820146_Inspection_20200707

��4. �i ° ' � ; C�'1lDrvislongOf Water Resource"s'�( � � a � '
�: FaciIat Nuanher Z I�� O Division of Sot!a titer Conserv'atlolt ma ��1, V
.a ka ". , 5 ,,r "° 0 Qther, enC 6 �": i g _ 3 t §tAt A
Type of Visit: i Conppliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0-Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint- 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 2Arrival Time: /1j/'.sV 4- Departure Time:) //:10, County: sl-' Cs'ON Region: r,�-�Y
Farm Name: lC i 'f�'pH—`Q' l 4-2, Owner Email:
Owner Name: (Q(1-4,4ti'',"- Vut, 41 • 1 WC- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: j - - .
L
Facility Contact: 4. M 41 _ - Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: I t - Integrator: 14/ (3;s
Certified Operator: ke' JA'fs& it-
Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
.
,, 5-:Design Current °, i a Design Cu end . Design_ Current ¢
Swine a ►achy Pop -� -Wet_Poultry i Capacity Pop Cattle Capacity Pop E
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow -;'
Wean to Feeder ��(9p /7' Non-Layer Dairy Calf -
a
Feeder to Finish �'
�ZDlU® ��U(� � P z �� Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean 7 CO —7 (9 tf(., ._ 3 Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder. ,I') Poult , Ca i aci Poi. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish . .:`',• . Beef Stocker ;
Gilts = •Non-La ers ��A°. Beef Feeder ez
Boars .Pullets �� Beef Brood Cow
Other ° 4,4 :M Turke Poults . :4 ? ° ;
a
. _ .
2 i.,' Other �a <_ �4 � . Other_
a �� �—= —..rye. �� � -� a � _s_ � � _
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [ j1NSS ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No DIVA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? .
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes 0 No ['NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ,❑ Yes ❑ NA 0 NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters- ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3. 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 17_- f L4 b Date of Inspection: 7Tu •ozd
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes El—Kr❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): yL( 3 I
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes a]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 12‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes di\T-o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window /❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): V �[ 0 r (7 k 5 7
13. Soil Type(s): CA-h kvy ,-��
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ^[�'I ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes Et< ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ID< ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes o'‘ ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ` ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes L_I 1Vo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 42—/t,(,brj Date of Inspection: 7 uty
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ( ❑ Yes r No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: •
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? El Yes lEt<o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document El Yes 0 ❑ NA El NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes El ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes I211To ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes []-‹ ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use draw/ (�
drawings of facility to better explain situations
(/use�additional
''��pa�.ges as necessary).
/
66'7,
1 +' !
cat af9 -30 (651
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 6 °l 0 Vac to Phone:To--t Jt-333
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i 0401Date: 7-i 't,y
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015