820156_Inspection_20200827

DIAL-5 . /j-ru' -
-OSPDivision of Water Resources
Facility Number G) - I b 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: .''-Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: t*a Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up • 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: pdt 12rArrival Time: liC 5� Departure Time:I _1�� County: 2wL1' 11 Region: cc
Y
Farm Name: I' (t1&.- Oct,k.-.-& Owner Email:
Owner Name: .E-f1 tJI- 0✓ii I 1 Flcv `A' >i,C-, Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: CJ(P 4 (� V3 rtv-(4/J LAG ! Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 14 Integrator: E 51,u,'l k
Certified Operator: G (-'(_ NO i/V1(S Certification Number: Z2 414
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer _ Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer _Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish `j? '3 C Z7 Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. _Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker _
Gilts •Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes alCric ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑ Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No1A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ENA 0 NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 6Z- is-b Date of Inspection:;Z7 it) 2. u
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes CA-1C❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 7 -
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ J, v ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage, etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or envir mental t reat,notify DWR
V7o any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
.DYes -ra o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any,9f the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): b S1O �`�
13. Soil Type(s): C f \I1 - 1
14.Do the receivingcrops differ frorli those designated in the CAWMP? Yes No NA NE
P � ❑ � ❑ ❑
1
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 13<To ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes co[ ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes In No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents �-
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E f1 ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes Q-IVo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes To ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 217o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: r,( 5 — 1 5'(, Date of Inspection: g'
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
El Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
C`ViI 191k4)6e1,, 6u. e, &zv-&e7 !j t-a.e, -( 0-3. p. , z /1z-
yt€ el 110 0 t`l_ tx-J-e- s' a S �e,g,Q
/4+5 t--cem/cg
F tc vtl, bfrk () 3 Avk p 05 7-
/e4( c�c� �3o g--6 9 (
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:V110" ` `3
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (, „t Date: 11 4-0(y- 1Z-O2V
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015