by Pennsylvania smartweed (Persicaria pensylvanica), redroot flatsedge (Cyperus
erythrorhizos), and soft rush (Juncus effusus). The species identified within Wetland 7
included 87 percent facultative to obligate wetland plant species. Primary observed
hydrology included upstream seep heads and a high water table.
Wetland 7: 6.15-acre PFO
Wetland 7 is a forested wetland within the active channel of Willis Creek (Stream 9).
Vegetation was dominated by bald cypress, sycamore and boxelder. The species
identified within Wetland 7 included 75 percent facultative to obligate wetland plant
species. The wetland exhibited hydrology in the form of water marks on the trees and an
obvious algal mat present that is indicative of recent inundation.
3.1.2 Streams and Other Waters of the U.S.
Stream 1/1b: 0.03-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 1 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. It begins at a seep head on the western edge of the floodplain and is joined by
Stream lb. At the time of the delineation, the water was flowing to the south with slightly
turbid water. The approximate bank width was 4 feet with moderately well-defined banks.
Stream bed substrate included silt and sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 3-
6 inches.
Stream 2: 0.1-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 2 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River that flows to the south from its source. The source includes seep heads to the west
and it serves as the primary drainage for the floodplain valley. Approximate bank width
was 4 feet with a clear incised water line on the bank. Stream bed substrate included silt
clay and cobble stones. Normal base flow depth is approximately 2-6 inches.
Stream 3: 0.01-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 3 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. It begins at a seep head on the western edge of the floodplain and terminates within
the floodplain valley, losing all bedibanks and becoming a zone of saturation. The channel
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 6 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntee Consultants of NC, PC
water was flowing to the east with slightly turbid water at the time of survey. Approximate
bank width was 2 feet with moderately well-defined banks. Stream bed substrate included
silt and mucky sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 3-6 inches.
Stream 4: 0.33-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 4 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River that drains to the Cape Fear River from its source. The source is Wetland 2 where
it flows north approximately 250 feet and turns east into Wetland 3 to flow approximately
300 feet to the Cape Fear River. Approximate bank width was 4-12 feet with a clear
incised water line on the bank. Stream bed substrate included silt and sand. Normal base
flow depth is approximately 7-12 inches.
Stream 5 w/tributaries: 0.91-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 5 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Its source is headwater seeps to the west and a few small tributaries. It flows
approximately 300 feet into the Cape Fear River. The portions of the stream below the
confluence of the tributaries was contained within Wetland 4 and Wetland 6.
Approximate bank width was 4-12 feet with a clear incised water line on the bank. Stream
bed substrate included silt and sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 4-14
inches.
Stream 6: 0.1-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 6 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Its sources are Stream 7 and Stream 7a to the north. It flows approximately 200
feet into the forested Wetland 6 and ultimately the Cape Fear River. Approximate bank
width was 33 feet with a weakly defined bed and bank. Stream bed substrate included silt
and sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 2-6 inches.
Stream 7: 0.1-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 7 is a perennial stream located within the 100-year floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Its source is headwater flow from tributaries west of the Project Area. It had
recently been disturbed by timber harvest and road construction. Stream 7 flows
approximately 750 feet into Stream 6. One of its tributaries, Stream 7a, meets it just north
of the confluence of Stream 6. Approximate bank width was 4-6 feet with a moderate bed
and bank definition. Stream bed substrate included silt, sand, and some cobble. Normal
base flow depth is approximately 2-12 inches.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 7 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntee Consultants of NC, PC
Stream 8: 0.06-acre, Un-named, Perennial stream
Stream 8 is a perennial stream located outside of the floodplain of the Cape River and is
a tributary to Willis Creek. Stream 8 flows approximately 600 feet into the forested
Wetland 7 and Stream 9, and ultimately the Cape Fear River. Approximate bank width
was 4-10 feet with a clear incised water line on the bank. Stream bed substrate included
silt and sand. Normal base flow depth is approximately 5-10 inches.
Stream 9: 6.15-acre, Willis Creek, Perennial stream
Stream 9, Willis Creek, is a perennial stream located partially within the 100-year
floodplain of the Cape River, mostly in the area of its confluence with the river. Its
southern and western banks form the northern boundary of the Project Area. The majority
of the stream is outside of the Cape Fear River floodplain. Its source is several tributaries
to the north, west, and southwest; including Streams 8 and 10. It flows approximately
2,800 feet into the Cape Fear River and its ordinary high water mark encompasses most
of Wetland 7. Approximate bank width was 40-50 feet with a clear incised water line on
the bank. Stream bed substrate included silt, sand, and some cobble. Normal base flow
depth is approximately 12-24 inches.
Stream 10: 0.09-acre, Un-named, Intermittent stream
Stream 10 is an intermittent stream located outside of the floodplain of the Cape Fear
River. Its source is primarily stormwater flow and shallow groundwater as it flows into
Stream 9, Willis Creek. Stream 10 flows approximately 400 feet into Wetland 7 and
Stream 9. The approximate bank width of Stream 10 was 4 feet with a moderately defined
bed and bank. Stream bed substrate included silt and clay. At the time of survey Stream
10 did not exhibit normal base flow, as the surveys were conducted during the seasonal
dry period.
