820206_Inspection_20200730

vision of Water Resources ks(vik5' .1® j N
Facility Number Z. - 7—o6 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: ,30 -1,( 2.01,0 Arrival Time: J2 ?5Q w Departure Time:UNZEIM County: S74-1' SON Region:TAtf
Farm Name: ( ! :5 C N V Cl L 1-C- Owner Email:
Owner Name: I t Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C -Y'4t5 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: Pr` S/-C '
Certified Operator: ( Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: (y;r-e 1'34-y C 't bci Certification Number: ltiv f�3.3
Location of Farm: I ° ( I( Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish '2411lb '_f( 7 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
_Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
•
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 11 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No El—NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑'NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No E A ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes I INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 7.-1- Date of Inspection:3U.3 (j lZ ZQ
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ©'1 l�A ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2,3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [' No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ErN.o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 0_,No ❑ NA ❑ NE -
maintenance or improvement? -
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes V1_ 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): -CO a c_22 s G 0
13. Soil Type(s): 4u , &)o, No
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ©'Slo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? •
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Q-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 12-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists E Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections E Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ff Z-- - Date of Inspection:3-0 JJ 2,0Za
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes []"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [ rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes EK:To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Ell14lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [ 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 12/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use�drawings of facility to better explain situations
/n(use additional pages as necessary).). q
ej tatic-ft.9,-(
— i ?
0 - , 1� el,
QiJ l,'C�
�� l�. �`�c �'-I ����til 1 � l (.v �mot,
41
(© �2 p`rn
C. 1 qfo- 3 5(
Reviewer/Inspector Name: E ( U t , ,p Phone: I l° i3 3 33 3 t/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C`''4 earn_ Date: 3 0 zo
Page 3 of 3 U 2/4/201