820166_Inspection_20200805

ivision of Water Resources - IVAS Wes- Q.0-1,10
Facility Number 'Z 0 Division of Soil and Water Cogservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Ge6m iance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
2-49
Date of Visit: ME' Arrival Time: Departure Time: L y-t 0 County: S4-Vt PCO !Region:FA
Farm Name: 111 i Kt, IL In(O hax-wl Owner Email:
Owner Name: J cyy,Y 144, !CL q`4 t'[fv(e- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Cuvt..4'5 6 c-c Title! Phone:
Onsite Representative: ,lc Integrator: ,Preac,
Certified Operator: ,f c t►'tip-e. 11 'LOe c Certification Number: 9,p q
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean totc%L� "V-^ Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Fan-ow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No TA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No LE NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 r - 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - l rp Date of Inspection:5'4C Z�
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): • r.°
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes I e ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes ❑�Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EVN<> ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑-IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Jam_ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): c//��1 S'�- ) '7)
13. Soil Type(s): '/7r..
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Oslo 0 NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 13,Iv6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes I ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes to El NA ElNE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes liar)- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes El-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes LJ 1V ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ffNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: f 2. - /a Date of Inspection: ,C"0 G,
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [j—N ,..._ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes `tJ - ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the E Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ` No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes L"J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
' No p Gotv --,,k_i c eo ec4-11 -ec.67.,,,,,,- 5 ,___ /,,,i.epa,--1 5
\( 0,"
ss
WI' . /,0 14A, 1`7,1 ovl (2---,,,c) (A)) c 6 0-C-- ctre-,
c-cl otto - 3 0 ,-- 6 . i'
Reviewer/Inspector Name: G d k 1. Q u K./...y
Phone:1(O� 4;) 331(
c\ () 0
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �J eaVd2fi Date: �V 6 7,6, 20
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015