Stream 11: 26.68-acre, Cape Fear River, Perennial Stream/River
The Cape Fear River is the perennial river in which its western banks form the eastern
perimeter boundary of the Site. Its 500-year and 100-year floodplains and Floodway
boundaries exist within the Project Area and it serves as the primary drainage for the site
tributaries. According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) the
established elevation for the 100-year floodplain is 68 feet, which encompasses a majority
of streams and wetlands identified within the Site, but less than 1/3 of the Site itself. The
approximate bank width of the Cape Fear River was 300-350 feet, and multiple wrack
lines of debris from past floods were observed within the floodplain. Stream bed substrate
included silt and sand. Normal base flow depth is greater than 6 feet. Many aquatic fishes,
reptiles, and avian species were observed within the river during survey activities.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 8 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntee Consultants of NC, PC
Less than a quarter mile downstream of the Project Area the William O. Huske Dam
serves as the flood control mechanism. Upper pool and lower pool U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS) stream gauge stations (02104000/02105500, respectively) monitor the
water flow and stage height. The river was not at flood stage during surveys.
Table 2. Delineated Features Identified Within the Ecological Survey Area
Resource
Latitude
Longitude
Total Area
(acres)
Length
(linear feet)
Wetlands
W-01 Forested wetland
34.837128
-78.824049
0.70
NA
W-02 Forested wetland
34.83929
-78.823939
4.73
NA
W-03 Forested wetland
34.842317
-78.824885
2.75
NA
W-04 (Forested wetland)
34.844964
-78.826174
0.45
NA
W-06 Forested wetland
34.845613
-78825877
4.62
NA
W-07 Forested wetland
34.851793
-78.829302
6.15
NA
Wetlands Total
19.23
Streams
S-01/lb Perennial Stream
34.839165
-78.824940
<0.01
278
S-02 Perennial Stream
34.839358
-78.824812
0.10
517
S-03 Perennial Stream
34.839876
-78.825258
0.01
70
S-04 Perennial Stream
34.842190
-78.825166
0.33
1,913
S-05 (Perennial Stream)
34.84444223
-78.8260069
0.86
2,013
S-06 Perennial Stream
34.84602857
-78.82612713
0.17
651
S-07 Perennial Stream
34.84599
-78.828037
0.10
633
S-08 Perennial Stream
34.85170817
-78.82917242
0.20
435
S-09 Willis Creek
34.852174
-78.828725
6.18
2,645
S-10 (Intermittent Stream)
34.850458
-78.827737
0.05
320
S-11 (Cape Fear River
34.850219
-78.826644
26.75
5,416
Streams Total
34.49
Total
53.72
14,891
4 CONCLUSION
Geosyntec identified approximately 53.72 acres of potentially jurisdictional features
within the Site, including approximately 19.23 acres of wetlands and 34.49 acres of
streams. These findings were obtained utilizing wetland delineation methods
implemented by the USACE and NCDEQ. Please note, a formal Jurisdictional
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 9 October 2020

Geosyntec
consultants
Geosyntee Consultants of NC, PC
Determination by the USACE (Wilmington District) had not been conducted at the time
of this report preparation and the results of this assessment and delineation has been
determined based on Geosyntec professional opinion and experience. Only the USACE
can make an official determination on the status and jurisdictional nature of the listed
features.
Chemours Fayetteville_WOTUS Report 10.19.20 10 October 2020

FIGURES

_ Jt7 � Overt°
0
Greensboro flRalelgh =
� v
Charlotte NORTH
o CAROLINA °F
Q a
eenvile
Columbia ttcoed
0
SOUTH
1 CAROLINA o A� Rd
��� irA''Awn1Y
s '
C?h Y ��s�Pnnau
e7 4
a Me Mw O, Rd c$
M'RseY fa:r
yy�tUs Creek
yQb
V
SF6_
George
huh
�pPrr I t6
rry0
Legend
1,000 2,000 4,000 Fee ❑ Project Area
rL I I I I I I I I I I I
USGS SITE LOCATION MAP Date: Scale: Drawn By: Applicant No.:
GeosYTI 10/21/2020 1 in:2,000 ft NSW
Consultants It Chemours° Chemours Fayetteville Works Project
Chemours Fayetteville Works Reference: Figure No.
Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. WORLD TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI 1I
NC License No.: C-3500 andC-zse Cumberland Bladen County, North Carolina

APPENDIX A
Wetland and Water Resources Data Forms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP01
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8371110 Long.-78.824054 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with a perennial seep discharge zone in the floodplain of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
X
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation A3
X
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks 131
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
X
Sediment Deposits 132
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows CS
X
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
X
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 10
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15' surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Shallow seep head associated with a backwater floodplain of the Cape Fear River. Perennial seep is the primary
hydrology. A lot of slash debris from windstorms.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP01
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Taxodium distichum
35 Y
OBL
2. Acer negundo
15 Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
50 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 25
20% of Total Cover:
10
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 145 x 1 145
1. Acerrubrum
25 Y
FAC
FACW species 15 x 2 30
2. Taxodium distichum
10 Y
OBL
FAC species 45 x 3 135
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 205 (A) 310 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.5 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
35 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 17.5
20% of Total Cover:
7
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Leersia oryzoides
70 Y
OBL
2. Abildgaardia ovata
15 N
FACW
3. Rotala ramosior
15 N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Sagittaria calycina 10 N OBL
5. Persicaria amphibia
5 N
OBL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
115 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 57.5 20% of Total Cover: 23
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1. Campsis radicans
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP01
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-5
10YR 4/2
93
7.5YR 4/6
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
5-14
10YR 4/1
98
7.5YR 4/6
2
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP02
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8372530 Long.-78.823952 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the wetland, adjacent to the high bank of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 62
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15' surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP02
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.
