820179_Inspection_20200619

0-Division of Water Resources y Ak 5
Facility Number gi 2 - /-7 1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation p1 i
0 Other Agency 1�
Type of Visit: 0-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 041outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: f 1 -Ittv-vael Arrival Time: e4 Departure Time: /( r;YJ 4- County: :/g— S(j!'U Region:(- L
Farm Name: N tE"✓' Owner Email:
Owner Name: CI'1It t`S .3k71 r -- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: G`l,�tj �� L'� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: I < Integrator: Pr 5 Yu.
Certified Operator: C rjl�[n t`
Certification Number: ( F
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder '3 L Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other _Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes © O ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑4To ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes EiLNa ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - /7( Date of Inspection: I? .r.,t sr, `z=�
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Lslc� ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No QNi ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Gj 7
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ to ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ,[ slo ❑ NA ❑ NE ,
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I J 1V V ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑- ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 1114‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): g A'14'l tt C-r 2
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 2<o- ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes [ �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes El--1.115 ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA n NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes El..-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents ,�
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes g--1‹ 0 NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. 0 Yes D—Pdo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA n NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: B2 - /7 Date of Inspection: /9 zT c. —aXX
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yesd'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ai(c ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IE N ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues 'NO
,�, �
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes L ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes QT10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [ rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
Ccv(1 7-3.6 --1 G
(1,4 -e ,e.,(44_47 ,d-_, ,
&)b d Skit t
c -,ii �. o4l49 • a c( 'Io- n&- C5I
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name: I I 1D (.2k L2X Phone:91 o"14 3 )
..(1Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 19 �T;„.e tt m
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015