820210_Inspection_20200818

et Division of Water Resources
Z Facility Number Z' - rO 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance _
Reason for Visit: ' ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Al
Date of Visit: IVA-kgrArrival Time:MM. Departure Time: I(UU I- I County: PC0 V Region:
Farm Name: TO hit, V 1, Owner Email:
Owner Name: 9) t ` Cil� 1 M Phone:
•
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
� � f�
Facility Contact: tia') !AA ,`"
-) 4 �`W Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ,Integrator: U44 �M tT"�
Certified Operator: ik, t Ukt 1) Cul tq-dift Certification Number: it 6.76/
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:' Latitude: Longitude:
IDesign Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf •
Feeder to Finish Z.e bV , 16 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers - Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE -
Discharge originated at: El Structure El Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑'No f NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [II'NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Er-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters El Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2_- 74 0 Date of Inspection: rg /1f1 L?b'
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: '
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): _
Observed Freeboard(in): -4.C;
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 11)&6' ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes IIVIC ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
CDo any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? , / Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes io ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 17 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Flo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C B 6-6 0 /&�-y C,- 8� i
13. Soil Type(s): /1/v 1
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Voo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑- ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑'Ivo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes , No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ j-Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Et N ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: @I_ -' y (`) Date of Inspection: / - =.
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? El Yes o❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes EVro ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) ,✓
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? El Yes [4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
OLO by— b'-;VVeAviiC (A) (9 Jy t/\t cu-14-v_ ---o
4_
E. , 4vS
0.+( R, 2 -7 r A_'1A-L
CYI/1 07?-09_ g_5 [1:; .) 7 1
4L%
c„,t( qt 0-3 4- sl
Reviewer/Inspector Name: t .b"w Phone:710 (,7 3 .33 ; •
,�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ,63 j
aI
Date: I)-112,z, �Page 3 of 3 `J 2/4/21 S