Celtis laevigata
45
Y
FACW
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
N
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 9 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
105 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 52.5
20% of Total Cover:
21
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Ilex decidua
35
Y
FACW
FACW species 105 x 2 210
2.
Acernegundo
30
Y
FAC
FAC species 150 x 3 450
3.
Ilex opaca
15
N
FAC
FACU species 15 x 4 60
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 270 (A) 720 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.7 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
80
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 40
20% of Total Cover:
16
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
30
Y
FAC
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
20
Y
FAC
3.
Arundinaria gigantea
10
N
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Ligustrum sinense 5 N FAC
5.
Rubus trivialis
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
70
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 35 20% of Total Cover: 14
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
Smilax auriculata
5
Y
FACU
4.
5.
15
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 7.5
20% of Total Cover:
3
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP02
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/3
100
Loam / Clay
6-13
7.5YR 4/4
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/14/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP03
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope %: 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8392840 Long.-78.824923 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with an area with multiple perennial hillslope seepheads within the floodplain of the Cape Fear River
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 62
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15' surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Shallow exposed roots on many trees. Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP03
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.
Acer rubrum
60
Y
FAC
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Betula nigra
20
N
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
4.
Taxodium distichum
20
N
OBL
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 8 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
130 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 65
20% of Total Cover:
26
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 20 x 1 20
1.
Acer rubrum
30
Y
FAC
FACW species 40 x 2 80
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
25
Y
FAC
FAC species 230 x 3 690
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 290 (A) 790 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.7 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
55
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 27.5
20% of Total Cover:
11
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
30
Y
FAC
2.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
30
Y
FAC
3.
Elymus virginicus
15
N
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Carex cherokeensis 10 N FACW
5.
Osmundastrum cinnamomeum
10
N
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
95
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 47.5 20% of Total Cover: 19
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20% of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP03
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/2
100
Loam / Clay
6-14
10YR 4/2
93
10YR 4/6
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP04
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope %: 2-10 %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8393880 Long.-78.825161 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Wickham fine sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 62
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (B9) Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. On a slope (0-5%). Convex feature, nothing problematic or atypical. Seasonal conditions normal.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP04
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Quercus phellos
40
Y
FACW
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carya g/abra
25
N
FACU
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Acer rubrum
20
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
Carpinus caroliniana
15
N
FAC
across all strata: 9 (B)
6.
Quercus fa/cats
15
N
FACU
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 78 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
150 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 75
20% of Total Cover:
30
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Y
FAC
FACW species 40 x 2 80
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 177 x 3 531
3.
FACU species 70 x 4 280
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 287 (A) 891 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.1 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
40
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 20
20% of Total Cover:
8
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
35
Y
FAC
2.
Microstegium vimineum
20
Y
FAC
3.
Callicarpa americana
20
Y
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 N FAC
5.
Lonicera japonica
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
85
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 42.5 20% of Total Cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
7
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Smilax auriculata
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
12
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 6
20% of Total Cover:
2.4
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP04
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-14
10YR 4/2
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP05
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8423690 Long.-78.824866 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland at the confluence of multiple perennial seeps/tributaries within the floodplain of the Cape Fear River.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks 131
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
X
Sediment Deposits 132
X
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
X
Drift Deposits 133
X
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows CS
X
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
X
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
X Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (B7) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 8
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP05
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
25 Y
FACW
2.
Taxodium distichum
20 Y
OBL
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10 N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Acer negundo
5 N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
60 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 30
20% of Total Cover:
12
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 65 x 1 65
1.
Ilex decidua
30 Y
FACW
FACW species 85 x 2 170
2.
FAC species 30 x 3 90
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 180 (A) 325 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.8 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
30 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 15
20% of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Persicaria hydropiperoides
30 Y
OBL
2.
Unknown FACW
30 Y
FACW
3.
Saururus cernuus
15 N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Microstegium vimineum 5 N FAC
5.
Rubus argutus
5 N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
85 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 42.5 20% of Total Cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP05
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-7
10YR 4/2
93
7.5YR 4/6
7
RM
M
Loam / Clay
7-15
5YR 4/2
93
7.5YR 4/6
7
D
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP06
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, J. Hobart Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope %: 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8424850 Long.-78.825086 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 62
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15' surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP06
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.
Quercus fa/cats
40
Y
FACU
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Acer negundo
5
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 10 (B)
6'
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 70 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
75 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 37.5
20% of Total Cover:
15
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Acernegundo
10
Y
FAC
FACW species 5 x 2 10
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
5
Y
FAC
FAC species 110 x 3 330
3.
Ilex opaca
5
Y
FAC
FACU species 60 x 4 240
4.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
Y
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Aesculus glabra
5
Y
FACU
Column Total 175 (A) 580 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.3 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
30
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 15
20% of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
40
Y
FAC
2.
