820144_Inspection_20200715

r r^y.�
" 33 t/-1)1vision Of Water Resources "1: /
Faciii ��ty Number � �� � 0 llivision of Soii and Water Gonservat�on c (��� ' ��
„ , . i' g „ " O Other Agency, .a ..,, r.. ,3 x
Type of Visit: e'rOmpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: erfroUtine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7//_ Arrival Time: ?-,.'/� Departure Time:V'.'3 V County: LJr -.. Region: `Z p
Farm Name: c SS9r-Hdey y f 6)2 5 f,--r- Owner Email:
Owner Name: c;ryt - (,(.lc-(/rt Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: ,ceC'e-r.0/',lip Title: / j97 seg, t— Phone:
Onsite Representative: ,j Integrator: ., /l.1 r/ Y/O,
Certified Operator: j5�rtie___ Certification Number: / 7Y
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
s C 7,Dein Current ; k Design Current Deign Currnt - - g ' l Ca aci�t 'o Sne ; Capa y Pop � ;Vet PourY Ca citY PoP: te P :
P
Wean to Finish - Layer = Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder (,tom — Non-Layer Dairy Calf __
e/ eeder to Finish t Uv0 ----0 Dairy Heifer
//Farrow to Wean 4'00 3 z) 1,z = design`_ Current - Dry Cow.
,, Farrow to Feeder 'D -. Poultr 'Ca i aci Poi: _ Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish :' M = Beef Stocker
Gilts .. •Non-La ers °<,, Beef Feeder
Boars I.Pullets ', Beef Brood Cow
_ i �'
Other. . -,.6 �,. _ °` z •Turke Poults �� i�
Other 1.Other _
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1.Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ YesInc:- ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3.Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes E 1VO ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ��- - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes El<17o ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): () 9'
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes {j lie ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes L'J 1V0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or enviro mental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes lE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ©moo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): ,j`j z tM u coe /
i9//YIrS��-
13. Soil Type(s): 7gisie-rpt-tc6sW Be-4 / /cf 7*l/ /iU 4,3
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes / No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 12I- To ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ONO ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: - /14/ Date of Inspection: a 7�.�—�
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes a< ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check 26es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
[' on-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon >>
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: /
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes OrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes IZKo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes /❑/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA_ ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
•
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ‘-- 1,174' � ®"�� Phone: 971I j0, (jn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -14 e
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015