820200_Inspection_20200722

ivision of Water Resources a IVY S 3'u Ly 2.0
�23
�f�
Facility Number CJ - 7_00 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q-C6mpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: agictine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: f TJ�, Arrival Time: /'I$" 7 Departure Time: 8 /5 P County: 54-)/ 0/1) Region:
Farm Name: 7 a et /fl�Gt,�l Fvtiy 1 1()740 Owner Email:
Owner Name: k�9�'� � rccytG 141 -arc`��"l Phone:
Mailing Address: [[
Physical Address: �, j'mil.'
Facility Contact: ' _t C J �Lw� (-1 Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ( t Integrator: ,f),...,itc7f,
Certified Operator: L Certification Number: g-62
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: qc 6 1 l o
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish j(,e p ?,8,3 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers _ Beef Stocker
Gilts •Non-Layers _ Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®moo 0 NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No [- J N'A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No IA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®_o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E N ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: B 'Z - 2a) Date of Inspection:i2z.3--(i,y wZ1)
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No r[ to ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 2,1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Ilr'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes D No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes II--No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C $L O c5cti 41 it( - Artct tug[
13. Soil Type(s): A/a (J re-4 Ij t< j3wk_
i
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designate in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes [.]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑vNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ '-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes I2VN-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes El<To ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2—- z,,o Date of Inspection: Tdr Z020
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes EPIC ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ < ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [i1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes V8_ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Er(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [PI ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes RKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes jo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).aut+e_ Ect 01,4.27 C cjitrre(*t 0`'% e 7-2, St -
4-1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: t U 0 vi Phone: 1,10-- ti3 3-3 3 '/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: g (tee t f�� Date: 9Z uI
Page 3 of 3 Leg Z(D'
2/4/201