Elymus villosus
5
N
FACU
3.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
5
N
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Carex grayi 5 N FACW
5.
Rubus trivialis
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
60
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 30 20% of Total Cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Y
FACU
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20% of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP06
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-16
10YR 4/4
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP07
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8448730 Long.-78.82616 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with an area with multiple perennial hillslope seepheads within the floodplain of the Cape Fear River
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation A3
X
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks 131
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
X
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
X
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139) X Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15' surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primary hydrology is perennially flowing seep head donminated with nature cypress. Confluence of 5 seep head
is the primary hydrology.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP07
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1. Taxodium distichum
65
Y
OBL
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
35
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3. Acer rubrum
25
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4. Carpinus caroliniana
15
N
FAC
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 7 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
140 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 70
20% of Total Cover:
28
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 80 x 1 80
1. Carpinus caroliniana
20
Y
FAC
FACW species 100 x 2 200
2. Liquidambarstyraciflua
5
Y
FAC
FAC species 110 x 3 330
3.
FACU species 0 x 4 0
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 290 (A) 610 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.1 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
25
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 12.5
20% of Total Cover:
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Carex cherokeensis
55
Y
FACW
2. Onoclea sensibilis
20
Y
FACW
3. Saururus cernuus
15
N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Dryopteris carthusiana 15 N FACW
5. Ligustrum sinense
5
N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6. Acer rubrum
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
115
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 57.5 20% of Total Cover: 23
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1. Smilax laurifolia
10
Y
FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20% of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Exposed roots
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP07
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-12
10YR 4/1
95
10YR 3/4
5
C
M
Mucky Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP08
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Upland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope %: 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8450810 Long.-78.826096 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 62
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15' surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP08
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator
Status
1.
Celtis laevigata
65
Y
FACW
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
40
Y
FACW
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
4.
Quercus rubra
15
N
FACU
Total number of dominant species
5.
Ulmus alata
10
N
FACU
across all strata: 8 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 88 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
160 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 80
20% of Total Cover:
32
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Aesculus glabra
25
Y
FACU
FACW species 110 x 2 220
2.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 105 x 3 315
3.
FACU species 65 x 4 260
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 280 (A) 795 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.8 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
35
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 17.5
20% of Total Cover:
7
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Elymus virginicus
35
Y
FAC
2.
Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
20
Y
FAC
3.
Solanum carolinense
10
N
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Ligustrum sinense 5 N FAC
5.
Lonicera japonica
5
N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
75
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 37.5 20% of Total Cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1.
Smilax bona-nox
5
Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Smilax laurifolia
5
Y
FACW
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20% of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP08
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 4/3
100
Loam / Clay
6-14
10YR 4/6
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP09
Investigator(s): N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flats Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8456050 Long.-78.82588 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Chastain soils, frequently flooded NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation X Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes No X (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located in a herbaceous wetland along a depressional floodplain valley of the Cape Fear River. Trees were recently harvested.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 62
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15' surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primary hydrology is seepheads and high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: 1 DP09
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1.
2.
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 4 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
0 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 0
20% of Total Cover:
0
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 55 x 1 55
1.
FACW species 55 x 2 110
2.
FAC species 15 x 3 45
3.
FACU species 13 x 4 52
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 138 (A) 262 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.9 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
0 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 0
20% of Total Cover:
0
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Persicaria pensylvanica
35 Y
FACW
2. Cyperus erythrorhizos
30 Y
OBL
3. Juncus effusus
25 Y
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Andropogon glaucopsis 20 N FACW
5. Ligustrum sinense
10 N
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6. Per/lla frutescens
5 N
FACU
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7. Liquidambar styraciflua
5 N
FAC
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8. Eupatorium capillifolium
3 N
FACU
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
133 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 66.5 20% of Total Cover: 26.6
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1. Lonicera japonica
5 Y
FACU
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Trees were recently harvested
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP09
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-2
10YR 4/3
100
Loam / Clay
2-12
2.5YR 5/2
78
2.5YR 5/4
7
C
PI
Loam / Clay
2-12
7.5YR 5/6
15
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP10
Investigator(s): N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8455970 Long.-78.825632 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PF01C
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation X Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes No X (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent emergent wetland. Trees were recently harvested.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits B5
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP10
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1. Aesculus flava
5
Y
FACU
2. Carya glabra
3
Y
FACU
Number of dominant species that are
3. Celtis /aevigata
2
Y
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
4'
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 8 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 38 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
10 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20% of Total Cover:
2
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 10 x 1 10
1. Aesculus flava
5
Y
FACU
FACW species 17 x 2 34
2.
FAC species 73 x 3 219
3.
