820151_Inspection_20200825

r>5 ► 4s- 4u .,coz
f�Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ( 2 - ,5 I 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
` f
Date of Visit: .15 '' 610,4 Arrival Time:MOM Departure Time:«�y( . '15 County: Oil PSIJlZ Region: phy
Farm Name: Kn la Coe,* (v ;f✓ i Owner Email:
Owner Name: c,� ( ec 5-f-a7 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: .
Facility Contact: CAL 5 jo vtG0 te,(Y Title: . Phone:
Onsite Representative: (( Integrator: Ka yt.9 re-6 P'
Certified Operator: B Y'K/'L 80,4, l Certification Number: Z.,7 7 ' 0
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: ' Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder �350 S5CO Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow •
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars . Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Pouets.
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed frontany part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated,at: , ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ] 1 A ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ I A ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? //
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR)' El Yes ❑ No ❑!1VA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes Q'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters 0 Yes fo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? • l
Page 1 of 3 V - -2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: j - /S 1 Date of Inspection:OS 4UI.- ;
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [abkr- ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No alcrA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): Z c(
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [r]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes El--‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require - ❑ Yes po ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA .❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C.,a 6' & 0 Ifr .%
13. Soil Type(s): /j D I
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ©-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes L 1(o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes © ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes IJK ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [I- ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0.-1Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El
] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Z..- ]SJ Date of Inspection: G0
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 111,3Qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes © O ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes fo ElNA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes a1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0-ivu ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes la-NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
7 C -1 0 - 3 -7 P— 0 3AZ�
c_ed -, `(I O-3g'-- ( Sl
Reviewer/Inspector Name: � LV1,(6i) Phone:910`" j3- 33
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 7 Wje.10
Date: c, V (�i2o2.°
Page3of3 2/4/2015