820187_Inspection_20200729

rr�9 ®Division of Water Resources Q,t�is 2, 6k t.0
G
Facility Number Z.. - ('J l 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: G Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: %met Arrival Time:raffia Departure Time: c#0,, (1 County: S41111'stit) Region:r
Farm Name: j�r v1, tOciLu tac Fecrt'i Owner Email:
Owner Name: e vt Th ems. I,vu riu,a Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Cv 041 S 1�&-'k �� ` Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: e „,sG)cut- Integrator: P,re4-40-,.
Certified Operator: '(( Certification Number: G
p 1 gc?
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow _
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 7-cu ° .2 Cf&k Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker _
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets _ Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1IA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No R-1 A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No El< ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes r o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: e - / .7 Date of Inspection:> -�, 0
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [L] ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No El'NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): '3 L'
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes D-lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes a1,14 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes u 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Q'lGo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window El Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C 1d'--r
13. Soil Type(s): /-
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes El'�lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes IZPxIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes Q'�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 121'1lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 2_- /s'7 Date of Inspection: 0Z7 r-siw 204
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? [ ❑ Yes alclo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes IFK ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 1:1.14Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Li"1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �To ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes LJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
cJb . %tL t IL 97.-1CSi ( ( ).46 - E ' 0✓s.91 F- sgo
.c.,e-ft qro-- 3 o -C 6
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1 `,` 1-3 U ck r Phone: T I(-13 `3, 3 I
, 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �c VP ,�Date: q-sal ��az
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015