FACU species 43 x 4 172
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 143 (A) 435 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.0 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
5
= Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Microstegium vimineum
65
Y
FAC
2. Perilla frutescens
25
Y
FACU
3. Cyperus erythrorhizos
10
N
OBL
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Persicaria pensylvanica 10 N FACW
5. Carex grayi
5
N
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6. Eutrochium purpureum
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
120
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 60 20% of Total Cover: 24
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1. Lonicera japonica
5
Y
FACU
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2. Smilax rotundifolia
3
Y
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
8
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 4
20% of Total Cover:
1.6
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Trees were recently harvested
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP10
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-2
10YR 4/3
100
2-14
10YR 4/4
100
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: NC Sampling Point: DP11
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8482360 Long.-78.827111 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within a mature forested wetland associated with an area with multiple perennial hillslope seepheads within the floodplain of the Cape Fear River
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
X
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
X
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Ve etated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits 65
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15' surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primary hydrology is seepheads and a high water table.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP11
Absolute
Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover
Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Taxodium distichum
50
Y
OBL
2.
Acer rubrum
45
Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Betula nigra
15
N
FACW
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4'
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
110 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 55
20% of Total Cover:
22
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 60 x 1 60
1.
Acer rubrum
20
Y
FAC
FACW species 60 x 2 120
2.
Ligustrum sinense
10
Y
FAC
FAC species 158 x 3 474
3.
FACU species 5 x 4 20
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 283 (A) 674 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 2.4 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
30
= Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 15
20% of Total Cover:
6
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Microstegium vimineum
50
Y
FAC
2.
Arundinaria gigantea
30
Y
FACW
3.
Urtica dioica
20
N
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Juncus effusus 10 N OBL
5.
Pluchea camphorata
10
N
FACW
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6.
Acer rubrum
5
N
FAC
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Persicaria pensylvanica
5
N
FACW
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8.
Ulmus alata
5
N
FACU
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Carpinus caroliniana
5
N
FAC
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
140
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 70 20% of Total Cover: 28
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1.
Smilax ratundifolia
3
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
3
= Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 1.5
20% of Total Cover:
0.6
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP11
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-3
10YR 3/2
95
10YR 3/6
5
C
M
Loam / Clay
3-9
10YR 5/2
90
7.5YR 4/6
10
C
M
Sand
9-15
10YR 4/2
90
7.5YR 3/6
10
C
M
Sand
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
X
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11) (MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17) (MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 150B
X
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Bladen Sampling Date: 9/16/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP12
Investigator(s): C. Nguyen, N. Weaver Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8480490 Long.-78.827408 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Dystrochrepts, steep NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits B5
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP12
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1.
Quercus rubra
40 Y
FACU
2.
Pinus taeda
35 Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
20 Y
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
4'
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 11 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 82 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
95 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 47.5
20% of Total Cover:
19
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
10 Y
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 0
2.
Ilex opaca
5 Y
FAC
FAC species 95 x 3 285
3.
Carpinus caroliniana
5 Y
FAC
FACU species 45 x 4 180
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 140 (A) 465 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.3 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
20 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 10
20% of Total Cover:
4
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1.
Symplocos tinctoria
5 Y
FAC
2.
Ilex opaca
5 Y
FAC
3.
Callicarpa americana
5 Y
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4,
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 7.5 20% of Total Cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Vitis rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 5
20% of Total Cover:
2
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP12
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 3/3
100
Sand
6-16
10YR 5/4
100
Sand
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 9/17/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP13
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope %: 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8516350 Long.-78.828952 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse-Gilead loamy sands, 15 to 25 percent slopes NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point located within the fringe of the active channel of Willis Creek. Mature forested vegetation extends beyond bank as the area is influenced by backwater
flooding from the Cape Fear River confluence.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
X
Surface Water Al
X
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
X
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
X
Sparsely Ve etated Concave Surface 138
X
Saturation A3
X
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X
Drainage Patterns 1310
X
Water Marks 131
X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
X
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
X
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
X
Crayfish Burrows CS
X
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
X
Iron Deposits 135
Other (Explain in Remarks
X
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) X FAC-Neutral Test D5
X Water Stained Leaves (139) X
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Yes X No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 0
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020. Primarily hydrology is high water table and flooding from Willis Creek.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP13
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Taxodium distichum
70 Y
OBL
2.
Number of dominant species that are
3.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
4.
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 6 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
70 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 35
20% of Total Cover:
14
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 70 x 1 70
1. Ilex decidua
25 Y
FACW
FACW species 45 x 2 90
2.
FAC species 25 x 3 75
3.
FACU species 5 x 4 20
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 145 (A) 255 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 1.8 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
25 = Total Cover
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 12.5
20% of Total Cover:
5
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Microstegium vimineum
15 Y
FAC
2. Panicum repens
10 Y
FACW
3. Carex grayi
10 Y
FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 N FAC
5. Solanum carolinense
5 N
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
45 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 22.5 20% of Total Cover: 9
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes X No
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP13
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-6
10YR 3/1
80
7.5YR 3/4
20
C
M
Mucky Loam / Clay
6-14
Gley1 4/10y
93
2.5Y 6/4
7
C
M
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
X
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
X
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Site: Chemours City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 9/17/2020
Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: INC Sampling Point: DP14
Investigator(s): A. Mathes, C. Nguyen Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope %: 2-10
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P133A Lat. 34.8515270 Long.-78.829125 Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: Vaucluse-Gilead loamy sands, 15 to 25 percent slopes NWI Classification: no
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in the Remarks)
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic?
Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point located along an forested upland fringe of the adjacent wetland.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is require; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators minimum of two required)
Surface Water Al
Aquatic Fauna B13
Surface Soil Cracks 136
High Water Table A2
Marl Deposits 1315 LRR U
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 138
Saturation A3
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns 1310
Water Marks 131
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines 1316
Sediment Deposits 132
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table C2
Drift Deposits 133
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6)
Crayfish Burrows CS
Algal Mat or Crust 134
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery C9
Iron Deposits B5
Other (Explain in Remarks
Geomorphic Position D2
Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow A uitard D3
Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test D5
Water Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum moss D8 LRR T, U
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
—See Climatic Summary Below --
Remarks:
The Feld surveys were conducted September 14-17, 2020 during a period in which the region had received below normal rainfall amounts for the september month -
to -date (a -1.49" deficit from a 2.09" normal value) as of September 14. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.01", 0.45", and
0.13" were recorded on 9/12, 9/11, and 9/9; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 43.67" which is a 10.15" surplus according to the National
Weather Service Fayetteville Area, INC climate station. Considering the recent precipation was small and preceded by dry weather, the delineators felt that surface
hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the above average annual precipitation to date. No high-water,
flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated no drought conditions existed for the
regional area for the week of September 14, 2020.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
VEGETATION Four Strata - Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point: I DP14
Absolute Dominant
Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
% Cover Species?
Indicator Status
1. Fagus grandifolia
60 Y
FACU
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
35 Y
FAC
Number of dominant species that are
3. Carpinus caroliniana
10 N
FAC
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
4'
Total number of dominant species
5.
across all strata: 5 (B)
6.
Percent of dominant species that are
7.
OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80 % A/B
Prevalence Index Worksheet
105 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 52.5
20% of Total Cover:
21
Total % cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
OBL species 0 x 1 0
1. Carpinus caroliniana
35 Y
FAC
FACW species 0 x 2 0
2.
FAC species 120 x 3 360
3.
FACU species 65 x 4 260
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 0
5.
Column Total 185 (A) 620 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index: 3.4 B/A
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
8.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
9.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
35 = Total Cover
3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0*
50% of total Cover: 17.5
20% of Total Cover:
7
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation* (Explain)
Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
*Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
1. Chasmanthium sessiliflorum
25 Y
FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia
5 N
FAC
3. Vaccinium arboreum
5 N
FACU
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Ilex opaca 5 N FAC
5.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in
6
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
8
and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and
10.
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
40 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 20 20% of Total Cover: 8
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30'
1. Vitis rotundifolia
5 Y
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
2.
Yes No X
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total Cover: 2.5
20% of Total Cover:
1
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
SOIL Sampling Point: DP14
Profile Descri tion: Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
inches
Color
%
Color
%
Type*
Loc**
Texture
Remarks
0-16
10YR 4/4
100
Loam / Clay
*Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
H dric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted
Indicators for Problematic H dric Soils ***
Histosol Al
Pol value Below Surface S8 LRR S, T,U
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E i edon A2
Thin Dark Surface S9 LRR S,T,U
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic A3
Loamy Mucky Mineral F1 LRR O
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
Hydrogen Sulfide A4
Loamy Gle ed Matirx F2
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)(LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers A5
Depleted Matrix F3
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 153B)
Organic Bodies A6 LRR P, T, U
Redox Dark Surface F6
Red Parent Material (TF2)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck A9 LRR P, T
Marl F10 LRR U
*** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland
hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or
problematic.
Depleted Below Dark Surface A11
Depleted Ochric F11 MLRA 151
Thick Dark Surface Al2
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbric Surface F13 LRR P, T, U
.Sandy Mucky Mineral S1 LRR O, S
Delta Ochric F17 MLRA 151
Sandy Gle ed Matrix S4
Reduced Vertic F18) (MIRLA 150A, 15013
Sandy Redox S5
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix S6
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type: no
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 14, 2020 Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville Latitude: 34.839165
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
Total Points: 30.75
tream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_
County: Bladen
Stream Determination (circle one)
Perennial (>30)
Longitude:-78.824940
Other: S1/S1b
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
`" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 8)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Moderate (0.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 10.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1 1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks that is formed from a slope seephead.
exists within a forested wetland. A short tributary S1 b provides additional flow.
It serves as a tributary to S2 that
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 15, 2020 Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville Latitude: 34.839358
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
Total Points: 35.75
tream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_
County: Bladen
Stream Determination (circle one)
Perennial (>30)
Longitude:-78.824812
Other: S2
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
`" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 9)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Moderate (0.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 12.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1
1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain. It is the primary drainage
forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology. Flow is to the south where
into the Cape Fear River.
for the
it discharges
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 15, 2020 Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville Latitude: 34.839165
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
Total Points: 30.75
tream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_
County: Bladen
Stream Determination (circle one)
Perennial (>30)
Longitude:-78.824940
Other: S1
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
`" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 8)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Strong (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 10.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1 1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
A shallow perennial stream that drains from a slope seep head into the floodplain valley where it loses it's bed/banks
and becomes a saturation zone. Weak sandy, mucky soil substrate. Heavy reduced iron in flow.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 15, 2020 Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville Latitude: 34.842190
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
Total Points: 45.25
tream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_
County: Bladen
Stream Determination (circle one)
Perennial (>30)
Longitude:-78.825166
Other: S4
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 23)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
`" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 11)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Strong (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 11.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1 1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain. It is the primary drainage for the
adjacent forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology. Flow is to the east where it
discharges directly into the Cape Fear River.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.845324
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.825817
Total Points: 39.25
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: AS5-TRIBUTARIES
Stream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 13)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Strong (0)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1 1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
This is a perennial tributary to the cape fear river. Head water source are multiple seep heads. With a weak sandy
organic substrate. This stream received frequent high backwater flooding from the Cape Fear river. Several water
quality samplers installed.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020 Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville Latitude: 34.84444223
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
Total Points: 36.25
tream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_
County: Bladen
Stream Determination (circle one)
Perennial (>30)
Longitude:-78.82640069
Other: AS5
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
`" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 10.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Moderate (0.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 8.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Moderate (1)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1
1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain.
forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology.
directly into the Cape Fear River.
It is the primary drainage for the
Flow is to the east where it discharges
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.84602857
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
County: Bladen
Longitude:-78.82612713
Total Points: 30.75
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S6
Stream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 11)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 9.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1
1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL
= 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain. It is the primary drainage
forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology. Flow is to the south where
into S5. Substrate is a sandy, organic soil texture.
for the
it discharges
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020 Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville Latitude: 34.848599
Evaluator: Alex Mathes I County: Bladen I Longitude:-78.828037
I Total Points: 36.75 Stream Determination (circle one) Other: S7
Stream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
Perennial (>30) Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
`" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 11)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 9.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1 1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with a defined bed/banks located within Cape Fear floodplain. It is the primary hydrology source for
the forested wetland. Multiple seep heads provide primary source of hydrology upstream and outside of the project
area. Flow is to the south where it discharges into the floodplain valley and loses its channel bed. Substrate is a
sandy, mucky soil texture.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020
Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville
Latitude: 34.85170817
Evaluator: Coklin Nguyen
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.82917242
Total Points: 35
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other: S8
Stream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
Perennial (>30)
Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Biology (Subtotal = 6)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Strong (0)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1 1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
OBL (1.5)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial tributary to Willis Creek with a defined bed/banks. A single
hydrology. Flow is to the north where it discharges into Willis Creek.
seep head provides
Substrate is
its primary source of
a sandy, mucky soil texture.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020 Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville Latitude: 34.852174
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.828725
I Total Points: 52.75 Stream Determination (circle one) Other: S9
Stream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
Perennial (>30) Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
`" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 11)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Weak (1)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 9.75)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Weak (2)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (2)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1 1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream, Willis Creek, shortly before it flows into the Cape Fear River. Backwater flooding occurs up the
confluence, from the Cape Fear River when it floods. S8 and S10 provide additional drainage for this stream. A
mature forested wetland consisting of baldcypress are located within the stream channel and multiple sandy sediment
"islands" are present during low water conditions.
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020 Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville Latitude: 34.850458
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver
County: Cumberland
Longitude:-78.827737
I Total Points: 19.75 Stream Determination (circle one) Other: S10
Stream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
Intermittent (>19) Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 14)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Weak (1)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
`" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 3.5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Strong (0)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Weak (0.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 2.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Strong (0)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Moderate (1)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1 1
1
1.5
Weak (0.5)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Tributary to Willis Creek with intermittent flow. Currently the stream is dry due to seasonally
bed substrate is primarily clay loam with sandy depositing located in deeper pools.
dry conditions.
Channel
Sketch:
41

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Sep 16, 2020 Project/Site: Chemours Fayetteville Latitude: 34.850219
Evaluator: Nathan Weaver I County: Bladen I Longitude:-78.826644
I Total Points: 50.75 Stream Determination (circle one) Other: S11
Stream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30"
Perennial (>30) Stream ID:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Score
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-
pool, ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
weak (1)
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
weak (1)
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
Absent (0)
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
Absent (0)
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
`" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 13)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
Strong (3)
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
Absent (1.5)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
Strong (1.5)
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
Yes (3)
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 9.25)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
Absent (3)
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
Moderate (2)
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
Strong (1.5)
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
Moderate (1)
25. Algae
0
1 0.5
1 1
1 1.5
Moderate (1)
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
FACW (0.75)
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
The Cape Fear River is perennial river with head water source from multiple upstream tributaries. Substrate is a mix of
sand and silt. The river frequently floods and inundates the floodplain within the project area. A lock and dam is
located within the river immediately downstream of the project area to provide navigable transportation and flood
control.
Sketch:
41

APPENDIX B
Representative Photographs

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 1
�� r
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: North
r'
Comments: Southern
portion of the access
road through the center
�.
of the Project Area.
Photograph 2
r
-
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Southern
portion of the access
road through the center
of the Project Area.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 1 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 3
_ I
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: East
Comments: An access
road to the Seep C work
area located near the
center of the Project
Area that cuts east/west
perpendicular to the
Cape Fear River.
*
T
Photograph 4
. �.
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: West'
Comments: Another
view of the access road
to the Seep C work area.
T �
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 2 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 5
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: Northwest
Comments: Wetland 1
is located in the southern
portion of the Project
Area and flows into the
Cape Fear River (S11).
i
Wetland boundary is
flagged with pink tape.
.
t:.
r
Photograph 6ILI
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: Southeast
Comments: Stream 1
flows southeast towards
the Cape Fear River
(S11) and is bounded on
both sides by Wetland 2._.
