820212_Inspection_20200722

CO- ivision of Water Resources Q1ft s ,u`t) �
Facility Number ; 2_ - Z1 2-- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation �1 )
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: atom 'ance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: mums Arrival Time:E1m' Departure Time: r County: S t p501 Region: FA- f
Farm Name: G- i tit LC�`�t.'C ' ` 6.K Li_c- Owner Email:
Owner Name: �. /1 6117eVL Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: ////
Facility Contact: G a e-k l�� CC LGu Y 11 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: t( Integrator: ;rc
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 17 A 4
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish .f 2 97,0 S2„2-c, Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑'�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ETA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E'lA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [,]1 To ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - Z.— Date of Inspection: y2.6
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ NoA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): <J Z—
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [r N ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 1g-4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑'1 l�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA - 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes -1Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 01 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C -- cS& 0
13. Soil Type(s): `Vo !`' - ( (-4.-cl 6c,
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated/ in tlYe CAWMP? ❑ Yes al< ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 0- ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ©-4o ❑ NA El5NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE>
Required Records&Documents �
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e . - 21 7i Date of Inspection: r Jy )2r>
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ( ❑ Yes ❑APGo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ®4o- ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes []N ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ 4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 124 ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ✓ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Cw1►b,f-ct —( s ey [ .- ( , - l ? ;el 1(71_
c-J °lit
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ST:5 MA,1,a p Phone: ' f Q' -l3J`333 c(
C' r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �� 11�-j z(�
Page3of3 2/4/2015