820217_Inspection_20200327

Division of Water Resources ` r Z wZ�J
Facility Number 4g 2_ - 24 '7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conse on
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: aegnpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: el—Patine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 27 ii►'la,..-2p Arrival Time: (611O 1---
Departure Time:1//; 3S 1 County: 44(6.0►t F Region:.
Farm Name: eJ et 7 I- --„ti 'L .-1-,g, Owner Email:
Owner Name: g €i1✓1 ,CL1irl Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: w c'' Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: l( Integrator: PVCS'I 7—e
Certified Operator: l[ Certification Number: /1 7� 67
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current - Design Current Design Current
Swine ,Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle , Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish S'g13 4 G I Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca 1 ad Poi. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish •La ers -- ,` Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars El Pullets --` Beef Brood Cow
Other II Turke Poults
Other •Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ©— ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No la-NA ❑ NE
i
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No lag-ic ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? •
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Elio ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [g'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: t - )', Date of Inspection: 7 iftz, 1-1
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No S-NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): / /2
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®' 0 NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑--/Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er1V-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): 41
13.Soil Type(s): Go / e Re,
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes p'1Qo. ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes D-Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes lf N ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes lE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes < ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 176Clo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015'Continued

Facility Number: e 7-41 Date of Inspection: JA,7 !+'"A 2.0
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 111-1113 NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes a1V > ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Q-"lVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes a1V 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e., discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er-NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Ergo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 121co ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C �21 ,�—�` � �.,� /i i /' Sr ,� l —a.c{ r l
L 2-7 7
t � u
_ ,, J) _ 1 a Yt4 t alls �
�� l d �'� �YX S T �
e�c( fo - 3oBf
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1. Phone 7 t Q3 3.3? '
fn4Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,p / (C Date: Zi
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015