090159_Inspection_20200629

-_,s D1visi<on otWater Resources ttrvt : .?j ,� -.
• I'aci sty Number /$ ( -0 Division of Soil andhWater Conservation
x'
'': O Other Agency t° 5 :. (
Type of Visit: 0-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
hReason for Visit: oran�utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Ifl1' I'' Arrival Time:I j40 j Departure Time:0ma County:S 4ii f *It) Region: e
Farm Name: ,3 fLG i t 8 L 45 Owner Email:
Owner Name: tO t_ i 13 d 5/ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: + , ��!!
Facility Contact: 0 �t_(L lit Z t'' J Title: Phone: •
Onsite Representative: 4 Integrator: rl (L.(
Certified Operator: 1/i Certification Number: l l 7 7
Back-up Operator: Zeta GC J&4( c1 .1) Certification Number: 1 f b S> f
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current '" Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity :Pop , Wet Poultry ,,Capacity Pop Cattle Capacity ps Po
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
e Wean to Feeder 3z-e- AeLi Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean - Design Current- , Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca 1 aci Po. . Non-Dairy
• Farrow to Finish `N Beef Stocker =
• Gilts _ II Non-La ers Beef Feeder =
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
r4 MIUMERI -- - 3 yam°
Other ' •Turke Poults �� ° _
Other Other °
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ ❑ NA El NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ [ A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No (g-ICrA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ®NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 09, - 5 c Date of Inspection:M 9-0
Waste Collection&Treatment ��-
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes Er-Z.— ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the.structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No E'NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 113'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes []'1Go ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E1.To ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Q-lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 17TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 04o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ElEvidence of Wind Drift I:: Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ?GL) E
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those d'esigna ed in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 1=1 1S ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Q ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes lallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes IErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number:- C S' l Date of Inspection: g.-cr�...c WO
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes I'3 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes D--/co❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes j-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes (o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes l7 -I ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which-cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ©- ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �,..INd6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
c
l 6,4 Dev
S g — .1 �- P 0— 3 , i -
3, (,
1(6— 3o [
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name: B 1.( 0 u 3
4.[ Phone:' © -73 3 r
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1�+ Date:�CL : L? 0 d
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015