Stream boundary is
flagged with blue and
white tape. Wetland
boundary is flagged with
pink tape.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works j 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 7
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Wetland 2
within the Project Area.
Wetland 2 bounds
Stream 1 and Stream 2
and is within the Cape
Fear River Floodplain.
Wetland boundary is
flagged with pink tape.
Photograph 8
Date: 9/14/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Stream 2
flows south towards the
Cape Fear River and is
bound by Wetland 2.
Stream boundary is
flagged with blue and
white tape.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 4 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 9
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Road
crossing at Stream 4.
Photograph 10
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: West
Comments: An access
road crosses the Project
Area, adjacent to Stream
4.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 5 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 11
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Stream 4
drains from several seep
heads, moving east
towards the Cape Fear
River (S11). Stream
boundary is flagged with
blue and white tape.
Photograph 12
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: West
Comments: Stream 4
drains from several seep
heads, moving east
towards the Cape Fear
River (S11). The
location shown is near
it's confluence with the
Cape Fear River. Stream
boundary is flagged with
blue and white tape.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 6 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 13
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Wetland 3
is sourced by several
seep heads and flows
east to the Cape Fear
River (S11).
Photograph 14
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: South
Comments: The
northern end of Wetland
3.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 7 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 15
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Stream 5 is
sourced by several seep
heads and flows east to
the Cape Fear River.
Photograph 16
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Stream 5
confluence with the
Cape Fear River (S 11).
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 8 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 17
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Wetland 4
is adjacent to Stream 5.
Photograph 18
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Wetland 6
is fed by Stream 6,
Stream 7, and Stream 7a.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 9 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 19
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: Southeast
Comments: Upper reach
of a seep head that flows
into Wetland 6.
Photograph 20
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Stream 6
flows into Wetland 6.
Stream boundary is
flagged with blue and
white tape.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 10 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 21
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: Northeast
Comments: Stream 7
flows into stream 6 and
spanned by a bridge
constructed with timber
mats. Despite the lack of
recent rain, water still
flowed in this stream.
Photograph 22
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Stormwater
discharge from culvert
serves as the primary
hydrology for Stream 7a.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 11 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project LocNC ation: Cumberland County,
Photograph 23
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: West
Comments: A storm
drain with erosion
control measures exists
on both sides of the
access road to the water
treatment facility that
bisects the northern
portion of the Project
Area.
Photograph 24
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: West
Comments: A dry wash
upgradient of Stream 10
with no evidence of
seasonal flow.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 12 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Cumberland County,
NC
Photograph 25
-'-TT r-3
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: West
Comments: Stream 8
flows cast and north into
Stream 9 (Willis Creek).
tsa.t�
..." '�
c- r.
Photograph 26
$
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: Souther
Comments: Stream 8�
down gradient of timber
cleared areas before it
meets Stream 9 (Willis
Creek).
- s
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 13 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD 11
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Cumberland County,
NC
Photograph 27
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Stream 9
(Willis Creek)
confluence with the
Cape Fear River (S11).
Stream 9 receives
backwater flooding from
the Cape Fear River in
this area.
Photograph 28
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Stream 9
(Willis Creek) and
Wetland 7 flowing up
gradient of the Cape
Fear River. Wetland 7 is
mostly contained within
the Stream 7 ordinary
high water mark.
r
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 14 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
ISite: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project LocNC ation: Cumberland County, I
Photograph 29
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: Northeast
Comments: Stream 11,
the Cape Fear River,
flows north to south
along the eastern
boundary of the Project
Area. This is within the
southern section of the
Project Area.
Photograph 30
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Stream 11,
the Cape Fear River,
flows north to south
along the eastern
boundary of the Project
Area. This is within the
northern section of the
Project Area.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 15 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 31
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
1, a wetland data
point.
Photograph 32
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 1.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 16 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 33
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
2, an upland data
point.
Photograph 34
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 2, an upland
data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 17 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 35
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
3, a wetland data
point.
Photograph 36
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 3.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 18 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 37
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil
profile for data point
4, an upland data
point.
Photograph 38
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data
point 4, an upland
data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 19 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 39
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 5, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 40
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: East
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
5.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 20 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 41
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 6, an
upland data point.
Photograph 42
Date: 9/15/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
6, an upland data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 21 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 43
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 7, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 44
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
7.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 22 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 45
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 8, an
upland data point.
Photograph 46
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: West
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
8, an upland data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 23 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 47
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 9, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 48
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
9.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 24 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 49
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 10, an
upland data point.
Photograph 50
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
10, an upland data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 25 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 51
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 11, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 52
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
11.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 26 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 53
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 12, an
upland data point.
Photograph 54
Date: 9/16/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
12, an upland data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 27 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 55
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 13, a
wetland data point.
Photograph 56
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: South
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
13.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 28 10.23.20

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C.
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR0795-39
Site: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Location: Bladen County, NC
Photograph 57
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: N/A
Comments: Soil profile
for data point 14, an
upland data point.
Photograph 58
Date: 9/17/2020
Direction: North
Comments: Habitat
conditions at data point
14, an upland data point.
TR0759/39: Chemours Fayetteville Works 29 10.23.20